Wednesday, August 19, 2009





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CHCpuzTqUA


Caught you and the RCMP peeking me Jeremy Swanson now I am going to tell your nasty little buddy Dean Roger Ray and his dumb pals such as Depupty and Deyala on you‏
From: David Amos (motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com)
Sent: August 3, 2007 9:59:36 AM
To: deanr0032@hotmail.com; swanson@storm.ca; alltrue@nl.rogers.com; radar_cdn@yahoo.com; tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com; news957@rci.rogers.com; samperrier@hotmail.com; jacques_poitras@cbc.ca; pierre_nollet@cbc.ca; dan_goodyear@cbc.ca; allan_white@cbc.ca; mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com; jonesr@cbc.ca; susan_king@cbc.ca; alan_white@cbc.ca; info@ottawapolice.ca; bkay@videotron.ca; Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us; wickedwanda3@adelphia.net; khr909@hotmail.com; fbinhct@leo.gov
Cc: dan.bussieres@gnb.ca; oldmaison@yahoo.com; Andrew.MacKinnon@canadaeast.com; cumby.meghan@dailygleaner.com; wGilmour@ProuseDash.ca; dohertylaw@rogers.com; premier@gnb.ca; abel.leblanc@gnb.ca; t.j.burke@gnb.ca; execdir@nblib.nb.ca; mleger@stu.ca; jwalker@stu.ca; plee@stu.ca; carleton@stu.ca; kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca; John.Foran@gnb.ca; kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca; whistleblower@ctv.ca; staples.michael@dailygleaner.com; dcoon@conservationcouncil.ca; Danny.Copp@fredericton.ca; lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca; Kathy.Alchorn@fredericton.ca; Kim.Quartermain@fredericton.ca; Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca; police@fredericton.ca; carl.urquhart@gnb.ca; cityadmin@fredericton.ca; Easter.W@parl.gc.ca; andrew.holland@nb.aibn.com; scotta@parl.gc.ca; caseyb@parl.gc.ca; Harper.S@parl.gc.ca; bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com; days1@parl.gc.ca; day.s@parl.gc.ca; Dion.S@parl.gc.ca; Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca; norm.mcfarlane@saintjohn.ca; moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca; Layton.J@parl.gc.ca; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca; btaylor@nbnet.nb.ca; pat.bonner@saintjohn.ca; Ivan.court@saintjohn.ca; eamacleod@cbrmps.cape-breton.ns.ca; doralee.smith@pwgsc.gc.ca; MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca

Just Dave
By Location > Visit Detail
Visit 1,623
[<<] [>>]
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 207.164.187.# (YMCA de Montreal)
ISP Bell Canada
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Fort Frances
Lat/Long : 48.6167, -93.4167 (Map)

Language English (U.S.)
en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 6.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits

Time of Visit Aug 3 2007 2:28:49 am
Last Page View Aug 3 2007 2:31:39 am
Visit Length 2 minutes 50 seconds
Page Views 2
Referring URL
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Aug 3 2007 1:28:49 am
Visit Number 1,623


Just Dave
By Location > Visit Detail
Visit 1,617
[<<] [>>]
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 199.212.150.# (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
ISP Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)

Language unknown
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 6.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; INFOWEB-APPROVED; INFOWEB-APPROVED-IE6-EN; INFOWEB-APPROVED-IE6-FR; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
Javascript disabled
Time of Visit Aug 2 2007 1:26:28 am
Last Page View Aug 2 2007 1:26:28 am
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL unknown
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Out Click
Time Zone unknown
Visitor's Time Unknown
Visit Number 1,617



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wu3fSX-PUNs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVTUPfq8fmk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10hietHU9Mo




David Amos wrote:
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 16:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Yo Sam the Rogers' crook Tom Young Byron had that nasty bastard Jeremy Swanson that Byron knew talking on the radio like he was some kind of hero.
To: tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com, news957@rci.rogers.com,
swanson@storm.ca, radar_cdn@yahoo.com, alltrue@nl.rogers.com,
samperrier@hotmail.com, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, pierre_nollet@cbc.ca,
dan_goodyear@cbc.ca, allan_white@cbc.ca,
mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com, jonesr@cbc.ca, susan_king@cbc.ca,
alan_white@cbc.ca, info@ottawapolice.ca, bkay@videotron.ca
CC: dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
Andrew.MacKinnon@canadaeast.com, cumby.meghan@dailygleaner.com,
wGilmour@ProuseDash.ca, dohertylaw@rogers.com, premier@gnb.ca,
abel.leblanc@gnb.ca, t.j.burke@gnb.ca, execdir@nblib.nb.ca,
mleger@stu.ca, jwalker@stu.ca, plee@stu.ca, carleton@stu.ca,
kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca, John.Foran@gnb.ca, kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca,
whistleblower@ctv.ca, staples.michael@dailygleaner.com,
dcoon@conservationcouncil.ca, Danny.Copp@fredericton.ca,
lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca, Kathy.Alchorn@fredericton.ca,
Kim.Quartermain@fredericton.ca, Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca,
police@fredericton.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, cityadmin@fredericton.ca,
Easter.W@parl.gc.ca, andrew.holland@nb.aibn.com, scotta@parl.gc.ca,
caseyb@parl.gc.ca, fbinhct@leo.gov, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca,
bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, days1@parl.gc.ca, day.s@parl.gc.ca,
Dion.S@parl.gc.ca, Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca, norm.mcfarlane@saintjohn.ca,
moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca,
btaylor@nbnet.nb.ca, pat.bonner@saintjohn.ca, Ivan.court@saintjohn.ca,
eamacleod@cbrmps.cape-breton.ns.ca, doralee.smith@pwgsc.gc.ca,
MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca


http://www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2006/08/02/spoof-emails.html

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2006/08/10/spoof-emails.html

http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/columnists/story.html?id=8ccd8479-432c-48fd-9df4-4951481d827b

The press ignores your son's plight in support of Byron and mine as well. The Keystone cops in Ottawa take Swanson's BB guns and old 303s but ignore it when Swanson attacks Byron and his old pal Dirty Dicky Dean. Even when his Radar Group pals threatened mean old me they look the other way and hope we have a little hoedown?

However as soon as a crooked little tough talking little prick from South Africa whines that his wife made the cops take his old 303 years ago and he still can't get it back, all the newsmens' panties catch fire because Harper don't want his crooks to talk to newsman in the Maritimes so they look for something to slam him with instead? ? For shits and giggles today, I called that big talking Tom Young arsehole today and promised that old fart this email. It seems that he forgot his liberal heroes dreamed up that gun nonsense in the first place EH?
What was even funnier was the night before I caught someone using the Rogers chickenshits competition in Halifax to check out my blog. Man the media dudes at National Post are dumb as posts but they don't hold a candle to the Maritime arseholes EH? They are quite simply too funny to be pissed off for long. I am just going to embarass them in front of their corrupt friends and blog the hell out of it.
Vertas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

Just Dave
By Location > Visit Detail
Visit 1,597
[<<] [>>]
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 142.176.236.# (Stentor National Integrated Communications Network)
ISP Stentor National Integrated Communications Network
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Nova Scotia
City : Halifax
Lat/Long : 44.65, -63.6 (Map)

Language English (Canada)
en-ca
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 6.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1152 x 864
Color Depth : 32 bits

Time of Visit Jul 31 2007 1:45:44 pm
Last Page View Jul 31 2007 1:45:44 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.google.ca...rci.rogers.com&meta=
Search Engine google.ca
Search Words news957@rci.rogers.com
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo.../03/me-and-bush.html
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo.../03/me-and-bush.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-4:00
Visitor's Time Jul 31 2007 1:45:44 pm
Visit Number 1,597



Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 02:35:06 -0400
From: Postmaster@ottawapolice.ca
Subject: MDaemon Notification -- Attachment Removed
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

The following message sent by you contained attachment(s) which are
restricted for transmission on Ottawa Police Service Computer Systems. The attachment(s) have been automatically stripped from the message before delivery to the recipient. The recipient has been notified and given information which will allow them to request the removed attachment(s), should they be required for business reasons. IT Security Ottawa Police Service itsecurity@ottawapolice.ca Message Details: From : motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com To : info@ottawapolice.ca Subject : Who will act with a semblance of integrity first? the cops in Ottawa or the CBC in Fredericton Message-ID: <20060907063415.90569.qmail@web33614.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Attachment(s) removed: ----------------------------------------- 11wiretap tape 139.wav 1wiretap 143.wav

Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 18:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Ken"
Subject: Mr. Jeremy Swanson
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

Dear Mr.
Amos, I am writing directly to you in response to your email to Mr. Jeremy Swanson who you made several rather negative comments. I believe you are a paranoid, conspiracy-theorized lunatic, who is preying on a man who has done more for humanity than you can comprehend. More importantly, you have insulted and threatened a very personal friend of my closest acquaintance. Sir, as your post lacks integrity and demonstrates a complete lack of communication skills, I will make this simple for you. Your crude email to Mr. Prior is threatening and slanderous. If you make any attempt to meet Mr. Swanson in a setting other than fit for the finest of gentlemen, the Radar Group's meeting with you will not be as cordial. If you fuck with Mr. Swanson or his reputation, then you have fucked with the Radar Group. You can interpret "fuck" in any manner of your displeasing. This is not the first email where you have sworn, used
threatening tones and been crude. For the time being, I won't promulgate them. Oh yes, the pleasant ending. So very sincerely, Radar One

From: "Jeremy Swanson"
To: "'David Amos'" , alltrue@nl.rogers.com
Subject: RE: Jeremy Swanson, Ottawa YMCA, 10 th Floor.
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 01:17:01 -0400

BOO ! ! ! !











--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 11:56 PM
To: Byron Prior
Cc: swanson@storm.ca
Subject: Re: Jeremy Swanson, Ottawa YMCA, 10 th Floor.


I am glad to see that you are using your nose. I knew Swanson was a crook as soon as he threatened to sue your old friend Teslacoils. (I just5 challenged Swanson to sue me didn't ?) I called his buddy and your friend Martha Jette as well and they all have failed a very simple stress test of their ethics except Teslacoils..I told ya long ago do not trust anyone but i trully think that young fella is ok but he speaks too much of things most folks find hard to believe, Sometimes less is more.. That said I am running in another election and having some minor successes raising hell. I am glad to see you are finally getting pisssed off and playing politics. The dude slamming your guest book is not Swanson though. I think it is coming from Stratus within the legislative building in Newfoundland. Respond when you get this email and the next two because the feds are fucking with me bigtime today and they are the best protection I can give you. Feel Free to forward them anywhere..
Dave

P.S. Fuck you Swanson I will enjoy meeting you when I come to Ottawa I am a true father who has suffered some serious shit as you shall soon see. Send your best lawyers and the RCMP I will enjoy meeting them too.

Byron Prior wrote:
Jeremy Swanson is the man who met me the day I went to Ottawa at the YMCA and pretented to be a friend and represented Mens Rights. What he really does is take advantage of people with problems and gets all the info and money he can from them in food or taking him out to dinner and beer, while he keeps the authorities informed on their status. He then informs everyone on the internet he no longer supports this person when conditions are right for their purposes. He says he stays at the YMCA, in a room with no smell what so ever, I paid him a surprise visit one day, very powerful binoculars in the window, all kinds of computer equipment and printers, fax and scanners. His cloths and shoes all new but hasn't had any income in years. Says he goes many days without food, in the 5 months I was there he didn't loose 1 pound. After my surprise visit to his room, I never had the opportunity to go there again, he kept saying meet me in the kitchen down the hall. He knew many people on Parliament Hill every time he came to visit me and had me leave with him early. I'm going back as soon as I get rid of some kidney stones. His address is swanson@storm.ca he said you e-mailed him and another guy he knows Guy Lavene of Fathers 4 Justice, I also think he is a plant also.
Byron
Byron
Turning Legal Gun Owners Into SOCIAL LEPERS

Barbara Kay
National Post


Wednesday, August 01, 2007


Citing concern over the "sinister uses" of guns, University of Toronto officials are closing down their 88-year-old shooting range. No word yet on the fate of the university's chemistry labs.
More than just one more example of political correctness run amok (which of course it is), I take this gesture as academic ideologues' invitation to government to follow suit and ban gun sport and gun collecting nationally. Alas, I think the initiative might find broad public support. To many liberal Canadians nowadays, tolerating gun use in any capacity is akin to complicity in Bambi's mother's murder, fatalism regarding school massacres and genuflection to American imperialism.
Such a ban would be a mortal blow to civil liberties and property rights in this country, but it wouldn't take much muscle to finish the job: The implementation of the Firearms Act in 1995 has already battered gun lovers to their knees.
Unlike the United States, Canada has little in the way of a criminal gun culture. Consider: Thirty-five thousand Canadians have purchased $5-million liability insurance policies from the National Firearms Association (NFA), which cover their legitimate gun-related activities all over North America. Their annual premium is just $7.95. Why so cheap? Because, as NFA president Dave Tomlinson dryly explained in an interview, his company virtually never receives claims. Legal gun-owners are unusually responsible people. If they weren't, his company would be out of business.
But the 1989 Montreal Massacre of 14 women by Marc Lepine drove rational attitudes to guns, perhaps forever, from the collective Canadian psyche.
Ironically, in spousal or partner killings of Canadian women by men, guns are the culprit in only about 25 cases per year -- this in a country of over 30 million people. Spurned men are far more likely to kill themselves than their partners. Women are six times as likely to be assaulted with other weapons as with guns. Nevertheless, since the Lepine massacre, guns have become synonymous with violence against women, and gun control with protection for women.
Enter the Firearms Act, which had nothing to do with general gun crime (at a low ebb when the Act was introduced), or actual prevention of homicidal intent, and everything to do with appeasing feminists' irrational fear of a frightening -- but statistically tiny --menace.
The good guys who suffer the most are gun collectors -- invariably men -- in the process of a marital breakdown. For in its obsession with protecting women, the Firearms Act now accords spouses control over their husbands' right to renew their licences (in principle, the control operates bilaterally; but in reality, it almost invariably comes down to women controlling men's renewals) and, in many cases, the right to continued ownership of their property.
Jeremy Swanson is a poster boy for this phenomenon. A knowledgeable South African-born amateur war historian and ballistics expert, he worked as a civil servant for the War Museum in Ottawa, whose rigorous background checks he successfully passed. (In 1997, he was named the museum's top employee).
Owner of a small antique firearms collection (please don't call them "weapons," he insists), Swanson has never broken the law in his life. He passed the Canadian Firearms Safety Test in 1999 with a 98% score. Even throughout a bitter divorce process, Swanson's ex-wife never alleged domestic or child abuse. Swanson's collection was safety trigger-locked, and stored in a firearm safe, with ammunition stored separately. His wife retained possession of the only two keys, and Swanson had never attempted to re-enter his home after being asked to leave it.
Six months after their separation, in October, 2001, Swanson's wife, who was legally authorized to store the collection elsewhere if she didn't want guns in the house, instead asked the Ottawa police to take the collection -- principally four antique rifles, two non-firing BB guns (falsely recorded as rifles), a toy Luger replica (falsely recorded as real) and some jokey paperweight dummy grenades (all together ominously labelled by the police as a "mini-arsenal")-- into "safekeeping."
Then his real troubles began. Swanson was never informed by the police of the seizure (he found out six months later by chance). From that day to this, he has never been interviewed by the police, let alone arrested or charged with any crime, nor has either a past or present chief of police ever responded to his pleas for a meeting. Although police attempts to declare him a "danger to himself and others" have come to naught, they have entailed several humiliating summons to criminal court.
Swanson remains in the Kafkaesque limbo of a man with no criminal record who for six years has been treated like a criminal, not to mention a social leper, on the basis of ? nothing. Sadly, I am told by insiders versed in firearms-related law, the injustices Swanson has suffered are in no way unique.
In a recently-published book discussed on these pages last Thursday, Mistakes Were Made:Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts, social psychologists Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson argue that many social and cultural problems spring from humans' inability to admit when they're wrong. How right they are. And as further evidence to those adduced in their book, I would cite: the blinkered ideologues who punish responsible gun users for the sins of criminals; police who automatically privilege the idle or fabricated concerns of disaffected women over men's property and civil rights; and governments who continue to throw good money after bad in perpetuating an institution that fails utterly to deter gun crime, but succeeds magnificently in stigmatizing an identifiable minority of law-abiding citizens as criminals in waiting.
bkay@videotron.ca
© National Post 2007

More Amos emails....goes on forever!

This Dean dude really pissed me off.‏
From: David Raymond Amos (davidramos@xplornet.com)
You may not know this sender.Mark as safe|Mark as junk
Sent: January 4, 2007 10:08:33 PM
To: samperrier@hotmail.com; alltrue@nl.rogers.com
Cc: dean Ray (deanr0032@hotmail.com); motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

Apparentely I was summoned to stand before a Yankee Court on January 3rdto answer more false criminal charges but I was not served anything andnobody would talk about it. Now the day has come and gone and stilleverybody is playing dumb.It is also abundantly clear I was very wrong about this Dean kid. Heis a real snake in the grass. I also was invited to another one of thosesneaky Yahoo chat rooms on New Years Eve. Need I say I smelled foul play?Remeber what I thought of Integrity BC crowd before I went to jail? When Istomped on the bastards in another Yahoo Group this little prick Dean showedme his nasty arse. Obviously I pissed of his buddies. Ask me if I care. Iguess it is just another one of thise things I do that nobody seems toappreciate.I just spent the second miserable Xmass without my kids and I amfeeling as mean as a snake. My little Darlin came down with diabetes andcried all Xmass day because I was not there. Rest assured there will be Hellto pay. because I could not make my Gracie's wish come true.This is just one of many emails I received from that Dean kid in thepast few days. What he says of me is absolutely incredible but notsurprising at the same time. Rest assured I will use everyone of his ownwords against him. However when he began slamming Sam in a couple of emailsI figured you guys should know. If you say nothing its cool. I am about totear the little bastard a brand new arsehole to cram a couple of Newfydiddlers up into .(I see Tommy Marshall has a new job eh?)Notice how the chickenshit out west claims Hickman is behind me andSam works with Hickman? A lot he knows eh? Does this kid even know how toread or does he just cut and paste everything? Curiousity has got the cat.I must ask Byron is he one of the dudes that warned you away from me?Happy New Year fellasDave ----- Original Message -----From: "dean Ray" To: ; <4humanitysake@comcast.net>;<911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com>; ;; ; ;; ; ;; ;; ;; ;; ; Cc: ; ; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 5:55 PMSubject: If your trying to imply you are a investigative team fintrac orfbsa who do you? > http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/2002/12/23/rcmp021223.html>>>> I cross references Yves Bourduas with freemasons and found nothingProbably> nothing under clean up of Iluminati either. He is not cleaning up any> terrorist more like cleaning up dissidents or pissed off citizens. I> believe you are an agent trying to set up Byron Prior to do somethingcrazy> and attempt to protect T Alex Hickman a rich Baby diddler.> why would you send me this garbage? You seen saddam hanged do you realize> how close the New World Order is to falling apart. Do you realize whatthe> citizens will do to you if you are guilty. What you have done to Byron> Prior Is treason !!!!>> why not just clear your name you have my questions?>> Is Collin Robinson the guy who raped my cousin connected to your clan?> This guy erased critical research on T Alex Hickman while I was at work I> stored my computer at my Aunts place?> Why is your best buddy Sam Perrier doing business with T Alex Hickman?>> Why did you sit back and watch Jeremy Swanson blead dry poor ByronPrior?>> Then show up out of nowhere too late? Nobody contacted you How did you> know anything was going on? you brag you see everything....>> What group owns that club that backed your parliament adventures?>> You brag you have escape vehicles all over does Your baby diddler friend T> Alex Hickman pay for that?>>>> Am i correct that you are connected to Hells Angels and those vehicles are> paid for by blood money?>> If that is the case how many children have to die so that you live?>> DId you tell someone to play bumper tag with me on the highway?>> Answer all my queries and I stop otherwise I just go till I am stopped.>>>> 38th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION> Standing Committee on Justice, Human Rights, Public Safety and Emergency> Preparedness>>> EVIDENCE> CONTENTS>> Tuesday, December 7, 2004> Pierre-Yves Bourduas, Deputy Commissioner, Federal Services and Central> Region, Royal Canadian Mounted Police: I will start by talking about> Canada's anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing regime, which> impacts on two separate branches of the RCMP. The RCMP Proceeds of Crime> Branch is the authority that oversees the AML regime, and the National> Security Operations Branch is the authority reporting on the ATF regime.>> The RCMP was provided with 34 positions in total that were assigned tomoney> laundering units across Canada and to RCMP Headquarters. Their> responsibilities include assessing money laundering intelligence received> from the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada, or> FINTRAC, the Canada Border Services Agency and others. Originally, theRCMP> did not any receive resources under the initiatives to address ATF issues.>> One of the key areas that must be addressed in this legislative review is> the expansion of the current list of designated information that FINTRACis> legislated to disclose to law enforcement and intelligence agencies.>> As stated in the consultation paper, the 2004 Report of the AuditorGeneral> of Canada and the Year Five Evaluation of the National Initiatives toCombat> Money Laundering and Interim Evaluation of Measures to Combat Terrorist> Financing, the effectiveness of FINTRAC disclosures are limited by> legislative restrictions that constraint the information that can be> disclosed.>> The most valuable addition would be a narrative underlying the rationalefor> disclosing and, more specifically, the reason for suspicion. This> information, if provided, would improve the value of FINTRAC disclosures,> eliminate duplication of effort and ultimately enhance Canada's AML andATF> regimes.>> Many private businesses under the protection of section 462.47 of the> Criminal Code of Canada continue to make direct voluntary disclosures tothe> RCMP, and most of these disclosures contain more information than what is> actually received from FINTRAC. Although some are voluminous, they are> accompanied by a brief explanation of why the institution considers the> transaction suspicious. This narrative can save investigators considerable> time and analytical effort.>> It should be stressed that Canadian law enforcement is not seeking direct> access to FINTRAC information. Although unique internationally, the RCMP> continues to respect its arm's-length relationship with FINTRAC and theneed> to ensure personal information under its control is protected. However,once> this independent agency has reasonable grounds to suspect that their> information would be relevant to investigating or prosecuting a money> laundering offence, this information should be made more readily available> to Canadian law enforcement agencies at large.>> Further, the RCMP believes consideration should be given to lowering the> threshold for obtaining production orders from ``reasonable grounds to> believe'' to ``reasonable grounds to suspect'' on the balance of> probabilities. This would result in a more efficient and effective system> and would ultimately strengthen our ability to deal with the money> laundering issue.>> The RCMP is keenly interested in the Department of Finance's continuing> negotiation with the legal profession to develop a new legislative and> regulatory regime that better takes into account the duties of legal> counsel. The RCMP agrees with parliamentarians, the Auditor General andthe> media that the exclusion of the legal profession poses a significant gapin> Canada's regime.>> It is clear that due to the special privileges the legal profession is> granted, this is a sensitive area. It is also the reason why the> Interpretative Notes of the Forty Recommendations allow for flexibility,> including allowing professions such as the legal profession to send their> Suspicious Transaction Reports to their appropriate self-regulatory> organization, provided that there are appropriate forms of cooperation> between these organizations and the financial intelligence unit.>> Anyone, including lawyers, who act as a financial intermediary must accept> responsibility to ensure they are not moving criminal or terroristproceeds.> Failure to have any segment of society accept this responsibility makesthem> the weak link and a potential target. The FATF recommendations clearly do> not impede access to legal counsel and serve the interests of society> without impacting solicitor-client privilege.>> The RCMP supports the inclusion of diamond, precious metals and stones asa> reporting entity under the act. This would require the reporting of large> cash and suspicious transactions and a range of client identification and> record- keeping requirements by the industry.>> As stricter regulations are imposed on businesses in the financialservices> industry, criminals are seeking alternative methods of laundering themoney> accumulated from criminal activity. Various characteristics of theindustry> make it highly vulnerable to criminal activity.>> The RCMP fully supports the government's proposal to amend the act and its> regulations to establish a registration regime for money servicesbusinesses> and foreign exchange dealers for the purpose of anti-money laundering and> anti- terrorist financing measures.>> Recent investigations across Canada clearly exemplify how the absence of> licensing or registration in Canada makes this sector highly attractive to> money laundering criminals looking for alternatives to the regulatedbanking> sector. This sector continues to grow as they continue to be found in> convenience stores, clothing stores, restaurants, book stores, videostores,> nail polishing stores, wireless communication stores, jewellery stores and> travel agencies.>> The ``white label'' ATMs are non-bank ATMs owned and operated byindependent> service operators and without any known financial institution logo. Theyare> mentioned briefly in the Department of Finance's discussion paper as anarea> the government will be reviewing in the future. The RCMP encourages this> review as investigations continue to indicate that these machinesrepresent> an ideal method to launder significant amounts of money.>> The RCMP is part of an initiative led by the Department of Finance that> sought additional resources for consideration in the 2006 federal budget.It> appears the RCMP will enhance its resource level under the National> Initiative to Combat Money Laundering, NICML, both within our Proceeds of> Crime Branch and our National Security Operations Branch. The latter is> expected to receive 12 additional resources, which will be allocated tothe> operational divisions. These new investigators will help build up capacity> in the three major financial centres where the majority of information is> received from FINTRAC. The addition of new resources to the program will> still require prioritization of activities; however, it will allow for a> more balanced approach and ultimately allow law enforcement to truly test> the ``value added'' of the Canadian money laundering strategy.>> Maureen Tracy, Director General, Enforcement Programs Directorate,> Enforcement Branch, Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA): Before I begin,on> behalf of the Canada Border Services Agency, I would like to thank the> deputy chairman for his kind words in introducing us. As a very new agency> with a broad mandate and many expectations placed on us, it is very goodto> hear the support that comes from the Senate and others.>> I would like to thank you very much for the invitation to come and speak.> Our administration of Part 2 of the proceeds of crime legislation is amajor> component of our enforcement program, and we are quite proud of theresults> we have achieved over the last few years.>> I would like to give you a brief overview of the role of the Canada Border> Services Agency as it relates to the National Initiative to Combat Money> Laundering, or NICML, and the international fight against money laundering> and terrorist financing in general. I will also provide information on how> we have organized ourselves to deliver this program in the field and the> successes we have had to date.>> As you are aware, the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist> Financing Act, which received Royal Assent in June 2000, was introduced to> remedy shortcomings in Canada's anti-money laundering legislation. The act> was aimed at implementing specific measures to combat money laundering,> including the requirement to report cross- border movements of currencyand> monetary instruments equal to or greater than a prescribed amount to the> Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada, FINTRAC.>> Bill C-36, the anti-terrorist omnibus bill, expanded the scope of the> legislation to also combat terrorism. The name was changed to the Proceeds> of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act, PCMLTFA.>> The Canada Border Services Agency is responsible for the administrationand> enforcement of Part 2 of the act, which requires every person or entity to> report to a CBSA border officer the importation or exportation of currency> or monetary instruments valued at $10,000 Canadian or greater. Thereporting> requirements under the legislation encompass all modes of travel,including> air, highway, rail and marine, and all methods of importation and> exportation, that is, personal travellers, vehicles, commercial cargo,> courier and postal.>> >From an administrative perspective, the CBSA collects cross-bordercurrency> reports from travellers and commercial entities. Officers also assist> travellers and businesses in complying with the currency reporting forms.In> other words, we have a service provision responsibility in this regard as> well. The completed reports are transmitted to FINTRAC for analysis.>> >From an enforcement perspective, the CBSA has the authority to search and> seize non-reported currency and monetary instruments greater than $10,000> Canadian or equivalent. Information relating to seizure actions is also> transmitted to FINTRAC. All seizures are subject to appeal to the Minister> of Public Safety and, ultimately, to the Federal Court of Canada.>> The cross-border currency reporting program of the CBSA was allocated> approximately $3.2 million per year to enforce the legislation. Thisfunding> was dedicated to processing and communicating reports to the field,> headquarters coordination, and compliance verification and enforcement.The> bulk of the resources were devoted to the administration, receiving and> processing of reports and to the enforcement and compliance verification> activities that proceed from that.>> The dedicated resources were placed at high risk ports of entry, covering> both the air and highway modes. There are also currency enforcement teamsas> well as currency dog teams in place at key locations.>> The CBSA has also invested in a variety of detection tools, includingmobile> X-ray units and other detection tools such as video scopes. We have at our> disposal a wide range of other technologies that assist in thenon-intrusive> examination of goods.>> Since the commencement of the cross-border currency reporting program in> January 2003, over 100,000 import and export cross-border currency reports> have been received by the CBSA.>> Enforcement of the legislation by the agency from inception to April 30,> 2006, has resulted in over 5,100 enforcement actions, involving more than> $132 million. Of the over 5,000 seizures that have been undertaken sincethe> inception of the program, just under 600 have been appealed to theminister.> Of those, 321 were maintained as assessed, 111 were mitigated and 49 were> cancelled. There are currently 37 active cases before the courts.>> In closing, we believe at the Canada Border Services Agency that with the> implementation of this program our agency has been very successful in> increasing its contribution to the international fight against transborder> crime, specifically money laundering and terrorist financing. As a direct> result of the program, more than $34 million in suspect proceeds of crime> were forfeited and thus taken out of circulation.>> [Translation]>> Senator Massicotte: In your report, Mr. Bourduas, you mention the rolethat> lawyers play. This legislation contains an important exception forlawyers,> in so far as client-attorney privilege is concerned. Every citizen is> entitled to legal representation. At the same time, this right impacts our> objective of addressing the money laundering issue.>> If a lawyer deposits funds in a Canadian bank, does the bank have an> obligation to ask more questions about the origins of these funds? If the> bank is acquainted with the lawyer and deems him to be a credible, serious> individual, does the questioning end there? What rules of disclosure apply> in the case of such funds? Is it the responsibility of the lawyer or ofthe> client to disclose the source of these funds?>> Mr. Bourduas: There are two parts to that question, the first involving a> lawyer's obligation toward his client. On looking at the provisions of the> act, we believe that a lawyer also has a responsibility toward society in> general to see to it that any funds a law firm is asked to handle for its> client were not obtained through unlawful means.>> The purpose of these amendments is to ensure that lawyers adopt the same> procedures as financial institutions, that is that they know their client,> record the origin of the funds as such and invest these funds.>> We recognize the importance of attorney-client privilege. A clearframework> must be in place to prevent money laundering operations, since the first> step is the actual investment of the funds.>> We want to avoid a situation where law enforcement officials arrive with a> warrant to search the offices of law firm. A substantial percentage of our> investigations eventually lead us to law firms that have been involved in> certain questionable transactions.>> Senator Massicotte: I want to be clear about this. I understand your> interpretation of the provision, but are lawyers completely exempted atthis> point in time, or only with respect to some of the transactions handled by> their firm? Accountants and insurance brokers are not excluded.>> Mr. Bourduas: The exclusion applies to transactions that bring in> substantial sums of money to the firm. Most lawyers claim to have thiskind> of privileged relationship with their client and are not necessarily> required to disclose the origins of these funds.>> Senator Massicotte: Take the case of a lawyer who makes a deposit. He> represents a client who is not exactly on the up and up. He takes receiptof> a large sum of money which he then deposits in a Canadian bank. What> obligation does the Canadian bank have in this case? It knows the lawyerand> his firm has some major accounts with this financial institution. Does the> bank's responsibility end there? Should the bank ask questions about the> origin of all funds that it handles? Does it have an obligation toquestion> the client?>> Mr. Bourduas: One of the first rules is ``know your customer.''>> Senator Massicotte: In this case, the customer is the lawyer. Correct?>> Mr. Bourduas: That is right.>> [English]>> Therefore, it is ``know your customer'' and not ``know the customer ofyour> customer.''>> [Translation]>> Senator Massicotte: The obligation ends with the lawyer.>> Mr. Bourduas: Correct. If, for example, the firm is a serious businessthat> handles large sums of money, then the bank has already met its obligations> up to a point.>> The purpose of the proposed amendment to the act is to make law firms> accountable. They need to know the exact origin of the funds that they> handle so as to avoid having people take advantage of their credibilityand> so that they do not become the intermediary through which funds are> channeled to financial institutions.>> Senator Massicotte: There are a number of lawyers, all of whom are very> honourable, seated here at this table. However, occasionally we encounter> some who are not so honest. The legislation gives them an opening to take> advantage of the situation and possibly to launder substantial sums of> money.>> Mr. Bourduas: You have raised a very important point. It is generally> accepted that lawyers are honest individuals. This legislation seeks to> protect lawyers or the legal profession per se by making lawyers legally> required to declare these funds. The lawyer, therefore, has an obligationto> tell his client that he must report and hence disclose the origin of any> funds handed over to the firm. This obligation makes the lawyer's position> that much more comfortable in that he has a duty to manage his client. The> burden of ensuring that the transaction is legitimate is thus shifted tothe> lawyer and eventually, to the financial institution which will not ask> question because the lawyer's credibility is already well established.>> Senator Massicotte: My second question is for Ms. Tracy. Recently I was in> Hong Kong and visited the port, one of the busiest in the world, if the> volume of container traffic is any indication.>> Ms. Tracy: To which port are you referring?>> Senator Massicotte: I am talking about the port of Hong Kong, and aboutthe> port of Singapore as well. I observed that all of the trucks and people> accessing the port must go through a control post where they are scannedto> ensure that nothing suspicious finds its way into one of the containers.>> Two or three weeks ago, I read in a Canadian Press article that no such> procedure was followed in Canada. However, no explanation was given forthis> oversight. Yet, Canada is a fairly wealthy country, when compared to Hong> Kong or Singapore. We constantly hear how a wide variety of goods are> handled at Canadian ports. Why are such procedures not in place in Canada?>> [English]>> Ms. Tracy: Could it be that the equipment you are referring to isradiation> detection equipment?>> Senator Massicotte: It could be.>> Ms. Tracy: There is good news from the CBSA on that front. We spent the> better part of 18 months researching radiation detection equipment. Wehave> selected equipment that, for the moment, based on the technology that isout> there, is the best fix for us. I am referring to portal equipment wherethe> trucks will drive through two posts and be scanned for radiation.>> To get the bugs out, on a pilot basis we installed the equipment at asmall> container port in New Brunswick, but by the end of the 2006 calendar year,> we are very optimistic that we will have it in Halifax, Montreal and> Vancouver. That will mean that as close as we can get to 100 per cent of> containers will be scanned for radiation.>> In addition to that equipment, we have gamma ray technology in the form of> 11 or so mobile VACIS. You pass a container through it and, in about 30> seconds, you see an image of the inside of that container and candetermine> whether the declaration is actually accurate or whether the container> contains contraband.>> [Translation]>> Senator Massicotte: Why is this done only at ports and not at borderpoints> in general or at other major points of entry?>> [English]>> Ms. Tracy: The ports are the first element of our strategy. I am awarethat> the United States has radiation detection at their land borders. There are> no plans at this time for Canada to put radiation detection at our land> border. We believe we have targeted the equipment to the highest riskarea.> In the security and prosperity partnership with Mexico and the United> States, we have committed to looking at expanding the radiation detection> program in concert with the United States, and that would be both for> research and additional deployment, but at this point there are no plansto> put it at our land border.>> Senator Goldstein: I wish to pursue a question that was asked by Senator> Massicotte. Lawyers handle all kinds of transactions. It is certainly true> that there are very honest lawyers and less honest lawyers in existence.> That is true of every profession. How would you address the concerns that> lawyers have expressed to you? Independent of professional privilege,where> a transaction is not privileged - that is, where a financial transaction> takes place between two parties - both parties know that it is financed by> money that may be coming from the U.K., entirely legitimately, or from any> other source. The lawyer has to then make a judgment call as to whether he> or she should divulge or not divulge. You have given us the beginning ofan> answer, which is that lawyers who are known to be honest will not be> considered to be involved in suspicious transactions, whereas lawyers who> are known by their own institutions to be perhaps less perfectly honestwill> be. That necessarily requires arbitrary judgments because there are no> objective criteria for them. How does one justify making those judgments> when one is aware of the Charter obligation to not make those judgments?>> Mr. Bourduas: We recognize that there are governing bodies within thelegal> profession, and our position here speaks to this point exactly. Thelawyers,> through their governing bodies, would report to FINTRAC all transactionsin> excess of $10,000.>> As Senator Massicotte mentioned, a huge gap needs to be addressed. ``Know> your client'' is a slippery slope when you start leaving it to the good> judgment of a particular individual who might not be seized with all ofthe> surrounding circumstances that brought this amount of cash to the lawyer's> office. We are saying, let us take this burden of good judgment and use> regulations to simply transfer it to an independent body like FINTRAC, for> instance. They would be in a position to look at the transaction involving> this individual and then look at their overall data bank to ensure thatthis> person has not used this particular law office for a single transactionthat> would link with other suspicious transactions. That would paint a much> larger picture. It does not influence or affect the good judgment of this> particular lawyer. We are simply saying that we should put a system inplace> that would allow for a much broader picture to be painted about specific> transactions.>> Senator Goldstein: I am not sure that your answer really responds to the> concern that I am trying to express. You have suggested that, in the> upcoming amendment process, the criterion for being able to go to court> should be changed from ``reasonable grounds to believe'' to ``reasonable> grounds to suspect.'' That is a long dimension of arbitrary judgment.>> Mr. Bourduas: I would like to set the record straight. I did not talkabout> going to court. I am simply talking about a production order. We areasking> for a production order when we have ``reasonable suspicion'' as opposed to> ``beyond a reasonable doubt.''>> Senator Goldstein: From whom would you ask for that production order?>> Mr. Bourduas: We would ask FINTRAC for that. We are not talking aboutgoing> to court. It is important to realize that our main focus is to address the> weakest link possible when we talk about the money laundering process. The> weak links are these hockey bags filled with money. I know this from> professional and personal experience, having been the manager of a major> money laundering case in Montreal from 1990 to 1994, where we laundered$162> million over a four-year period with four undercover agents from the RCMP.> We had people coming in with hockey bags full of money they wanted toplace,> and this is the reason we have to focus corporately and collectively atthis> stage. We have to make it a little harder for these people to place this> large amount of cash.>> Senator Goldstein: You told us, Ms. Tracy, that machinery and equipmentare> in place in specific parts of the country for a variety of purposes,> including the intention to create radiation screens throughout thecountry.> If I were seeking to bring something into Canada, knowing what you justtold> us, I could simply cross into Canada elsewhere.>> Ms. Tracy: That is a fair comment. The Canada Border Services Agency needs> to deploy equipment to the areas that we have assessed as presenting ahigh> risk. We have to acknowledge that there are many ways an individual can> bring things into the country. We are doing our best in our riskassessment> process to plug those gaps. We are continuing with our assessment of those> risks and with our research and development into new technology.>> I think the inventory of equipment that is out there now - and I amprobably> going to get this wrong but not too wrong - is in the neighbourhood of $68> million. In 2000 it was something like $1.5 million, so the investment has> been made.>> In addition, the type of equipment we have out there is much more> sophisticated than we had just four or five years ago. As I mentioned, we> have entered the field of radiation detection. We have much stronger gamma> ray systems that provide for better screening and for the screening ofmore> cargo.>> Yes, you are right that it is an uphill battle when you consider we have> such a large country with so many possibilities and ways for someone to> enter. However, we are working on the basis of risk and will continue to> deploy equipment to the areas that we see are vulnerable.>> Senator Goldstein: Mr. Bourduas, what kind of training do your 34analysts,> and the ones you are asking for now, receive so that they can be certainto> understand the balance between investigative requirements and Charter> requirements?>> Mr. Bourduas: When looking at the proceeds of crime, our analysts alsohave> to be versed in what type of criminality we are investigating. Our> investigators have field experience and have gone to court with regard to> substantive offences. They have operated for a number of years with the> reality of the Charter and have been brought into the fold to look at the> proceeds of crime legislation and ways to develop a clearer picture of the> challenges we face and how we can strategically deploy our limitedresources> to address those challenges.>> Senator Tkachuk: Mr. Bourduas, page 3 of your brief states:>> ...the RCMP continues to respect its arm's length relationship with> FINTRAC.... However, once this independent agency has reasonable groundsto> suspect that their information would be relevant to investigating or> prosecuting a money laundering offence, this information should made more> readily available to Canadian law enforcement agencies.>> This implies that you are not satisfied with the information you aregetting> and its availability to you. Perhaps you could expand on that onesentence.>> Mr. Bourduas: With regard to FINTRAC, we are of the opinion that thecurrent> legislation talks about what should constitute ``designated information.''> We also believe that the legal interpretation given to ``designated> information'' is a little too narrow in scope. We would like to seek a> broadening of this information and the definition of ``designated> information'' so we can access additional information from FINTRAC in> relation to what constitutes their reasonable grounds to believe that a> transaction is labelled suspicious. We are asking for reasons to justify> this referral and additional information that would allow ourinvestigators> to better focus our investigation into a given area.>> We are satisfied with the relationship we have with FINTRAC, but we are> seeking is a much broader definition or interpretation of the definitionof> ``designated information.''>> Senator Tkachuk: You would prefer it to be less onerous on their part soyou> would receive more information; correct? Is it the quality or you justwant> more?>> Mr. Bourduas: It is both the information and also the qualifier of the> particular information that we are seeking.>> Senator Tkachuk: Would this require amendments to the act to expand the> amount of information that would be turned over to the RCMP?>> Mr. Bourduas: Currently, subsection 55(7) of the act deals with designated> information and talks about names and addresses, the amount and type of> currency, the type of transaction, the account number, and then, at> subparagraph (e), makes reference to ``any other identifying information> that may be prescribed.'' That has been ruled to be very much in line with> the previous four items, without broadening the definition to at leastallow> investigators to know why FINTRAC has labelled particular information> ``suspicious.'' We are seeking a broadening of the definition so that> investigators can have a better idea as to why some of these transactions> have been labelled ``suspicious.''>> Senator Tkachuk: When we discussed the issue of privacy with officialsfrom> FINTRAC, they said that a number of measures were in place to protect the> privacy of the information. They also said that at the end of five years> they would get rid of it unless it was sent to the police; then it waseight> years. What do you do with it? If you expand the amount of informationthat> they are sending over to you, then the police are getting moreinformation,> which is simply information. We do not know if a particular person hasdone> anything wrong; it is just information. Do you get rid of your information> after a certain number of years or does it stay in that file forever?>> Mr. Bourduas: We would like to do something with the information, ofcourse,> and that is the main thrust behind what we are seeking. We want additional> information to get a much clearer picture as to what certain groups or> individuals are doing in relation to financial transactions. By obtaining> additional information, we would be in a better position to focus our> limited resources on a particular file or referral as opposed to simply> placing the referral in a queue. We have limited resources, so we alsohave> to manage risk and prioritize.>> Senator Tkachuk: I understand that, but let us say they could provide you> with more extensive information. What happens if this additionalinformation> leads you nowhere? What would you do with it in the end? Would it be> discarded or would that information stay with you forever? Let us say that> the information is just a name with a whole bunch of financial details and> it sits in a file at the RCMP and leads nowhere. Would you get rid of it> after a while?>> Mr. Bourduas: When it is just a name with limited information, we set it> aside. We also have rules and regulations internally in relation to howlong> we keep certain information on file. Like any other organization, at one> point the information is simply discarded.>> Senator Tkachuk: Is it destroyed or is it moved to another building?>> Mr. Bourduas: At some point we run out of buildings, senator; that is our> reality.>> Senator Tkachuk: The task force on money laundering made a number of> recommendations in 2003-04. One of them involved casinos not beinglicensed,> a more regulatory and supervisory regime for casinos and also ownership> requirements. I think those are all provincial matters. Are the provinces> that the RCMP is serving - like Saskatchewan, for example, where the RCMPis> our police force - not licensing properly? Do you feel the regulations are> sufficient to prevent money laundering in provinces that have casinos?>> Mr. Bourduas: In my former life as a commanding officer in Quebec, I hadto> deal with investigations that brought us to casinos in that province. Rest> assured that these institutions, very much like other institutions, wantto> avoid, like the plague, criminal organizations using their institutions to> launder money. They are very much regulated and they do cooperate with> police authorities - be it the provincial police or the RCMP - becausethey> are cognisant of the fact that their institution might be used for exactly> this purpose. They closely monitor their transactions and make unsolicited> reports to police agencies when they see a suspicious transaction. Underthe> auspices of the Criminal Code, they will provide us with more information> than we would normally get from an institution like FINTRAC. They want to> ensure they provide us with all the information and all the related> circumstances to allow the investigators to put the information into> perspective.>> Senator Tkachuk: Considering that gambling used to be a criminal activity,> they might have more knowledge about it than a bank or a credit union.>> Mr. Bourduas: Obviously, it is legal now. Rest assured that the provincial> government wants to keep these types of activities from being infiltratedby> organized crime because it used to be managed more or less by organized> crime.>> Senator Tkachuk: In that recommendation, the task force stated that> necessary legal or regulatory measures be taken to prevent criminals or> their associates from holding or being the beneficial owners of a> significant or controlling interest or holding a management function or> being the operator. Is there reason to suspect that casinos in Canada are> infiltrated by criminals or people interested in money laundering?>> The Deputy Chairman: Do you mean the ownership?>> Senator Tkachuk: Or the management.>> Mr. Bourduas: Or the board of directors.>> Senator Tkachuk: Yes.>> Mr. Bourduas: Once again, police organizations are working closely with> casinos. The majority of security forces for casinos are constituted by> former police officers and are doing background checks on anyone who deals> with the management of the casinos to ensure everything is above board in> relation to their operation. They all know what the consequences might beif> anyone associated with organized crime were to have a major role in the> operation of any casinos or board of directors, for that matter.>> Senator Campbell: When the RCMP receives information from FINTRAC, where> does it go from there? Who do you pass it on to?>> Mr. Bourduas: As a result of Bill C-22, we formed a group of specialized> investigators that are seized with the information they receive eitherfrom> FINTRAC or from CBSA. These people try to put the information into context> so they can dispatch it to our proceeds of crime units that are deployed> across the country.>> Senator Campbell: Would you pass this information on to Canada Revenue> Agency?>> Mr. Bourduas: Our investigators are focused on the criminal aspect of what> constitutes a potential violation of the Criminal Code. Therefore, as I> indicated, they would dispatch this particular information to some of our> investigators who are dealing with proceeds of crime.>> Once the investigation has started and the piece of information that we> received from FINTRAC were to help us paint a clearer picture, we wouldgive> priority this investigation over others. We would deal with theindividuals,> the organization, the substantive offence and the proceeds aspect of the> investigation and would bring these individuals or the organization before> the court. We also have a liaison officer who deals with the CanadaRevenue> Agency, and some of the financial information might be passed on to theCRA.>> Senator Campbell: How about other police forces?>> Mr. Bourduas: Other police forces are part of our Combined Forces Special> Enforcement Units, or CFSEUs. These units are scattered all over the> country. Our ultimate goal is to put these criminals out of business.>> That is the reason we are striving to gain access to additionalinformation.> We need more context than a name and an amount of money. We would then bein> a better position to actually channel this information through our CFSEUsto> our proceeds of crime unit and also to other police forces, if need be.>> Senator Campbell: Clearly I am pro police, but there is a question oftrust.> I do not mind the information being there. It is okay if the information> goes to a particular organization, but my worry is that it might then goto> a separate organization, which might then send it to all sorts of other> organizations. Along the way, the public must be absolutely certain thatthe> information is always used for the reason for which it was gathered. The> difficulty is that every organization has a different reason for lookingat> that information. That, to me, is the worry. Where is the tipping point?We> all want to catch the bad guys and put them in jail; we all want to fight> terrorism. At what point do we tip over? I suppose that is the question we> are really looking at here.>> Also, I know you have regulations stipulating that this information mustbe> kept for a certain amount of time, but we are not talking about awarehouse;> we are talking about an infinite hard drive. What is the minimum amount of> time you are required to hold on to files before you get them out of the> system?>> Mr. Bourduas: Bear in mind that when we investigate proceeds of crimefiles,> some of the information that relates to a particular individual must bekept> for a certain amount of time. In fact, we ran into problems when we> discarded some information and then 10, 15 or 20 years down the roadneeded> additional information to substantiate before the court that an individual> had been involved in crime for so many years. That is why we looked at a> policy dealing with the disclosure of information. As I indicated, most of> the time this information is put in context and we will keep it for the> duration of the file. At other times, we will keep the information if the> individual is the subject of interest in any other file within the> organization.>> Senator Campbell: If I had been involved in crime 30 years ago, I wouldhave> a record and you would have it. It would never be gone; is that correct?>> Mr. Bourduas: It would depend on the record. If you were to have recordsin> your personal notebook ->> Senator Campbell: I am not talking about me, Larry Campbell. I have notbeen> a criminal for 30 years. I am speaking hypothetically. You were sayingthat> you lost all of this information because you did not have the criminal> records of the person involved. However, if I were involved in criminal> activity and were convicted, then I would have a criminal record thatshould> be on the files. You are talking about someone who was involved in an> activity and may or may not be a criminal - you do not know - and now you> want to find out more about them. That creates a problem. There is astatute> of limitations on most things. What we are doing here is saying, ``Let's> extend this.''>> When I worked in the business, we could never have enough intelligence. It> is a matter of bringing it all in and shifting through it. I am really> having difficulty with this.>> Mr. Bourduas: As well, we need to give context to the intelligence, sir;you> are absolutely right. Our organization keeps a piece of information to> ensure that it fits in some puzzle somewhere so that we can complete the> picture of the individual with whom we are dealing. It is important,> however, that we provide some context. If the information is not relevantto> any ongoing investigation or any files or the subject is of no interest to> us, then we have plenty of other organizations and individuals to look at.>> Senator Campbell: I will go back to what you said before. Let us assume> there is information on Larry Campbell, but nothing of relevance. Thatkind> of information does not go away. Twenty years from now, you want to beable> to put my name into the system, my date of birth if you have it, and have> the information appear. As you said, you lost that information, so thereis> no way of tying Larry Campbell to activities that took place 20 years ago.> Suddenly, however, there is a new investigation and my name pops up. Thatis> my problem.>> Senator Tkachuk: I have a supplementary. I was not sure that I got myanswer> when I asked a similar question.>> Senator Campbell and I are both concerned. When you receive a name thathas> been investigated, a lot of evidence has been accumulated that has nothing> to do with any criminal activity. It might simply be personal information> unearthed by your investigator who has talked to friends, bankers,> employers, et cetera. Nothing happens with the accumulated information> because there is no evidence of any criminal wrongdoing. What happens to> that file? My belief is that the file is never closed and just sits there.I> believe that you never get rid of that file.>> Mr. Bourduas: As I indicated, we have retention dates on files because at> one point it would become ridiculous to keep all of these files open.>> Senator Tkachuk: It is possible to store all of that information on> computers today. Would you destroy such a file?>> Mr. Bourduas: All the information is disposed of after a certain length of> time. The organization has parameters on discarding certain files. For> example, our files on individuals involved with break and enters are> destroyed after a period of time, whereas the files on more serious crimes> such as murder are kept forever. There are different thresholds.>> I am a stickler for numbers, so I will share with you some of thestatistics> on disclosures from FINTRAC. We received a total of 382 disclosures from> FINTRAC. Nine per cent identified new or unknown individuals. This doesnot> mean we started investigations in relation to these individuals but rather> that they were new or unknown to us. Fourteen per cent provided additional> information to ongoing investigations. Twenty-five per cent were thedirect> result of previous voluntary reports received from the RCMP. Sixteen per> cent have been forwarded to other agencies. Twenty-nine per cent of the> disclosures were associated with investigations that have been concludedby> the RCMP having sufficient resources to conduct investigations. Sixteenper> cent contained insufficient information to proceed with an investigation.> Fifty-three per cent of the disclosures were concluded for the following> reasons: no criminality was detected, insufficient information, nopredicted> offence, and dated information or lack of resources. That is basicallywhat> is happening with these files.>> Senator Baker: Unfortunately, I do not have time to ask a question of the> RCMP officer who was the commanding officer for the largest cocaineseizure> in Canadian history, in Eastern Canada, which was called ``operation> jewels,'' I believe.>> Mr. Bourduas: You are well informed, senator, yes.>> Senator Baker: He was also the investigating officer into a particularbiker> gang operation, the substance of which has gone to trial in many cases. He> is a well-versed individual on search warrants and the relevant> requirements, particularly in lawyers' offices.>> I remind you, Mr. Bourduas, that section 488 of the Criminal Code on> searches of lawyers' officers has been struck down by the Supreme Court of> Canada and replaced with a set of rules. I suspect that you are telling us> within that context and your operations in the past that you want toobtain> additional information without a search warrant, whereas you would needone> normally. In your recommendations to this committee, you want greater> authority to obtain information without going to the trouble of search> warrants.>> Ms. Tracy, my question has to do with concerns about the act and criticism> levied by the courts against subsection 12(1) of Part 2, which you> administer. Myriad cases have been judged before the courts in Canada in> which people have been trying to get back money that was seized at the> border. The criticism of the courts relates to the question that the RCMP> officer mentioned a moment ago - the difference between suspicion and> belief. If CBSA officers suspect something, they can seize monies crossing> the border. The minister then makes a determination as to whether thatmoney> should be forfeited to the Crown.>> The criticism levied by the courts against this procedure is that nothing> under the act enables someone to get their money out of forfeiture unless> they can prove definitively that the money is legitimate. There is areverse> onus on the person, and no there is procedure under the act that allowsthem> to get their money back, except to question the border guard on theseizure.>> Ms. Tracy: The question is precisely the issue of reasonable suspicion. I> was made aware this morning of the committee's interest based on testimony> yesterday. I began this morning to inform myself on the judgments thathave> been rendered to date and what is currently before the courts.>> I would not pretend to be able to answer, particularly now that I am> informed you are a lawyer. I will not go into a great deal of detail, butI> will offer to provide more detailed information to the committee from the> CBSA on this matter.>> The one thing I will say, though, is that I have not been involved withthis> act for the whole time that it has been implemented, but I was, in aformer> job, responsible for some of the design of the legislation - Part 2,> obviously, because I have a customs background. One of the things that was> very important to the drafters, and to us as well, was that we did notwant> to trap individuals who had simply made a mistake or who did not know orwho> were nervous about telling people because they might be robbed. We builtour> program on that basis.>> Yes, the standard is reasonable suspicion, and I have some statistics. Of> 5,000 enforcement actions, 595 were forfeitures. This is very different.Of> those remaining that were not forfeited, they were believed to be relatedto> issues of carelessness and perhaps deliberate non-reporting for whatever> reason, but there was no suspicion of proceeds of crime. Our officers have> been given very clear guidelines as to how to judge a level 4 seizure,which> is forfeiture.>> My point is that we are aware. The Canada Border Services Agency wears two> hats. The first is that we are most definitely as an enforcement> organization, but the other is that we are very conscious of how we affect> the lives of the public and business in relation to imports and exports.In> the design of this program, and I believe I can say that in the> administration of this program, we are aware of that. Obviously, if there> are errors we will correct them, but we have taken safeguards and are> comfortable and hopeful that the 37 cases before the courts right now will> be ruled on in favour of the legislation and in favour of the agency.>> Senator Goldstein: How inhibiting would it be to the success of your workto> have legislation stating that if no prosecution results, you must destroy> records within a predetermined period of time rather than relying on your> internal criteria?>> Mr. Bourduas: We keep the records because a different set of circumstances> is attached to each name. Fifty-three per cent of these disclosures didnot> lead anywhere. Therefore, we pass on if there is insufficient information.> If we can just put context to this, ultimately the file is destroyed, andit> is internally that we can manage this.>> The Deputy Chairman: The answer was very prejudicial.>> [Translation]>> Senator Massicotte: Mr. Bourduas, your summary notes that in the last five> or six years, 80 or so suspicious transactions have been reported to the> RCMP. My impression is that those involved in organized crime areextremely> creative. They can afford to be creative, given the lucrative nature of> their activities. Senator Campbell, the former mayor of Vancouver, told us> that marijuana trafficking alone generated revenues of $7 billion inBritish> Columbia. That is only one small component of organized crime. My guess is> that we are talking about transactions worth $30 billion to $40 billion,and> yet, only 10 or so transactions were reported annually by FINTRAC. Only$35> million is assets were seized. To my way of thinking, that is only a very> small percentage of all revenues associated with criminal activity andmoney> laundering operations.>> Mr. Bourduas: That is consistent with my findings. Only by workingtogether> will we be able to acquire the legislative means that will allow law> enforcement agencies and border service officers to make a dent inorganized> crime. Existing legislation has produced some results, qualified or not,but> armed with more effective tools, we will be able to achieve even better> results.>> The government has already made some strides, but it is simply a matter of> tightening up some of the legislative provisions in place to ensure thatour> investigators have the authority to do the job that they are paid to do.>> Senator Massicotte: Am I wrong to think that our legislation has verylittle> impact on the various kinds of criminal activity in Canada?>> Mr. Bourduas: No, but it is having an impact of some kind when we compare> ourselves to the rest of the world, and when we take into account our> resources. Our people are doing an impressive job, but we need to shore up> our resources.>> Senator Massicotte: How effective would you say we are? Are we 20, 30, 80or> 90 per cent effective?>> Mr. Bourduas: Our Commissioner has said that our operations impact 25 per> cent of the 600 criminal organizations in all. There is nonetheless one> important element that we are completely overlooking. My proposals areaimed> at bringing in more stringent legislation that would give ourinvestigators> the tools to target organized crime where it hurts most, namely their> financial operations.>> [English]>> The Deputy Chairman: Honourable senators, our next two meetings will be on> May 31 and June 1, when we will deal with two reports that have been sentto> your offices. One concerns the demographic study, which we will deal withon> June 1. The other relates to a revised consumer report.>> [Translation]>> Thank you very much, Deputy Commissioner.>> [English]>> Ms. Tracy, thank you for coming. It flowed from the testimony you bothgave> that you would be willing to provide further information, particularly Ms.> Tracy on the issue of jurisprudence.>> Given the importance of what we are doing in terms of our collective> security, this has not been enough time. The steering committee will> consider conducting further hearings on this subject. If you feel thatwould> like to come back or have further information, either from the point ofview> of the RCMP or your agency, I would invite you to do so.>> Mr. Bourduas: The point that needs clarification is the elimination ofsome> of these records from our files, and it is obviously a concern around this> forum.>> I will endeavour to provide a reply in writing as to our policies in> relation to retention dates. If you are not satisfied with the reply, I> would be more than willing to come back and answer your questions.>> The Deputy Chairman: That would be fine.>> You made a point regarding lawyers. Originally, I recall that lawyers were> well covered in the legislation, but they raised issues of professional> solicitor-client privilege, what some might call a moratorium onenforcement> against lawyers. I can tell you from personal experience that some lawfirms> actually act as if they are bound by the law. They comply and do the> declarations, and everything is fine. However, there is a cadre of one,two> and three person practices, and I think those would be the ones thatconcern> you more. We have been informed by some of the evidence that there are> discussions.>> [Translation]>> Discussions are under way between officials and lawyers.>> [English]>> What is the tenor of these discussions? We are told that in the United> States, in the United Kingdom and other jurisdictions, which all have the> same justice system as we do and the same legal ethics and codes ofconduct> for lawyers, they do not have this problem that we have encountered in> Canada.>> This committee would like to find a solution. As I understood yourevidence,> it is one of the biggest lacunas in legislation. If you could enlighten us> as to where it is headed, that would be helpful.>> Mr. Bourduas: I certainly will.>> The committee adjourned.>>>>> RCMP chief had 'no choice' but to come clean> SCOTT DEVEAU>> Globe and Mail Update>> Outgoing RCMP Commissioner Guiliano Zaccardelli said Thursday in Ottawathat> he "had no choice" but to come clean when he realized he had made mistakes> in his testimony in the case of Maher Arar. The comments came the same day> as Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day faced tough questions over Mr.> Zaccardelli's resignation. "I had no choice. I had never had any choicebut> to tell the truth," Mr. Zaccardelli said during a press conference in> Ottawa.>> Á 1100> The Chair (Hon. Paul DeVillers (Simcoe North, Lib.))> Mr. Guy Racine (Mayor, Reeve of the MRC Haute-Yamaska and> Spokesperson for the Coalition of Mayors, City of Granby)>> Á 1105>> Á 1110>> Á 1115>> Á 1120>> Á 1125>> Á 1130>> Á 1135> Mr. Jean D'Amour (Mayor, City of Rivière-du-Loup)>> Á 1140>> Á 1145> The Chair> Mr. Guy Racine> Mr. André Langevin (Mayor, City of Coaticook)>> Á 1150> Mr. Guy Racine> Mr. Gilles Veilleux (Representative, City of Roberval)>> Á 1155> Mr. Guy Racine> Mr. Claude Vigneault (Mayor, Municipality ofÎles-de-la-Madeleine)> The Chair> Mr. Guy Racine> Mr. Jean Thériault (Representative, City of Baie-Comeau)>> Â 1200> Mr. Guy Racine> Mr. Jean-Claude Patenaude (Representative, City of> Saint-Hyacinthe)> Mr. Guy Racine> Ms. Colette Roy Laroche (Mayor, City Lac-Mégantic)>> Â 1205> The Chair> Mr. Guy Racine>> Â 1210> The Chair> Mr. Vic Toews (Provencher, CPC)>> Â 1215> Mr. Guy Racine> The Chair> Mr. Guy Racine> Mr. Jean D'Amour>> Â 1220> The Chair> Mr. Serge Ménard (Marc-Aurèle-Fortin, BQ)>> Â 1225> The Chair> Mr. Serge Ménard> Mr. Robert Vincent (Shefford, BQ)> The Chair> Mr. Guy Racine> The Chair> Mr. David Christopherson (Hamilton Centre, NDP)>> Â 1230> The Chair> Mr. Guy Racine> The Chair> Mr. Serge Gosselin (Municipal Counsel, City of Coaticook)> Mr. Guy Racine> Mr. Jean D'Amour> The Chair> Mr. David Christopherson>> Â 1235> Mr. Guy Racine> Mr. Jean D'Amour> The Chair> Mr. Guy Racine> The Chair> Hon. Denis Paradis (Brome-Missisquoi, Lib.)>> Â 1240>> Â 1245> Mr. Paul Crête (Montmagny-L'Islet-Kamouraska-Rivière-du-Loup,BQ)> Hon. Denis Paradis> The Chair> Mr. Guy Racine> The Chair> Mr. Garry Breitkreuz (Yorkton-Melville, CPC)>> Â 1250> The Chair> Mr. Guy Racine> The Chair> Hon. Roy Cullen (Etobicoke North, Lib.)>> Â 1255> The Chair> Mr. Guy Racine> The Chair> Mr. Guy Racine> The Chair> Mr. André Langevin> The Chair> Mr. Serge Ménard>> · 1300> The Chair> Mr. Serge Ménard> The Chair> Mr. Guy Racine> The Chair> Mr. Guy Racine> The Chair>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>>>>>>>>> CANADA>>> Standing Committee on Justice, Human Rights, Public Safety and Emergency> Preparedness>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------> NUMBER 012> l 1st SESSION> l 38th PARLIAMENT>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------->> EVIDENCE> Tuesday, December 7, 2004> [Recorded by Electronic Apparatus]> * * *>> Á (1100)>> [Translation]>>> The Chair (Hon. Paul DeVillers (Simcoe North, Lib.)): I call to order> this meeting of the Standing Committee on Justice, Human Rights, Public> Safety and Emergency Preparedness.>> Our witnesses are the mayors and representatives of themunicipalities.> We are carrying out a study on the closing of RCMP detachments in the> regions. Mr. Racine, Mayor of the City of Granby, is the spokesperson.>> Mr. Mayor, I would like to ask you to introduce the representatives> accompanying you.>> We usually give our witnesses about 10 minutes to make their> presentation. However, I know that you have to share your time with all of> the municipality representatives, so I will ask you to make all of your> presentations in 30 or 40 minutes. In that way, the members will have time> to ask their questions.>> Mayor Racine, you may begin.>>> Mr. Guy Racine (Mayor, Reeve of the MRC Haute-Yamaska and Spokesperson> for the Coalition of Mayors, City of Granby): Thank you very much, Mr.> Chairman, for welcoming and agreeing to hear us. We very much appreciateit.>> Before starting and introducing my colleagues, I'd like to take a few> moments to point out the members who are with us here today. I hope Iwon't> forget any. This presentation is quite a production.>> With us are Mr. Vincent, member for Shefford--my riding--Mr. Crête,> member for Montmagny-L'Islet-Kamouraska-Rivière-du-Loup, Ms. Bonsant,member> for Compton-Stanstead, the Honourable Denis Paradis, fromBrome-Missisquoi,> who was a major partner in this issue. Have I forgotten any members?>> An hon. member: Marc Boulianne.>> Mr. Guy Racine: Not to mention Marc Boulianne, member for> Mégantic-L'Érable.>> Pardon me; I looked around a little earlier. And yet we both have the> same haircut. I should have remembered. Pardon me.>> I'm told that the member for Saint-Hyacinthe-Bagot, Mr. Loubier, willbe> here in a few moments.>> Mr. Chairman, with your permission, I'd also like to note the presence> in this room of the former member for Shefford, Ms. Saint-Jacques, who> ardently worked on the RCMP file, and David Price. A warm hello to them.>> Now allow me to introduce the mayors and the mayors' representatives> here with us. Some mayors couldn't be here today.>> So we have Gilles Veilleux, representative of the City of Roberval;> André Langevin, mayor of the City of Coaticook, and Serge Gosselin,> municipal councillor of the City of Coaticook; Jean Thériault,> representative of the City of Baie-Comeau; Claude Vigneault, mayor of the> municipality of Îles-de-la-Madeleine; Jean-Clause Patenaude,representative> of the City of Saint-Hyacinthe; Colette Roy Laroche, mayor of the City of> Lac-Mégantic; Jean D'Amour, mayor of the City of Rivière-du-Loup, and> Johanne St-Pierre, his director of communications.>> I am the mayor of the City of Granby and the reeve of the MRC> Haute-Yamaska. I'm acting as the spokesman of the common front of mayorswho> find this decision unacceptable.>> Here's how I'll proceed, Mr. Chairman. As the spokesperson, I'll read> you the message summing up the issue as a whole. Then I'll hand over, fora> brief period, perhaps two or three minutes, to the people here with me so> that they can add to the information given to you.>> Then we'll be pleased to answer your questions or to listen to your> comments.>> With your permission, I'll proceed.>> Following the September 23, 2004 announcement, the mayors of thecities> affected by the closing of the RCMP detachments met with Pierre-Yves> Bourduas of the RCMP. The latter explained to them that the aim of this> administrative decision was to redeploy the RCMP's forces so it couldbetter> fulfill its mandate.>> This announcement was made at the same time as Operation Cisaille was> being carried out to combat marijuana cultivation. The federalgovernment's> decision to close RCMP detachments in nine Quebec cities has led to the> creation of a coalition of the mayors of the cities concerned, as well asof> the reeves of the MRCs where these RCMP detachments are located, backed by> the elected members for these ridings.>> Á (1105)>> The aim of this group's concerted efforts is to request the federal> government to declare a moratorium on and review this decision.>> The withdrawal of the RCMP from our communities is a serious threat to> the security of the populations concerned and creates an opening for> increased crime. The RCMP's presence was fostering better partnership with> the various authorities in our communities and the local police forces.>> Increasingly, criminal activity is extending beyond the borders of the> major urban centres and the signatories to this report object to any> reorganization that drains the regions of their services, at a time when,at> every level, decentralization is becoming a major tool for local> development.>> The Annual Report of the Criminal Intelligence Service Canada dealing> with organized crime in Canada in 2004 says "Illicit drug activities fuel> violence unlike any other criminal activity. There are socio-economiccosts> associated with the illicit drug trade such as property crimes, assaultsand> homicides.">> This same report stresses that "illicit commodities are eitherconcealed> within the larger volume of legitimate commercial and traveller movement> entering through designated customs entry points or smuggledsurreptitiously> through the vast stretches of less controlled border areas." It alsostates> that organized criminals will exploit less controlled areas. It is> noteworthy that the Executive Committee of the Criminal IntelligenceService> Canada (CISC) is chaired by the RCMP Commissioner.>> Let's talk about Baie-Comeau and the Baie-Comeau region. There are> almost 600 km separating Baie-Comeau from the Labrador border alongHighway> 389 in a non-urban and unwatched area, leaving the way clear for the many> narcotics smugglers. The closest RCMP detachment is in Sept-Îles, 240 km> away, leaving Baie-Comeau with no federal policing service. TheBaie-Comeau> SQ detachment has only four police officers in its narcotics-related> organized crime squad to cover over 900 km of roads, that is to say 600 km> with the Labrador border, 200 km with Tadoussac and 120 km with> Baie-Trinité.>> Since the closing of the Baie-Comeau RCMP detachment, confidential> information indicates that no maritime surveillance is happening at all.> Furthermore, no joint SQ-RCMP projects are being contemplated for> Baie-Comeau which, in the past, have led to arrests for trafficking or> possession for the purpose of trafficking. These joint operations were> making it possible to fight drug trafficking better.>> Since September 11, 2001, the RCMP's priority has been focused onborder> entry points, with little surveillance of the maritime routes. Thepersonnel> at Sept-Îles consists of one supervisor and three police officers who have> to cover the area from Tadoussac to Blanc-Sablon and from Schefferville to> Anticosti. Since their workload is already excessive for the Sept-Îlesarea> alone, maritime surveillance is currently nonexistent. The people who were> working in Baie-Comeau were not transferred to Sept-Îles, but to different> provinces in Canada. From eight officers on duty in Sept-Îles, there arenow> no more than four. We can assert that the "way is open" for traffickers in> Baie-Comeau, via the Seaway.>> For the City of Baie-Comeau, the entire maritime component of the St.> Lawrence River is being left without surveillance. A lot of narcotics> trafficking takes place on vessels travelling in these waters and usingthe> Baie-Comeau harbour and the Alcoa and Cargill Ltée wharfs.>> Á (1110)>> The federal wharf received 68 vessels in 2003, Alcoa 78 and Cargill119.> Those vessels came from Algeria, Brazil, Sweden, Asia and the UnitedStates.>> For Baie-Comeau, in spite of the Sûreté du Québec's efforts, their> personnel is clearly insufficient: four police officers are assigned tothe> organized crime squad to watch Highways 138 and 389 to Labrador, giving> narcotics traffickers free rein.>> The population of the MRC Manicouagan, of which the City ofBaie-Comeau> is part, is 31,479 residents and, to this number, must be added 3,600> Aboriginal people who represent 11.4 percent of the total population.>> Let's talk about Coaticook. The MRC de Coaticook has 18,500inhabitants> and would be henceforth served by the Sherbrooke RCMP located 35kilometers> away and 40 minutes travel time. The agricultural producers in theCoaticook> region are dealing with pot growers who invade their land and corn fields.>> The MRC de Coaticook runs along 30 km of the US border with the states> of Vermont and New Hampshire and this border would be left without> surveillance except for the three border crossing points located onHighways> 253, 141 and 147. Finally, in the Coaticook area, Highways 253> (East-Hereford - Beecher Falls), 141 (Hereford and Canaan), and 147> (Stanhope) are unwatched.>> As regards the City of Granby and the Granby region, the RCMP has been> providing an essential presence in Granby since 1949. Granby has no more> than three police officers to cover a very vast territory comprising three> border crossing points. The day after the announcement, the RCMP building> was covered with graffiti saying "Good riddance!". All that was missingwas> the applause.>> The elected member for Shefford in 2003, Diane St-Jacques, with the> assistance of the mayors, prefects and RCMP, SQ and municipal police> management, had obtained the government's assurance that the Granby> detachment would remain open.>> We were told that the RCMP was to consult the elected members, mayors> and other stakeholders before making any decision whatsoever, but insteadwe> were faced with a fait accompli, without any consultation having taken> place, with the excuse that it had to redeploy its forces to the major> centres.>> One might legitimately ask what Drummondville has as a major centrethat> Granby does not. We feel that this choice is unjustified.>> The closing of the RCMP detachment represents a terrible loss for the> city and the MRC, because, without a strong police presence, the area is> open to organized crime and criminals of all sorts. The government isgiving> free rein to cannabis growing, narcotics trafficking, alcohol bootlegging,> motorcycle gangs and terrorism, while weakening the enforcement of over130> federal laws.>> Our municipal security service in Granby cooperates regularly with the> RCMP on almost a daily basis on a number of matters: criminal motorcycle> gangs, narcotics trafficking, alcohol bootlegging, criminalinvestigations,> and so on.>> Á (1115)>> Should we conclude that one wants to make way for organized crime inthe> area? Because this closure is an invitation to organized crime to head to> the Eastern Townships, to our regions where the borders are open.>> The Sûreté du Québec and the municipal police forces cannot pick upall> the slack for the area served. Along with undermanning at the Sûreté du> Québec due to the map revision in 2002, 174 municipal police forces have> merged into 44. There is widespread dissatisfaction among the citiesserved> by the SQ and the municipal police force's job has grown. And who will end> up paying for it? The citizens, of course. It will cost more to boost> municipal police forces, because the SQ is undermanned and the RCMP is> closing its detachments.>> Our citizens pay municipal taxes for municipal policing, provincial> taxes for the SQ and federal taxes for the RCMP. But we are not receiving> these services and, on top of that, we are not being consulted.>> Some RCMP staff members have, in fact, stated that their numbers are> clearly insufficient to combat organized crime. As proof, the number of> officers in Granby dropped from six to three in one year. The City ofGranby> has 46,500 inhabitants, in the very heart of the MRC Haute-Yamaska, which> has 78,000 inhabitants. We will become an excellent place for organized> crime, near to everything and far from everything.>> As for the Magdalen Islands, the federal and provincial police> authorities are aware that marine space is frequently used as a channelfor> narcotics trafficking. With the Magdalen Islands being located in themiddle> of the Gulf of St. Lawrence, the RCMP officers were vigilant in combating> marine and air smuggling traffic. We can expect narcotics smuggling to> proliferate once the RCMP is no longer watching the marine space.>> In the Magdalen Islands, the closing of the RCMP detachment willaffect> the surveillance of marine and air narcotics smuggling and the> confrontations between seal hunters and anti-seal hunting activists are> likely to increase.>> For the Magdalen Islands, it is primarily the marine space that willnot> be watched for possible seaborne or airborne traffic.>> As for the Joliette region, the MRC de Joliette detachment has existed> since 1949. Two years ago, Joliette could count on more than a dozen> officers serving its territory. This year, there are no more than four> officers and, tomorrow, there will be nobody.>> Joliette cannot concur with the plan concocted by management that will> have policing services for the MRC concentrated in Saint-Jérôme or> Trois-Rivières. This territory will be orphaned, without a federalpolicing> service nearby. Yet, like everywhere else, crime is not decreasing. It is> the entire Lanaudière region that will be deprived of policing services.> Furthermore, the community pays taxes that should provide it with the same> services as elsewhere.>> The Joliette region will be doubly penalized: firstly, by losing> personnel that the citizens have paid for and, secondly, by having to> increase the number of provincial or municipal officers in order to getthe> same services. It is common knowledge that reducing the number of police> officers has always resulted in an increase in crime.>> Á (1120)>> The population is worried because it seems that the RCMP is already> quietly vacating the premises. The detachment is already no longer taking> calls for complaints but is referring them to Saint-Jérôme.>> Is the Joliette RCMP detachment effectively closed and is it beingwound> up even before we can be heard by the Justice Committee? Is theconsultation> process only for show or to have us believe that we can influence the> decision?>> What I'm saying about Joliette we've heard about Granby and theMagdalen> Islands. As you'll see in the rest of the presentation, which is coming to> an end, that will be repeated. The dismantling has begun, and we're> appearing before the committee today in order to be heard. It's somewhat> ironic, but we have evidence in our regions that the dismantling hasbegun.>> In Lanaudière, the RCMP officers were handling close to 250 cases ayear> and conducting 100 or so searches. The statistics for the past few years> attest to this.>> We are thus opposed to the closing of the RCMP detachment in Joliette.> We do not want to be treated like a second-class region. We are a> full-fledged region and we demand the same rights and privileges as other> regions of Quebec and Canada. We therefore insist that the governmentleave> the detachment and officers as they are. The Lanaudière region deserves to> be treated equitably. We demand the same services as elsewhere. It is our> strictest right.>> As I mentioned, the same sentence could have been repeated from cityto> city.>> Moving on to the City of Lac-Mégantic, the RCMP has been there forover> 50 years. The methods of the criminal groups have changed but they are now> increasingly found operating locally, in rural areas, in more insidious> forms. For the MRC de Granit, its low population density, accessibilityand> isolated farm and forest land are conducive to the growing, dealing and> distribution of cannabis. This region is a preferred doorway for exporting> cannabis in exchange for other narcotics from the United States. The> proximity of the Canada-US border (31 km) and the reassignment of the RCMP> officers to Sherbrooke (130 km from Lac-Mégantic) and Saint-Georges de> Beauce (110 km from Lac-Mégantic) will mean that they will no longer beable> to carry out regular preventive patrols along the border. The region> comprises 171 kilometers of Canada-US border along the states of Main and> New Hampshire. The large distances to cover significantly reduce theability> of officers to respond quickly to emergency calls from customs and> immigration officers.>> The closing of the RCMP detachments for the border municipalities will> allow the criminal groups, clandestine immigrant smugglers and terrorist> organizations to operate more easily. The RCMP detachments in our> municipalities and the preventive patrols on our territory are deterrentsin> the fight against organized crime. The government's restructuring is thus> weakening police intervention in the rural regions.>> There are close to 90,000 inhabitants in the City of Rivière-du-Loupand> region and approximately 100 km of its border is shared with the United> States. Its geographical situation makes it a very spread-out area with> concentrated urbanized areas. The secondary roads and "rangs" are great> places for illicit activities, mainly due to their isolation and low> population density. The main criminal activities observed in this regionare> related to drugs (growing, distribution and sale), contraband (alcohol and> cigarettes) and theft networks. The closing of the RCMP detachment putsthe> region in a vulnerable position because it will be exposed.>> Á (1125)>> The presence of a well-known motorcycle gang in the Pocatière area> confirms that criminal organizations are no longer solely active in the> major centres but that regional communities also have to contend withthem.>> The Rivière-du-Loup region includes infrastructures that are conducive> to and facilitate the transhipment of illicit goods, whether it be via the> airport, the wharf facilities or the road system. With the closing of the> RCMP detachments, the municipal public security services will have> additional responsibilities thrust upon them for which they do not havethe> required expertise to conduct investigations under the many complexfederal> laws, especially as this type of mandate does not fit the level ofservice.>> Furthermore, some crimes take place in the cities but they originatein> neighbouring municipalities where the local police have no jurisdiction to> intervene. In the same vein, many municipalities currently deplore the> reduction in the number of patrols carried out by the Sûreté du Québec in> their cities, since their municipal police force was abolished.>> The Rivière-du-Loup region has many unwatched roads and trails in the> Pohénégamook, Témiscouata and Kamouraska areas that can be accessed by> various means of transportation such as four-wheel drive vehicles,> snowmobiles, etc.>> The removal of services inevitably means added costs for our citizens.>> As for Roberval, the priority that the RCMP claims to be giving to the> Aboriginal issue also opens up a number of questions for us. TheAboriginal> communities that are located near urban centres may be properly served,> perhaps, but what about the more northern communities of the Innu, Creeand> Atikamek.>> The demographic statistics are well known: a non-Aboriginal Quebec> family produces 1.43 children per family, whereas Quebec Aboriginalfamilies> produce 4.3 children per family. Thirty percent of the population in these> communities is under 16 years of age with all the attending socialmiseries> (alcoholism, substance abuse, suicide, sexual abuse) experienced by such> communities. The RCMP has no known strategy to follow up on these issues> than to close the detachments neighbouring these communities. They surelydo> not realize how fragile the situation is.>> Nobody can be happy about this situation and the presence of the RCMPon> federal lands is essential. The Sûreté du Québec must support the RCMP and> the Aboriginal police forces but the responsibility for supporting local> police forces rests primarily with the federal government. In this> geographical context, what message does the Canadian government wish to> deliver to the Quebec regions and the Aboriginal communities?>> Lastly, before concluding, I'd like to talk about the Saint-Hyacinthe> region. For a number of years, the Saint-Hyacinthe region has been> contending with organized crime squatting on farmland for the purpose of> growing large amounts of cannabis. With the presence of the RCMPdetachment> over the past few years, the situation has greatly improved. The RCMP> represents an important deterrent in the fight against organized crime.The> RCMP and the SQ exchange information almost daily.>> In conclusion, Mr. Chairman, the mayors request that the Solicitor> General decree a moratorium on the decision announced regarding the> reassignment of the personnel of nine RCMP detachments in Quebec,especially> as this decision was made without any real consultation having takenplace.> They invite the Solicitor General to review this matter, stay the decision> and give back to the municipalities the personnel needed to carry out the> RCMP's mandates.>> Á (1130)>> By closing the nine RCMP detachments in Quebec, the Canadiangovernment> is sending a clear message to criminal groups: "Come out to the regions,> there is no more surveillance." The new policy advocated by the government> in the RCMP issue seems to be based more on an internal managementoperation> rather than on a real concern to better protect the borders and help stop> organized crime and terrorism.>> A complete analysis of criminal movements operating in the regions is> urgently needed, unless one already exists and has been ignored. It seems> unlikely that the use of border detection will be as efficient andeffective> as systematic patrolling. The Americans realized this quickly on September> 11, 2001. Following the atrocious and tragic events in New York, the media> brought out the fact that the American administration might have focusedtoo> much on intelligence to the detriment of a more deterrent local presence.>> No detection surveillance or intelligence-oriented techniques could be> as great a deterrent as a local presence. The minimum number of officersand> necessary funds must be given back to the regions so that we can fightcrime> and the resulting social problems effectively. By losing the RCMPpersonnel> in our municipalities, we lose the synergy with our police forces and the> stakeholders in the community.>> Everyone is decrying this decision: the mayors of the nine cities> concerned; the MRC prefects; the Association des policiers provinciaux;the> Fédération des policiers et policières municipaux du Québec; theFraternité> des policiers de la Montérégie; the Association de la Gendarmerie Royaledu> Canada au Québec. We are unanimous in requesting that this decision be> reversed, or at the very least that a moratorium be decreed, to re-examine> the whole situation.>> We request that we be ensured that our taxes provide us with the same> services as elsewhere. Crime and organized crime circles are not confinedto> any regions, cities or borders and do not need a consultation study or tobe> heard by committees in order to act. They are where we are not. They look> for the weak link. Do not make way for them because, rest assured, theywill> come, if they have not already done so.>> Mr. Chairman and committee members, thank you for your attention. With> your permission, I'm going to hand over to the representatives and mayors> here with me today. They will round out the brief description I've givenyou> of the regions as a whole. I'll start with the mayor of Rivière-du-Loup,Mr.> D'Amour.>> Á (1135)>>> Mr. Jean D'Amour (Mayor, City of Rivière-du-Loup): Thank you verymuch,> Mr. Racine. Ladies and gentlemen, first I want to thank you for receivingus> this morning. This is a particularly important subject for us.>> First, I'll say that the RCMP presence in Rivière-du-Loup dates backto> 1932. At that time, we had nine officers; from nine, the number fell to> seven, then to two. We've finally just been told that, with only two> resource persons, they can't adequately serve the area. I can't doanything> but agree with that. With two persons, how can anyone do a proper job?>> I don't intend to return to what my colleague, Mr. Racine, said amoment> ago about Rivière-du-Loup. Simply to clarify the context, I will say that> Rivière-du-Loup is roughly 110 kilometers from the Atlantic Provinces and> approximately 100 kilometers from Maine. We own an airport and have a deep> water port nearby, the seaport of Gros-Cacouna.>> In short, there is a lot of traffic entering Rivière-du-Loup. With> regard to the centralization of RCMP operations in Rimouski and> Saint-Georges de Beauce, I would point out that Rimouski is approximately> 120 kilometers from Rivière-du-Loup and Saint-Georges de Beauce 277> kilometers. You can imagine the kind of situation this leads to in> Rivière-du-Loup.>> Mr. Bourduas, who was asked how the RCMP would continue protecting the> roads that are already protected and protecting the 100 or 150 access ways> scattered over the area which are not, told us that that could be done> electronically. He told us--and I take the liberty of repeating his> words--that access via certain roads was monitored electronically and that> RCMP officers did checks. They don't move in a case of a deer, but they do> if they observe regular traffic. Can you imagine a smuggler deciding that> Tuesday morning at nine o'clock is his day and time? I don't think so.This> situation is causing a lot of concern in Rivière-du-Loup.>> Lastly, let me tell you that, at a time when there has never been so> much drug and narcotic activity in the area, the RCMP, by the actions itis> taking today, that is to say its reassignment process, will jump-start the> crime industry like never before. This concerns us. Today drugs are being> found in elementary schools. I don't know whether that disturbs you, but> that concerns me, particularly as a mayor and the father of four children.>> Now I'm going to talk about the effects of this situation on police> departments, both municipal departments and the Sûreté du Québec. FirstI'll> say that a municipal police department doesn't have all the expertise that> the RCMP has. To conduct investigations under federal statutes, which are> particularly complex--particularly since that type of mandate is not> consistent either with the level of service, as I said earlier--our police> department is being given additional responsibilities because some> responsibilities have been taken away from the RCMP's Rivière-du-Loup> detachment: I'm thinking here of the transportation and arrest of persons> whose federal parole has been suspended. Furthermore, since the RCMPoffice> no longer receives counterfeit cases, Rivière-du-Loup's Service de la> sécurité publique has to forward them to the RCMP in Rimouski.>> I should also say that many Quebec municipalities and cities are> currently criticizing the Sûreté du Québec's low level presence in their> areas. We won't conceal that fact. Consider, for example, the MRC de> Rivière-du-Loup. There is currently only one patrol vehicle, andsometimes,> when police officers have to take leave, the area is served by the MRC de> Kamouraska. We're not greatly reassured by this, not to mention the fact> that, in the past six or seven years, the organized crime squad, which was> established in Rivière-du-Loup, has been centralized in Rimouski. That's> another nice bit of business. All these denunciations about the Sûreté du> Québec aren't at all reassuring either.>> On November 25, 2004, very recently, a news item was published in the> media concerning the SQ's intention to cut the number of its call centres> currently in the various Quebec regions from 11 to two. My impression is> that, when the cities pay, the governments say that achieving level 1places> numerous demands on the municipal police departments, but, when it's the> Sûreté du Québec or the RCMP--and that's what we're talking abouttoday--and> it's the government that's paying, then they do reassignments.>> I've examined this matter in a relatively exhaustive way with the> members of our council in recent weeks, and I'd be tempted to tell youthat> we're talking here about the RCMP working for the RCMP. I'm referring> directly to Mr. Bourduas' remarks. He told us that he had to rationalize,to> implement cuts. So they're rationalizing in the regions.>> The studies that have been conducted, including a document by ENAP,> which we will be able to submit, refer to this phenomenon. Ultimately, if> the regions are opened up, the major centres will be able to supply> themselves with narcotics more easily.>> Á (1140)>> It goes even further than that. Without being irresponsible, I'm going> to push things a bit further. My colleague referred to September 11 alittle> earlier. We have common borders with the states of Vermont, New Hampshire> and Maine. President Bush was in Canada last year. They talked aboutborder> protection. Jean Lapierre made a speech to the Fédération des chambres de> commerce du Québec in early October. I heard it; I was sitting beside him.> The most important thing for him, as Minister of Transport, is border> protection in order to protect our international trade, our trade with the> United States, which is entirely legitimate. Mr. Lapierre was verysurprised> when I subsequently went to see him and told him that we had never been> consulted on the subject. I told him that we felt his speech was entirely> responsible in the circumstances, particularly since the events ofSeptember> 11, but that we had never been consulted.>> I invite you to ask Jacques Chagnon, Quebec's Minister of PublicSafety,> whether he was consulted on the subject. I met him a month ago and I asked> him the question. You'll be surprised at his answer, if you ask him the> question. He told me he had been informed, but that he, the Minister of> Public Safety, had not been consulted.>> Are we going to leave this in the hands of a structure? I have a great> deal of esteem and respect for Mr. Bourduas. I understand he has budgets> that must be met, but this mustn't be done on the backs of the Quebec> regions. I find that very hard to accept, and I'm going to denounce this> situation at every opportunity.>> Last week, some bar owners came to see me at my office. They were> concerned about the possibility that a criminal group might establishitself> in our area by buying other bars. I'm experiencing this reality. I'm the> mayor of a city. One of my primary responsibilities, as is the case for my> colleagues, is public safety. The fact that bar owners tell us to bewareof> what's coming seriously concerns me.>> The effects on the community are numerous. Mr. Racine referred alittle> earlier to the annual report of the Canadian Criminal IntelligenceService.> That service is headed by Mr. Bourduas. Read the report and look at the> reassignment plan. You'll see inconsistencies and absurdities that speakfor> themselves.>> I won't go on ad infinitum. I'm getting to the end. Don't worry.>> Our understanding is this: the RCMP appears to be attributing the> closing of the Rivière-du-Loup detachment to the fact that budgets havebeen> cut in recent years. The Rivière-du-Loup detachment suffered significant> budget cuts. Mandates were withdrawn. With less budgetary flexibility,they> no longer have the means to conduct investigations, at a time when thereare> more narcotics than ever before in the area. You only have to watch the> news. We get information on this every day. It's then much easier tojustify> position cuts by saying that the office is less effective.>> I'm going to tell you what we've experienced back home. We've found it> gut-wrenching. We learned through the media that, as a result of the> meetings and discussions we had in Quebec City, the RCMP offices ofcertain> regions might close sooner. We met in the first few days of October andmade> submissions. On October 22, they came to town, to Rivière-du-Loup, and did> an equipment inventory. I invite you to check that. What's worse, therewas> a case of flagrant contempt. On November 1, an airplane landed in> Rivière-du-Loup with six persons on board, seven including the pilot. They> had come to close the office in Rivière-du-Loup. They found themselves ina> tough spot because they learned that some investigations were still under> way. As though there were no such thing as a telephone.>> We mayors have to experience these kinds of situations. This meansthat> our police department will have to be even more vigilant at a time whenthe> Sûreté du Québec-it has to be admitted-is less and less present. And now> there's the RCMP case in addition to that.>> That's the conclusion I've come to. It's as though municipalauthorities> told our snow remover: "There are three neighbourhoods in the city of> Rivière-du-Loup: Saint-François, Saint-Patrice and Saint-Ludger. From now> on, for economy's sake, don't plow Saint-Ludger. When a storm comes, we'll> call you and you can go to Saint-Ludger. The rest of the time, forgetabout> it. We have to rationalize." That's what the RCMP is doing. It says it's> redeploying its personnel to the major centres and going to the smalltowns> only if they report specific things. I don't accept that at all.>> Thank you for listening to us because it's important. Correct me ifI'm> wrong, but there are 18,344 citizens in the City of Rivière-du-Loup. I> didn't count them to see if they were all there this morning, but we have> their support, and those people are concerned.>> Á (1145)>>> The Chair: Thank you. I must warn you that we have to stop at 1:00p.m.> If we want to have time for discussions with the members, you'll have tobe> more brief.>> Mayor Racine, over to you.>>> Mr. Guy Racine: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Now that Mr. D'Amour is gone,> the worst is over. I find it hard to control him, but I'm not his reeve,> just his colleague. As I say, the worst is over and the best is yet tocome.> I'll be in trouble for that, Mr. Chairman.>> Without any further delay, I'm going to hand over to the mayor of the> City of Coaticook, Mr. Langevin.>> Mr. Langevin.>>> Mr. André Langevin (Mayor, City of Coaticook): Thank you, Mr. Racine.>> Mr. Chairman, committee members, thank you for welcoming us. I'll be> brief, out of respect for my colleagues who have a few words to say.>> RCMP management says it has to regroup its personnel in order toaddress> priorities such as organized crime, terrorism, Aboriginal people and> international services. In their view, the small towns and rural regions,> even border regions, no longer require their continuing presence.>> I have in my hand articles from La Tribune, a newspaper in Sherbrooke,> in the Eastern Townships, which appeared yesterday and today. You have> copies of them. I'm only going to read you this:>> Tower sabotaged by terrorists? Explosives planted on a Hydro power line in> Coaticook.>>> This happened less than two kilometers from the U.S. border. You can> imagine, Mr. Chairman and committee members, that our neighbours, our> American friends are very concerned about a situation like this.>> Reference was made to cannabis. Coaticook is a highly agricultural> region, and our farmers are frightened by being harassed by peopleinvolved> in marijuana and cannabis. The Coaticook region runs along the U.S. border> for nearly 35 kilometers. The RCMP has been in Coaticook since the 1930s,> since 1933, more precisely. We've always acknowledged the importance of a> detachment and officers in Coaticook, because it's important that the area> be covered by the RCMP.>> This question should be put to RCMP management: what's being doneabout> prevention? We're always told that's important. How can you engage in> prevention from 50 or 100 kilometers away when you can see today that the> border posts are deserted? How can anyone consider that a police presenceis> less important in the rural and border areas? It's strange. The mayors and> representatives of those cities and regions weren't consulted, much less> listened to.>> From what we know, gentlemen, you weren't consulted that much eitherin> that negotiation. We're asking ourselves a serious question: who decidesin> this country, senior civil servants or elected representatives? Werepresent> cities, regions, but you were elected to be part of the Government of> Canada. How is it that these kinds of decisions are made and senior public> servants consult no one? We trust you to defend the interests of our> regions. In an election campaign, you tell us you won't forget ourregions.> And yet, every year, sometimes every month, decisions are made to cut> services in our small towns and regions. We want you to defend our pointof> view. That's very important for the survival of the regions and smalltowns> in Canada.>> Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman and members.>> Á (1150)>>> Mr. Guy Racine: Thank you very much, Mr. Langevin.>> Mr. Chairman, I'm now going to hand over to Mr. Veilleux, the> representative of the City of Roberval.>>> Mr. Gilles Veilleux (Representative, City of Roberval): Thank you, Mr.> Chairman. Members, thank you for receiving us.>> I'll start by telling you that, in Roberval, we mainly pay attentionto> the Aboriginal aspect. The City of Roberval had been served by the RCMP> detachment since 1944. I worked with them myself because I had a 30-year> career at the Sûreté du Québec. It's sad for a police officer to see anarea> abandoned by a large police force like the RCMP, which has enormous> investigation and work resources. We talk about all kinds of things, drugs> and other things as well.>> Very recently, in our little municipality, there were two majorseizures> of drugs under hydroponic cultivation worth several millions of dollars.As> my colleagues mentioned, drugs have now entered the elementary schools and> are in contact with minors. We were told we were going to be given> resources.>> I'm going to quote a sentence from Mr. Bourduas, with all due respect:>> Over the next year, Division C will continue to address the RCMP'sstrategic> priorities and to be involved in the community by supporting community> programs for youths and Aboriginal people in order to maintain a highlevel> of service to Quebec citizens.>>> How can you say such a thing when nine territories in Quebec have been> left without surveillance, including ours, where there are four Aboriginal> reserves, which are federal territories: Obedjiwan, 350 kilometers fromthe> Chicoutimi detachment, and Waswanipi, more than 400 kilometers from> Chicoutimi? These areas have been left in isolation.>> It has been left up to the Sûreté du Québec, which, as one of my> colleagues said, has been completely overwhelmed since the municipalpolice> forces were integrated, to cover the Obedjiwan reserve. A detachment of 10> to 15 officers goes there every two weeks, paid by the federal government,> and we're told they lack resources. The federal government pays the Sûreté> du Québec, which is already overwhelmed, so that it can provide police> coverage in the area. This is abandonment. These are extreme costs.>> Mr. D'Amour mentioned organized crime. When you've been on a police> force as I have, you go to bars and you observe. Organized crime waslargely> dismantled through the spring 2001 operation, with mixed regional squads,> squads like Carcajou. They dismantled organized crime on a large scale.But> they're not stupid: you uproot a weed, and thousands of weeds grow back.>> You can see in the bars that they're reorganizing very well. As Mr.> D'Amour said, they're buying hotels. They're buying hotels back home as> well. We increasingly see them organizing in bars. They used to hold> meetings in secret; now they feel a little safer. The Sûreté du Québec is> overwhelmed. There's no more municipal police force, and the RCMP has left> the area. As my colleague said, I think they're taking over the place.>> We're asking you and begging you not to accept this state of affairs.We> need high-quality services, like an RCMP force. We absolutely need them.Let> us keep them; I beg you, let us keep them. Thank you.>> Á (1155)>>> Mr. Guy Racine: Thank you very much for your presentation.>> Mr. Chairman, I wasn't lying when I told you the best was yet to come.> We've had a demonstration of that.>> Without any further delay, I'll hand over to mayor Claude Vigneault,> from the Magdalen Islands.>> Mr. Mayor.>>> Mr. Claude Vigneault (Mayor, Municipality of Îles-de-la-Madeleine):> Thank you, Mr. Racine.>> Mr. Chairman, thank you very much for allowing us these few minutes to> tell you about a major concern, that of all the municipalities affected by> the closing of the various RCMP detachments.>> In the Magdalen Islands, we have a population of 13,000 inhabitants,> Canadians who are currently very concerned about this decision. Inaddition,> every year, we have considerable tourist activity, which brings in traffic> of 58,000 to 60,000 visitors.>> The Magdalen Islands are located some 230 kilometers off the Gaspé> coast, approximately 80 kilometers from Prince Edward Island and Nova> Scotia. As you can see, it's a hub, located in the middle of the Gulf ofSt.> Lawrence, where it's possible to engage in illegal trafficking.>> As the mayor of the municipality, I'd say that such a rapid anddramatic> elimination of the personnel that ensures citizens' safety means that weare> not here today with a light heart. People tell us that Ottawa will have to> listen to all the alarm calls that will be made in the coming days. Youneed> only look at the local newspapers: for more than a month now, people have> asked the federal government to be more watchful, to be more attentive to> our regions.>> For a very long time now, we have been looking for solutions in an> attempt to resolve matters at all levels. The Magdalen Islands environment> is highly fragile, in social terms in particular, but also in terms of> erosion. Mr. Chairman, you have power in a matter such as this. We hope> that, after listening to the comments of our representative, Mr. Racine,you> will understand in the coming weeks that this is an alarm call.>> Why are our regions so hard hit? Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island> are absolutely unaffected by any personnel cuts. So we're very concerned.I> hope that all the delegations accompanying us, ladies and gentlemen, will> show solidarity in reacting very quickly starting tomorrow. Thank you, Mr.> Chairman.>>> The Chair: Thank you.>>> Mr. Guy Racine: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I'll now hand over to the> representative of the City of Baie-Comeau, Jean Thériault.>>> Mr. Jean Thériault (Representative, City of Baie-Comeau): Goodmorning,> Mr. Chairman. Thank you for hearing us.>> In Baie-Comeau, we feel that the detachment closing will have major> impact. The port is the busiest in Quebec and receives cargo from aroundthe> world. The recent past has shown that investigators had to get lucky to> intercept an illegal cargo. You need only think of the 45-gallon barrels> found at Rivière-à-Tonnerre. Now with a single detachment in Sept-Îles,> we're convinced that it will take miracles. I think this is an opening,> almost a gift, that we're giving traffickers all along the St. Lawrence> River.>> Thank you, Mr. Chairman.>> Â (1200)>>> Mr. Guy Racine: Thank you very much, Mr. Thériault. I'll now hand over> to the representative of the City of Saint-Hyacinthe, Jean-ClaudePatenaude.>>> Mr. Jean-Claude Patenaude (Representative, City of Saint-Hyacinthe):Mr.> Chairman, ladies and gentlemen, following Mr. Racine's preamble on the> status of the situation in Saint-Hyacinthe, I would like to provide youwith> some additional information.>> First of all, on September 23, 2004, the Royal Canadian MountedPolice,> through its commander in Quebec, announced a broad restructuring plan,> including, among other things, the closing of nine regional RCMP officesin> Quebec. The Saint-Hyacinthe office was one of them. This is not a new> phenomenon: approximately five years ago, Mr. Loubier was faced with a> similar case, when there was talk of cutting personnel, indeed of even> closing the office.>> First of all, we would like to tell you that we were very surprised to> learn that the RCMP was preparing to close the Saint-Hyacinthe detachment.> Five years ago, when we were faced with the same situation, we managed to> convince those responsible that closing regional offices in Quebec was nota> good idea and especially that it was not in the interests of the> Saint-Hyacinthe region.>> So we want to tell you that we profoundly disagree with this decision.> It has nothing to do with the objectives of efficiency stated by Deputy> Commissioner Bourduas in a news release announcing the restructuring.>> Need I recall that Montérégie, and the large region of Saint-Hyacinthe> and Acton Vale in particular, have been coping with a terrible curse for a> number of years now: squatting on agricultural land by organized crime in> order to cultivate large quantities of cannabis? In addition, thesecriminal> groups have national and international branches.>> The situation has vastly improved in recent years. We believe that the> presence of an RCMP office in our area has greatly contributed to that> improvement. However, the effort should especially not be abandoned.Closing> the office would definitely send a very wrong message.>> We feel that our fellow citizens are safer as a result of the presence> of RCMP officers in our area. Closing the RCMP detachments would send a> clear message to the various criminal groups in Quebec that they can now> operate more freely in the areas abandoned by the RCMP. The mere presenceof> an RCMP office is a deterrent in the fight against organized crime and an> essential and complementary tool to the work done by the Sûreté du Québec.>> Every year, the Saint-Hyacinthe detachment handles at least 300 cases,> most of which concern drug traffickers. So we repeat that we profoundly> disagree with the decision to close the Saint-Hyacinthe RCMP detachment.> Madam Minister, we ask you please to intervene to set with unwarranted> decision aside.>> After that preamble, I should tell you that I too am a former police> officer, with 33 years' experience, including 11 in criminalinvestigations.> I had the privilege of working with officers from the Sûreté du Québec and> the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Our relations were very good. We> conducted two major operations in the Saint-Hyacinthe region every year,and> the crime rate fell sharply following those operations, and we haveevidence> to support that statement. Is it necessary for us to keep our RCMPofficers?> Yes, they must be kept. The appropriate and necessary efforts must be made> to ensure better protection.>>> Mr. Guy Racine: Thank you very much, Mr. Patenaude.>> Mr. Chairman, I've kept the dessert for the end. I now hand over tothe> mayor of the City of Lac-Mégantic, Colette Roy Laroche.>>> Ms. Colette Roy Laroche (Mayor, City Lac-Mégantic): Thank you, Mr.> Racine.>> Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen, almost everything has already been> said. So I'll try to be brief.>> I represent a city whose population, of approximately 22,000> inhabitants, lives in an immense rural area. What characterizes our region> is of course its low population density, but it's also a vast forestedarea.> As Mr. Racine mentioned, the Canada-U.S. border extends 171 kilometers> through our area. In addition, as we've already mentioned to you, the> detachments that are nearest to us and where there are control measuresare> more than 100 kilometers away.>> Last year, the municipal council and I made submissions to our federal> MP, Mr. Binet. We obtained his support and that of David Price indefending> our case. A year ago, we were reassured about the closing of the> Lac-Mégantic detachment, among others. The City of Lac-Mégantic forwardeda> resolution to the Solicitor General on September 11, 2003. However, inJuly> of this year, the Deputy Prime Minister informed us that the RCMP had> undertaken an analysis of its resources in Quebec, but that no decisionhad> been made about the allocation of those resources. You have that letter;> it's in our file.>> We have a lot of questions and we're very concerned about thefollowing> facts. In July of this year, there was only one officer left at the> Lac-Mégantic RCMP detachment. A few days later, on August 30, thedetachment> was closed for good. Today there's only one officer left.>> Going along with what's already been said, I'm asking you, on behalfof> the citizens of the region of Granit and the City of Lac-Mégantic, for the> reasons already given, to review this decision. We must maintain the> services of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in our regions, particularly> in the sparsely populated, isolated rural areas.>> Thank you.>> Â (1205)>>> The Chair: Mr. Racine.>>> Mr. Guy Racine: Thank you very much, Madam Mayor.>> Mr. Chairman, we've now covered all the municipalities concerned,except> for my own. So, as mayor of the City of Granby and reeve of the MRC, I'll> take the liberty of adding a few words on the situation of Granby. Wecover> two ridings, Shefford and Brome-Missisquoi, which are represented> respectively by Mr. Vincent and Mr. Paradis.>> I would mention that there are border posts in these two ridings. I> don't want to go back to the importance of ensuring the supervision ofthose> posts: that was done earlier. However, I want to talk to you about the> presence of the RCMP detachment in downtown Granby, which covers both> ridings.>> We get the impression that we're somehow the victims of our own> excellence. At the RCMP, they told us that the forces would be redeployedto> be sent to Drummondville and Saint-Jean. I have absolutely nothing against> those cities. When I say that we're the victims of our own excellence, I'm> alluding to the fact that Granby has distinguished itself in Quebec by> eliminating its debt and, consequently, by achieving one of the lowest tax> rates. In the minds of RCMP officials, Granby can definitely afford to> increase the budgets of its municipal police force since it has preserved> its police department, in an attempt to offset the RCMP's staff shortages> and withdrawal of services. Perhaps it's for that reason that the decision> was made to make the transfer to Drummondville and Saint-Jean.>> Mr. Chairman, I want to say that this kind of magical thinking isfalse.> I'm talking to you about money because, when we nine mayors met Mr.Bourduas> in Quebec City, he drew a comparison that somewhat stunned us. I'm happy I> already have almost no hair because I would probably have lost a lot then.> Regarding the presence of police officers in the small municipalities, he> told us that their salary, which is $63,000, was a bit high for de luxe> gardeners. He was alluding there to the cultivation of marijuana.>> If I told my municipal police officers, who earn approximately $50,000a> year, to let citizens file joint reports and to respond only to given> situations, I'm not sure I'd be kept at city hall for very long.> Accountability goes together with the fact that our face is posted on> telephone poles every four years. All of Quebec will go through that> experience in 2005. When you hear comments like that, you realize that> accountability doesn't carry much weight. Mr. Bourduas gave us a perfect> demonstration of that. He came to us with a well substantiated file on the> reasons why this kind of rationalization had to be done. He told us it> wasn't for financial reasons, but he talked about money again and again.He> told us that this service rationalization wasn't a dollar matter, but he> very much emphasized the financial aspect.>> The personnel have been reassigned, but, with all that's been saidabout> the municipalities concerned, one wonders about the place that organized> crime will occupy. It was with this in mind that all the mayors issued an> alarm call. This decision absolutely has to be reviewed. As I told you, in> Granby, the morning after the closing was announced in the media--that isto> say after the news was simply communicated to us--graffiti covered the> building and the criminals applauded. Wherever the RCMP isn't, thecriminal> world will be; you can be sure of that.>> Â (1210)>> I'll conclude by telling you that all the mayors, reeves, members of> Parliament and public who are represented here pay taxes as they do in any> other MRC, any other riding, any other city in Quebec or Canada, and are> entitled to the services of the RCMP. We don't want to think that it's a> privilege to have that. This is a presence that is unfortunately necessary> because of the criminal world. If there were no criminals, we wouldn't be> here, but we're not on the right planet. We need all our policedepartments,> and the RCMP is one of them.>> Thank you for listening to us. Now I'll hand over to you. We're readyto> answer your questions.>>> The Chair: Thank you very much to all the presenters. It's really> something to hear the concerns of your regions as a whole.>> I'm going to give the floor to the members. I would inform you thatI'll> be very strict about speaking times in order to give time to the largest> possible number of speakers.>> Mr. Toews, for seven minutes.>> [English]>>> Mr. Vic Toews (Provencher, CPC): Thank you very much.>> I want to thank all of the municipal officials who came here today and> provided us with this very important information, which will serve as the> basis for questioning the commissioner. I also want to thank my colleaguein> the Bloc, Richard Marceau, who brought this motion forward.>> The irony isn't lost on me that a separatist would bring forward a> motion to keep a federal police force in Quebec, but that's quite another> issue. I happen to agree with the thrust of the motion. One would thinkthat> rather than wasting millions of dollars on flags in Quebec to increase the> federal presence, one of the things our Liberal government could have done> was keep the RCMP there to maintain the federal presence. That would not> only maintain the federal presence, but of course be an effective law> enforcement mechanism.>> In response to your question, Mayor Racine, that this all for show,and> can you influence the decision, I want to assure you we in theConservative> Party are very concerned about this particular issue, and I'll tell youwhy.>> Your story is all too familiar. In the western provinces the RCMPserve> as our provincial police force. Back in 1998, the province where I come> from, Manitoba, went through a very similar process with the closing of> detachments. What we were told at the time--and I was in the provincial> government then--was that this would better fulfill the RCMP's mandate and> get more RCMP officers into the street.>> In fact, what did we see? First of all, we saw the local RCMP> detachments close--exactly what has happened--then centralization, andthen> a cut in the RCMP officers in the centralized detachments. So that'scoming> already if you don't stand up and speak clearly in the way you have been> doing.>> As for what we see in a place like Manitoba, we have 65 policeofficers> dedicated to the highway patrol, and 35 of those officers are now being> moved out of highway patrol, leaving 30 officers for all of the provinceof> Manitoba to basically do all of our rural area. Manitoba isn't as large as> Quebec, but it is a large province geographically. This has a huge impacton> accident scenes, regular patrols, and patrol of the border.>> We want to assure you that this problem is not simply a regionalproblem> in Quebec; it's something we've been experiencing in western Canada.That's> why I was so pleased that Mr. Marceau brought this motion forward. It's> exactly the same problem as happened in Manitoba.>> One of the large problems is that we have an RCMP commissioner who isin> effect a deputy minister in the government. How can a man serve twomasters> like this? He is serving the interests of his minister, yet trying to> represent the interests of the RCMP. You can't do it. There needs to be a> fundamental shift in the way the RCMP is joined together with the federal> government. We're not serving the interests of law enforcement; we're> serving the interests of a particular political party that is ingovernment> right now. That needs to be changed.>> Rather than taking up any more of your time--I don't know if there'sany> response to that--I simply want to assure you that we are with you, we> understand your problem, and we will work for your issue, together withthe> Bloc and the other MPs who want to join in with this particular motion. We> think the motion is timely, and we thank you very much for your> representation.>> Â (1215)>> [Translation]>>> Mr. Guy Racine: Thank you very much.>>> The Chair: Thank you, Mr. Toews.>> Mr. Racine, would you like to make a comment?>>> Mr. Guy Racine: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.>> Thank you very much, sir, for your good words. As for responding toyour> remarks, I'd like instead to hand over to my colleague, Mr. D'Amour, whois> the mayor of Rivière-du-Loup.>>> Mr. Jean D'Amour: I'll only say a few words further to what you said> about your province, about how this whole process has played out in the> west. As for Ontario, Mr. Bourduas often talks about a similar exercise he> conducted in that province. Earlier I spoke to you briefly about a letter> from Robert Bernier, who is a professor at ENAP. In that letter, he wrote:>> Furthermore, a similar operation was conducted in Ontario in 1995, and the> results have been mixed, because they open the door to greater circulation> of criminal activity, more particularly in the Timmins region.>>> You can see that a similar kind of situation appears to be getting> established in Quebec. You also refer to the western provinces. We seethat> this operation didn't achieve the desired results in Ontario either. Ifyou> wish, I'll submit a copy of this document. Do you already have it? All> right. I'm told it's already been submitted.>> Â (1220)>>> The Chair: All right, thank you.>> Mr. Ménard will take the floor for the Bloc québécois?>> You have seven minutes.>>> Mr. Serge Ménard (Marc-Aurèle-Fortin, BQ): Thank you. First I want to> thank the mayors for coming here today. As you may have noticed, the> Conservative member admitted that it was Mr. Marceau who introduced the> resolution to invite you to appear. We agree with and understand your> position. We also know that we have good friends on the other side whothink> exactly the same way on this subject, even though we don't belong to the> same political party.>> We are aware of the specific problems associated with police> surveillance in the largest state of North America. If we think of a map,we> see that the largest state in North America is Quebec. It's also the one> with the longest borders. To come back to my Conservative friend, I'll say> that, as long as we are part of Confederation, we'll continue to pay taxes> associated with that surveillance. We are aware of its deficiencies.>> We have before us a plan of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in which> it is claimed that better supervision will be provided by moving police> officers away from the borders. I would point out that these people madethe> same mistake with regard to the supervision of ports. They removed police> officers in 1997, but were forced to return them to the ports later. If my> memory serves me, that operation cost approximately $123 million. Their> attitude is still the same: today, investigations make it necessary to> target large criminal organizations, and, to that end, to concentratepolice> officers. I'll explain later what that means in practice. According towhat> they say, they consulted the provinces, which will continue the services.In> view of the checks you make, you know perfectly well that's false. Quebecis> financially unable to replace the police officers who are being removedfrom> the field.>> The federal government constantly tends to seek a mission, regardlessof> the area of jurisdiction it relates to, to carry it out and thus to createa> need among the public. Once people are used to that need, it withdraws. It> then asks the provinces or municipal authorities to bear the sameexpenses,> without financial compensation.>> In fact, the RCMP is once again trying to play its role as the> aristocrat of police forces. These people want to conduct major> investigations, those that last a long time and produce spectacularresults.> They prefer to work from nine to five in the safety of theirwell-organized> offices rather than go dirty their hands in the field by patrolling,> familiarizing themselves with locales, attempting to determine where> smugglers go and getting to know people. As a result of this action, the> police officers removed from certain cities are taken far away from the> borders. This is what's quite different from the American trend toward> reinforcing surveillance and increasing strength in the field.>> At the borders, the number of patrollers in the field was already> insufficient to cover this immense area--practically the biggest in North> America--that is our border areas. To meet the present challenges, we need> more police officers at the borders, not fewer.>> It's marvellous to see you here today. It shows that all Quebecelected> representatives, regardless of their level or political party, are aware> that this decision is a mistake and that it must not be allowed.>> Â (1225)>> The question is whether, in a democratic state, the opinion of all> elected representatives is of any importance. Who will decide to monitorour> borders adequately? Will it be a federal public servant, or police> headquarters if we're in a police state?>> I don't know whether you have anything to suggest or add, Mr. Racine,> but I invite you to do so since the others feel that you're theirspokesman.> I'm convinced that we all view the problem the same way.>>> The Chair: There are two minutes left.>>> Mr. Serge Ménard: I believe Mr. Vincent has something to say,> particularly since he's your member.>>> Mr. Robert Vincent (Shefford, BQ): I'm going to add this. I think the> Bloc québécois has been monitoring the issue from the outset, and I'm sure> we'll see it through to the end. I believe the Bloc members from theregions> concerned are all here today. I also note that the Liberal, Conservativeand> NDP members are here as well. This is a very serious issue. Mr. Loubier> fought this fight on closings seven years ago with the member for Shefford> at the time. Mr. Loubier received death threats for denouncing the> situation.>> We're dealing with the same type of closing today, but I think we're> prepared. I think we have the leadership of the mayors and everyone. Of> course we'll wait for the Commissioner's version on Thursday. At thatpoint,> we'll be better informed and can make the best possible decision.>> I'll now hand over to Mr. Racine.>>> The Chair: Thank you, Mr. Vincent.>> Mayor Racine, you have one minute.>>> Mr. Guy Racine: Thank you, Mr. Vincent and Mr. Ménard. I don't want to> go on too long. Mr. Ménard, you thanked us for being here. So I first want> to thank the mayors and councillors who have travelled here. December is> budget month in our municipalities. Most of us have to sit on municipal> council Monday evening to present our budgets. We weren't given any> dispensation to come and meet with you. Most of us got to our hotel rooms> around two o'clock this morning. That's why we're so bright-eyed and> talkative. It's also why the witty remarks are coming fast.>> That said, we can't put a price on the defence of these interests. As> you emphasized, we have put Mayor Langevin's good words and vastexperience> to good use. We are all clearly headed in the same direction. I'm pleasedto> hear the people from the Bloc québécois and the Conservative Party saythat> party differences don't matter on this issue. There are only elected> representatives who are all on the same footing. We all have the same> objective, the welfare of our fellow citizens. That and their safety are> what are at stake today.>> [English]>>> The Chair: Merci, Maire Racine.>> Next is the New Democratic Party, Mr. Christopherson.>>> Mr. David Christopherson (Hamilton Centre, NDP): Thank you, Chair.>> Thank you all for your presentations.>> I was formerly a city councillor myself. I started out in municipal> politics, so I understand all of these things that we talk about at theend> of the day. I also served in the provincial legislature, so I know verywell> how things start here and flow through. We all know what flows downhill,and> it goes right on down to the municipalities, where the real world happens.> There's certainly nothing more important to elected representatives,> particularly at the municipal level, than the actual physical safety and> well-being of their citizens. So your concerns are certainlyunderstandable,> and we in the New Democratic Party share those concerns about securitybeing> an absolute priority.>> You're making your case, obviously, that this needs to be changed. I'm> sitting in for Mr. Comartin, who's our regular member here, so I may notbe> fully up to speed on the file. But I am curious about whether you had a> chance to review the RCMP budget, and if you were able to identify where> money saved was not being reinvested directly into Quebec and was going> elsewhere.>> Have you been able to identify anything, or is the argument being made> that the money is being reinvested and it's there in the budget? From a> budget perspective, have you been able to identify whether any money is> being saved by the rationalization, the closing, of any detachments and if> that money is being reinvested elsewhere outside Quebec?>> Â (1230)>>> The Chair: Thank you.>> Monsieur le maire Racine.>> [Translation]>>> Mr. Guy Racine: No. Unfortunately, we haven't seen the RCMP's budget> figures. When we met with Mr. Bourduas in Quebec City, he briefed us onthe> situation and told us the reasons for these decisions. He was very well> documented. The budget question was always avoided. We didn't ask any> questions. The mayors got together to hear Mr. Bourduas, not to react tohis> remarks. So we heard him.>> On the only occasions when he talked about money, it was to tell usthat> our $65,000 a year gardeners were a luxury for our small municipalities. I> can guarantee you--we're going to continue talking about money--that ittook> everything we had to refrain from reacting. We had decided not to react,and> that's what we did. He told us, in his presentation, that the idea was> merely to redeploy the forces, that it wasn't a matter of rationalization.> Those were the only times--I'd ask my colleagues to correct me if I'm> wrong--that we heard about money.>>> The Chair: Thank you.>>> Mr. Serge Gosselin (Municipal Counsel, City of Coaticook): Mr.Chairman,> Mr. Christopherson, for your information, there are no budgets. However, I> can tell you that, at the Coaticook detachment, immediately after theevents> of September 11, there were at least 11 members to investigate, monitorand> so on. Today there's no one. So where did those 11 persons go? Where arethe> budgets? We have no idea.>>> Mr. Guy Racine: Mr. D'Amour.>>> Mr. Jean D'Amour: I simply want to add that Mr. Bourduas also spoke to> us about an additional amount of $700 million, which he had received after> September 11 in order to be able to properly serve the borders. I would> simply recall that New Hampshire, Vermont and Maine are the three states> with which we're going to have serious problems at the borders.>> Since we're talking about money, I would like to recall that six> individuals, plus the pilot, came to town to close an office, whichmoreover> was not closed because investigations were under way. How much did allthat> cost? This is the kind of example we deal with, in our cities, when> rationalizations are conducted.>> [English]>>> The Chair: Mr. Christopherson, you still have three minutes left.>>> Mr. David Christopherson: Thank you, Mr. Chair.>> Thank you for your answers. That's very helpful.>> I also noted that the Solicitor General in Quebec--or is it theMinister> of Public Safety, anyway, the Solicitor General--had no idea. They were> informed but not consulted. And I wondered if you have any awareness.... I> don't know if Mr. Ménard can be of help here, being a former Solicitor> General in Quebec, but I would find it very surprising, as a former> Solicitor General of Ontario, which I am, to find there was any kind of> review of RCMP services where you wouldn't be working in tandem with the> provincial police.>> There aren't many provinces that have their own provincial police. We> have Quebec and Ontario, and I'm not sure who the others are, but thoseare> the two. I know the feds wouldn't dare do that in Ontario, and I wanted to> make sure I understood correctly that your minister in Quebec has said> that--I'm assuming it's a he--he or she was advised but not consulted. I> wondered if you've had discussion with the minister.>> Is this unusual in Quebec? I find it really hard to believe, because> it's pretty well integrated at that level. By the time you have municipal> police services, provincial, RCMP, if you're going to be effective because> you have three different jurisdictions, you need to have a coordinatedplan.> You have to have good dialogue going on among them and you have to makesure> your deployment efforts are complementing one another in your regions, so> that inadvertently each person doesn't back off and suddenly there'snothing> there.>> So could you expand on that a little bit? I found it really surprising> and potentially troubling.>> Â (1235)>> [Translation]>>> Mr. Guy Racine: I see the word "information" has stuck in your mind.The> information we received from the minister is that he had... How was itsaid,> Mr. D'Amour? How can we summarize his sentence? I don't want to attribute> words to him that he didn't say.>>> Mr. Jean D'Amour: He said he had been informed, not consulted.> Ultimately, it's a bit like us. I'll refer to a meeting that Mr. Crête> organized in January, if I'm not mistaken, in Rivière-du-Loup with Mr.> Bourduas. Mr. Bourduas gave us his vision of matters, but he was supposedto> come back and see us before making any decisions or clearerrecommendations> regarding the deployment. But I learned how things turned out through the> media.>> When we talk about cooperation between the RCMP and the Sûreté duQuébec> and, I would add, our municipal police departments, the three forces haveto> work together. I'm not saying they don't or that they won't. We all havethe> same interest, but that's how we learned it.>> If I put myself in the position of the Minister of Public Security in> Quebec City, it's not pleasant or interesting. I'm not sure that it's> ultimately more effective because the SQ was not consulted. There may be> some things that it would be better for everyone to know at the same time.> The same is true for the municipal police departments. It's not because> we're in cities that we're less effective, that we have a lesser interestin> public safety.>>> The Chair: To conclude, we'll hear from Mayor Racine.>>> Mr. Guy Racine: I'd prefer to hand over to Mr. D'Amour because it washe> who spoke with the minister. I got a phone call late in the afternoon> informing me that this was going to appear in the newspaper the next day.I> was quite dismayed: it was inconceivable to act that way. I called my> member, Mr. Vincent, who had just been elected. I was the one who gave him> the news. I was insulted that Mr. Vincent, the member of Parliament, wasnot> aware. I thought he wasn't taking an interest in his files, but in fact he> hadn't been informed.>> I'd like to clarify something. I reacted quickly at the time and that> made the headlines, which is another story. Look, it's inconceivable! Noone> was informed: the sitting member, the mayors, my municipal securitydirector> or the reeve. I checked with the member, and he hadn't been informedbecause> I gave him the news. The words "information" and "communication" may notbe> part of Mr. Bourduas' standard vocabulary.>>> The Chair: Thank you, Mayor Racine.>> I'll move on to another member from the region, Mr. Paradis. I knowhe's> monitoring the situation closely. It was Mr. Paradis who wrote thecommittee> at the very start so that this meeting could take place.>> Mr. Paradis, the floor is yours.>>> Hon. Denis Paradis (Brome-Missisquoi, Lib.): Thank you, Mr. Chairman.As> everyone knows, this is not a recent issue. Some raised this question four> or five years ago. There was some question that these detachments would be> closed at that time. In fact, this didn't all start before the last> election; it started earlier than that. The RCMP made a kind of commitment> that it would not move without consulting us. I note the ceaseless work of> my former colleagues in this matter, Diane St-Jacques, David Price and> Gérard Binet. I also congratulate my new colleagues for continuing thework.>> I agree with Serge Ménard. This issue affects everyone. It isn'trelated> to one political party or another; it affects our general population. I> thank the mayors for their presentation and for coming here to meet withus> today to sound the alarm. The mayors, as we know, operate at the political> level, which may be the closest to the people in our regions. That's> important. You take the public's pulse every day. Thank you for passing on> this information to us.>> I'm the member for Brome--Missisquoi, Mr. Chairman. There are 10border> posts in my riding. The Granby detachment deals with those border postsmore> particularly.>> Perhaps two years ago, I received an invitation to appear before a> committee of the U.S. Congress. It was a committee on justice and drugsthat> were circulating and were found near the border on U.S. soil. I attendedand> met people from Congress. To make a long story short, at the end of my> testimony or the end of the discussion with the committee members, the> committee chair asked me:>> Â (1240)>> [English]>> "What about your Quebec gold?">> [Translation]>> That shows that these people want the borders to be tight, monitoredand> so on.>> [English]>> "What about your Quebec gold?">> [Translation]>> That comment has stuck in my mind. They really think we producecannabis> on a large scale and send it to them from the other side of the border.This> kind of thing is definitely not conducive to better relations at theborder,> in this case between Vermont and Quebec.>> There are 10 border posts in our riding, but there are even more roads> to Vermont. In three or four cases, there's no surveillance. From what one> customs officer told me, sometimes a guy will get out of a car fromVermont,> run back across the border and be picked up by someone else in another car> on the other side. With the short staff we have, things simply aren't> working, so if we reduce it even further, do you think they'll be any> better? This makes no sense.>> I'm going to talk about the schools. I've heard the testimony of a> number of teachers, from Cowansville and Farnham, among other places. The> mayor of Rivière-du-Loup previously mentioned that there's now cannabis in> the elementary schools. That really makes no sense. We're not going tofight> over which region is the hardest hit. The mayor of Coaticook said earlier> that there were a lot in his region. The same is true of Saint-Hyacinthe.I> have to tell you that we haven't been spared in Brome-Missisquoi either.> There's violence in the schools, with everything that entails. It's> important to preserve a police presence in our regions. Of course it has a> deterrent effect. When we don't see any police officers, virtually> everything seems to go. You need only think of certain individuals whofeel> they can exceed the speed limit when they don't see any police officers on> the road. It's important to see police officers and that they be in the> regions, if only to read our regional newspapers.>> The other day, in one of the small papers in my riding, they said that> properties around a large lake in my riding had been sold for two or three> times their appraised value. A real estate agent told me that they hadalso> been paid for in cash. There are cases where you have to be in the fieldand> see the people in the community to learn certain things. Police officers> have to see with their own eyes that so and so, who's on welfare, has anew> truck every year and has a snowmobile for each of his four children. If> they're not in the field, they can't see that some things are wrong. Their> presence can also reassure seniors who see these things, as well asfarmers.> Some of them receive $2,000 in their mailbox at the side of the road. They> wonder why, but gradually they accumulate amounts of $2,000.>> I remember a meeting that Diane St-Jacques organized in Granby a few> years ago. The RCMP, the Granby police department and the Sûreté du Québec> were there. People told us about the chemistry that has to exist between> police forces. If police officers don't work together and personnel are> reassigned from Drummondville or Montreal, no chemistry is possible. It's> created through the habit that police departments acquire of working> together. It's an important phenomenon.>> Mr. Chairman, I'll close by talking about costs. I find some thingshard> to understand. If three investigators are sent to my riding to work on a> case over two weeks, they have to stay at a hotel and bill their meals.I'm> not sure this kind of thing has been considered. Someone said that we're> talking here about the RCMP working for the RCMP. Sometimes I'd beinclined> to say that's the case. And yet we should be talking about the RCMPworking> for the public. We all agree on that point.>> Lastly, I'd like to emphasize that the Quebec Liberal Caucus is> unanimously asking that the RCMP remain in all these regions of Quebec.>> Â (1245)>>> Mr. Paul Crête (Montmagny-L'Islet-Kamouraska-Rivière-du-Loup, BQ):Only> organized crime and the RCMP don't agree with you.>>> Hon. Denis Paradis: Mr. Chairman, those were more comments than> questions. I don't know whether the mayor of Granby would like to commenton> my remarks.>>> The Chair: Mr. Racine, you have roughly 30 seconds.>>> Mr. Guy Racine: I'll begin right away because the countdown's started.>> Mr. Paradis referred to the meetings at Granby City Hall at the time> there was talk of potentially closing the RCMP detachment in Granby. The> municipal police department, the Sûreté du Québec and the RCMP were all> there. The word "chemistry" constantly came up. Real drama was going on in> Granby at the time that happened. Criminal biker gangs had invaded thearea.> It was in the headlines at the time. Municipal police officers hadreceived> death threats. A major operation was conducted by the three police forcesto> dismantle those criminal biker gangs. It may have taken a year or two of> investigating to work up to a major operation, and it succeeded.>> Adding on to what Mr. Paradis said, when you talk about pot sales inthe> schools, when you talk about street sales, dealers get their supplies froma> higher level. The higher level gets its supplies from another higherlevel.> If the RCMP isn't there, my municipal police force won't have thenecessary> expertise and won't be able to deploy the necessary personnel to attack> levels 3, 4 and 5, which are importing what's on the street. It's even> happening in the elementary schools. On this point, Mr. Paradis is correct> in saying that the welfare and safety of citizens, and even our children,> are at stake.>>> The Chair: Thank you, Mr. Mayor.>> [English]>> Mr. Breitkreuz, for three minutes.>>> Mr. Garry Breitkreuz (Yorkton-Melville, CPC): Thank you very much.>> I really appreciate your presentation. It gives us a lot of help inour> battle to have more safety for our public citizens. Your presentationreally> strikes at the heart of why we organize ourselves in a civil society, and> that is to provide for public safety. That's number one. I think you havea> lot of evidence, even in other jurisdictions such as New York City, thatif> you have the presence of police officers on the street it is a strong> deterrent to crime, and in fact even violent crime was reduced in thatcity> simply by having more police present on the street.>> I think that organized crime is really unravelling the very fabric of> our society in ways many people do not realize, and we have aresponsibility> to combat this extremely serious situation. Unfortunately, politics is> involved in many of the decisions. I think everybody around here has the> same goals, but money is not unlimited. We have to determine what our> priorities are and where we want to spend that money.>> I want to tell you of an incident that happened last week at this> committee to illustrate that we do have to make decisions, and I want your > reaction to that in case you are not familiar with this. We, as> Conservatives, introduced a motion to take $20 million from the wastefulgun> registry and the Firearms Centre and transfer that money to front-lineRCMP> policing priorities. That's what happened at this committee.Unfortunately,> the Bloc, the Liberals, and the NDP voted against our motion, and at that> point I could not understand why, because I knew that this was coming andI> felt that very strongly we needed to give you that kind of support. Itwill> come up again this Thursday, but what do you think?>> I really understand your situation. In my home town of Yorkton,> Saskatchewan, we have the same situation, but we're not as well organizedas> you are, where you come to the committee, you go right to where the> decisions are made. What do you feel about this? Do you think that youwould> have supported us in our priorities to put more money into the RCMP front> line?>> Â (1250)>> [Translation]>>> The Chair: You have 30 seconds to give your answer.>>> Mr. Guy Racine: We've come to file our complaints with the committeeand> to talk to the political authorities, but we don't want to interfere inthe> decisions of the political parties.>> I simply want to tell you, as you mentioned a little earlier, that we,> all political parties included, agree on one point: we have to seetogether> how this decision can be deferred and reviewed for the welfare and safetyof> citizens. It's of little importance to the mayors whether it's a questionof> money or of redistributing funds. For us, the important thing is that> security be guaranteed in our regions and that our fellow citizens who pay> direct and indirect taxes to the federal, provincial and municipal> governments are all treated fairly.>> We live in a free and democratic country. We're lucky to be able to> express ourselves and make our submissions. Today, the mayors' commonfront> has come to make its submissions. We leave the political aspect to theHouse> of Commons.>>> The Chair: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. You answered well.>> [English]>> Mr. Cullen, for three minutes.>> [Translation]>>> Hon. Roy Cullen (Etobicoke North, Lib.): Thank you very much, Mr.> Chairman.>> First I would like to thank you all, mayors, reeve and other> representatives, for coming here today, for travelling to Ottawa topresent> your viewpoint on the closing of the RCMP detachments in your regions of> Quebec. I understand perfectly well that it's a very important subject for> you and your fellow citizens, and that's why you're here today before the> Standing Committee on Justice, Human Rights, Public Safety and Emergency> Preparedness.>> I also want to hail my colleagues from the last Parliament, Diane> St-Jacques, David Price and Gérard Binet and to praise their commitment,> since they're still working on this issue.>> I'm a member from Ontario, but I was born in Montreal and did part ofmy> education in the Eastern Townships. So I know a little about your regionand> some of your challenges.>> I apologize for switching to English because this is a bit complex.>> [English]>> I'd like to say at the outset that this decision of the RCMP, whichthe> federal government supports, has nothing to do with resources. In fact, if> you look at the budgetary allocations to the RCMP, you'll see that since> 2000 their allocation has gone up from $2 billion a year to more than $2.8> billion. That's not to say we're not always working with the RCMP to lookat> the resources they need to fight organized crime, to fight terrorism. But> this decision parallels a decision that was made in Ontario in 1995 to> consolidate resources and have a stronger critical mass so that we could> fight terrorism and organized crime more effectively.>> Monsieur Racine, you said that the SQ is understaffed in Quebec. That> might well be; I don't know. But you're right that we have to worktogether.> You said you don't want to be second-class citizens. Well, the citizens of> the province of Ontario went through the same exercise in 1995.>> We talked about the cross-border crime. We have established integrated> border enforcement teams--in fact there are three in Quebec: eastern,which> deals with Quebec, Vermont, and Maine; Champlain, which covers Quebec, New> York, and Vermont; and Valleyfield. This is where we're getting a lot of> cooperation across borders with U.S. law enforcement, and intelligence> operations as well.>> I agree with you that we need to be very concerned about organized> crime. In fact, our government has introduced legislation that will bringin> tougher sanctions for grow-ops. We do know that organized crime isinvolved,> and we're going to take the steps necessary to make sure the RCMP has the> resources they need.>> Remember that the RCMP in the province of Quebec and in Ontario is not> the front-line police force. You have the Sûreté du Québec. The RCMP actsin> some provinces as a contract police, but in the province of Quebec it is> simply there to deal with federal matters. The delivery of law enforcement> in the province of Quebec is primarily through the Sûreté.>> I think my time is probably running short, and I want to give you a> chance to respond.>> I want to thank you.>> Â (1255)>> [Translation]>> I want to thank you for being here.>> [English]>> We hear what you're saying. We see it more as an operational decision ofthe> RCMP, which was done in parallel in Ontario some years ago, but we respect> your views and we thank you for coming here today.>> [Translation]>>> The Chair: Would you like to react briefly before I give the floor to> Mr. Ménard for the last turn?>>> Mr. Guy Racine: I understood. You're saying it's an operational> decision. All right, it's an operation. However, as Mr. Langevinemphasized> earlier, we are elected representatives. Political decisions are beingmade> in the orientations area. We elected representatives will never interferein> their application. I'll never tell my public safety director to install> radars at a particular location or to investigate or search another.> However, as elected representatives, we have a responsibility to set> orientations. That's why we oppose this decision, because we were never> consulted, we were never informed after receiving assurances that thematter> would remain open.>> You refer to the matter of jurisdictions. I won't be teaching anyone> anything by saying that, in the world of organized crime, when criminalsare> preparing to commit a crime, be it at the international, provincial orlocal> level, they don't consider what jurisdiction may catch them. They simply> consider where it's easiest to go, to enter Quebec, to infiltrateorganized> crime, to infiltrate the schools to sell their drugs, their habits. They> look at where it's easiest to pass counterfeit money or bootleg alcohol,to> buy off farmers, to put $2,000 in their mailbox and to use part of their> field to grow pot. They don't start looking at the government committee or> jurisdiction that's responsible for that. Is it the Sûreté du Québec, the> Ontario Provincial Police or the RCMP? No, it may be the parish guard> because there's no one left in our regions.>>> The Chair: Thank you, Mr. Mayor.>>> Mr. Guy Racine: Mr. Langevin wanted to add a brief word, with your> permission, Mr. Chairman.>>> The Chair: Go ahead, Mr. Langevin.>>> Mr. André Langevin: We all know that our American friends andneighbours> doubt that we really want to protect our borders. I don't think I'mmistaken> in saying that border protection is mainly the responsibility of the RCMP> and the Government of Canada.>>> The Chair: Mr. Ménard, you have the floor for the last three minutes.>>> Mr. Serge Ménard: First I'd like to add a word to what I said earlier> about the attitude of the RCMP, which wants to be the aristocrat of police> forces. I would nevertheless point out that the members of the RCMP whoare> in the field and who therefore know the field and experience people's> day-to-day problems are also opposed to the closings.>> I see a news release from them:>> The federal government's decision to close nine detachments of the RCMP> across Quebec as of November 1 will result in a general free-for-all for> organized crime and terrorism by leaving certain isolated regions without> appropriate federal police protection, say the members representing theRCMP> association in the province.>>> You see, these are people who have knowledge in the field and whodon't> share this purely elitist vision of RCMP authorities.>> Here's what we propose to do. I'll ask you whether you agree with me.So> that our meeting today is effective, I would like to move that thecommittee> report to the House on our proceedings. That means that all thesubmissions> that you've made will be forwarded to the House, properly transcribed.With> the unanimous consent of the people here, I and my Bloc québécoiscolleagues> would like to present the following motion:>> That the Committee recommend to the government that the RCMP immediately> stop reassigning personnel in Quebec in order to keep the nine detachments> in Quebec open, and that it maintain a critical mass of eight officers per> detachment.>>> I would like to know whether you are in favour of this resolution.>> Lastly, I'll remind government representatives that bordersurveillance> is clearly a federal jurisdiction. This is what's causing the greatest> concerns. The arguments the RCMP is giving you and that you are repeatingto> us are the same as those you advanced in favour of withdrawing from the> national ports and international airports. In 2001, you were forced toturn> to the airports and national ports. In the public interest, we want you to> avoid making the same mistake.>> · (1300)>>> The Chair: Mr. Ménard, the committee must hear the RCMP before makinga> decision. I believe it would be preferable to await the RCMP's replybefore> giving notice of your motion.>>> Mr. Serge Ménard: Thank you for your advice. I believe it's correct,Mr.> Chairman.>>> The Chair: Mayor Racine, you have the floor.>>> Mr. Guy Racine: To answer Mr. Ménard's question, we agree on his> resolution because of the comments you've just made, Mr. Chairman. Of> course, we can't be opposed to virtue because that's the objective we'veset> for ourselves in appearing here.>> I would like to add one thing to what Mr. Ménard said when he talked> about RCMP officers working in the field. He then referred to the news> release. Since that operation in September--my colleagues can probablytell> you the same thing--I've received calls from RCMP members working in the> field. They've told me not to give up and that this simply makes no sense.> Of course, I won't give any names; these people who supported us in our> efforts are in active positions.>>> The Chair: I would like to thank all the mayors and representatives of> the municipalities for coming here today. As agreed, we will hear the> representatives of the RCMP on Thursday morning and will take our measures> after that. Thank you very much and I wish you a speedy return to your> region, before two in the morning, I hope.>>> Mr. Guy Racine: Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.>>> The Chair: The meeting is adjourned.>>>>> >From: "David Raymond Amos" > >To: , ,> >"dean Ray" , ,> >, <4humanitysake@comcast.net>,> ><911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com>, ,> >, , ,> >, ,> >, ,> >, ,> >, ,> >, ,> >, ,> > > >CC: , ,> >, ,> >,> >, ,> >, , ,> >, ,> >, ,> >, ,> >,> >, > >Subject: I just called you again Mr Bourduas> >Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:00:17 -0400> >> > Why did you not call me back? My number is 506 434 1379. Yoursnotty> >assistant playing dumb and the malicious laughter of the lair who speaks> >for your pal Mr Sweeney out west do not surprise me anymore. What wouldbe> >truly nice to see is a little integrity coming my way ASAP byway of the> >RCMP. N'est Pas? The obvious question is do you support what this very> >confused dude Dean Roger Ray says of my character?> > Veritas Vincit> > David Raymond Amos> >> >----- Original Message -----> >From: "David Raymond Amos" > >To: ; > >Cc: ; ;;> >; ; ;> >; ;> >; ;> >; ; ;> >; ; ;> >; ;> >; ;> >; ; ;> >; > >Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 4:13 PM> >Subject: What gives with this nonsense Mr Foran? Chucky Leblance claims I> >am> >a Hells Angel therefore I am?> >> >> > > As far as I know slander is a criminal act. Ask the Newfys Paul> > > Perrier and Danny Williams about that fact before you disagree withme.> >EH?> > >> > > ----- Original Message -----> > > From: "dean Ray" > > > To: ; ;> > > > > > Cc: <4humanitysake@comcast.net>; <911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com>;> > > ; ; ;> > > ; ;> >;> > > ; ;> > > ; ;> > > ; ;> > > ; ;> >;> > > ;> >> > > Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 5:16 AM> > > Subject: RCMP QUESTIOED ME TODAY about Dear Citizen letter ......> > >> > >> > > >> > > > I am sending copies of this email to my family in person not email> >If> >I> > > > die they will carry on till I recieve justice.> > > >> > > >> > > > David Amos did you hire some trucker to play bumper tag and shortenmy> >car> > > > two inches? I am guessing it is the same guy who pressured me toquit> >the> > > > Demolition Company. He had so many tattoos and earings and a shiny> >bald> > > > head. Looked like vin diesel with attitude.> > > >> > > > I went to show the RCMP my bumper thinking their would be just> >minor> > > > damages apparently there is a lot of damage that was buried by the> >snow> > > > proving I was rear ended.> > > >> > > >> > > > Everyone is wondering what my game plan is.....Especially the RCMP!> > > >> > > > I will be trying to find out wether not David Amos orderedsomeone> >to> > > run> > > > me off the road. No silly head games I will be looking throughevery> > > email> > > > scrutinizing why you would contact me when you did. I will beasking> >some> > > > serious questions:> > > >> > > > How do you keep track wether or not I am on line?> > > > Why is your friend Sam Perrier linked to Alex T hickman ....I wastold> >he> > > > has a contract with Hickman?> > > > Why did you fake all that information with Jeremy Swanson?> > > >> > > > whos this ? FBIndian@techemail.com> > > >> > > > How did you know to contact Byron Prior when he was with Jeremy> >Swanson?> > > > I am told nobody contacted you and you arrived after this guy milked> > > Byron?> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Why did you complain your email was blocked and copy and paste> > > information> > > > from my site as proof.> > > >> > > > I took the address of the complaint you posted on the email and> >guess> > > > what my site came up. It was a link to a site complaining of thesame> > > thing> > > > word for word?> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Citizen:> > > >> > > > It saddens me to inform you that the Canadian government> > > > no longer has the capacity to protect you from criminal foreign> > > > interests. Project sidewinder brings to light hard evidense ofcorrupt> > > > politicians including Steven Harper who has remained silent. Theprime> > > > minister has chosen not to inform you due to his own personal> > > > involvement. Project sidewinder involves a criminal brotherhood that> > > > has taken over the Canadian governance. Lawmakers have protectedthis> > > > allegiance with a with emergency powers act established around the> >time> > > >> > > > of the FLQ. Here is what you do not know! You were not told aboutthe> > > > barn burning incident involving RCMP. The FLQ were meetting with the> > > > black panthers to reveal a freemason fraternity inbedded in theRCMP.> > > > These freemason are linked to Albert Pike the creator of the KKK. A> > > > Royal Mcdonald inquiry shut down the RCMP ESPIONAGE unit. CSIS wasset> > > > up as a civilian authority governerned by CIRC who's board membersare> > > > made from the official opposition. There is evidense the RCMP have> > > > filtered there top beauracrats back into CSIS. "Covert Entry" by> >Andrew> > > >> > > >> > > > Matrovika is good evidense of that claim. Covert Entry is theexposure> > > > of CSIS agents opening your mail. The book reveals a corporationthat> > > > works along side Canada Post opening your mail and scanning your> > > > private letters. The shadow government was faced with a dilemma when> > > > the official opposition was controlled by two separatist factions.The> > > > Reform Party and the Bloc. The CIRC never allowed them to sit on the> > > > board. CSIS sent out an agent to deal with the situation, his name> > > > Grant Bristow. He got the job as Preston Mannings body guard. Grant> > > > Bristows other job was building up of a white supremacy party called> > > > the heritage front. Grant Bristow trained heritage front members the> > > > art of gangstalking using methods that would freighten any communist> > > > infiltrator. Imagine being harrassed by neighbours funded by the> > > > heritage front. Rcmp played both sides having their agentsinfiltrate> > > > the anti racist action group. They never needed a barn to burnbecause> > > > the two sides would never aggree to meet. If they did the RCMP could> > > > simply arrest them all. This story is just the tip of the iceberg.The> > > > freemason are a global fraternity/club/cult. Sir John A Mcdonald is> > > > believed to be Iluminati and he created the North West MountedPolice> > > > who became the RCMP. Be careful what you believe when you see aperson> > > > trying to escape the police. You could be watching me or findyourself> > > > running! The media has been told if you want proof do the researchin> > > > the government archives available on the internet then tell a> > > > newsreporter and watch them make up reasons this story can not be> >told.> > > >> > > >> > > > Then do research who owns that newspaper. I live #3 XXXX_XXXEdmonton> > > > Alberta My name is Dean Roger Ray. My neighbour downstairs has been> > > > tapping and banging even disturbing her own childs sleep to try to> > > > break me. She is offered a reward if I crack or commit a crime. If I> > > > try to get even the landlord will be called over to witness thecrime> > > > and I will be charged by the RCMP. The evidense is documented on> > > > websites all over the world. www.stopcovertwar.com The internet is> >full> > > >> > > >> > > > of cyberstalkers harrassing anyone who knows the truth. Moststalkers> > > > track back to websites funded by the carlyle group. The Carlylegroup> > > > is funded by the Canadian Pension Fund. Sadly my cousin has fallen> > > > victim to a vicious boyfriend named Collin Robinson of Ottawa. Shewas> > > > beat up and her hair pulled out by the roots. Chelsea's boyfriend> > > > approached her and started dating. I left my computer at my Aunts> >place> > > >> > > >> > > > knowing she had alarms. Someone got to my computer and erasedcritical> > > > research and left me a nasty virus disabling Internet connection onmy> > > > laptop. I had my suspicians about Collin but it was too late. Collin> > > > went back to Ottawa and helped chelsea drum up a twenty five hundred> > > > dollar cell phone bill. Her father freaked causing her to move into> > > > Ottawa. Collin raped her and beat her and manipulated checks fromher> > > > mother. If I can prove Collin is a stalker there is a law that> >protects> > > >> > > >> > > > the police. My suspicians were raised when the RCMP told Chelsea's> > > > father that this case is out of their jurisdiction. This is the same> > > > runaround I got five years ago. Aunt Shirly was a David Bay fan and> > > > helped me research the freemason. She no longer wants to do the> > > > research and blames me for what happened to her daughter. The> > > > collateral damage has again benifitted the freemason and the RCMP.My> > > > Aunts name is Shirly Ostopowich uncles name is Dennis Ostopowich heis> > > > a executive at sobeys and it looks like they now have become victims> >of> > > >> > > >> > > > the NEW WORLD ORDER. If you are looking for the guilty just look in> >the> > > >> > > >> > > > mirror and ask yourself if you would help or look away or worse join> > > > the freemasons in hopes of a reward. Stockwell day has used his> > > > position to make gangstalking legal. Proof is all around you all you> > > > have to do is look up freemasonry in your local dire ctory. You will> > > > also find that there is freemason websites listing famous members.One> > > > famous member was John Defeinbaker who sold out the Avro Arrow.> >Another> > > >> > > >> > > > famous member is Tommy Douglas who started the NDP and created> > > > Healthcare. Famous victims of freemasonry are Howard Hughes,Nikola> > > > Tesla, Captain William Morgan. I have a website that lists more> >crimes.> > > >> > > >> > > > The freemason claim they are a harmless social club for> > > > politicians,lawyers,judges,laW enforcement ,hospital administrators.> >We> > > >> > > >> > > > have already heard that the liberals stole millions and the RCMPfail> > > > to administer justice. I am attempting to setup a citizenscoalition.> > > > All you have to do is phone the newspapers see if they will> > > > investigate. Second ask the RCMP if they have a gangstalking law.Ask> > > > them why Victims of gangstalking have to create their own websites.> >Ask> > > >> > > >> > > > them why no law enforcement has ever offered assistance. When your> >told> > > >> > > >> > > > to go away phone up all your friends share my message with them and> >ask> > > >> > > >> > > > them to read this letter and do the same. When everybody knows how> > > > close the New World Order is to their neighbourhood they might wantto> > > > stomp it out..> > > >> > > >> > > > never give up!!!never give up!!!never give up!!!never giveup!!!never> > > >> > > > HELL ANGELS FROM MONTREAL LOOKING FOR CHARLES LEBLANC????> > > > by Charles LeBlanc Saturday, Jun. 12, 2004 at 11:26 AM> > > > oldmaison@yahoo.com Fredericton> > > >> > > > updates from Charles...> > > >> > > > With all the excitement of the story of the bureaucrat who wanted to> >get> > > rid> > > > of my column? I forgot to tell you readers a few stories thathappened> >to> > > me> > > > last week.> > > > Friday, I went in the Gallery at the Legislautre and once again sat> >beside> > > > Dorothy Dawson. It was too hot for me to stay in there so thereforeI> > > left.> > > > Once at the door, a woman asked me which side were the Liberals and> >the> > > > P.C.'S?> > > > She told me that she was from Grand Bay! I said - Ok? You must readmy> > > > column then?> > > > She quickly said - Are you Charles?? And waited a few seconds and> >said-> > > > Charles LeBlanc???> > > > I like to hear this because I'm always curious to know the amount of> > > people> > > > who does read my column? I like having that little piece because the> >owner> > > > of the River Valley News- Diane Bormke allows me to write about any> >issues> > > I> > > > want to write about.> > > > HEY??? IF YOU MISSED IT????> > > > Here's a transcript of what Dr.Furlong said last week on Melanson> >Live!!!> > > >> > > > Denis Melanson - Just a very quick Question of what> > > > Charles was saying. Is Ritalin a quick fixes?> > > >> > > >> > > > Dr. Furlong - Ohhh Yes, I think Ritalin is over prescribed and Ithink> > > > that's an issue for the Medical> > > > Profession. It's only prescribed by the Medical> > > > Profession. However? I , myself even seen now teachers> > > > who send parents and children to my office suggesting> > > > they should be on Ritalin and because not all of them> > > > all on because not all of them are truly hyperactive.> > > > Well? You have to have an accurate diagnosis in order> > > > to at least some hope that the therapy is going to> > > > work because for over activity disorders and active> > > > kids Ritalin will have no affect.> > > >> > > > Denis Melanson - OK.and that's the last word we'll> > > > hear about Ritalin tonight!!!!> > > >> > > > Friday afternoon, I bumped into Madeleine Dube < Minister ofEducation> > >> > > and> > > > told her what the Dr.Furlong told the T.V. Audience. I must admitthat> >I> > > > wasn't please because the day that my protest ended???> > > > The Department of Education sent a memo telling the teachers thatthey> > > > cannot suggest to the parents that their kids should be on Ritalin.> > > > Let me see if I can locate the letter in my email???> > > >> > > >> > > > I FOUND IT!!! HERE IT IS!!!!!> > > >> > > > To: "Charles Leblanc" > > > > CC: "Dawn Bowie" , "McInerney, Terry (ED)"> > > > , "'Lydon, Barry (ED)'",> > > > "Dumas, Pierre (ED)" , "Mitchell, Pam(DHW/SME)"> > > > , "Whitenect, Barbara (DHW/SME)"> > > > , "David Balmain (nbms@nbnet.nb.ca)"> > > > > > > > Subject: FW: Medications - Ritalin> > > > Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:03:00 -0400> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Mr. Leblanc, I am responding to your recent e-mail to Terry> > > McInerney,> > > > on behalf of our Assistant Deputy Minister, English Educational> >Services> > > > Division, with whom you met some weeks ago. I am also including acopy> >of> > > > the e-mail that was sent to superintendents and directors ofeducation> >in> > > > the English public school system. You may be interested in knowing> >that> > > this> > > > is a reiteration of the message that I sent to the same group,> >including> > > > Student Services administrators approximately two years ago.You have> >also> > > > requested results concerning the meeting held with the ADM andPierre> > > Dumas> > > > and other interested individuals. It is important to note that the> >Expert> > > > Report on Behaviour Disorder was initiated and conducted by the> >Department> > > > of Health, under the direction of Ms. Marcella Laaper, Director of> >Child> > > and> > > > Adolescent Services. Ms. Barb Whitenect is currently in that> >position.In> > > > essence, given that this report was initiated and developed by the> > > > Department of Health and Wellness, any further action to be taken on> >this> > > > report must be initiated by the Department of Health and Wellness.> > > Officials> > > > of the Department of Education who participated on that committeedid> >so> > > at> > > > the invitation of the committee chair from the Department of Health> >and> > > > Wellness.You will note that I have also copied this e-mail directedto> >you> > > > to individuals within the Department of Health and Wellness whoshould> >be> > > > the primary contacts for any further action concerning that> >report.Should> > > > you have any further questions, please feel free to contactme.Robert> >E.> > > > Gerard Student Services(Phone: 506-444-47117Fax:> > > > 506-457-7835-E-mail:Robert.Gerard@gnb.ca -----Original> >Message-----From:> > > > Phillips, Deanna (ED) On Behalf Of McInerney, Terry (ED)Sent:> >Thursday,> > > > January 29, 2004 1:29 PMTo: (ED) Superintendents (Eng.)Cc: (ED)> >Directors> > > of> > > > Ed (Eng.)Subject: Medications - RitalinRecent stories in theTelegraph> > > > Journal and other media have heightened the public's awareness ofthe> >drug> > > > Ritalin, a drug which is generally used to assist in the treatmentof> > > > ADD/ADHD among children of school age and adults. While educatorshave> >a> > > > definite role to play in the referral process for children who are> > > > displaying characteristics associated with Attention Deficit> >Hyperactivity> > > > Disorder, and in assisting the medical and psychological profession> > > > diagnoses of this disorder, teachers are to refrain from suggestingto> > > > parents that prescription medication of any sort should be used inthe> > > > management of students' behavior. The diagnoses and prescription of> > > > medication for disorders that impact on a classroom's Positive> >Learning> > > > Environment remains the responsibility of the medical profession.> > > Principals> > > > are asked to remind teachers that the Department of Education> >recognizes> > > > that teachers have an important role to play in the referralprocess.> > > > Suggesting to parents that they may want to consider discussingtheir> > > > child's attention difficulties with their family doctor comes as a> >result> > > of> > > > a collaborative process involving the school-based student services> >team> > > who> > > > have considered in- depth the child's strengths and needs. Teachers> >are> > > > encouraged to share their observations with the school-based student> > > > services teams, and with physicians. Teachers can also serve as an> > > important> > > > source of information in the monitoring by the physician of> >appropriate> > > > dosage of medication. Please share this information with principals,> >who> > > > will share with their staff.> > > >> > > >> > > > AND HERE'S THE FRENCH VERSION!!!!!> > > >> > > > -----Message d'origine-----De : Dumas, Pierre (ED) Envoyé : 23> >février,> > > 2004> > > > 15:58À : 'charles leblanc'Cc : Dawn Bowie; Léveillé, Guy (ED);Lavoie,> > > > Marcel (ED); Whitenect, Barbara (DHW/SME); David Balmain> > > > (nbms@nbnet.nb.ca)Objet : Médicaments - Ritalin Monsieur LeBlanc, En> > > réponse> > > > au courrier que vous m'avez fait parvenir le 16 février dernier,> > > > permettez-moi de vous informer qu'une note a été envoyée aux> >directions> > > > générales de tous les districts scolaires francophones de laprovince> >le> >4> > > > février. Cette décision avait été prise lors de notre rencontre avec> >vous> > > et> > > > des représentants du ministère de la Santé et du mieux-être et de la> > > Société> > > > médicale. Comme le rapport du comité spécial d'experts sur les> > > comportements> > > > perturbateurs était sous la direction du ministère de la Santé et du> > > > mieux-être et plus précisément coordonné par madame Marcella Laaper,> > > > anciennement directrice des services aux enfants et adolescents et> > > > présentement à la retraite, toutes autres actions reliées à cerapport> > > > devront être prises par ce ministère. Si vous avez d'autresquestions,> > > > n'hésitez pas à communiquer avec moi. Pierre DumasDirecteur adjoint,> > > > services aux élèvesDirection des services pédagogiquesTél.: (506)> > > > 453-2750Fax : (506) 457-7835Courriel: pierre.dumas@gnb.ca NOTE> > > > DESTINATAIRE(S) : Directions générales ORIGINE : Guy LéveilléCOPIE(S)> >:> > > > Roger Doucet Marcel Lavoie Pierre Dumas DATE : Le 4 février 2004OBJET> >:> > > > Troubles de l'hyperactivité avec déficit del'attention / RitalinSuite> >à> > > la> > > > couverture médiatique qui a refait surfaceau sujet du Ritalin et des> > > élèves> > > > ayant des troublesde l'hyperactivité avec déficit de> >l'attention(THADA),> > > je> > > > vous saurais gré de bien vouloir rappelerces quelques points au> >personnel> > > > visé de votredistrict. De par leurs observations, les enseignants> > > > peuventcertes avoir un rôle important à jouer dans leprocessus> > > > d'identification des élèves ayant destroubles de l'hyperactivitéavec> >un> > > > déficit del'attention, tout en étant une source valabled'information> >pour> > > le> > > > médecin lors du dosage d'unmédicament. Leur rôle est donc de faire> >part> >de> > > > leurs observations à l'équipe des services aux élèves et aupersonnel> > > > médical s'il y a lieu. Il faut cependant souligner que le> > > > personnelenseignant ne doit en aucun cas suggérer aux parentsun> >médicament> > > > ou une consultation chez un médecin dansle but de modifier le> >comportement> > > > de l'enfant. Lediagnostic et la prescription de médicaments nesontpas> >du> > > > ressort de la profession enseignante mais biende la profession> >médicale.> > > En> > > > vous remerciant de votre collaboration, je vousprie de recevoir> > > l'assurance> > > > de ma considérationdistinguée. Le sous-ministre adjoint, GuyLéveillé> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Now if you don't believe me what Dr.Furlong said this??? Listen to> > > Melanson> > > > Live on Monday at 5:30pm!!!!> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Thursday morning, I showed up at the Legislature to use the computer> >at> > > the> > > > Library.> > > > I was told by security that two rough looking individuals walked> >through> > > the> > > > doors and asked for a Charles Leblanc?> > > > They described the guys as rough looking and one of them had a long> >gray> > > > beard with a leather jacket!> > > > At first, I believe it was the Hell Angels coming down from Montreal> >for> >a> > > > hit on Charles.> > > > Hours later, I seen my bigot buddy Matthew Glenn and he was in front> >of> > > the> > > > Legislature with his blowhorn.> > > > For you people who don't know the bigot? He's the one who startedthe> > > Anglo> > > > Society. I seen him preaching to three young kids and of course Ibutt> >in> > > > and said - Hey Bigot??? Why don't you bigot go home?> > > > Minutes later, we were approached by two guys and they asked> > > politely -Where> > > > can we locate a Charles LeBlanc???> > > > In a matter of seconds, the bigot quickly pointed at me.> > > > I said to myself - Ohhh?? Thanks a lot Bigot!!!> > > > At the end? It was a guy named David Amos and I guess that he's> >running> >at> > > > an independent in the riding of Fundy Royal. The guy have beenliving> >in> > > the> > > > area of Boston and he's been following my updates on the internet.I'm> > > > telling you that the information highway is a great way to spreadthe> > > > message to the rest of the world!> > > > We talked for around 30 minutes and it was nice to see the bigot, me> >and> > > > David Amos together debating our own little concern issue. We allhave> >our> > > > own issues and it's too bad that we cannot unite and fight butthat's> >the> > > > way Canadians do things.> > > > They remind silent until the Government really pissed them all andgo> >out> > > > and vote the party in power out of office.> > > >> > > >> > > > You can read my past column at> > > >> > > > Ftowncrier.com> > > > Click on the forum section> > > >> > > > http://justicenetworkcanada.com/> > > >> > > > or> > > > http://maritimes.buffaloimc.org:8080/features/New_Brunswick/> > > >> > > > I also paste my update in a forum call HERE but unfortunately they> >always> > > > delete my updates from their forum. I believe it's a forum only for> > > certain> > > > elite people.> > > > Makes you think it's own by the Irvings?????> > > > OK.That's about it and this is Saturday and I'm at the Library somany> >of> > > > you will received this update during the weekend but some of youwill> >only> > > > receive this on Monday. Excuse the style and grammar of this update> > > because> > > > I just send the darn thing to you people on the informationHighway!!!> > > >> > > > Here's a few comments that I received during the last 24 hours!> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > 1-> > > > LOL,LOL,LOL,...Does he think that he can take away> > > > your freedom of speech....tell him to bring it on!> > > > You do have 51% backing you....you can write whatever> > > > you want about whoever you want as long as you are not> > > > lying and that's the way it is. Is Ed Kelly a lawyer?> > > > Tell him to make your day and do whatever he wants and> > > > there are a lot of computers, ect around that you would> > > > not need his. Is he jealous of your friendship with> > > > Dianne? Something is wrong....and the reason that he> > > > must of gave up his column is because his letters do> > > > not make any sense when you read them. What does he> > > > want you to do apologize to the 300 people on your> > > > list for what...your the victim...remember> > > > that....someone called you, you did not call> > > > them...you have more contacts and ways of finding out> > > > then he does and that's his problem....let me know what> > > > you are going to do> > > >> > > >> > > > 2-> > > >> > > > Hi Charles....another reason why Tanker shouldn't cross the> > > floor...checkout> > > > the latest media release by Tanker and Jody...FOR IMMEDIATE> >RELEASEJune> > > 11,> > > > 2004LIBERALS SAY THEY WOULD MAINTAIN 298 BED CUTS[Fredericton, NB] -A> >day> > > > after a Miramichi Liberal MLA said a LiberalGovernment wouldn't rule> >out> > > bed> > > > cuts in Miramichi, his Leader has said hewouldn't reverse the Lord> > > > Government's decision to eliminate 298 beds in theprovince.Speakingon> >CBC> > > > Radio yesterday, Shawn Graham said changes are necessary andhe> >wouldn't> > > > reverse the bed cuts as long as seniors who don't need to be inthe> > > hospital> > > > are moved to a nursing home.Two Tory MLAs came out swinging in the> > > > Legislature today against theLiberals over the government's health> >plan.> > > PC> > > > Caucus Chair Jody Carr andParty Whip Tanker Malley, MLA forMiramichi> >Bay> > > du> > > > Vin, said more and morethey are hearing Liberal members agree withthe> > > > health plan."Shawn Graham said on CBC yesterday he'd cut the same298> >bed> > > > cuts if moreseniors were moved into nursing homes," said Mr. Carr,MLA> >for> > > > OromoctoGagetown. "The ironic thing is we are doing more to improve> > > nursing> > > > homes.$90-million dollars will be invested toward nursing homes. We> >have> > > > built twonew homes with a few more slated for construction including> >the> > > > Village ofGagetown. We have also committed to a multi-yearrenovation> >plan> > > > to upgrade10 nursing homes."Mr. Malley repeated again in the> >legislature> > > > Miramichi Liberal MLA JohnForan's comments on CBC Radio that if the> > > Liberals> > > > were in government hecouldn't rule out 27 bed cuts inMiramichi."This,> > > after> > > > signing petitions and asking me to cross the floor," said Mr.Malley.> >"Once> > > > again, why would I want to cross the floor with the likes ofthosetwo?> >The> > > > Liberal Leader just doesn't get it. If he supports our plantoredirect> > > > funding to provide better services for New Brunswickers, thenjustsay> >so.> > > > Don't raise fears and false innuendo just for his own politicalgain> >when> > > he> > > > supports bed cuts.""The previous Liberal government over 12 yearsdid> >not> > > > build one singlenursing home," said Mr. Carr. "And they wonder why> >there> > > are> > > > so manyseniors in hospitals who could be in a nursing home. We know> >they> > > > wouldn'treverse our decisions because they know a balanced approach> >will> > > > improveservices. We can't stay in the 80's and fear monger like the> > > > Opposition. Weare proud of our health plan. We're focused, showing> >true> > > > leadership, andwe're finding real solutions to better health care -> >not> > > just> > > > for today butfor many, many years to come," he continued.The fouryear> > > plan> > > > was released Wednesday. It will secure our province'shealth care> >system> > > and> > > > make it sustainable into the future. It will helpthose working inthe> > > health> > > > care system to make long-term plans forinvestment where care isneeded> > > most> > > > and to implement changes that need tobe made.The goal is to improve> >the> > > > overall health and well-being of NewBrunswickers by building a> >sustainable> > > > health system that delivers the rightservices, in the right way, at> >the> > > > right time at a cost taxpayers canafford. "To turn back the clock> >would> >be> > > > difficult. And what we're saying today isthat we're going to takethe> >beds> > > > out of the system, which are mainlyoccupied by seniors. So what I> >would> > > say> > > > today to you Terry is if we can putin place a strategy that dealswith> > > > moving those senior citizens out of thebeds that are being occupied> >for> > > > acute care into long term care then thestatus quo will remain."Shawn> > > > Graham, CBC Radio, June 10, 2004.[CBC TV Political Panel, June 11,> > > > 2004]SEGUINOkay let me just... I want to pin this down. I'm gonnacome> >to> > > > you in onesecond but let me getask - let me get Shawn on this. Would> >you> > > > reverse the cuts?GRAHAMNo, we're not going to go out and say today> >that> > > > we're against theminister's plan wholeheartedly.SEGUINSo you wouldnot> > > > reverse the cuts?GRAHAMNo, what we're saying today is there has tobe> >put> > > in> > > > place in a long-termcare strategy care, Terry,so that seniors, where> >we> > > > eliminate the beds that are being occupied byseniors in nursing> >homes,are> > > > given a bed or - sorry - are being discharged out of hospitals,> > > they'rebeing> > > > given a bed in anursing home and that's where the plan fails.-30-> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > 3-> > > >> > > > Thanks for the update about Dr. Furlong......interesting. I missed> >show> >as> > > I> > > > was in PEI at a conference We are sooooooo far behind in NB!!!! Allis> > > well> > > >> > > > 4-> > > >> > > > So are you still writing the column for the Grand Baypaper? I hopeso> > > > because I enjoy reading them! Havea Good Weekend> > > >> > > > 5-> > > >> > > > You mean there were grammar mistakes in your update? Really?Haha,just> > > some> > > > sarcastic Friday kidding from your friend.Ray Charles diedyesterday.> >One> > > of> > > > my favourites, he was a giant in themusic world.> > > >> > > > BY THE WAY???? REMEMBER LAST WEEK THAT I WROTE THAT LARRY KINGCALLED> > > BRIAN> > > > MULRONEY THE FORMER PRIME MINISTER OF GREAT BRITAIN???? HERE'S THE> > > > TRANSCRIPT OF THE INTERVIEW!!!> > > >> > > >> > > > KING: We're going to spend a few moments with BrianMulroney, the> >former> > > > prime minister of Canada, joiningus from Montreal.You remember that> > > evening> > > > -- Brian.BRIAN MULRONEY, FMR. CANADIAN PRIME MIN.: I doindeed,Larry.> >St.> > > > Patrick's Day 1985. The Shamrock Summit inQuebec City, just in> >shouting> > > > distance of where theIrish first landed, those coming to Canada,> > > firstlanded> > > > in Canada in the early 1830's. So I remember itwell. It was quite a> > > > night.How close were the two of you?MULRONEY: Well, we had awonderful> > > > relationship.George Schultz, I gather, is with you, and he> >couldtestify> >to> > > > the fact, of course, that President Reaganwas a gentleman, a great> > > > gentleman, and he made itvery easy for new leaders.I came on theblock> > > four> > > > years after he had been swornin, had been inaugurated, and he madeit> >--> > > it> > > > was apiece of cake, to be welcomed and to work with himvery closely,> >both> > > on> > > > bilateral matters, thehemispheric free trade concept, the> > > > Canada-UnitedStates free trade concept, but also internationallywith> >that> > > > tremendous agenda we had in those years. The Soviet Union, with> >nuclear> > > > missiles pointed at us,and the work in NATO and so on, it was -- he> >made> > > > iteasy to work with him.KING: Have you spoken with Mrs. Reagan --> > > > Brian.MULRONEY: Yes, Nancy and I, we speak regularly andhave overthe> > > years,> > > > and as it happened, yesterday Ispoke with Nancy. I called Nancy> >because> >I> > > > had heard,of course, that things weren't going well, and it was--> >Nancy> > > > indicated that things were pretty tough andindeed after I hung up,> >Larry,> > > > within half-an-hourPresident Reagan had passed on.KING: I wouldguess> > > you'll> > > > be attending his funeral inWashington on Friday. Are you going tocome> >out> > > > forthe burial, too, in California?MULRONEY: We're certainly going to> >be> >in> > > > Washingtonfor the funeral.KING: But you don't know about California> > > > yet?MULRONEY: I don't know about the rest of the programyet. AllI've> > > heard> > > > is about Washington. KING: What was his special quality, from> > > > yourviewpoint?MULRONEY: Well, you know, Larry, in leaders Ithinkthere> >are> > > > basically two kinds. You can be atransactional leader or you can bea> > > > transformationleader, and Ronald Reagan was the epitome of> >atransformation> > > > leader, someone who profoundly changedthis country and changed the> >world> > > for> > > > the better.And what was most surprising was that he was able todo> >this,> >to> > > > make history in an extraordinary way, andyet retain that simplicity> >and> > > > charm and almost insome ways a sense of quiet Irish innocence about> > > > themanner in which he conducted himself with otherpeople.So you had> >this> > > > very powerful leader who conducted theforeign policy and thenational> > > policy> > > > of the UnitedStates of America, and on the other hand you had> >thisgentle,> > > > thoughtful, warm and very entertaining humanbeing who was the person> >you> > > > dealt with. I think thatwas his great charm and the reason for his> > > > greatsuccess.KING: Did he exceed your expectations?MULRONEY: Youknow,> >I> > > > think probably Ronald Reagan mayhave exceeded everyone'sexpectations> > > except> > > > Nancy's.Nancy probably was the only one who knew the greatthings of> >which> > > he> > > > was capable from the earliestyears.But for the rest of us, unless> >there> > > are> > > > exceptions ofwhom I'm unaware, for the rest of us he was a delightto> >work> > > > with who just kept getting better. KING: Thank you for sharing this> >with> > > us,> > > > Brian. Greatseeing you again, by the way.MULRONEY: Good to see you,> >Larry.> > > > Thank you for havingme and delighted to be with you.KING: Mypleasure.> > > Good> > > > guy. Brian Mulroney, theformer prime minister of Great Britain(sic).> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > add your comments> > >> > > ----- Original Message -----> > > From: "dean Ray" > > > To: ; <4humanitysake@comcast.net>;> > > <911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com>; ;> > > ; ; ;> > > ; ;> > > ; ;> > > ; ;> > > ; ;> > > > > > Cc: ; > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 8:35 PM> > > Subject: FW: Unable to deliver your message....how convenient for you> > > David!!! TIMES UP!!> > >> > >> > > >> > > > I believe David Amos is not alone and represents Hells Angels. IfI> >am> > > > wrong I have some huge apologising to do!> > > >> > > > A couple of years back the grim reapers of Edmonton handed intheir> > > > colors and joined Hells Angels. Why did they join? from my> >understanding> > > > they had no choice due to the power of the secret societies. Mysite> > > > mentions no Hells Angels because I needed to see if I can find> >anything> > > out> > > > about David AMos first. I was never intimidated by the notes on my> >door> > > we> > > > are watrching you. Hells Angels Bikers are just as much a secret> >society> > > as> > > > are the Triad and Yakuzza. David Amos was told my concerns aboutthe> > > Night> > > > club that sponsered him. I never had proof and now I have toresearch> > > > everything all over again. I fear David Amos might be afraid of the> > > > information I posess and might have hired a truck to run me off the> >road.> > > > When I came back alive David Amos was the only one acting weird.> >Sending> > > me> > > > information about swanson who has probably forgotten about me. I> >was> > > > heavily stalked at Marnevik construction by Hells Angels and a> >freemason> > > > openly admitting their affilliations. Smith openly threatened tokill> >me> > > > when I asked about a missing Indian that worked for the company. I> >showed> > > > this fellow everything and him and others went missing.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > http://www.seanscreenplays.com/BeteNoireCD/Articles1/HIDDEN%> > > > 20POWER.htm> > > >> > > > Hells angels is the same as the jesuits are to the CatholicChurch.> > > They> > > > are the bottom scrapers who go after people the freemason can not> >touch.> > > > The same way the freemason use the triads this explains project> > > sidewinder.> > > > http://www.primetimecrime.com/columns/Columns%202000/20000927.htm> > > >> > > > The plan Amschel laid out consisted of several steps, including:> > > > One of the steps definately is handled by the Hells Angels ! (6)> > > >> > > > 1) Law is force in disguise. Right lies in force ("Might makesRight")> >The> > > > right to rule lies in force.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > 2) Political freedom is an idea, not a fact. In order to usurp> >political> > > > power, all that is necessary is to preach 'liberalism,' and the> > > electorates> > > > will give up more and more power to the conspirators.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > 3) Money is all powerful. Governments are insignificant compared to> >money.> > > > Since governments control the money, that control must be removedfrom> > > > governments, and put in the hands of the conspirators.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > 4) Any and all means to achieve the goal of world domination by the> > > > conspirators is justified.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > 5) The size, scope, and power of the conspirators' resources must> >remain> > > > hidden.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > 6) Alcohol, drugs, and moral corruption shall be used to weaken the> >will> > > of> > > > the people.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > 7) Wars should be instigated and orchestrated so that both sideswould> >be> > > in> > > > their debt (in other words, the conspirators would gain profit and> >power,> > > no> > > > matter who "won" the wars!).> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > 8) Propaganda and control of information should be used to influence> > > > opinion.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > 9) Pre-planned and artificially manipulated financial panics and> > > depression> > > > should be used to tame the people, and weaken governments, so as to> > > > ultimately form a one-world government, with the conspirators as the> > > rulers.> > > >> > > > First thing David Amos said to me was to not talk of freemasons so> >much.> > > > When I first met hime he wanted me to go after the Queen of England.> >She> > > > definately had links to freemasonry and his argument convincing butI> > > failed> > > > to see the point. I believe I would of been duped just like all the> >other> > > > patsies.> > > >> > > >> > > > >From: Yahoo! Groups > > > > >To: deanr0032@hotmail.com> > > > >Subject: Unable to deliver your message> > > > >Date: 3 Jan 2007 23:32:30 -0000> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >We are unable to deliver the message from > > > > >to .> > > > >> > > > >Your email account has been bouncing mails. This means that emails> > > > >sent to your account over several days have been returned to us.> > > > >This is sometimes because mail boxes are filled up, or because of> > > > >configuration problems. To reset your Yahoo! Groups account,please> >go> > > > >to http://groups.yahoo.com/myprefs?edit=2> > > > >> > > > >For further assistance, please visit> > > http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/> > > >> > > > >



David Amos wrote:
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Daruty and Cellucci may wish to talk to these Yankees
To: sbj5@sbcglobal.net




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Better first dates. More second dates. Yahoo! Personals Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Daruty and Cellucci may wish to talk to these Yankees
To: madwriterrc@yahoo.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger
Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun.Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:39:01 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Daruty and Cellucci may wish to talk to these Yankees
To: deborahlbmc@yahoo.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:50:11 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Daruty and Cellucci may wish to talk to these Yankees
To: sketch420@hotmail.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 14:09:57 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Daruty and Cellucci may wish to talk to these Yankees
To: thomas.allen17@ntlworld.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 08:35:57 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Daruty and Cellucci may wish to talk to these Yankees
To: thesteveuc@yahoo.com, dante17678@hotmail.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:47:27 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Daruty and Cellucci may wish to talk to these Yankees
To: dgage@oregongreyhound.com


This the last file now you have everything Magna got today. Have some fun with this stuff.

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:21:58 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Daruty and Cellucci may wish to talk to these Yankees
To: dgage@oregongreyhound.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:51:22 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Daruty and Cellucci may wish to talk to these Yankees
To: MEC.investors@magnaent.com, dhart@pattersonpalmer.ca,
smay@pattersonpalmer.ca


I am about to sue their nasty arses plus a bunch more for good measure. They have a thing or to to learn about falsely imprisoning a pigheaded Maritimer to have his head examined. I am about to take it up with the UN and Franky McKenna. As I told the lady that answered your phone for ya Don, perhaps you should consider quitting Magna and become my lawyer. You would never need another client in order to make a very decent living. I have need of legions of ethical lawyers. I think the best place to find them is straight out of law school before their ethics are tainted by the system. Check History. Cardinal Law did quit his job the day after I filed the Affidavit in US District Court on Dec 12th 2002. The DHS did come try to take me away right after I gave my stuff to the US attorney in New Hampshire and just before I went to the annual shareholders meeting of the Brookline Bancorp.The Sec did settle with Putnam Investments in November of 2003 immediately after I talked to Philip Koski and Louis Randazo of the SEC about Putnam and the Brookline Bank. The Pope did give Cardinal Law a job inside the Vatican in May of 2004 after I notified the lawyers in Boston I was suing the Bastards again. (Law was still on the Boston payroll and my wife's Kickham cousin is still their secretary) I am being prosecuted by an unsigned criminal complaint made by a lawyer who flat out lied to the cops and they all know it. The wiretap tapes are going to piss off a lot of Italian mobsters very soon. We all know they can afford lawyers like Richard Egbert when it is to their advange to litigate. Then there is the fact that if the bastards snuff me it will be a political killing because I was on the ballot in Fundy and I told many people many things in front of many witnesses. Do you want my blood on your hands particularly aft I had accurately predicted the the Death of H. Paul Rico in jail down south long before it happened? Never forget that Argeo P. Cellucci is likely familiar with many people recorded on the tapes that I have and how many fancy fella like David Aufhauser and Theodore Olson etc quit their jobs immediately after they received hard copy of my material. I have a very big stick to use against the rampant public corruption and I will not settle without the truth being well known to all or I will die trying. This is not about money. It is about freedom and staying alive. I am using the lawyers worship of money and denial of justice against them to suit my own ends. They love it so I will take it from them if they do not obey the rules of their profession. Get it? Beleive me when I say that I know a great deal more about many things that can prove and have not spoken of yet. My pending criminal trial is going to be an interesting affair. Ask the General Counsel of the SEC. I dare ya.

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:01:31 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: some respnses
To: rearadmiral3@yahoo.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:40:26 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: some respnses
To: HJMcClure2@msn.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 07:41:52 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: some respnses
To: pogo@pogo.org




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:15:57 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: some respnses
To: lcampenella@ledger.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:04:17 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: some respnses
To: unkadon@netzero.com, assistant_ottawa@mennonitecc.ca




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:51:34 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: some respnses
To: ve1jh@hotmail.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 15:22:24 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: some respnses
To: trvl@hotmail.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 13:36:37 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: some respnses
To: looneroo@hotmail.com
CC: Ron6388@vif.com, colwellcountry05@yahoo.ca, pigletstheman@hotmail.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:14:02 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: some respnses
To: ironlodgesky@charter.net




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 07:52:31 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: some respnses
To: hsnider@controvalve.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 08:44:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: some respnses
To: metroplex86@speedfactory.net




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 08:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: some respnses
To: dent2004@ptd.net
CC: info@driscollforcongress.com, greta_browne@hotmail.com,
campaign@rich2004.com, dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca,
CustomerService@NEMoves.com, news@dailygleaner.com, info@gg.ca,
peter.ringrose@lawsociety.nf.ca, srobinson@lspei.pe.ca, dpink@nsbs.org,
mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca, pierre.cleroux@cdnq.org,
jhoule@barreau.qc.ca, kcorrick@lsuc.on.ca, afineblit@lawsociety.mb.ca,
klogan@lawsociety.sk.ca, Don.Thompson@lawsocietyalberta.com,
jmatkin@lsbc.org, lawsoc@nunanet.com, lsy@yknet.yk.ca,
whitford-lsnt@theedge.ca, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca, diane.bourque@flsc.ca,
brad.woodside@fredericton.ca, police@fredericton.ca, Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca,
corp.website@sunlife.com, martine.turcotte@bell.ca,
cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, chebert@thestar.ca,
Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca, Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca,
MacAulay.L@parl.gc.ca, WERHANEP@darden.virginia.edu, gfdavis@umich.edu,
st.int@cbs.dk, dsicilia@umd.edu, sb.ikl@cbs.dk, men.ikl@cbs.dk,
info@lynnwestmoreland.org, milan01@cs.com, info@kucinich.us,
contact@edhermanforcongress.com, dhooper@uplogon.com,
lynn@actionstrat.com, jt@truscottgroup.com,
cassell4congress@earthlink.net, GA06@mail.house.gov,
deversman@daveeversman.org, bryce@calderclay.com,
information@catherine2004.org, kajode@aol.com, jim.demint@mail.house.gov,
Bob@inglisforcongress.com, aspencer@limestone.edu, gary@garymcleod.org,
preachergirl68@yahoo.com, Stew@StewForCongress.com,
Info@MelissaBrownforCongress.com, jpd4cd14@verizon.net, dent2004@ptd.net,
campaign@paterno2004.com, lcauditor@aol.com, flk828@aol.com,
bobney@bobney.org




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail – CNET Editors' Choice 2004. Tell them what you think. From: David Amos
Subject: some respnses
To: motomaniac@techemail.com




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

--Forwarded Message Attachment--





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
David Amos wrote:
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Re: Justice for the Priors of Grand Bank, NFLD.
To: sbj5@sbcglobal.net




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Make Yahoo! your home page Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Re: Justice for the Priors of Grand Bank, NFLD.
To: madwriterrc@yahoo.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Sign up for Fantasy Baseball.Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:41:31 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Re: Justice for the Priors of Grand Bank, NFLD.
To: deborahlbmc@yahoo.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:48:55 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Re: Justice for the Priors of Grand Bank, NFLD.
To: sketch420@hotmail.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Make Yahoo! your home page Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 14:08:38 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Re: Justice for the Priors of Grand Bank, NFLD.
To: thomas.allen17@ntlworld.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 08:34:48 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Re: Justice for the Priors of Grand Bank, NFLD.
To: thesteveuc@yahoo.com, dante17678@hotmail.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:20:34 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Re: Justice for the Priors of Grand Bank, NFLD.
To: dgage@oregongreyhound.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:20:43 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Re: Justice for the Priors of Grand Bank, NFLD.
To: MEC.investors@magnaent.com, dhart@pattersonpalmer.ca,
smay@pattersonpalmer.ca




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:45:40 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Re: Justice for the Priors of Grand Bank, NFLD.
To: ve1jh@hotmail.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 15:14:23 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Re: Justice for the Priors of Grand Bank, NFLD.
To: trvl@hotmail.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 13:16:07 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Re: Justice for the Priors of Grand Bank, NFLD.
To: looneroo@hotmail.com
CC: Ron6388@vif.com, colwellcountry05@yahoo.ca, pigletstheman@hotmail.com,
damos3@cogeco.ca




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:02:50 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Re: Justice for the Priors of Grand Bank, NFLD.
To: ironlodgesky@charter.net




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 07:36:53 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Re: Justice for the Priors of Grand Bank, NFLD.
To: hsnider@controvalve.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 17:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: moto maniac
Subject: Re: Justice for the Priors of Grand Bank, NFLD.
To: Byron Prior ,
Prime Minister/Premier ministre
CC: premier@gov.nl.ca, tedcardwell@mail.gov.nf.ca, rarespade@nfld.net,
moto maniac ,
Conservative Party of Canada ,
Jack Layton , 'John Reynolds' ,
'Loyola Hearn' ,
New Democratic Party of Canada ,
'Norman Doyle' , Peter MacKay ,
Pierre Bourque , 'Scott Brison' ,
'Stephen Harper' ,
The Liberal Party of Canada ,
'Vic Toews'


October 5th Old Adriene may sing a different tune for the Queen than the one Crosbie sang about Tequila Eh Bryon. Lets see if Bill Matthews and his crew are the one's to get screwed this time around. Give me a call if Roberts asks you sign anything this time around. I would like to be there to witness it and then we could both go and chuck rocks at Hickman's house until someone took us under their jurisdiction.







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

--Forwarded Message Attachment--



October 5th Old Adriene may sing a different tune for the Queen than the one Crosbie sang about Tequila Eh Bryon. Lets see if Bill Matthews and his crew are the one's to get screwed this time around. Give me a call if Roberts asks you sign anything this time around. I would like to be there to witness it and then we could both go and chuck rocks at Hickman's house until someone took us under their jurisdiction.







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


October 5th Old Adriene may sing a different tune for the Queen than the one Crosbie sang about Tequila Eh Bryon. Lets see if Bill Matthews and his crew are the one's to get screwed this time around. Give me a call if Roberts asks you sign anything this time around. I would like to be there to witness it and then we could both go and chuck rocks at Hickman's house until someone took us under their jurisdiction.







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


October 5th Old Adriene may sing a different tune for the Queen than the one Crosbie sang about Tequila Eh Bryon. Lets see if Bill Matthews and his crew are the one's to get screwed this time around. Give me a call if Roberts asks you sign anything this time around. I would like to be there to witness it and then we could both go and chuck rocks at Hickman's house until someone took us under their jurisdiction.







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


October 5th Old Adriene may sing a different tune for the Queen than the one Crosbie sang about Tequila Eh Bryon. Lets see if Bill Matthews and his crew are the one's to get screwed this time around. Give me a call if Roberts asks you sign anything this time around. I would like to be there to witness it and then we could both go and chuck rocks at Hickman's house until someone took us under their jurisdiction.







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


October 5th Old Adriene may sing a different tune for the Queen than the one Crosbie sang about Tequila Eh Bryon. Lets see if Bill Matthews and his crew are the one's to get screwed this time around. Give me a call if Roberts asks you sign anything this time around. I would like to be there to witness it and then we could both go and chuck rocks at Hickman's house until someone took us under their jurisdiction.







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


October 5th Old Adriene may sing a different tune for the Queen than the one Crosbie sang about Tequila Eh Bryon. Lets see if Bill Matthews and his crew are the one's to get screwed this time around. Give me a call if Roberts asks you sign anything this time around. I would like to be there to witness it and then we could both go and chuck rocks at Hickman's house until someone took us under their jurisdiction.







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


October 5th Old Adriene may sing a different tune for the Queen than the one Crosbie sang about Tequila Eh Bryon. Lets see if Bill Matthews and his crew are the one's to get screwed this time around. Give me a call if Roberts asks you sign anything this time around. I would like to be there to witness it and then we could both go and chuck rocks at Hickman's house until someone took us under their jurisdiction.







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


October 5th Old Adriene may sing a different tune for the Queen than the one Crosbie sang about Tequila Eh Bryon. Lets see if Bill Matthews and his crew are the one's to get screwed this time around. Give me a call if Roberts asks you sign anything this time around. I would like to be there to witness it and then we could both go and chuck rocks at Hickman's house until someone took us under their jurisdiction.







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


October 5th Old Adriene may sing a different tune for the Queen than the one Crosbie sang about Tequila Eh Bryon. Lets see if Bill Matthews and his crew are the one's to get screwed this time around. Give me a call if Roberts asks you sign anything this time around. I would like to be there to witness it and then we could both go and chuck rocks at Hickman's house until someone took us under their jurisdiction.







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


October 5th Old Adriene may sing a different tune for the Queen than the one Crosbie sang about Tequila Eh Bryon. Lets see if Bill Matthews and his crew are the one's to get screwed this time around. Give me a call if Roberts asks you sign anything this time around. I would like to be there to witness it and then we could both go and chuck rocks at Hickman's house until someone took us under their jurisdiction.







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


October 5th Old Adriene may sing a different tune for the Queen than the one Crosbie sang about Tequila Eh Bryon. Lets see if Bill Matthews and his crew are the one's to get screwed this time around. Give me a call if Roberts asks you sign anything this time around. I would like to be there to witness it and then we could both go and chuck rocks at Hickman's house until someone took us under their jurisdiction.







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


October 5th Old Adriene may sing a different tune for the Queen than the one Crosbie sang about Tequila Eh Bryon. Lets see if Bill Matthews and his crew are the one's to get screwed this time around. Give me a call if Roberts asks you sign anything this time around. I would like to be there to witness it and then we could both go and chuck rocks at Hickman's house until someone took us under their jurisdiction.







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


October 5th Old Adriene may sing a different tune for the Queen than the one Crosbie sang about Tequila Eh Bryon. Lets see if Bill Matthews and his crew are the one's to get screwed this time around. Give me a call if Roberts asks you sign anything this time around. I would like to be there to witness it and then we could both go and chuck rocks at Hickman's house until someone took us under their jurisdiction.

David Amos wrote:
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:58:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: sbj5@sbcglobal.net




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Better first dates. More second dates. Yahoo! Personals Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: madwriterrc@yahoo.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:44:00 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: deborahlbmc@yahoo.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:00:17 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: sketch420@hotmail.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 14:16:25 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: thomas.allen17@ntlworld.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 08:44:29 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: thesteveuc@yahoo.com, dante17678@hotmail.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:04:18 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: rearadmiral3@yahoo.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Make Yahoo! your home page Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:43:44 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: HJMcClure2@msn.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 07:44:38 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: pogo@pogo.org




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:18:21 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: lcampenella@ledger.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:07:05 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: unkadon@netzero.com, assistant_ottawa@mennonitecc.ca




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:47:47 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: ve1jh@hotmail.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 15:19:04 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: trvl@hotmail.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 13:33:05 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: looneroo@hotmail.com
CC: Ron6388@vif.com, colwellcountry05@yahoo.ca, pigletstheman@hotmail.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:08:45 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: ironlodgesky@charter.net




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 07:49:23 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: hsnider@controvalve.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 08:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: dent2004@ptd.net
CC: info@driscollforcongress.com, campaign@rich2004.com,
dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, CustomerService@NEMoves.com,
news@dailygleaner.com, info@gg.ca, peter.ringrose@lawsociety.nf.ca,
srobinson@lspei.pe.ca, dpink@nsbs.org, mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca,
pierre.cleroux@cdnq.org, jhoule@barreau.qc.ca, kcorrick@lsuc.on.ca,
afineblit@lawsociety.mb.ca, klogan@lawsociety.sk.ca,
Don.Thompson@lawsocietyalberta.com, jmatkin@lsbc.org, lawsoc@nunanet.com,
lsy@yknet.yk.ca, whitford-lsnt@theedge.ca, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca,
diane.bourque@flsc.ca, brad.woodside@fredericton.ca,
police@fredericton.ca, Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca, corp.website@sunlife.com,
martine.turcotte@bell.ca, cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca,
chebert@thestar.ca, Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca, Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca,
Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, MacAulay.L@parl.gc.ca,
WERHANEP@darden.virginia.edu, gfdavis@umich.edu, st.int@cbs.dk,
dsicilia@umd.edu, sb.ikl@cbs.dk, men.ikl@cbs.dk,
info@lynnwestmoreland.org, milan01@cs.com, info@kucinich.us,
contact@edhermanforcongress.com, dhooper@uplogon.com,
lynn@actionstrat.com, jt@truscottgroup.com,
cassell4congress@earthlink.net, GA06@mail.house.gov,
deversman@daveeversman.org, bryce@calderclay.com,
information@catherine2004.org, kajode@aol.com, jim.demint@mail.house.gov,
Bob@inglisforcongress.com, aspencer@limestone.edu, gary@garymcleod.org,
reachergirl68@yahoo.com, Stew@StewForCongress.com,
Info@MelissaBrownforCongress.com, jpd4cd14@verizon.net, dent2004@ptd.net,
campaign@paterno2004.com, lcauditor@aol.com, flk828@aol.com,
bobney@bobney.org




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail – CNET Editors' Choice 2004. Tell them what you think. From: David Amos
Subject: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: metroplex86@speedfactory.net


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!CC: Kathryn
From: Kathryn
Subject: Re: This my best effort to protect someone I respect
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 22:59:42 -0400
To: David Amos

David ,
I hope you come out ok. Make peace with your wife and children. Before
you go. A mother's care and prayer I send to you and your family. I am
afraid to call Byron just to say hello.
Kathryn
On Oct 17, 2004, at 9:58 PM, David Amos wrote:

>
>
> Note: forwarded message attached.
>
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail – CNET Editors' Choice 2004. Tell them what you think.
> From: David Amos
> Date: October 17, 2004 9:51:56 PM EDT
> To: dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca
> Cc: dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, CustomerService@NEMoves.com,
> news@dailygleaner.com, info@gg.ca, peter.ringrose@lawsociety.nf.ca,
> srobinson@lspei.pe.ca, dpink@nsbs.org,
> mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca, pierre.cleroux@cdnq.org,
> jhoule@barreau.qc.ca, kcorrick@lsuc.on.ca,
> afineblit@lawsociety.mb.ca, klogan@lawsociety.sk.ca,
> Don.Thompson@lawsocietyalberta.com, jmatkin@lsbc.org,
> lawsoc@nunanet.com, lsy@yknet.yk.ca, whitford-lsnt@theedge.ca,
> jeff.mockler@gnb.ca, diane.bourque@flsc.ca,
> brad.woodside@fredericton.ca, police@fredericton.ca,
> Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca, corp.website@sunlife.com,
> martine.turcotte@bell.ca, cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca,
> chebert@thestar.ca, Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca, Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca,
> Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, MacAulay.L@parl.gc.ca,
> WERHANEP@darden.virginia.edu, gfdavis@umich.edu, st.int@cbs.dk,
> dsicilia@umd.edu, sb.ikl@cbs.dk, men.ikl@cbs.dk,
> info@lynnwestmoreland.org, milan01@cs.com, info@kucinich.us,
> contact@edhermanforcongress.com, dhooper@uplogon.com,
> lynn@actionstrat.com, jt@truscottgroup.com,
> cassell4congress@earthlink.net, GA06@mail.house.gov,
> deversman@daveeversman.org, bryce@calderclay.com,
> information@catherine2004.org, kajode@aol.com,
> jim.demint@mail.house.gov, Bob@inglisforcongress.com,
> aspencer@limestone.edu, gary@garymcleod.org,
> preachergirl68@yahoo.com, Stew@StewForCongress.com,
> Info@MelissaBrownforCongress.com, jpd4cd14@verizon.net,
> dent2004@ptd.net, campaign@paterno2004.com, lcauditor@aol.com,
> flk828@aol.com, bobney@bobney.org
> Subject: Fwd: This my best effort to protect someone I respect
>
>
>
>
> Note: forwarded message attached.
>
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail – CNET Editors' Choice 2004. Tell them what you think.
> From: David Amos
> Date: October 17, 2004 9:44:39 PM EDT
> To: barrupdate@bobbarr.org
> Cc: mjyannone@aol.com, lynne@votecobb.org,
> BushCheney04@GeorgeWBush.com, info@johnkerry.com, cei@nbnet.nb.ca,
> alltrue@nl.rogers.com, atvnews@ctv.ca, michel.lalande@bell.ca,
> info@obamaforillinois.com, newsroom@globeandmail.ca,
> rebozo@u.washington.edu, Patrick.E.Murphy.72@nd.edu,
> mail@cebcglobal.org, nbowie@umn.edu, dunfeet@wharton.upenn.edu,
> donaldst@wharton.upenn.edu, hartmane@andromeda.rutgers.edu,
> dmessick@kellogg.northwestern.edu, tpiper@hbs.edu, lnash@hbs.edu,
> rsolomon@mail.utexas.edu, WicksA@darden.virginia.edu,
> ltrevino@psu.edu, brenkg@msb.edu, timfort@umich.edu,
> Diana_Robertson@bus.emory.edu, info@hodesforcongress.com,
> mckim@mckimforsenate.com, ncicco@seacoastonline.com,
> info@nadeau2004.com, info@johnlynch04.com,
> thomas.eaton@leg.state.nh.us, scotta@parl.gc.ca, Brison.S@parl.gc.ca,
> davidorchard@sasktel.net, rosent@math.toronto.edu, dpm@pm.gc.ca,
> ethics@harvard.edu, Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca, McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca,
> Easter.W@parl.gc.ca, Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,
> Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Efford.J@parl.gc.ca, Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca,
> Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, Valeri.T@parl.gc.ca, Dosanjh.U@parl.gc.ca,
> kcarmichael@bloomberg.net, dwford@dmb.com, bill.glahn@mclane.com,
> cathy@green-utter.com, chuckmorse@morseforcongress.com,
> michael.gunnison@usdoj.gov, Mhall@hallstewart.com,
> ekaplan@sulloway.com, Bjorn_Lange@fd.org, Dmullen@doj.state.nh.us,
> soconnell@nixonpeabody.com, lvogelman@skv-law.com,
> gretchen.witt@usdoj.gov, tarrance@tarrance.com, info@voteparke.com,
> woodchuck200@adelphia.net, mconnolly@haslaw.com, pcowan@sheehan.com,
> davies.carl@nbpub.com, news@timestranscript.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
> nbombud@gnb.ca, advocacycollective@yahoo.com, brad.green@gnb.ca
> Subject: This my best effort to protect someone I respect
>
>
> I explained it to the lady and she did agree. It is not a bad way
> to protect my friends. When I believe that somebody knows too much, I
> make certain that everybody else knows it as well. Thus I send the
> attached email to all.
> I do not abide in Chatham House Rules like Bob Barr and his
> buddies do. They are all far too sneaky for me. I do not agree with
> the lawyers that think that the truth should be kept confidential to
> protect the reputation of the corrupt. The task of seeing the public
> trust is upheld falls upon ordinary people when lawyers, politicians
> and law enforcement authorities would rather cover up the crimes and
> not act within the scope of their employment and uphold the law .
> When the Media refuses to exercise their Constitutional Freedom
> to report what they know to be true just because of the interests of
> the CEO's that pay their wages maybe adversely affected. Ordinary
> people must spread the word and reveal the truth anyway they can for
> the benefit of all. You can ask W5 or Frontline or Bob Barr and a
> great many others my opinion about that.
> If anyone believes me, please forward this information to
> everyone you know. I must go to court on October 19th and defend my
> freedom because I sent a crooked lawyer litigating against me three
> emails that she didn't like to receive. She lied and pretended that I
> was a mere acquaintance that was stalking her and everyone knows it is
> not so. It is her and her clients that are harassing my family.
> Methinks I will forward to all the emails that I sent to her on
> the day I stand before the court. We shall see what the folks on the
> world wide web think about that. If I cannot do so because my lines
> are cut again or if I am sent back to jail. I ask that my friends to
> do it for me in order that the truth be revealed.
> If necessary I also ask that my friends forward the Affidavit
> that caused a Yankee judge to send me to jail without bail in order to
> check my mental health. I am not crazy to bring my attorney (me,
> myself and I) with me every where I go even into the downtown Psych
> Ward. I had served the Sheriff the year before because she had failed
> to uphold the law. The Sheriff's Dept. had assisted the perjury of the
> US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan after I had paid their substantial
> bill. I would not allow her deputies to deny me of my rights without
> protest and demanding to speak to their lawyer, the Sheriff herself.
> Eventually they let me out on five thousand dollar cash bail.
> While I was in jail the Canadian Consulate dudes came to see me and
> told me that I had threatened a judge but when I asked my jailers for
> the charges against me it was only listed as "other". I have not
> received any notice of such charges and I know for a fact that I
> didn't. If I had threatened a judge he would have charged me
> immediately while was standing before him in court. The DA is a liar.
> The judge properly recused himself because I informed him that he is
> my neighbor as soon I knew and was allowed to speak. It was not my
> fault that the court, or the DA or the judge did not compare our
> addresses before they attempted to prosecute me. I definitely was not
> stalking the judge, I stayed far away in Canada and only entered the
> USA on the days I was ordered by the court to appear. The DA's claim
> that I was a flight risk was absolutely ridiculous. I look forward to
> the argument in the proper jurisdiction in front of a jury of my
> peers. The fact I won't file a Motion to Dismiss is why they think I
> am nuts. I am not. It is a necessary argument for the benefit of my
> Clan. I must make a stand and defend our rights. To take the chance of
> going to to jail as another wrongly prosecuted man is a very small
> price to pay. Trading safety for freedom is not wise.
> To all the others that consider this spam, ask me if I care. At
> least you can never say that I didn't tell what was so. I have the
> proof that the message was sent in good byway of Yahoo to you.
> David Raymond Amos
>
> Note: forwarded message attached.
>
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail – CNET Editors' Choice 2004. Tell them what you think.
> From: David Amos
> Date: October 16, 2004 11:16:53 AM EDT
> To: Kathryn
> Cc: mjyannone@aol.com, info@votenader.org, lynne@votecobb.org,
> BushCheney04@GeorgeWBush.com, info@johnkerry.com, cei@nbnet.nb.ca,
> alltrue@nl.rogers.com
> Subject: Re: Another kettle of Fish
>
>
> Kathryn, I thank you for your interest. You are the first person
> to respond to my emails in a positive fashion. My numbers are as
> follows: Home 617 698 6549 Cell 506 434-1379
> The following is the name of a man of your party that I had a
> long talk with last night. I like him a lot. I will support his bid
> for election anyway I can. Obviously I just told him so. I do not
> support political parties I support individuals that prove to me their
> honesty and therefore are worth being placed in a seat in Congress or
> elsewhere in order to uphold the Public Trust.
> Another fella of your party Glen Schwarz dropped the ball and
> insulted me as some sort of conspiracy nut yesterday. If he only knew
> how that offended a Canadian that knows a little bit about tainted
> blood on Little Rock. Then he would know why I saw red.
> Good Day Mark and thanks for listening. Please do me the favour
> and call my friend Byron Prior 709 834-9822. He is a man in true need
> of support. A simple phone call would be a long needed sip of the milk
> of human kindness from a stranger.
> As for me I need no help. I do better alone. I make myself more
> powerful by helping others. In return, I merely hope that they will
> testify as to what they know to be true. Before I help anyone, they
> must prove to me that they can be trusted. There is quite simply no
> middle ground for anyone to stand on in my battles with the corruption
> within the justice systems and the governments of two countries.
> Although they are supposed to be separate entities within separate
> nations, they are in fact tied at the hip. Thanks to the malevolent
> actions of lawyers such as Cobb and Nader who pretend to be something
> that they are not.
> Last night I had just discovered that your party had a man
> running for President. Now I have discovered that there are in deed
> many people running for the presidency. If they wish to receive them,
> I will forward them all the same emails I sent to your party. However
> I also saw that your man was running around with the likes of David
> Cobb, a lawyer I do not trust for very justifiable reasons. Please
> view the attached files and ask Mr. Cobb what he knows to be true
> about my concerns.
> My best advice to Mr. Badnarik is to be careful of who he
> associates with. The attached files should explain my reasons why. Mr.
> Cobb and Mr. Nader can expect a summons to court someday. I will not
> bother your man Badnarik because he is a layman and not obliged to
> uphold the law. If he or anyone of his friends wish to call, it is
> fine by me. I will tell anyone what I know to be true. It simply does
> not matter whether I trust them or not. Truth must be known to all and
> not kept secret.
> My word is my bond. Lawyers require signatures not honest men.
> However if you do not trust my word, save this email for your own
> benefit. Frank Quatronne's and Martha Stewart's matters proved how
> valuable emails can be.
> Right now John Kerry is the Senator representing my Clan in
> Massachusetts. If he loses this election, he is still our senator. He
> also brags a lot about being a former Suffolk County District
> Attorney. He has had a copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape
> numbered 139 for a very long time. The Suffolk County District
> Attorney, Daniel Conley has had many original tapes since Sept 3rd
> 2004 as have Canadian law enforcement authorities.
> The tapes have been discussed before a court that does not have
> jurisdiction to even begin to hear the matter. I had served upon the
> court byway of an affidavit that I had given the material to the
> Suffolk County District Attorney as directed by the Milton Police
> Chief, the Canadian Governor General, A Canadian Attorney General and
> the even the Massachusetts Trail Court's own legal Dept. to name a
> few. On October 1st of this year before a judge sent me to jail in a
> blatant violation of my Eighth Amendment Rights, the very police
> surveillance tapes that I speak of were piled on the DA's table on
> open view to all rather than being filed under seal. the tapes are
> irrefutable of the Fourth Amendment Violations of others. Everyone
> witnessed the DA not upholding the law and the court asked no
> questions. I was then sent to the custody of a Sheriff that had
> assisted the criminals acting against me for years. There will be a
> profound legal argument about the false allegations made against me or
> I will die defending my right to do so. I hope that is clear.
> I had also informed Kerry of many other crimes beginning on
> October 23rd 2002 before he was reelected our Senator. He cannot deny
> that his assistant tried to call me immediately after a very important
> argument in Norfolk Superior Court on Sept 29th, 2003. I had others
> listen to my voicemail. On the very same day I sent the evidence of
> crimes to every US Attorney in the USA and began mailing the same
> material to every Member of Congress that is a lawyer. I have received
> responds from many. they can never say they don't know the truth about
> what I say.
> It is now almost two years to the day since I had first crossed
> paths with Senator John Kerry. On October 19th in Dorchester District
> Court I will name him and his friends Kennedy, Edwards, Lynch,
> Kucinich and many others as witnesses to testify in my defense
> against the very office he once was employed by. I have their
> signatures. Therefore they can never claim that they are not well
> aware of my matters. I am inviting everyone to witness my Trial in
> front of a Jury of my Peers. This is an important matter for the
> benefit of all the peoples rights in two democratic countries.
> I also informed Kerry of what I knew about the FBI claims to me
> of preparing to go to war in Iraq on Oct 15th, 2002. What he says now
> about that War is very offensive to me, particularly as a Canadian
> Citizen. Americans such as Argeo P. Cellucci chastise us for not
> becoming involved and label us as chickens. The Yankees like Argeo
> have a very short memory span. It appears that they forget World War
> One and Two. The USA did not become involved until they were attacked.
> In my opinion that is the proper way to employ a country's armed
> forces. Canada had to go to war because our Monarchy had ordered it. I
> am very glad that Canada did not follow the British lead into Iraq.
> The British always use the colonials as cannon fodder. I know a 48th
> Highlander, a Lady from Hell that will talk to you all day about that
> fact.
> I say the blood of a Patriot should only be spilled in defense
> of his country. A President should not order the people he serves to
> draw first blood. War is a tool that serves only politicians. They
> should do what the people elected them to do. Merely speak softly as
> they hold the big stick.
> I am sick and tired of hearing the phrase "Weapons of Mass
> Destruction". They are just catch words employed by a malicious
> politician to strike fear in the hearts of the people he represents.
> That very man controls the greatest arsenal in the world of such
> weapons.
> I would debate Dick Cheney about this or anything any day of
> the week and twice on Sunday. George W. Bush is just too dumb to waste
> my breath with. Look into his eyes before you attempt to argue me
> about that fact. I have heard that he is on the same pills that have
> been prescribed to my wife and yet she continues to function as a
> normal hard working person who is the loving mother of two. The pills
> do the the job for her. To me George W. Bush is a space cadet on the
> wrong medication. He now wants my native land to become involved in
> his buddies' pet Star Wars Project. Bush's puppet, Steven Harper just
> forced the malevolent Martin to go along with the plan. I say nay, no
> way. What say you?
> David Raymond Amos
>
> Need I say this email is being forwarded to many Canadians.
>
>
>
> Mr. Mark J. Yannone (AZ)
>
>
> Current Office: Challenger
> Office Seeking: U.S. Representative
> District Seeking: 3
> Party: Libertarian
> 2 West Pershing Avenue
> Phoenix, AZ 85029
> Phone: 602-548-7123
>
> Kathryn wrote:
> Do you have a phone number?
> Kathryn
> Media Executive Assistant
> On Oct 15, 2004, at 9:52 PM, David Amos wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Note: forwarded message attached.
> >
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now.
> > From: David Amos
> > Date: October 15, 2004 7:21:58 PM EDT
> > To: markyannone@yahoo.com
> > Cc: appoe@aol.com, jsykes@ak.net, info@millicanussenate.com,
> > vernon_mason@yahoo.com, Powell@GammillForCongress.com,
> > Delawarewc@yahoo.com
> > Subject: Fwd: Another kettle of Fish
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Note: forwarded message attached.
> >
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail – CNET Editors' Choice 2004. Tell them what you think.
> > From: David Amos
> > Date: October 14, 2004 6:03:02 PM EDT
> > To: newsroom@globeandmail.ca
> > Cc: lavoie.luc@quebecor.com, michel.lalande@bell.ca,
> > jean-francois.legault@bell.ca, christopher.ginther@bell.ca,
> > atvnews@ctv.ca, bcecomms@bce.ca, info@obamaforillinois.com,
> > newsroom@globeandmail.ca
> > Subject: Fwd: Another kettle of Fish
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Note: forwarded message attached.
> >
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
> > From: David Amos
> > Date: October 14, 2004 2:35:13 AM EDT
> > To: jmargolis@hbs.edu
> > Cc: rebozo@u.washington.edu, Patrick.E.Murphy.72@nd.edu,
> > mail@cebcglobal.org, nbowie@umn.edu, dunfeet@wharton.upenn.edu,
> > donaldst@wharton.upenn.edu, hartmane@andromeda.rutgers.edu,
> > dmessick@kellogg.northwestern.edu, tpiper@hbs.edu, lnash@hbs.edu,
> > rsolomon@mail.utexas.edu, WicksA@darden.virginia.edu,
> > ltrevino@psu.edu, brenkg@msb.edu, timfort@umich.edu,
> > Diana_Robertson@bus.emory.edu, WERHANEP@darden.virginia.edu,
> > gfdavis@umich.edu, st.int@cbs.dk, dsicilia@umd.edu, sb.ikl@cbs.dk,
> > men.ikl@cbs.dk
> > Subject: Fwd: Another kettle of Fish
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Note: forwarded message attached.
> >
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
> > From: David Amos
> > Date: October 13, 2004 10:18:52 PM EDT
> > To: promano@VillageVoice.com
> > Cc: info@lynnwestmoreland.org, milan01@cs.com, info@kucinich.us,
> > contact@edhermanforcongress.com, dhooper@uplogon.com,
> > lynn@actionstrat.com, jt@truscottgroup.com,
> > randell.shafer@comcast.net, cassell4congress@earthlink.net,
> > GA06@mail.house.gov, deversman@daveeversman.org,
> > bryce@calderclay.com, information@catherine2004.org, kajode@aol.com,
> > jim.demint@mail.house.gov, Bob@inglisforcongress.com,
> > aspencer@limestone.edu, gary@garymcleod.org,
> > preachergirl68@yahoo.com, Stew@StewForCongress.com,
> > Info@MelissaBrownforCongress.com, jpd4cd14@verizon.net,
> > dent2004@ptd.net, campaign@paterno2004.com, lcauditor@aol.com,
> > flk828@aol.com, bobney@bobney.org, RonCrews@crewsforcongress.com,
> > contact_chase@chaseforcongress.com, info@jonesforuscongress.com,
> > info@johnthune.com, info@diedrichforcongress.com,
> > info@BobBrown2004.com, Denny.Rehberg@mail.house.gov,
> > janice@bowlingforcongress.com, jcollins@foley.com,
> > Craig.Morford@usdoj.gov, slevin@mail.house.gov
> > Subject: Fwd: Another kettle of Fish
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Note: forwarded message attached.
> >
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail – CNET Editors' Choice 2004. Tell them what you think.
> > From: David Amos
> > Date: October 13, 2004 2:29:38 PM EDT
> > To: BRICE@darden.virginia.edu
> > Cc: moriartyb@Darden.virginia.edu, FreemanE@darden.virginia.edu,
> > dean.krehmeyer@atkearney.com, headquarters@fanniemae.com,
> > Ken_Rietz@was.bm.com, Harold_Burson@nyc.bm.com,
> > chris_komisarjevsky@bm.com, John_Maltese@nyc.bm.com,
> > Celia_Berk@nyc.bm.com, Andrew_Nibley@marsteller.com,
> > Michael_Mckenna@marsteller.com, Richard_Mintz@was.bm.com,
> > Scott_Pastrick@was.bm.com, cveith@directimpact.com,
> > Linda_Recupero@nyc.bm.com, attgenmail@moago.org, Chris@votebyrd.org,
> > TalkToUs@pamelawallin.com, louis@canapple.com
> > Subject: Another kettle of Fish
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Note: forwarded message attached.
> >
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
> > From: David Amos
> > Date: October 12, 2004 10:02:27 AM EDT
> > To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
> > Cc: info@hodesforcongress.com, mckim@mckimforsenate.com,
> > ncicco@seacoastonline.com, info@nadeau2004.com,
> info@johnlynch04.com,
> > thomas.eaton@leg.state.nh.us, scotta@parl.gc.ca,
> Brison.S@parl.gc.ca,
> > davidorchard@sasktel.net, rosent@math.toronto.edu, dpm@pm.gc.ca,
> > ethics@harvard.edu, Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca, McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca,
> > Easter.W@parl.gc.ca, Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,
> > Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Efford.J@parl.gc.ca, Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca,
> > Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, Valeri.T@parl.gc.ca, Dosanjh.U@parl.gc.ca,
> > kcarmichael@bloomberg.net, dwford@dmb.com, bill.glahn@mclane.com,
> > cathy@green-utter.com, michael.gunnison@usdoj.gov,
> > Mhall@hallstewart.com, ekaplan@sulloway.com, Bjorn_Lange@fd.org,
> > Dmullen@doj.state.nh.us, soconnell@nixonpeabody.com,
> > lvogelman@skv-law.com, gretchen.witt@usdoj.gov,
> > tarrance@tarrance.com, info@voteparke.com,
> woodchuck200@adelphia.net,
> > cei@nbnet.nb.ca, mconnolly@haslaw.com, pcowan@sheehan.com,
> > davies.carl@nbpub.com, news@timestranscript.com,
> oldmaison@yahoo.com,
> > nbombud@gnb.ca, advocacycollective@yahoo.com, brad.green@gnb.ca,
> > dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca,
> > CustomerService@NEMoves.com, news@dailygleaner.com, info@gg.ca,
> > peter.ringrose@lawsociety.nf.ca, srobinson@lspei.pe.ca,
> > dpink@nsbs.org, mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca,
> > pierre.cleroux@cdnq.org, jhoule@barreau.qc.ca, kcorrick@lsuc.on.ca,
> > afineblit@lawsociety.mb.ca, klogan@lawsociety.sk.ca,
> > Don.Thompson@lawsocietyalberta.com, jmatkin@lsbc.org,
> > lawsoc@nunanet.com, lsy@yknet.yk.ca, whitford-lsnt@theedge.ca,
> > jeff.mockler@gnb.ca, diane.bourque@flsc.ca,
> > brad.woodside@fredericton.ca, police@fredericton.ca,
> > Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca, corp.website@sunlife.com,
> > martine.turcotte@bell.ca, cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca,
> > chebert@thestar.ca, Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca, Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca,
> > Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, MacAulay.L@parl.gc.ca, alltrue@nl.rogers.com,
> > jmilan01@cs.com, motomaniac@techemail.com
> > Subject: Notice I did not tell Granny?
> >
> >
> > She didn't respond but something else did. Now I am gonna tell
> > everyone elses' computer what I know to be true. Bill Gates'
> services
> > have failed me again, so I will rely on faithful old Yahoo. Brad
> Smith
> > and Steven Balmer really should have responded to my letters, much
> to
> > the chagrin of a local boy William D. Green and McGraw Hill. They do
> > own Businessweek and Mulroney speaks for Forbes and Quebecor. You
> > think they would have called and invited me to speak at the
> Accenture
> > big deal in the Big Apple. Could it be they knew I was going to jail
> > so they felt free to snub me?
> > At least computers are faithful. It takes wicked people to
> > ignore or delete the files. I still have retained my faith in the
> > ordinary mans' sense of curiousity and greed. I will wager a few
> > people will have a look and then the cat will be out of the bag and
> > forwarded around the world.
> > Just so other people that recieve this email know, this is no
> > virus nor anything malicious such as spam. It is just some of the
> > awful truth that I have come to know. When you have satisfied your
> > curiousity and see what i say may be true. It should make you sick
> > enough to give someone a call to voice your indignation.
> > I thought it was only fair that since I was spilling the beans on
> > the Republicans in Beantown, I must to the same for the Democrats as
> > well. Click on the attachment and have a look. Then everyone should
> > give Jeanne Shaheen and Judy Reardon a call and ask them if they are
> > in bed with George Bush. If you seek true enlightenment give Barack
> > Obama a call and ask him about the letter I sent him long before I
> > went home to rum for Parliament. Id he denies receiving it ask me for
> > a copy it was sent confirmed US Mail.
> > My fellow Canadins this message is for you. This email merely
> > contains some crap about bad acting Yankees it is no real news
> because
> > everyone knows it true anyway. What you should pay attention to is
> > that Paul Martin went to Russia this weekend to advise them on Civil
> > Rights issues. I can easily prove to you why he should have stayed
> > home. I will forward to anyone that asks the info that will make you
> > cry about our own sad state of affairs. We nedd to fix ourselves
> first
> > before we elect assholes to advise. Does anyone remember Tainted
> blood
> > and Martin's involvement in the matter? Ask his wicked little
> deputy
> > from the Maritimes Anne McLellan or Belinda Baby's Buddy Billy
> > Clinton about that. Howard Wilson ain't saying what he knows about
> > jackshit.
> > The will be more email to follow to those I choose to inform.
> > I will send more info to those that ask me nicely and if I can
> afford
> > the time.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: promano@VillageVoice.com
> > Cc: info@lynnwestmoreland.org ; milan01@cs.com ; info@kucinich.us ;
> > contact@edhermanforcongress.com ; dhooper@uplogon.com ;
> > lynn@actionstrat.com ; jt@truscottgroup.com ;
> > randell.shafer@comcast.net ; cassell4congress@earthlink.net ;
> > GA06@mail.house.gov ; deversman@daveeversman.org ;
> > bryce@calderclay.com ; information@catherine2004.org ; kajode@aol.com
> > ; jim.demint@mail.house.gov ; Bob@inglisforcongress.com ;
> > aspencer@limestone.edu ; gary@garymcleod.org ;
> > preachergirl68@yahoo.com ; Stew@StewForCongress.com ;
> > Info@MelissaBrownforCongress.com ; jpd4cd14@verizon.net ;
> > dent2004@ptd.net ; campaign@paterno2004.com ; lcauditor@aol.com ;
> > flk828@aol.com ; bobney@bobney.org ; RonCrews@crewsforcongress.com ;
> > contact_chase@chaseforcongress.com ; info@jonesforuscongress.com ;
> > info@johnthune.com ; info@diedrichforcongress.com ;
> > info@BobBrown2004.com ; Congressman Denny Rehberg ;
> > janice@bowlingforcongress.com ; moto maniac
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 8:13 AM
> > Subject: Fw: Your Message to Johnny; Please Make Sure Your Address is
> > Included
> >
> > Sometimes you can make government computers work for you. At
> least
> > they act faithfully and give everyone the same answer. You people
> that
> > seek to have these folks positions are you going to play the Hear no
> > Evil, See no Evil and speak no evil game as well? Jeez I gave you a
> > very interesting clue about how I can prove John Kerry is not worthy
> > of the Public Trust.
> > As of yet not one of you has responded. Could it be because
> > someone told you not to because I can prove Mr. Bush is worse?
> Please
> > review what I sent you and never forget that allow I am just a
> > Canadian, I have the same rights as you under Title 42 Sec 1981 &
> 1982
> > etc etc. Am I the only one willing to speak up in the defense of
> your
> > Rights and demand that the Public Trust be upheld and malevolent
> > authorities be held accountable?
> > Most of you are not encumbents I threw in some to spice up the
> > stew. This is you chance to sweep public corruption from the
> congress
> > for at least maybe a day or two. Someone might as well speak up
> > because I am emailing the World.
> > What planet are you folks from?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: Representative Johnny Isakson
> > Cc: Congressman Denny Rehberg
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 7:51 AM
> > Subject: Re: Your Message to Johnny; Please Make Sure Your Address is
> > Included
> >
> >
> > Hey Johnny You should really think about what you just sent me
> > and review what I sent you. Then ask your help to explain Rule 9 of
> > the Code of Ethics that was made law about 1958 or so Title 18 sec
> > 1001 or Title 28 sec 530b can enlighten you as well.
> > I can send you a summons to court from any of every US District
> > Court and you would have to answer me then or pay a great amount of
> > relief.
> > At least I thank you for acknowledging what you received. Whether
> > you read it or not is not my fault. You can never deny you got it.
> My
> > address is clearly stated within the tif files attached.
> > The same holds true for you too Denny Boy.
> > Why don't you all just pick up the phone and ask H. Marshaal
> > Jarrett or Michael E. Shaheen to go Mr. Raines' New School of
> Ethics?
> > Maybe they can learn some new tricks to teach all you dudes in
> > Congress. I am bored with the standard operating proceedure give me
> > something new to ponder or get honest. Will ya?
> > Cya'll in Court:)
> > David R. Amos
> > 153 Alvin Ave.
> > Milton.MA. 02186
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Representative Johnny Isakson"
> > To:
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 12:28 AM
> > Subject: Your Message to Johnny; Please Make Sure Your Address is
> > Included
> >
> > > Thank you for contacting my office. Due to the extremely high
> volume
> > of
> > > emails I receive, I am only able to respond to messages from the
> > State of
> > > Georgia that contain a complete name and street or mailing
> address.
> > I
> > > appreciate your input and ideas, and hope that you will take a
> > moment to
> > > visit my website at http://www.house.gov/isakson. This message is
> > sent
> > > out as an automatic response to every email.
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Johnny Isakson
> > > Member of Congress
> > >
> >
> >
> > Dear Friend:
> >
> > Thanks for your message. I appreciate receiving your comments and
> > hope you will pardon the automated reply, but I wanted you to know
> > quickly that I have received your message.
> >
> > I would like to respond via email to each of the emails I receive.
> > Unfortunately, we have not yet found a way to send a secure,
> > tamper-proof email. If you would like a personal response from me,
> > via U.S. mail, please include your name and mailing address in the
> > text of your message, or email me through my website
> > www.house.gov/rehberg. Your thoughts are important to me, and I want
> > you to know that your email is read and appreciated. The views and
> > opinions of Montanans are extremely important to me -- you are my
> > "eyes and ears" -- and I appreciate your input.
> >
> > If you have further thoughts or questions, or if you are having
> > problems with a federal office and need assistance, my staff in
> > Washington, D.C. and Montana would like to hear from you. Here are
> my
> > office telephone numbers:
> >
> > Washington, D.C.: (202) 225-3211
> > Billings toll-free: 1-888-232-2626
> > Billings: (406) 256-1019
> > Missoula: (406) 543-9550
> > Great Falls: (406) 454-1066
> > Helena: (406) 443-7878
> >
> > All e-mails concerning scheduling are forwarded to my Montana and
> > Washington, DC staff. If you were contacting me on a scheduling
> > matter, my staff will be in touch with you.
> >
> > I also invite you to visit my website www.house.gov/rehberg for
> > information that will help you track current issues before the U.S.
> > House of Representatives. If you have time and the opportunity, you
> > might also want to visit THOMAS, the Library of Congress Legislative
> > Information System on the Internet (at http://thomas.loc.gov/) and
> the
> > House of Representatives home page (at http://www.house.gov/) where
> > you will find a great deal of useful information on Congressional
> > activities.
> >
> > Again, thanks for your interest. Your thoughts and concerns help
> > create a better future for Montana. Keep in touch.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Denny Rehberg
> > Representative for the State of Montana
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: lcauditor@aol.com
> > Cc: flk828@aol.com ; bobney@bobney.org ;
> RonCrews@crewsforcongress.com
> > ; contact_chase@chaseforcongress.com ; info@jonesforuscongress.com ;
> > info@johnthune.com ; info@diedrichforcongress.com ;
> > info@BobBrown2004.com ; denny.rehberg@mail.house.gov ;
> > janice@bowlingforcongress.com
> > Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 11:29 PM
> > Subject: Fw: I just called here is your tip
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: promano@VillageVoice.com
> > Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 10:51 PM
> > Subject: Fw: I just called here is your tip
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: milan01@cs.com
> > Cc: info@kucinich.us
> > Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 2:13 PM
> > Subject: Fw: I just called here is your tip
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: contact@edhermanforcongress.com
> > Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 8:39 PM
> > Subject: I just called here is your tip
> >
> > These are just a tif files nothing malicious but fairly enlightening.
> > I simply don't care about your political standing as long as it
> comes
> > from ethical reasoning give me a call if you wish.
> > Best Regards
> > David R. Amos
> >
> >
> > Note: forwarded message attached.
> >
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail – CNET Editors' Choice 2004. Tell them what you think.
> > From: "David Amos"
> > Date: October 12, 2004 8:15:49 AM EDT
> > To: "moto maniac"
> > Subject: Fw: I just called here is your tip
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: promano@VillageVoice.com
> > Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 10:51 PM
> > Subject: Fw: I just called here is your tip
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: milan01@cs.com
> > Cc: info@kucinich.us
> > Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 2:13 PM
> > Subject: Fw: I just called here is your tip
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: contact@edhermanforcongress.com
> > Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 8:39 PM
> > Subject: I just called here is your tip
> >
> > These are just a tif files nothing malicious but fairly enlightening.
> > I simply don't care about your political standing as long as it
> comes
> > from ethical reasoning give me a call if you wish.
> > 506 434-1379
> > Best Regards
> > David R. Amos
> >
> > Kucinich.tif>
> > Response.tif>
> > baby.tif>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Do you Yahoo!?
> vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
> Dudes.tif>
>
>
>
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

--Forwarded Message Attachment--



Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.
David Amos wrote:
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:58:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: sbj5@sbcglobal.net




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Better first dates. More second dates. Yahoo! Personals Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: madwriterrc@yahoo.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:44:00 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: deborahlbmc@yahoo.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:00:17 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: sketch420@hotmail.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 14:16:25 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: thomas.allen17@ntlworld.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 08:44:29 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: thesteveuc@yahoo.com, dante17678@hotmail.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:04:18 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: rearadmiral3@yahoo.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Make Yahoo! your home page Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:43:44 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: HJMcClure2@msn.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 07:44:38 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: pogo@pogo.org




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:18:21 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: lcampenella@ledger.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:07:05 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: unkadon@netzero.com, assistant_ottawa@mennonitecc.ca




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:47:47 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: ve1jh@hotmail.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 15:19:04 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: trvl@hotmail.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 13:33:05 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: looneroo@hotmail.com
CC: Ron6388@vif.com, colwellcountry05@yahoo.ca, pigletstheman@hotmail.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:08:45 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: ironlodgesky@charter.net




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 07:49:23 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: hsnider@controvalve.com




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 08:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: dent2004@ptd.net
CC: info@driscollforcongress.com, campaign@rich2004.com,
dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, CustomerService@NEMoves.com,
news@dailygleaner.com, info@gg.ca, peter.ringrose@lawsociety.nf.ca,
srobinson@lspei.pe.ca, dpink@nsbs.org, mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca,
pierre.cleroux@cdnq.org, jhoule@barreau.qc.ca, kcorrick@lsuc.on.ca,
afineblit@lawsociety.mb.ca, klogan@lawsociety.sk.ca,
Don.Thompson@lawsocietyalberta.com, jmatkin@lsbc.org, lawsoc@nunanet.com,
lsy@yknet.yk.ca, whitford-lsnt@theedge.ca, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca,
diane.bourque@flsc.ca, brad.woodside@fredericton.ca,
police@fredericton.ca, Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca, corp.website@sunlife.com,
martine.turcotte@bell.ca, cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca,
chebert@thestar.ca, Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca, Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca,
Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, MacAulay.L@parl.gc.ca,
WERHANEP@darden.virginia.edu, gfdavis@umich.edu, st.int@cbs.dk,
dsicilia@umd.edu, sb.ikl@cbs.dk, men.ikl@cbs.dk,
info@lynnwestmoreland.org, milan01@cs.com, info@kucinich.us,
contact@edhermanforcongress.com, dhooper@uplogon.com,
lynn@actionstrat.com, jt@truscottgroup.com,
cassell4congress@earthlink.net, GA06@mail.house.gov,
deversman@daveeversman.org, bryce@calderclay.com,
information@catherine2004.org, kajode@aol.com, jim.demint@mail.house.gov,
Bob@inglisforcongress.com, aspencer@limestone.edu, gary@garymcleod.org,
reachergirl68@yahoo.com, Stew@StewForCongress.com,
Info@MelissaBrownforCongress.com, jpd4cd14@verizon.net, dent2004@ptd.net,
campaign@paterno2004.com, lcauditor@aol.com, flk828@aol.com,
bobney@bobney.org




Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail – CNET Editors' Choice 2004. Tell them what you think. From: David Amos
Subject: Relax I am tough as hell and as mean as a snake
To: metroplex86@speedfactory.net


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!CC: Kathryn
From: Kathryn
Subject: Re: This my best effort to protect someone I respect
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 22:59:42 -0400
To: David Amos

David ,
I hope you come out ok. Make peace with your wife and children. Before
you go. A mother's care and prayer I send to you and your family. I am
afraid to call Byron just to say hello.
Kathryn
On Oct 17, 2004, at 9:58 PM, David Amos wrote:

>
>
> Note: forwarded message attached.
>
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail – CNET Editors' Choice 2004. Tell them what you think.
> From: David Amos
> Date: October 17, 2004 9:51:56 PM EDT
> To: dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca
> Cc: dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, CustomerService@NEMoves.com,
> news@dailygleaner.com, info@gg.ca, peter.ringrose@lawsociety.nf.ca,
> srobinson@lspei.pe.ca, dpink@nsbs.org,
> mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca, pierre.cleroux@cdnq.org,
> jhoule@barreau.qc.ca, kcorrick@lsuc.on.ca,
> afineblit@lawsociety.mb.ca, klogan@lawsociety.sk.ca,
> Don.Thompson@lawsocietyalberta.com, jmatkin@lsbc.org,
> lawsoc@nunanet.com, lsy@yknet.yk.ca, whitford-lsnt@theedge.ca,
> jeff.mockler@gnb.ca, diane.bourque@flsc.ca,
> brad.woodside@fredericton.ca, police@fredericton.ca,
> Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca, corp.website@sunlife.com,
> martine.turcotte@bell.ca, cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca,
> chebert@thestar.ca, Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca, Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca,
> Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, MacAulay.L@parl.gc.ca,
> WERHANEP@darden.virginia.edu, gfdavis@umich.edu, st.int@cbs.dk,
> dsicilia@umd.edu, sb.ikl@cbs.dk, men.ikl@cbs.dk,
> info@lynnwestmoreland.org, milan01@cs.com, info@kucinich.us,
> contact@edhermanforcongress.com, dhooper@uplogon.com,
> lynn@actionstrat.com, jt@truscottgroup.com,
> cassell4congress@earthlink.net, GA06@mail.house.gov,
> deversman@daveeversman.org, bryce@calderclay.com,
> information@catherine2004.org, kajode@aol.com,
> jim.demint@mail.house.gov, Bob@inglisforcongress.com,
> aspencer@limestone.edu, gary@garymcleod.org,
> preachergirl68@yahoo.com, Stew@StewForCongress.com,
> Info@MelissaBrownforCongress.com, jpd4cd14@verizon.net,
> dent2004@ptd.net, campaign@paterno2004.com, lcauditor@aol.com,
> flk828@aol.com, bobney@bobney.org
> Subject: Fwd: This my best effort to protect someone I respect
>
>
>
>
> Note: forwarded message attached.
>
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail – CNET Editors' Choice 2004. Tell them what you think.
> From: David Amos
> Date: October 17, 2004 9:44:39 PM EDT
> To: barrupdate@bobbarr.org
> Cc: mjyannone@aol.com, lynne@votecobb.org,
> BushCheney04@GeorgeWBush.com, info@johnkerry.com, cei@nbnet.nb.ca,
> alltrue@nl.rogers.com, atvnews@ctv.ca, michel.lalande@bell.ca,
> info@obamaforillinois.com, newsroom@globeandmail.ca,
> rebozo@u.washington.edu, Patrick.E.Murphy.72@nd.edu,
> mail@cebcglobal.org, nbowie@umn.edu, dunfeet@wharton.upenn.edu,
> donaldst@wharton.upenn.edu, hartmane@andromeda.rutgers.edu,
> dmessick@kellogg.northwestern.edu, tpiper@hbs.edu, lnash@hbs.edu,
> rsolomon@mail.utexas.edu, WicksA@darden.virginia.edu,
> ltrevino@psu.edu, brenkg@msb.edu, timfort@umich.edu,
> Diana_Robertson@bus.emory.edu, info@hodesforcongress.com,
> mckim@mckimforsenate.com, ncicco@seacoastonline.com,
> info@nadeau2004.com, info@johnlynch04.com,
> thomas.eaton@leg.state.nh.us, scotta@parl.gc.ca, Brison.S@parl.gc.ca,
> davidorchard@sasktel.net, rosent@math.toronto.edu, dpm@pm.gc.ca,
> ethics@harvard.edu, Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca, McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca,
> Easter.W@parl.gc.ca, Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,
> Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Efford.J@parl.gc.ca, Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca,
> Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, Valeri.T@parl.gc.ca, Dosanjh.U@parl.gc.ca,
> kcarmichael@bloomberg.net, dwford@dmb.com, bill.glahn@mclane.com,
> cathy@green-utter.com, chuckmorse@morseforcongress.com,
> michael.gunnison@usdoj.gov, Mhall@hallstewart.com,
> ekaplan@sulloway.com, Bjorn_Lange@fd.org, Dmullen@doj.state.nh.us,
> soconnell@nixonpeabody.com, lvogelman@skv-law.com,
> gretchen.witt@usdoj.gov, tarrance@tarrance.com, info@voteparke.com,
> woodchuck200@adelphia.net, mconnolly@haslaw.com, pcowan@sheehan.com,
> davies.carl@nbpub.com, news@timestranscript.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
> nbombud@gnb.ca, advocacycollective@yahoo.com, brad.green@gnb.ca
> Subject: This my best effort to protect someone I respect
>
>
> I explained it to the lady and she did agree. It is not a bad way
> to protect my friends. When I believe that somebody knows too much, I
> make certain that everybody else knows it as well. Thus I send the
> attached email to all.
> I do not abide in Chatham House Rules like Bob Barr and his
> buddies do. They are all far too sneaky for me. I do not agree with
> the lawyers that think that the truth should be kept confidential to
> protect the reputation of the corrupt. The task of seeing the public
> trust is upheld falls upon ordinary people when lawyers, politicians
> and law enforcement authorities would rather cover up the crimes and
> not act within the scope of their employment and uphold the law .
> When the Media refuses to exercise their Constitutional Freedom
> to report what they know to be true just because of the interests of
> the CEO's that pay their wages maybe adversely affected. Ordinary
> people must spread the word and reveal the truth anyway they can for
> the benefit of all. You can ask W5 or Frontline or Bob Barr and a
> great many others my opinion about that.
> If anyone believes me, please forward this information to
> everyone you know. I must go to court on October 19th and defend my
> freedom because I sent a crooked lawyer litigating against me three
> emails that she didn't like to receive. She lied and pretended that I
> was a mere acquaintance that was stalking her and everyone knows it is
> not so. It is her and her clients that are harassing my family.
> Methinks I will forward to all the emails that I sent to her on
> the day I stand before the court. We shall see what the folks on the
> world wide web think about that. If I cannot do so because my lines
> are cut again or if I am sent back to jail. I ask that my friends to
> do it for me in order that the truth be revealed.
> If necessary I also ask that my friends forward the Affidavit
> that caused a Yankee judge to send me to jail without bail in order to
> check my mental health. I am not crazy to bring my attorney (me,
> myself and I) with me every where I go even into the downtown Psych
> Ward. I had served the Sheriff the year before because she had failed
> to uphold the law. The Sheriff's Dept. had assisted the perjury of the
> US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan after I had paid their substantial
> bill. I would not allow her deputies to deny me of my rights without
> protest and demanding to speak to their lawyer, the Sheriff herself.
> Eventually they let me out on five thousand dollar cash bail.
> While I was in jail the Canadian Consulate dudes came to see me and
> told me that I had threatened a judge but when I asked my jailers for
> the charges against me it was only listed as "other". I have not
> received any notice of such charges and I know for a fact that I
> didn't. If I had threatened a judge he would have charged me
> immediately while was standing before him in court. The DA is a liar.
> The judge properly recused himself because I informed him that he is
> my neighbor as soon I knew and was allowed to speak. It was not my
> fault that the court, or the DA or the judge did not compare our
> addresses before they attempted to prosecute me. I definitely was not
> stalking the judge, I stayed far away in Canada and only entered the
> USA on the days I was ordered by the court to appear. The DA's claim
> that I was a flight risk was absolutely ridiculous. I look forward to
> the argument in the proper jurisdiction in front of a jury of my
> peers. The fact I won't file a Motion to Dismiss is why they think I
> am nuts. I am not. It is a necessary argument for the benefit of my
> Clan. I must make a stand and defend our rights. To take the chance of
> going to to jail as another wrongly prosecuted man is a very small
> price to pay. Trading safety for freedom is not wise.
> To all the others that consider this spam, ask me if I care. At
> least you can never say that I didn't tell what was so. I have the
> proof that the message was sent in good byway of Yahoo to you.
> David Raymond Amos
>
> Note: forwarded message attached.
>
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail – CNET Editors' Choice 2004. Tell them what you think.
> From: David Amos
> Date: October 16, 2004 11:16:53 AM EDT
> To: Kathryn
> Cc: mjyannone@aol.com, info@votenader.org, lynne@votecobb.org,
> BushCheney04@GeorgeWBush.com, info@johnkerry.com, cei@nbnet.nb.ca,
> alltrue@nl.rogers.com
> Subject: Re: Another kettle of Fish
>
>
> Kathryn, I thank you for your interest. You are the first person
> to respond to my emails in a positive fashion. My numbers are as
> follows: Home 617 698 6549 Cell 506 434-1379
> The following is the name of a man of your party that I had a
> long talk with last night. I like him a lot. I will support his bid
> for election anyway I can. Obviously I just told him so. I do not
> support political parties I support individuals that prove to me their
> honesty and therefore are worth being placed in a seat in Congress or
> elsewhere in order to uphold the Public Trust.
> Another fella of your party Glen Schwarz dropped the ball and
> insulted me as some sort of conspiracy nut yesterday. If he only knew
> how that offended a Canadian that knows a little bit about tainted
> blood on Little Rock. Then he would know why I saw red.
> Good Day Mark and thanks for listening. Please do me the favour
> and call my friend Byron Prior 709 834-9822. He is a man in true need
> of support. A simple phone call would be a long needed sip of the milk
> of human kindness from a stranger.
> As for me I need no help. I do better alone. I make myself more
> powerful by helping others. In return, I merely hope that they will
> testify as to what they know to be true. Before I help anyone, they
> must prove to me that they can be trusted. There is quite simply no
> middle ground for anyone to stand on in my battles with the corruption
> within the justice systems and the governments of two countries.
> Although they are supposed to be separate entities within separate
> nations, they are in fact tied at the hip. Thanks to the malevolent
> actions of lawyers such as Cobb and Nader who pretend to be something
> that they are not.
> Last night I had just discovered that your party had a man
> running for President. Now I have discovered that there are in deed
> many people running for the presidency. If they wish to receive them,
> I will forward them all the same emails I sent to your party. However
> I also saw that your man was running around with the likes of David
> Cobb, a lawyer I do not trust for very justifiable reasons. Please
> view the attached files and ask Mr. Cobb what he knows to be true
> about my concerns.
> My best advice to Mr. Badnarik is to be careful of who he
> associates with. The attached files should explain my reasons why. Mr.
> Cobb and Mr. Nader can expect a summons to court someday. I will not
> bother your man Badnarik because he is a layman and not obliged to
> uphold the law. If he or anyone of his friends wish to call, it is
> fine by me. I will tell anyone what I know to be true. It simply does
> not matter whether I trust them or not. Truth must be known to all and
> not kept secret.
> My word is my bond. Lawyers require signatures not honest men.
> However if you do not trust my word, save this email for your own
> benefit. Frank Quatronne's and Martha Stewart's matters proved how
> valuable emails can be.
> Right now John Kerry is the Senator representing my Clan in
> Massachusetts. If he loses this election, he is still our senator. He
> also brags a lot about being a former Suffolk County District
> Attorney. He has had a copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape
> numbered 139 for a very long time. The Suffolk County District
> Attorney, Daniel Conley has had many original tapes since Sept 3rd
> 2004 as have Canadian law enforcement authorities.
> The tapes have been discussed before a court that does not have
> jurisdiction to even begin to hear the matter. I had served upon the
> court byway of an affidavit that I had given the material to the
> Suffolk County District Attorney as directed by the Milton Police
> Chief, the Canadian Governor General, A Canadian Attorney General and
> the even the Massachusetts Trail Court's own legal Dept. to name a
> few. On October 1st of this year before a judge sent me to jail in a
> blatant violation of my Eighth Amendment Rights, the very police
> surveillance tapes that I speak of were piled on the DA's table on
> open view to all rather than being filed under seal. the tapes are
> irrefutable of the Fourth Amendment Violations of others. Everyone
> witnessed the DA not upholding the law and the court asked no
> questions. I was then sent to the custody of a Sheriff that had
> assisted the criminals acting against me for years. There will be a
> profound legal argument about the false allegations made against me or
> I will die defending my right to do so. I hope that is clear.
> I had also informed Kerry of many other crimes beginning on
> October 23rd 2002 before he was reelected our Senator. He cannot deny
> that his assistant tried to call me immediately after a very important
> argument in Norfolk Superior Court on Sept 29th, 2003. I had others
> listen to my voicemail. On the very same day I sent the evidence of
> crimes to every US Attorney in the USA and began mailing the same
> material to every Member of Congress that is a lawyer. I have received
> responds from many. they can never say they don't know the truth about
> what I say.
> It is now almost two years to the day since I had first crossed
> paths with Senator John Kerry. On October 19th in Dorchester District
> Court I will name him and his friends Kennedy, Edwards, Lynch,
> Kucinich and many others as witnesses to testify in my defense
> against the very office he once was employed by. I have their
> signatures. Therefore they can never claim that they are not well
> aware of my matters. I am inviting everyone to witness my Trial in
> front of a Jury of my Peers. This is an important matter for the
> benefit of all the peoples rights in two democratic countries.
> I also informed Kerry of what I knew about the FBI claims to me
> of preparing to go to war in Iraq on Oct 15th, 2002. What he says now
> about that War is very offensive to me, particularly as a Canadian
> Citizen. Americans such as Argeo P. Cellucci chastise us for not
> becoming involved and label us as chickens. The Yankees like Argeo
> have a very short memory span. It appears that they forget World War
> One and Two. The USA did not become involved until they were attacked.
> In my opinion that is the proper way to employ a country's armed
> forces. Canada had to go to war because our Monarchy had ordered it. I
> am very glad that Canada did not follow the British lead into Iraq.
> The British always use the colonials as cannon fodder. I know a 48th
> Highlander, a Lady from Hell that will talk to you all day about that
> fact.
> I say the blood of a Patriot should only be spilled in defense
> of his country. A President should not order the people he serves to
> draw first blood. War is a tool that serves only politicians. They
> should do what the people elected them to do. Merely speak softly as
> they hold the big stick.
> I am sick and tired of hearing the phrase "Weapons of Mass
> Destruction". They are just catch words employed by a malicious
> politician to strike fear in the hearts of the people he represents.
> That very man controls the greatest arsenal in the world of such
> weapons.
> I would debate Dick Cheney about this or anything any day of
> the week and twice on Sunday. George W. Bush is just too dumb to waste
> my breath with. Look into his eyes before you attempt to argue me
> about that fact. I have heard that he is on the same pills that have
> been prescribed to my wife and yet she continues to function as a
> normal hard working person who is the loving mother of two. The pills
> do the the job for her. To me George W. Bush is a space cadet on the
> wrong medication. He now wants my native land to become involved in
> his buddies' pet Star Wars Project. Bush's puppet, Steven Harper just
> forced the malevolent Martin to go along with the plan. I say nay, no
> way. What say you?
> David Raymond Amos
>
> Need I say this email is being forwarded to many Canadians.
>
>
>
> Mr. Mark J. Yannone (AZ)
>
>
> Current Office: Challenger
> Office Seeking: U.S. Representative
> District Seeking: 3
> Party: Libertarian
> 2 West Pershing Avenue
> Phoenix, AZ 85029
> Phone: 602-548-7123
>
> Kathryn wrote:
> Do you have a phone number?
> Kathryn
> Media Executive Assistant
> On Oct 15, 2004, at 9:52 PM, David Amos wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Note: forwarded message attached.
> >
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now.
> > From: David Amos
> > Date: October 15, 2004 7:21:58 PM EDT
> > To: markyannone@yahoo.com
> > Cc: appoe@aol.com, jsykes@ak.net, info@millicanussenate.com,
> > vernon_mason@yahoo.com, Powell@GammillForCongress.com,
> > Delawarewc@yahoo.com
> > Subject: Fwd: Another kettle of Fish
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Note: forwarded message attached.
> >
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail – CNET Editors' Choice 2004. Tell them what you think.
> > From: David Amos
> > Date: October 14, 2004 6:03:02 PM EDT
> > To: newsroom@globeandmail.ca
> > Cc: lavoie.luc@quebecor.com, michel.lalande@bell.ca,
> > jean-francois.legault@bell.ca, christopher.ginther@bell.ca,
> > atvnews@ctv.ca, bcecomms@bce.ca, info@obamaforillinois.com,
> > newsroom@globeandmail.ca
> > Subject: Fwd: Another kettle of Fish
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Note: forwarded message attached.
> >
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
> > From: David Amos
> > Date: October 14, 2004 2:35:13 AM EDT
> > To: jmargolis@hbs.edu
> > Cc: rebozo@u.washington.edu, Patrick.E.Murphy.72@nd.edu,
> > mail@cebcglobal.org, nbowie@umn.edu, dunfeet@wharton.upenn.edu,
> > donaldst@wharton.upenn.edu, hartmane@andromeda.rutgers.edu,
> > dmessick@kellogg.northwestern.edu, tpiper@hbs.edu, lnash@hbs.edu,
> > rsolomon@mail.utexas.edu, WicksA@darden.virginia.edu,
> > ltrevino@psu.edu, brenkg@msb.edu, timfort@umich.edu,
> > Diana_Robertson@bus.emory.edu, WERHANEP@darden.virginia.edu,
> > gfdavis@umich.edu, st.int@cbs.dk, dsicilia@umd.edu, sb.ikl@cbs.dk,
> > men.ikl@cbs.dk
> > Subject: Fwd: Another kettle of Fish
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Note: forwarded message attached.
> >
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
> > From: David Amos
> > Date: October 13, 2004 10:18:52 PM EDT
> > To: promano@VillageVoice.com
> > Cc: info@lynnwestmoreland.org, milan01@cs.com, info@kucinich.us,
> > contact@edhermanforcongress.com, dhooper@uplogon.com,
> > lynn@actionstrat.com, jt@truscottgroup.com,
> > randell.shafer@comcast.net, cassell4congress@earthlink.net,
> > GA06@mail.house.gov, deversman@daveeversman.org,
> > bryce@calderclay.com, information@catherine2004.org, kajode@aol.com,
> > jim.demint@mail.house.gov, Bob@inglisforcongress.com,
> > aspencer@limestone.edu, gary@garymcleod.org,
> > preachergirl68@yahoo.com, Stew@StewForCongress.com,
> > Info@MelissaBrownforCongress.com, jpd4cd14@verizon.net,
> > dent2004@ptd.net, campaign@paterno2004.com, lcauditor@aol.com,
> > flk828@aol.com, bobney@bobney.org, RonCrews@crewsforcongress.com,
> > contact_chase@chaseforcongress.com, info@jonesforuscongress.com,
> > info@johnthune.com, info@diedrichforcongress.com,
> > info@BobBrown2004.com, Denny.Rehberg@mail.house.gov,
> > janice@bowlingforcongress.com, jcollins@foley.com,
> > Craig.Morford@usdoj.gov, slevin@mail.house.gov
> > Subject: Fwd: Another kettle of Fish
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Note: forwarded message attached.
> >
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail – CNET Editors' Choice 2004. Tell them what you think.
> > From: David Amos
> > Date: October 13, 2004 2:29:38 PM EDT
> > To: BRICE@darden.virginia.edu
> > Cc: moriartyb@Darden.virginia.edu, FreemanE@darden.virginia.edu,
> > dean.krehmeyer@atkearney.com, headquarters@fanniemae.com,
> > Ken_Rietz@was.bm.com, Harold_Burson@nyc.bm.com,
> > chris_komisarjevsky@bm.com, John_Maltese@nyc.bm.com,
> > Celia_Berk@nyc.bm.com, Andrew_Nibley@marsteller.com,
> > Michael_Mckenna@marsteller.com, Richard_Mintz@was.bm.com,
> > Scott_Pastrick@was.bm.com, cveith@directimpact.com,
> > Linda_Recupero@nyc.bm.com, attgenmail@moago.org, Chris@votebyrd.org,
> > TalkToUs@pamelawallin.com, louis@canapple.com
> > Subject: Another kettle of Fish
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Note: forwarded message attached.
> >
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
> > From: David Amos
> > Date: October 12, 2004 10:02:27 AM EDT
> > To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
> > Cc: info@hodesforcongress.com, mckim@mckimforsenate.com,
> > ncicco@seacoastonline.com, info@nadeau2004.com,
> info@johnlynch04.com,
> > thomas.eaton@leg.state.nh.us, scotta@parl.gc.ca,
> Brison.S@parl.gc.ca,
> > davidorchard@sasktel.net, rosent@math.toronto.edu, dpm@pm.gc.ca,
> > ethics@harvard.edu, Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca, McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca,
> > Easter.W@parl.gc.ca, Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,
> > Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Efford.J@parl.gc.ca, Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca,
> > Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, Valeri.T@parl.gc.ca, Dosanjh.U@parl.gc.ca,
> > kcarmichael@bloomberg.net, dwford@dmb.com, bill.glahn@mclane.com,
> > cathy@green-utter.com, michael.gunnison@usdoj.gov,
> > Mhall@hallstewart.com, ekaplan@sulloway.com, Bjorn_Lange@fd.org,
> > Dmullen@doj.state.nh.us, soconnell@nixonpeabody.com,
> > lvogelman@skv-law.com, gretchen.witt@usdoj.gov,
> > tarrance@tarrance.com, info@voteparke.com,
> woodchuck200@adelphia.net,
> > cei@nbnet.nb.ca, mconnolly@haslaw.com, pcowan@sheehan.com,
> > davies.carl@nbpub.com, news@timestranscript.com,
> oldmaison@yahoo.com,
> > nbombud@gnb.ca, advocacycollective@yahoo.com, brad.green@gnb.ca,
> > dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca,
> > CustomerService@NEMoves.com, news@dailygleaner.com, info@gg.ca,
> > peter.ringrose@lawsociety.nf.ca, srobinson@lspei.pe.ca,
> > dpink@nsbs.org, mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca,
> > pierre.cleroux@cdnq.org, jhoule@barreau.qc.ca, kcorrick@lsuc.on.ca,
> > afineblit@lawsociety.mb.ca, klogan@lawsociety.sk.ca,
> > Don.Thompson@lawsocietyalberta.com, jmatkin@lsbc.org,
> > lawsoc@nunanet.com, lsy@yknet.yk.ca, whitford-lsnt@theedge.ca,
> > jeff.mockler@gnb.ca, diane.bourque@flsc.ca,
> > brad.woodside@fredericton.ca, police@fredericton.ca,
> > Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca, corp.website@sunlife.com,
> > martine.turcotte@bell.ca, cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca,
> > chebert@thestar.ca, Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca, Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca,
> > Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, MacAulay.L@parl.gc.ca, alltrue@nl.rogers.com,
> > jmilan01@cs.com, motomaniac@techemail.com
> > Subject: Notice I did not tell Granny?
> >
> >
> > She didn't respond but something else did. Now I am gonna tell
> > everyone elses' computer what I know to be true. Bill Gates'
> services
> > have failed me again, so I will rely on faithful old Yahoo. Brad
> Smith
> > and Steven Balmer really should have responded to my letters, much
> to
> > the chagrin of a local boy William D. Green and McGraw Hill. They do
> > own Businessweek and Mulroney speaks for Forbes and Quebecor. You
> > think they would have called and invited me to speak at the
> Accenture
> > big deal in the Big Apple. Could it be they knew I was going to jail
> > so they felt free to snub me?
> > At least computers are faithful. It takes wicked people to
> > ignore or delete the files. I still have retained my faith in the
> > ordinary mans' sense of curiousity and greed. I will wager a few
> > people will have a look and then the cat will be out of the bag and
> > forwarded around the world.
> > Just so other people that recieve this email know, this is no
> > virus nor anything malicious such as spam. It is just some of the
> > awful truth that I have come to know. When you have satisfied your
> > curiousity and see what i say may be true. It should make you sick
> > enough to give someone a call to voice your indignation.
> > I thought it was only fair that since I was spilling the beans on
> > the Republicans in Beantown, I must to the same for the Democrats as
> > well. Click on the attachment and have a look. Then everyone should
> > give Jeanne Shaheen and Judy Reardon a call and ask them if they are
> > in bed with George Bush. If you seek true enlightenment give Barack
> > Obama a call and ask him about the letter I sent him long before I
> > went home to rum for Parliament. Id he denies receiving it ask me for
> > a copy it was sent confirmed US Mail.
> > My fellow Canadins this message is for you. This email merely
> > contains some crap about bad acting Yankees it is no real news
> because
> > everyone knows it true anyway. What you should pay attention to is
> > that Paul Martin went to Russia this weekend to advise them on Civil
> > Rights issues. I can easily prove to you why he should have stayed
> > home. I will forward to anyone that asks the info that will make you
> > cry about our own sad state of affairs. We nedd to fix ourselves
> first
> > before we elect assholes to advise. Does anyone remember Tainted
> blood
> > and Martin's involvement in the matter? Ask his wicked little
> deputy
> > from the Maritimes Anne McLellan or Belinda Baby's Buddy Billy
> > Clinton about that. Howard Wilson ain't saying what he knows about
> > jackshit.
> > The will be more email to follow to those I choose to inform.
> > I will send more info to those that ask me nicely and if I can
> afford
> > the time.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: promano@VillageVoice.com
> > Cc: info@lynnwestmoreland.org ; milan01@cs.com ; info@kucinich.us ;
> > contact@edhermanforcongress.com ; dhooper@uplogon.com ;
> > lynn@actionstrat.com ; jt@truscottgroup.com ;
> > randell.shafer@comcast.net ; cassell4congress@earthlink.net ;
> > GA06@mail.house.gov ; deversman@daveeversman.org ;
> > bryce@calderclay.com ; information@catherine2004.org ; kajode@aol.com
> > ; jim.demint@mail.house.gov ; Bob@inglisforcongress.com ;
> > aspencer@limestone.edu ; gary@garymcleod.org ;
> > preachergirl68@yahoo.com ; Stew@StewForCongress.com ;
> > Info@MelissaBrownforCongress.com ; jpd4cd14@verizon.net ;
> > dent2004@ptd.net ; campaign@paterno2004.com ; lcauditor@aol.com ;
> > flk828@aol.com ; bobney@bobney.org ; RonCrews@crewsforcongress.com ;
> > contact_chase@chaseforcongress.com ; info@jonesforuscongress.com ;
> > info@johnthune.com ; info@diedrichforcongress.com ;
> > info@BobBrown2004.com ; Congressman Denny Rehberg ;
> > janice@bowlingforcongress.com ; moto maniac
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 8:13 AM
> > Subject: Fw: Your Message to Johnny; Please Make Sure Your Address is
> > Included
> >
> > Sometimes you can make government computers work for you. At
> least
> > they act faithfully and give everyone the same answer. You people
> that
> > seek to have these folks positions are you going to play the Hear no
> > Evil, See no Evil and speak no evil game as well? Jeez I gave you a
> > very interesting clue about how I can prove John Kerry is not worthy
> > of the Public Trust.
> > As of yet not one of you has responded. Could it be because
> > someone told you not to because I can prove Mr. Bush is worse?
> Please
> > review what I sent you and never forget that allow I am just a
> > Canadian, I have the same rights as you under Title 42 Sec 1981 &
> 1982
> > etc etc. Am I the only one willing to speak up in the defense of
> your
> > Rights and demand that the Public Trust be upheld and malevolent
> > authorities be held accountable?
> > Most of you are not encumbents I threw in some to spice up the
> > stew. This is you chance to sweep public corruption from the
> congress
> > for at least maybe a day or two. Someone might as well speak up
> > because I am emailing the World.
> > What planet are you folks from?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: Representative Johnny Isakson
> > Cc: Congressman Denny Rehberg
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 7:51 AM
> > Subject: Re: Your Message to Johnny; Please Make Sure Your Address is
> > Included
> >
> >
> > Hey Johnny You should really think about what you just sent me
> > and review what I sent you. Then ask your help to explain Rule 9 of
> > the Code of Ethics that was made law about 1958 or so Title 18 sec
> > 1001 or Title 28 sec 530b can enlighten you as well.
> > I can send you a summons to court from any of every US District
> > Court and you would have to answer me then or pay a great amount of
> > relief.
> > At least I thank you for acknowledging what you received. Whether
> > you read it or not is not my fault. You can never deny you got it.
> My
> > address is clearly stated within the tif files attached.
> > The same holds true for you too Denny Boy.
> > Why don't you all just pick up the phone and ask H. Marshaal
> > Jarrett or Michael E. Shaheen to go Mr. Raines' New School of
> Ethics?
> > Maybe they can learn some new tricks to teach all you dudes in
> > Congress. I am bored with the standard operating proceedure give me
> > something new to ponder or get honest. Will ya?
> > Cya'll in Court:)
> > David R. Amos
> > 153 Alvin Ave.
> > Milton.MA. 02186
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Representative Johnny Isakson"
> > To:
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 12:28 AM
> > Subject: Your Message to Johnny; Please Make Sure Your Address is
> > Included
> >
> > > Thank you for contacting my office. Due to the extremely high
> volume
> > of
> > > emails I receive, I am only able to respond to messages from the
> > State of
> > > Georgia that contain a complete name and street or mailing
> address.
> > I
> > > appreciate your input and ideas, and hope that you will take a
> > moment to
> > > visit my website at http://www.house.gov/isakson. This message is
> > sent
> > > out as an automatic response to every email.
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Johnny Isakson
> > > Member of Congress
> > >
> >
> >
> > Dear Friend:
> >
> > Thanks for your message. I appreciate receiving your comments and
> > hope you will pardon the automated reply, but I wanted you to know
> > quickly that I have received your message.
> >
> > I would like to respond via email to each of the emails I receive.
> > Unfortunately, we have not yet found a way to send a secure,
> > tamper-proof email. If you would like a personal response from me,
> > via U.S. mail, please include your name and mailing address in the
> > text of your message, or email me through my website
> > www.house.gov/rehberg. Your thoughts are important to me, and I want
> > you to know that your email is read and appreciated. The views and
> > opinions of Montanans are extremely important to me -- you are my
> > "eyes and ears" -- and I appreciate your input.
> >
> > If you have further thoughts or questions, or if you are having
> > problems with a federal office and need assistance, my staff in
> > Washington, D.C. and Montana would like to hear from you. Here are
> my
> > office telephone numbers:
> >
> > Washington, D.C.: (202) 225-3211
> > Billings toll-free: 1-888-232-2626
> > Billings: (406) 256-1019
> > Missoula: (406) 543-9550
> > Great Falls: (406) 454-1066
> > Helena: (406) 443-7878
> >
> > All e-mails concerning scheduling are forwarded to my Montana and
> > Washington, DC staff. If you were contacting me on a scheduling
> > matter, my staff will be in touch with you.
> >
> > I also invite you to visit my website www.house.gov/rehberg for
> > information that will help you track current issues before the U.S.
> > House of Representatives. If you have time and the opportunity, you
> > might also want to visit THOMAS, the Library of Congress Legislative
> > Information System on the Internet (at http://thomas.loc.gov/) and
> the
> > House of Representatives home page (at http://www.house.gov/) where
> > you will find a great deal of useful information on Congressional
> > activities.
> >
> > Again, thanks for your interest. Your thoughts and concerns help
> > create a better future for Montana. Keep in touch.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Denny Rehberg
> > Representative for the State of Montana
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: lcauditor@aol.com
> > Cc: flk828@aol.com ; bobney@bobney.org ;
> RonCrews@crewsforcongress.com
> > ; contact_chase@chaseforcongress.com ; info@jonesforuscongress.com ;
> > info@johnthune.com ; info@diedrichforcongress.com ;
> > info@BobBrown2004.com ; denny.rehberg@mail.house.gov ;
> > janice@bowlingforcongress.com
> > Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 11:29 PM
> > Subject: Fw: I just called here is your tip
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: promano@VillageVoice.com
> > Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 10:51 PM
> > Subject: Fw: I just called here is your tip
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: milan01@cs.com
> > Cc: info@kucinich.us
> > Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 2:13 PM
> > Subject: Fw: I just called here is your tip
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: contact@edhermanforcongress.com
> > Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 8:39 PM
> > Subject: I just called here is your tip
> >
> > These are just a tif files nothing malicious but fairly enlightening.
> > I simply don't care about your political standing as long as it
> comes
> > from ethical reasoning give me a call if you wish.
> > Best Regards
> > David R. Amos
> >
> >
> > Note: forwarded message attached.
> >
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail – CNET Editors' Choice 2004. Tell them what you think.
> > From: "David Amos"
> > Date: October 12, 2004 8:15:49 AM EDT
> > To: "moto maniac"
> > Subject: Fw: I just called here is your tip
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: promano@VillageVoice.com
> > Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 10:51 PM
> > Subject: Fw: I just called here is your tip
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: milan01@cs.com
> > Cc: info@kucinich.us
> > Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 2:13 PM
> > Subject: Fw: I just called here is your tip
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: contact@edhermanforcongress.com
> > Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 8:39 PM
> > Subject: I just called here is your tip
> >
> > These are just a tif files nothing malicious but fairly enlightening.
> > I simply don't care about your political standing as long as it
> comes
> > from ethical reasoning give me a call if you wish.
> > 506 434-1379
> > Best Regards
> > David R. Amos
> >
> > Kucinich.tif>
> > Response.tif>
> > baby.tif>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Do you Yahoo!?
> vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
> Dudes.tif>
>
>
>
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

--Forwarded Message Attachment--



Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

--Forwarded Message Attachment--


Plus I know I am a very lucky man. Call Byron for your own good and his. He will warm your heart.
You asked about Representative Johnny Isakson. I know I did not send him hard copy because he ain't a lawyer. But I did fax him. Some of the non lawyer Congressmen responded the most notable was Dennis Kucinich. I did send every lawyer in Congress hard copy and a copy of the Tape by US mail. Here is some examples. I can fill your email box for a joke with info. Adam Smith is the fella in Atlanta that helped cause my friend's nervous breakdown.
Dave

Note: forwarded message attached.


David Amos wrote:
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Since the Premier does not like my attachment have some text everyone else has read
To: premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, minjus@leg.gov.mb.ca, minister@justice.gov.sk.ca,
premier@gov.sk.ca




David Amos wrote:
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: I just called ya O'Brien
To: OBrien.P@parl.gc.ca, Martin.P@parl.gc.ca, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca,
Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca


We all know the score on Harper and Martin. I am just trying to figure out who amongst my fellow Canadians is dumber, you or Parish or McLellan, or Cadman or Stronach or Kilgour or the Bloc Quebecois or the NDP or Billy Matthews or Johnny Crosbie or Andy Scott maybe just me? Methinks time will tell EH?

Maybe you should ask the Cubans. They are pretending they are as clueless as that moron George W. Bush and don't want me to say stuff on the phone. Hell everybody know what I know. I am just the only one will to say it, thats all. Whereas James Carville thinks Karl Rove is oh so smart, I guess I will have ask him EH? Say hey to the Cubans in Ottawa that pissed me off yesterday and I will say hey to Allan Rock at the UN for you.

Here is their number in case ya didn't know. Their associates in the UN are getting the same hard copy of material I gave Rob Moore, John Herron, Joe Day, Paul Zed, Brad Green, Danny Williams, Franky McKenna, the Arar Inquiry etc etc last year.

H.E. Ernesto A. Sentí Darias

388 Main St.,

Ottawa, ON, K1S 1E3

Tel 613 563-0141

Fax 613 563-0068

Yesterday, Mr. Cotler would not comment on whether the bill would be delayed. Rather, he said he was not aware of any commitment to Mr. O'Brien.

"I only know what I said to Pat O'Brien, which I suspect is the same thing the Prime Minister said . . . and that is this bill will have hearings as do all prospective legislation before committees, but it is the judgment of the committee as to what the nature and scope of those hearings will be.

"So the committee will make those determinations. It's not for us, a minister of the Crown, to make those determinations."

Said justice critic Vic Toews: "It appears to me that Paul Martin is just fooling with O'Brien in a desperate attempt to keep him. . . . "

Earlier this week, Mr. Martin lost one of his party's two Alberta MPs when David Kilgour left to sit as an independent. The Edmonton MP also opposes the same-sex marriage bill.

In welcoming back Mr. O'Brien with open arms, however, Mr. Martin raised the ire of New Democratic Party Leader Jack Layton, who accused him of kicking anti-Bush MP Carolyn Parrish out of his caucus but not an MP who is anti-equality and anti-woman.

Mr. O'Brien had referred to a female colleague, Liberal MP Sarmite Bulte, who disagreed with his position, as a "dumb blond bimbo."

Mr. Martin and his Liberals have been making efforts all week to shore up support wherever they can after polls showed their fortunes plummeting. The testimony at the Gomery inquiry into the sponsorship scandal and allegations that millions of dollars of taxpayer money found its way into Liberal Party coffers have caused an election frenzy on the Hill.

The government is doing everything it can to stay in office, including a proposal -- if it survives until the autumn -- to prorogue the Commons (officially end the session). The scenario, laid out at a recent meeting of senior ministerial staffers, involved, according to a source, proroguing the Commons in September so that it would not sit when the Gomery commission reports in the fall, then bringing the House back in January of 2006 with a Throne Speech followed by a budget and then an election.



After jumping ship from the federal Liberals, Edmonton-Beaumont MP David Kilgour announced yesterday the next election will mark the end of his political career. Kilgour also categorically ruled out running again for the Conservatives at a press conference yesterday at a Mill Woods pizza restaurant in his constituency.

"Read my lips. I intend to remain an Independent on the Liberal side of the house until the next election," he said.

"I am saying that I will not run in the next election, and therefore I will not be running for anybody. Twenty-seven years is probably long enough to be an MP."

Kilgour also said he wouldn't consider rejoining the Liberals before Prime Minister Paul Martin steps down as party leader.

"If Paul Martin were to see the writing on the wall, and decide to resign, and somebody who I agreed with most of the time ... I would probably go back to the Liberals," he said.

Nor would he actually be very welcome in the Conservative circles in the riding, according to Tim Uppal. He lost the seat to Kilgour by a whisker in last June's election.

With explosive testimony from the Gomery inquiry expected to lead to another election in the spring, Uppal said the Conservatives are ramping up their nomination process.

"At one point, he was the safest Liberal seat in Western Canada," Uppal said yesterday, adding Kilgour still enjoys a tremendous amount of respect in the riding.

"Good for him. But coming over to the Conservatives, he would face a very tough nomination battle, and it's a battle he would not want to fight.

"The Liberal party is hurting across Canada, and the Liberal party does not have a chance in this riding."

Kilgour said yesterday the party's stand on same-sex marriage and the scandal surrounding revelations of the Gomery inquiry were a big part of his decision to leave.

But he stressed the deal-breaker was Canada's failure to act to help civilians overrun by civil war in the Darfur region of Sudan. Kilgour blamed Martin for not acting.

In the wake of Kilgour's departure from caucus Wednesday, Martin said he was glad to be rid of someone who wasn't willing to stick it out through tough times.

Kilgour said he'll write a book and devote his time to helping underdeveloped nations after he retires from politics.



David Amos wrote:

Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: I just talked to ya Stevey Boy thanks for showng me your arse so fast
To: stephenb@cba.org, john.e.lowman@esso.ca, jfuhrer@ridoutmaybee.com,
jharris@myersfirm.com, leila.gosselin@calgary.ca, CWade@Heenan.ca,
gavin.wyllie@bellnet.ca, wdanson@mccuaig.com, george@mcallister-law.com,
cmasse@mccarthy.ca, gordon.murphy@aegoncanada.ca,
mcornish@cavalluzzo.com, kirsten.embree@fmc-law.com,
susandumont@telus.net, Brian.Carr@fmc-law.com,
pjrenaud@duncanandcraig.com, christian.whalen@gnb.ca, cba@unb.ca,
cbanb@cbanb.com, jean.trahan@gnb.ca, Pettigrew.P@parl.gc.ca,
cuba_onu@cubanmission.com, cuba@un.int


Christian R.C. Whalen, I just called you too and was put on hold while trying to explain my concerns. I hate that. May I suggest that you sit up and pay attention and act within the scope of your employment once you get back from lunch. The fact that I can use a phone and send emails must at least prove that I am human too and have at least the same rights as you. Rest assured I will be giving you hard copy once I return home in order to prove what I say is true. Putting me in jail or on hold will no longer do.
Just so you all know, there is no need to send your organization, the CBA hard copy. Your buddies George McAllister and Jeff Mockler amongst many others in Fredericton got it last year. I received their malevolent answers before I was was falsely imprisoned in the USA. I bet Georgey Boy and Elizabeth Weir are shitting bricks right now after what they have said in the newspaper about the insurance industry last year and the fact that old Hank Greenburg of AIG is in a world of trouble. When Elliot Spitzer went forward and sued Marsh McLellen whilst I was in jail it really pissed me off. I wonder if he and McAllister understand the term "personal injury" because they certainly failed to uphold the law and assisted John Ashcroft in my false imprisonment under the charges of "other"

These emails just prove that you all knew the truth before I take up my matters with the UN and then come home to run for Parliament again. We all know Franky McKenna and Allan Rock ain't worth a damn when it comes to speaking for the best interests of our fellow Canadians. Who knows maybe there is some other country that will assist and honest pigheaded Maritimer to expose the awful truth for the benefit of all people excepting lawyers of course. By water Cuba is a close neighbor may we should become better friends.
Rest assured if there is no one who will stand with me I will still sue your entire organization for failing the public trust placed in your profession. Methinks the Maritimes should separate from Canada and claim our natural resoures as our own. Lawyers know the maritimes is far from poor why else would buffons such as Franky McKenna and Bernard Lord get to rub elbows with all the rich and powerful? Danny Williams talks the talk should I walk the walk and inspire a true separation? If that were to come about I will wager many lawyers would move to Toronto or Montreal. Everybody knows most Maritimers hate lawyers because they are the ones that have caused us to suffer so while Upper Canadians such as Paul Martin's many cohorts have gotten wealthy off of our assests. Stephen Harper don't give a good god damn about the Maritimes in fact he has called us defeatists. Well he has met one that will challenge his thinking anyway of the week and six times on Sunday. What say you? Wanna call me a liar?


David Amos wrote:
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Here is some heavy reading for ya
To: mdavid@shadleybattista.com, kilgour@parl.gc.ca




David Amos wrote:
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 09:16:35 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Here is some heavy reading for ya
To: EaganBraude@969fmtalk.com




David Amos wrote:
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:54:17 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: The most effective email for Thelma
To: atkinn@sen.parl.gc.ca, doodyw@sen.parl.gc.ca, murral@sen.parl.gc.ca
CC: spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca, jcrivest@sen.parl.gc.ca, prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca,
plamom@sen.parl.gc.ca, lachah@sen.parl.gc.ca




David Amos wrote:
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:08:14 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: The most effective email for Thelma
To: info@traderinafishbowl.com, warren.tolman@hklaw.com, dan@dankennedy.net,
w.kirtz@neu.edu, howiecarr@wrko.com, bzelnick@bu.edu, n.daniloff@neu.edu,
barnicle@969fmtalk.com, info@grahamdefense.org
CC: johnduggan@legalaid.nf.ca, McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca, david@lutz.nb.ca,
cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, ethics@harvard.edu,
INFO7@elections.ca, inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca, cotlei@parl.gc.ca,
Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us, Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us,
Jack.Hart@state.ma.us, Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.ma.us,
Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.ma.us, Dianne.Wilkerson@state.ma.us,
Daphne.Thompson@gems2.gov.bc.ca, coulter.osborne@oico.on.ca,
WayneGreen@mail.gov.nl.ca, gallanpm@gov.ns.ca


Hey

Yesterday morning I put one over the bow of a bunch of bad acting Yankees in Beantown. I got a very predictable response from them, nothing. It seems they struck themselves dumb. It comes to them naturally, I might add. They seem to think the whole world revolves around them and their Big Digs and by-elections. Yet while I was teasing those dumb bastards what was far more important to me and my fellow Canadians was the budget vote up home. If Martin's government fell and my name came up as part of the cause of it, shit would roll down hill and I could impeach Georgie Bush in a New York minute. Then the Yankees would sit up and pay attention. It was a small wonder to me that the Conservatives refrained from voting and Georgie Bush picked up the phone and made his peace with the snake, Paul Martin.

Thus far everything has gone as I have predicted. However everybody does not know about me and the UN yet. Now there is a different kettle of fish. While everybody felt their own fat arses were so important and my dumb ass was not worth a damn, I was still playing the political game on many fronts. Watch out when I line them up.

That said, I listened with interest this morning to the Virgin Fat Bastard on Fox News to hear what he had to say. The most offensive things he said were about Canada and how we don't matter. Perhaps he should have read what I gave to Murdoch's General Counsel, Mr. Siskland last year. There is good reason Canada does not want Fox on its airwaves. It is Fox that does not matter. Plus does VB think Canadians do not buy and sell on the stock market as well? Hell it is a Canadian firm called Thomson that sells all you Yankee lawyers your information that makes you appear so wise. They sell their shares on the Yankee Stock exchange and their General Counsel is right here in CT.

I also heard what VB had to say about Reilly and his speach in front of the Taxpayer Dudes. Does Fox forget the fact that I sued Reilly, the IRS and everybody else years ago for not collecting Taxes?

Then I heard from another Mike Sullivan who writes for the Herald and talks on Fox. What he had to say was truly comical if you know what I know about what he don't know about. How many Mike Sullivans are there in Massachusetts anyway? He had a lot to say about the stock market. Perhaps he should confer with two other Mikey Sullivans to get the real scoop. One produces Frontline and the other is the US Attorney. Then if he wants to make some serious dough as a whistleblower perhaps he should talk to me. I will forward an email about the Media that contians a Tiff file that should properly introduce the three Mikey Sullivans.

I waited for the results of the budget vote to write my wife's last affidavit and then I am gone. You find what court she files it in. I ain't telling it would spoil my fun when I get back to Beantown in time for Tax Day up home. The Bloc Quebecois can call for a confidence vote anytime they want. Everybody knows how easy it is for me to piss off Frenchmen. I put it under the heading of sport.

Read on or not I don't care this email just saves me a lot of toner and paper and Us Postage in order to support my final mailings to expose Public Corruption. I am at the top of the heap it is time to deliver the Coup de Grace in order to cause an Confidence Vote in Canada. The bad acting Yankees can do nothing to stop me now.

Good bye Yankees. I do not wish you a Good Day.

"OTTAWA (Reuters) - Canada's minority Liberal government won a crucial budget vote on Wednesday after the official opposition Conservative Party abstained to ensure the administration stayed in power.

But Conservative leader Stephen Harper, who says Canadians have no desire for another election so soon after the vote last June, did not rule out voting against Ottawa's spending plans in the next few weeks. This, too, could trigger an election.

Legislators approved the budget by 132-73. The government had declared each of the budget votes to be a matter of confidence that could spark an early election.

The Liberals and the Conservatives are not enthusiastic about a new election since neither party has gained support since last June's vote, when the Liberals lost their majority in Parliament.

The Liberals hold 133 of the 308 seats in the House of Commons, with the Conservatives holding 99, the Bloc Quebecois 54, and the New Democratic Party 19. There are two independents and one seat is vacant.

"It's not in the national interest to have an election now," Harper said before the vote. His party -- created 15 months ago through the union of the Alliance and Progressive Conservative parties -- holds its first policy convention next week."

David Amos wrote:

Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 14:12:57 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: The most effective email for Thelma
To: HJMcClure2@msn.com


I truly believe that this email is the most important and timely email for Thelma and my little Clan as well. There is a lot more to this email than what first meets the eye. However if someone like Dick Gregory could have someone like Bill Cosby introduce Thelma to Martha Stewart and she could introduce what I know about lawyers and the SEC crooks to her. All of our troubles would be over when Martha Stewart gets mad as a wet hen. No kidding. It is hard for me to explain but very easy to do. The only problem I have is that nobody believes me. Maybe it is Thelma's credibility and friends are what I need to get the job done because I am too much of a radical. However if I were not such a fierce character I would not have been able to do what I did. Talk about a Catch 22 EH?

David Amos wrote:
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:45:28 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Governor M. Jodi Rell I just callel your office
To: mbevis@nhpr.org




David Amos wrote:
From: "David Amos"
To: "moto maniac" ,
,

Subject: Fw: Governor M. Jodi Rell I just callel your office
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:23:10 -0500



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: dennis.schain@po.state.ct.us ; Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ; attorney.general@po.statect.us ; chris.beaman@mail.house.gov
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 10:10 AM
Subject: Governor M. Jodi Rell I just callel your office


Shame on you Ms. Rell. I read your spiel about Ethics and wanted to talk to you or your lawyers about Attorney General Blumenthal and his actions with Elliot Spitzer and many other people connected with your State involving Securities Fraud before I sued your State. Whomever the woman was answered your phone demanded to know my business. Either she is very malicious or as dumb as a post. She only managed to be able to repeat what I said but seemed incapable of independent thought to answer a simple question and introduce me to your lawyers. Therefore I will sue you in federal court in order to meet them but not before calling Blumenthal to testify at my Trial. Long before that time you will have received Hard Copy of what Blumenthal had received under the reign of your former Governor and will stress test your ethics byway of Martha Stewart as soon as she gets out of jail. Meanwhile obviously I am telling the world what I think of Connecticut and all of its crooks. Tell me honestly. Whom do you do the common people will believe, me or a bunch of Yankee Carpetbaggers? I read about Howard Coble teasing Martha Stewart in prison. I truly hope she gets to return the favor. However Coble likely already knows that I will be suing him along with the Free Agent the loser/lawyer John Edwards.

If I were you I would have your dim witted help read this real slow a couple of times because many other people are receiving this email as well. Martha Stewart alone will make the shit hit the fan once she see her copy. However perhaps you had better have your lawyers contact me real fast because my evidence of crimes are far more powerful than hers and Martha would need my support to sue those that have offended her. I am making my best effort to embarrass you into ethical conduct. If that doesn't rest assured I will sue.



November 14, 2003

Lawrence J Lasser, Juan M. Marcelino,

342 Warren St, 360 Forest

Brookline, MA 02445 Bridgewater, MA 02324

Phone 617 566-5253 Phone 508 279-3341

Hey fellas,

Seems to me you two played dumb too long, then resigned from your lucrative positions way past too late. I know that you and I know you underestimated me. I know your prompt but secretive resignations from your posts are simply part of a cover-up and fraudulent attempt to display ethical behavior at a state, federal and private level. Is this an honourable act? Would Mr. Marcelino swear to it with "Scout’s Honor"?

I know you, Mr. Lasser, know your Kickham neighbors. You do cruise the same haunts. Watch out for Uncle Franky, if you see him behind the wheel of that 4x4. He is as blind as a bat. Why Safety Insurance gave him a good driver discount I will never understand. He has never even had a driver’s license. Watch out for Uncle Bill as well, I know he drinks and drives. Good thing for him has many buddies in the Cop Shops. I also know you know about my appearance at the Brookline Savings Bank Shareholders meeting. You must have known about my contact with George Putnam before attending. What you may not know about is the Kickham’s Court Ordered Second Accounts that were filed the same week. The documents are hereto enclosed. Have your best lawyer explain the ramifications to you. Then ask him if he will defend you after you receive a copy of my complaint. The instant he admits that he has read it and does not affirm the crimes of Charles J. Kickham Jr. I will sue him too. If no lawyer will talk to you, give Mr. Marcelino a call. He is a lawyer. He can’t be too busy these days and his concerns are the same as yours. I am sending you both the same documents that I sent every U.S. Attorney but only he gets a copy of the tape. Lucky for you, Mr. Lasser, that you are not a lawyer.

Seems to me that both of you and I may go toe to toe Pro Se. Even under the Patriot Act, the First Amendment and Freedom of Religion still stands. Watch me reel you in under the Rico laws for three times the total loss because of the conspiracy. If any lawyer disagrees, dare him to send me a letter. The transcripts of the Feb 8/02, May 16/02 and Oct 16/02 hearings in Norfolk Probate Court are enclosed for your review.

Seems to me that the worm has turned. I hope the Kickhams live long enough to go to jail. None of us can predict the future but I got a feeling that my kid’s future is looking brighter every day. Pretty soon they are gonna have to wear shades. As for me I has always been lucky. I have been living on borrowed time since I was three years old. All doctors were betting I would never come out of the coma. Would you like to make a little wager as to whether or not I complete my task before slipping back into the coma? One thing is for certain. Because you are now reading this letter you can never play dumb no more. Say hey to Chucky, Willy, Franky, Mr. Koski, Mr. Randazzo, Mr. Chapman and Mr. Tripp for me.

David R. Amos

Cya’ll in CourtJ

153 Alvin Ave.

Milton, MA. 02186



Conn. AG Sues Marsh & McLennan, ACE
Friday January 21, 4:26 pm ET
By Laura Walsh, Associated Press Writer



Connecticut Attorney General Blumenthal Sues Broker Marsh & McLennan, Insurer ACE


HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) -- Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal on Friday sued insurance brokerage giant Marsh & McLennan Inc. and a unit of the Bermuda-based ACE Ltd. insurance company for illegal commissions in connection with an $80 million state contract.
It was the latest in a series of actions that Blumenthal has taken since New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer filed suit last October against Marsh & McLennan, which is headquartered in New York, for bid rigging, price fixing and demanding incentive fees from insurance companies in exchange for sending more property and casualty business their way.
AIG, Marsh Execs Plead Guilty to Fraud
Tuesday February 15, 3:46 pm ET
By Joseph A. Giannone


NEW YORK (Reuters) - A former senior executive at Marsh & McLennan Cos. Inc. (NYSE:MMC - News) and two executives from American International Group Inc. (NYSE:AIG - News) pleaded guilty to fraud charges stemming from New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer's sweeping investigation of fraud in the insurance industry.


May 29th, 2004

Thomas P. Puccio Brendan V. Sullivan Jr.

c/o The Law offices of Thomas P. Puccio c/o Williams & Connolly LLP

230 Park Avenue, Suite 301 725 Twelfth St., N.W.
New York, New York 10169 Washington, DC 20005

RE: Corruption

Sirs,

I called and emailed both of your offices yesterday. Today someone called me from CT (203 964-0156) stating it was on Mr. Puccio’s behalf. He asked me what I knew of Cendant. Now I support my statements to him with these enclosures that are exactly the same material sent to Mr. Ferguson of the Federal Reserve Bank quite a while ago. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. I have also enclosed copies of two letters sent to the lawyers employed by Cendant Corp and a copy of a filing in Plymouth Probate Court in which the actions of Cendant Corp are mentioned.

I do not know nor do I judge the actions of your clients, Walter Forbes and Kirk Shelton. I do state that the Office of the US Attorney prosecuting them has no right to complain of anyone for not upholding the law. There is also the irrefutable fact that the lawyers now employed by Cendant Corp and at least two of its Directors , Brian Mulroney and William Cohen, both of whom are well known lawyers/politicians, have proven to me that they have a total disregard for upholding the law. They are far from worthy of the Public Trust. I will be filing my own complaints against them soon.

Feel free to argue me if you disagree but I think I have just served upon you a very big stick to use in the defense of your clients. Perhaps you should use it for the benefit of all. Although I am heading home to run for Parliament, rest assured I shall listen for the news of their present prosecution. I have also included a copy of a letter to Richard Blumenthal, the Attorney General of Connecticut, that has thus far gone unanswered. Perhaps you should ask him why he has chosen to ignore my allegations that should support the defense of your clients. At the very least I will call you as witnesses to my complaints. Perhaps you should consider my merits as a defense witness on your client’s behalf. I must say I would make fairly formidable rebuttal witness against the actions of any government lawyer. If you doubt me ask Assistant Attorney General Robb Quinan if I am capable of filling a courtroom. Say hey to Martha Stewart’s lawyers for me will ya? The fact that Feds are now prosecuting one of their own Secret Service Agents is just to funny in light of what I have sent to all parties involved in that matter. Please impress us all with a fine display of ethical conduct befitting your profession.

Cya’ll in CourtJ

David R. Amos

153 Alvin Ave

Milton MA. 02186




Connecticut Attorney General April 15th, 2004

Richard Blumenthal

P.O. Box 120,

Hartford, Connecticut

06141-0120

RE: Corruption

Sir,

Please find enclosed exactly the same documents etc. that were received by the Solicitor General Ted Olson a while ago. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as an officer of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. Please be the man I hope you are and not like the Attorney Generals in New York and Massachusetts. As you can see, I do not have much respect for Yankee lawyers but it does not follow that I hate them all. I have found one ethical lawyer who will speak for my wife as I hit the road and I am a proud father of two Yankees and am married to one. I can’t hate everyone. Please study this stuff and respond to me.

A couple of days ago I sent you an email that should have prompted you to ask me for more information if you are truly concerned about the actions of Big Banks and their recent mergers. When I received no reply, I called your office, and tried to inform the lady that answered of my concerns and of my sincere effort to make you aware. She had no time or interest in talking to me and told me to send my stuff to you by US Mail.

I am very curious if, when and what you may say about my concerns. As a father you must understand me. However the lawyer in you confuses me. I seek a friend not a foe. I have enough enemies. I have seen that you have been quite popular in your campaigns on behalf of the little guy and the people of your state obviously like you enough to keep you in office for so long. I must stress test your ethics in pursuit of a friend.

I know about other things far more important than crooked lawyers, bankers or mobsters. The sad part is many others do to but are too afraid to speak up. Therefore I must become a politician in order to try to speak of it in Parliament so I can expose the truth in such a way that others don’t suffer from it. If perchance I fail and you have proven to me that you are ethical, my ghost will make certain that you will know all that I once knew. I do not have a death wish. I am just laying low for a bit. If the bastards corner me, I will turn as mean as a snake. As one father to another I will ask you this. What is the point in raising happy children and sending them out to live in a miserable world? Shouldn’t we protect the future of all of the children for the benefit of our own? Whether or not I receive response from you, I must call you to court to testify. I sincerely hope that you will stand with me and not against me.

Cya’ll in CourtJ

David R. Amos

153 Alvin Ave.

Milton, MA 02186

January 8, 2004

John R. Cuti and Robert G. Morvillo

Hann M. Maazel Rebecca A. Monck and
Emery, Cuti, Brinckerhoff & Abady, PC John J. Tigue, Jr. c/o

545 Madison Avenue Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand,

New York, NY 10022 Iason & Silberberg, P.C.
Phone: 212 763-5000 565 Fifth Avenue
Fax: 212 763-5001 New York, NY 10017

Phone 212 856-9600

John Keker Fax 212 856-9494

Keker & Van Nest LLP
710 Sansome Street Richard M. Strassberg
San Francisco, CA 94111 Goodwin Procter, LLA

Phone: 415 391-5400 599 Lexington Avenue
Fax: 415 397-7188 New York, NY 10022

Phone: 212 813-8859

Wayne M. Carlin , Fax: 212 355-3333

Alix Biel, Edwin H. Nordlinger

Mark K. Schonfeld, Caren N. Pennington Mary Jo White, US Attorney
and Doria G. Bachenheimer Michael S. Schachter her Assistant

Securities and Exchange Commission Criminal Division
233 Broadway One St. Andrew's Plaza

New York, New York 10279 New York, NY 10007
Phone: 646 428-1510 Phone: 212 637-2631
Fax: 646 428-1981

RE: Corruption

Hey,

No one should ever say that I didn’t diligently try to make you people act ethically and professionally while many of your friends tried very hard to impeach me. Each of you know that I tried to contact you to stop the very improper political persecution and prosecution of Martha Stewart, Peter Bacanovic and Frank Quattrone. Over the past six months I have made each of you very well aware of my standing against the corruption within the government and you all know that I can easily prove it. Now I will drag you all to a place all lawyers fear to tread. It is the witness stand. Imagine having to swear to tell the truth and suffer through my questioning.

The first law firm that I notified was Goodwin Procter, LLP at Exchange Place, Boston, MA I did so byway of a fellow member of Goodwin Proctor, F. Dennis Saylor IV. It was done the instant I became aware that he was nominated for a position as a judge in the US District Court. I have no doubt they know exactly who I am.

It was not necessary to notify David J. Apfel and Richard M. Strassberg but I did call and fax them out of courtesy. Thus far I have heard nothing from them and do not expect to. No one else has contacted me. F. Dennis Saylor IV has known the truth since August of 2002 and he failed to act ethically in his bid to become a judge of the US District Court. In fact I have yet to receive even an acknowledgement from Mr. Saylor that I even exist. It seems I must complain of him and his law firm in order to receive a response. F. Dennis Saylor IV should have also acted in the best interest of the client of Goodwin Proctor, Peter Bacanovic and brought into the light the fact that the matter of The USA v. Martha Stewart et al is merely a case of the pot calling the kettle black. The US Attorney Office claims that it is all about lying. They should be very familiar with that act. The SEC are simply attacking celebrities with some very vague charges to put on a smoke and mirror show to take the public’s eyes off of their own many sins.

Every single one of you knows that I am the ultimate rebuttal witness against the government on behalf of the aforesaid defendants. Each of you also know that the instant that I speak in a widely witnessed public forum, the jig is up for many a corrupt government employee, politician and lawyer in private practice. I can only imagine your many discussions about what to do about me and my allegations. Why did it never dawn upon you to simply tell the truth and let the cards fall where they may for the benefit of all? The only possible answer is that you failed to uphold the law because of you hold your own personal self interests above your client’s interests or the public trust.

Over the past two weeks I was particularly vocal in many ways and in many forums that there is a hard rain about to fall upon the justice system and the political arena because I was doing my best rain dance and I had caught a few drips. The reason I could not come forward earlier in the aforesaid defendant’s behalf was because I did not wish to prevent the Secret Service, the FBI and the IRS from finally acting within the scope of their employment and investigating the Bank Fraud and Tax Fraud within the Brookline Savings Bank that was reported with a Form 211 six months ago.

I could not be certain as to whether or not the FEDs would become overcome by a sudden fit of honesty because of all the politicians I put over the pork barrel in the last six months. I know I tried hard to make them act responsibly but the bell just tolled today. Now I will sue them all as individuals. They are no longer sheltered by immunity as government employees. I have received no response from any of them. Although the Inspector General of the DHS promised to take a look but he is gonna keep it a secret from me. I don’t care what he thinks is proper in my opinion he has already broken Rule 9 of the Code of Ethics hereto attached within the enclosed documents. I will not be further delayed. I will file my first federal complaint very soon.


Sooner or later the defendants, Martha Stewart, Peter Bacanovic and Frank Quattrone, are going to hear of my efforts in their defense. Methinks that all of you will have hell to pay when the shoe is on the other foot. At the very least byway of the US Mail to you I have reaffirmed the fact that I have made you witnesses to my pursuit of justice. You will be named as such in my pending complaint.

I know it is a little redundant to send some of your offices the same documents again but there are a few others that you may not have seen and I wish to make certain that you all receive the same stuff so that you will be all on an even keel when I summons you to court. In my opinion John Keker has not offended me or anyone else as of yet. I just made him aware of me yesterday and without enough stuff to prove to him my sincerity. Now he should display his best ethical behavior very quickly before I file my complaint. After that point in time I will consider him way past too late.

Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter with all enclosures recently received by the CEO of Taxpayers against Fraud and a copy of a letter sent to The IRS six months ago with the form 211 and the evidence, Also included is a copy of letter sent to me by Francis Galvin and a copy of my response to him and Elliot Spitzer. They have ignored me too long and Spitzer in his malice even turned off his fax machine on me in order to ignore me. The copy of wiretap tape number 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it maybe properly investigated. I have also sent an exact copy of this letter with all of its enclosures to the following:

New York State Ethics Commission Thomas J. Cahill, Chief Counsel
39 Columbia Street Departmental Disciplinary Committee
Albany, New York 12207-2717 61 Broadway, 2nd Floor

Phone: 518 432-8207 New York, New York 10006
Fax: 518 432-8255 Phone: 212 401-0800

Fax: 212 401-0810

Don’t you think its high time someone does the right thing? After all each of you swore before the Bar that you would in order to practice law for a fee. Say hey to Martha, Peter and Frank for me will ya. It’s my turn to take a vacation and employ voicemail. I am tired of waiting for someone to call. I know you don’t wish me well but you all better hope I don’t die as well.

Cya’ll in CourtJ

David R. Amos

PO Box 2

South Acworth, NH 03607

Governor Rell Testifies in Favor of

Ethics, Campaign and State Contract Reforms

Appears Before Committee to Promote Reform Package



Governor M. Jodi Rell took her message of reform in state ethics, campaign finance and the awarding of state contracts before a legislative committee today, declaring that the state has “a historic opportunity” to “show the people of Connecticut that we are serious about change” with genuine, comprehensive reform.



“Enacting the reforms I have proposed will send a strong message to the people of Connecticut,” Governor Rell told the General Assembly’s Government Administration and Elections Committee. “That message will be that state government is open and accessible to them – not just to the favored few. That state government is here to work for them – not for the special interests. And that state government is using their hard-earned tax dollars wisely – and not squandering them in cozy deal-making.”



Since taking office seven months ago Governor Rell has made ethics reform the focal point of her administration. She has proposed a sweeping package of reforms promoting “fairness over favoritism.” Governor Rell’s personal appearance before the committee underscored the depth of her commitment to reforming state ethics, political campaigns and contracting processes.



In her testimony, Governor Rell said, “Over the past few years, revelations of scandal and corruption here in Hartford – and in city halls across our state – shook people’s confidence in our system. I have kept a steady focus on restoring public faith in our state government since taking office July 1. Now it is time to make even bigger and bolder gains through legislative action.



“We can take advantage of new leadership and a new spirit of civility and bipartisanship that exists in this building to satisfy the public’s desire for reform. We have a historic opportunity to literally rewrite our laws. To set the highest standards. To make it clear that Connecticut expects the best.



“I look forward to seeing these bills arrive on my desk for signature,” Governor Rell told the GAE members. The bills will “show the people of Connecticut that we are serious about change … that we are serious about regaining and keeping their trust by upholding the highest standards of ethics and integrity in our state government.”



Governor Rell testified in support of six bills in her reform package:



An Act Concerning the Citizen’s Ethics and Government Integrity Commission

This act creates a restructured and improved Ethics and Government Integrity Commission. It will focus the Commission’s resources and work on a stronger training and education component without compromising its enforcement responsibilities. It also compartmentalizes functions to avoid conflicts of interest, creates clear lines of responsibility and establishes a structure that makes an important distinction between the enforcement and advisory functions of the Commission.



New restrictions will also govern the actions and activities of Commission members to limit potential conflicts of interest.



An Act Concerning a Code of Ethics

This bill will allow a judge to reduce or revoke the pensions of public officials or state employees who are found guilty or plead guilty to a serious crime relating to their employment or the office they hold.



This bill would also:



· Prevent state employees and public officials from hiring a contractor to provide personal services, if that contractor does business with their agency

· Close several so-called “revolving door” loopholes to restrict the actions of a state employee moving to a job in the private sector

· Take important steps to tighten gift restrictions

· Require local Connecticut governments to adopt a Code of Ethics



An Act Concerning Ethical Standards for State Contracting

This bill imposes new requirements and new limits on companies seeking to do business with the state. It would:



Require these companies to report any state employee or public official who solicits a gift
Hold private companies responsible if they violate “revolving door” restrictions when hiring former state employees
Require that all large state contracts would have to include a summary of state ethics laws as part of the actual contract (and subcontract) language.
An Act Concerning Campaign Finance

This act seeks to limit the influence of special interests by prohibiting lobbyists and people doing business with the state from contributing to races for statewide office or the legislature. It also prohibits lobbyists from fundraising or soliciting contributions from their clients.



In addition, the bill:

· Lowers limits on contributions for all statewide and legislative offices, and applies these lower limits to political parties, Political Action Committees (PACs) and individuals.

· Limits the number of PACs for each legislative caucus

· Prohibits “ad books,” in which sponsors buy advertising in another fund-raising technique that the Governor called “just a gimmick for getting around the law.”

· Provides an incentive to encourage citizen participation and hold down the cost of campaigns through a tax deduction for contributions to candidates who voluntarily accept spending limits

· Includes an advance notification provision to stop the troubling trend of surprise negative attack ads



An Act Concerning a State Contracting Standards Board

The Contracting Standards Board will be charged with establishing contracting standards and practices that apply across the board, without exception, to all state agencies. They will:



· Give small, minority- and women-owned businesses an equal opportunity to obtain state business, and

· Encourage increased competition for state business



The Contracting Standards Board will assume the duties of the State Properties Review Board and have the authority to:



· Conduct compliance audits of state agencies

· Review the substance of agency contracts, a great improvement of the Attorney General’s present authority to review contracts as to form

· Under certain conditions, the Board will have the authority to review and terminate an individual contract for cause and to suspend or disqualify a contractor from state business for a period of time.



An Act Concerning False Claims

This measure encourages private citizens to get involved in cleaning up state government. It empowers individuals with knowledge of potential fraud to initiate lawsuits and win a percentage of any money recovered by the state.



It also creates new penalties for those who try to steal from taxpayers and the state.



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: wpc-cpa@farris.com ; goodale@sasktel.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 1:52 PM
Subject: Fw: You can't fool me McGuinty I'm too stupid



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: dalton.mcguinty@premiergov.on.ca
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 8:25 PM
Subject: You can't fool me McGuinty I'm too stupid


You lawyers are all the same but at least you can never say that you didn't know. I will call and leave a message with my cell phone I will have proof of that contact as well.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: david.anderson1@sasktel.net
Cc: anderd@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 5:30 PM
Subject: Fw: FYI I just called



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: fbastien@bell.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 5:02 PM
Subject: Fw: FYI I just called



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: info@ccr-ny.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 4:50 PM
Subject: FYI I just called


You are way past too late act ethical now
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: INFO7@elections.ca ; ombudsman@npr.org ; ombudsman@washpost.com
Cc: info@cfif.org ; 2020@abc.com ; niteline@abc.com ; cnn.feedback@cnn.com ; info@cnbc.com ; comments@foxnews.com ; world@msnbc.com ; today@nbc.com ; dateline@nbc.com ; newshour@pbs.org ; atc@npr.org ; letters@latimes.com ; letters@nytimes.com ; editor@usatoday.com ; editors@interactive.wsj.com ; letters@newsweek.com ; letters@time.com ; letters@usnews.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 2:55 PM
Subject: My name is beginning to be Blogged


Attn Mr. Jeffrey A. Dvorkin

I just called you and left a message. I have crossed paths with NPR before and just shook my head and went on alone to do what I had to do. It has already proven to me that it is no better than any other Media controlled by the wealthy few. So as I went about proving what everybody knows in that public corruption is rampant and way out of control. I figured I would prove the Media is a big player against the public's best interests and the only possible way for ordinary folk to know simple truths is what they can weed out for themselves from the truth and fiction found in the internet. I truly believe it is every bit the important tool the printing press was centuries ago before rich folks bought them all.

I contacted you Mr. Dvorkin because you are the most outspoken ombudsman on the web and you used to work for CBC in my native land. I am not surprised that you have not called me back yet. Everybody else does as well. As you can see I have sent this to many others just to rub that fact in. Why would you be any different than any of them? I will send only one more email to you and the others immediately after this one. I contains much text that should concern your former rivals at CTV in Canada and all Big Media in general. There is also attached just one small Tiff file that should properly serve to embarrass Frontline at PBS. After the end of the day I will ignore you too. Turn about is fair play.

I go to great lengths to check my own ethics constantly in order that none of my words may ever be impeached. In that regard I do agree with your following statements in particular. Most blogs are slanted and political just like the media. However not all are and since my battles are with both sides of the political fence in an sincere effort to expose the truth, I simply don't care who says what of me. It is far better than being ignored as NPR and its ilk have done. I will be comfortable with the fact that most ordinary people are more than capable to sort out who is a liar and who is not. I will let my work stand on its own and say no more to anyone. I am starting to bore myself as much as I have bored my friends long ago. Enough is enough.

I do not deny the possibility that you may have no idea as to who I am, If in fact you don't, it only further serves to prove my point that blogging will be the only way to reveal the truth that media willingly ignores in pursuit of its own interests and that of its owners. However after my phone call and my emails you can never claim that anymore. In my opinion the freedom of the press is a myth and any individual is only free if he resists oppression upon his freedom. It is up to you to challenge me in disagreement or run and hide your head in the sand. My work cannot be undone.

I am quite simply begging you to stress test my ethics to the max. The sooner the better for the benefit of all. Following your words and that of some others are several motions affidavits, answers and counterclaims that have been filed in two courts in two countries. I can further support all that I say is true with many emails that contain scans of legal documents letters and responses etc etc. If anyone responds to me by the end of the day. am asks for it. I will forward a rather large Tiff file that contains many legal documents, letters and response etc. It was exactly the same material that I sent to the Solicitor General Theodore Olson just before he quit his job while I was running for Parliament. IT is also exactly the same material that I served upon the Canadian Border Guards to send to their boss, the Solicitor General Anne McLellan to let her know I had made it home as was about to do my best to make all HELL break loose in an ethical and timely fashion. Six months after I sent one hell of a letter to Elections Canada I just received the funniest response yet. It seems everybody is nervous that I am going to come home and run again very soon. I am about to call their lawyer you answered me and ask her what the heel she did with her copy of wiretap tape numbered 139.

"Skews Narrow?

Many listeners tell me that the media -- NPR included -- doesn't skew left as much as it skews narrow. The range of issues needs to be broader, they say.

NPR could do more to ensure that it allows other points of view -- from the right and the left -- on the air. But not just the usual well-worn suspects like Bill O'Reilly from Fox News. In recent days, O'Reilly has admonished NPR for not having him on public radio to sell his book. But NPR has no obligation to put O'Reilly or any other shameless self-promoter on the radio.

There are a number of younger, more interesting thinkers and journalists from both sides of the spectrum that deserve to be heard and considered.

Perhaps fewer "think tankers" from the East Coast. More witty conservatives and liberals (yes, they exist). P.J. O'Rourke? Al Franken?

Maybe even Bernard Goldberg.".

"In Denial

NPR interviewed a number of academics and journalists about this story. The academics seemed to be in denial, tending to pooh-pooh the importance of this story for American journalism overall.

But others such as Bob Steele from The Poynter Institute and Tom Rosenstiel from the Project for Excellence in Journalism took the opposite view: that CBS’ mistake will have consequences for all news organizations and for some time to come.

After other recent scandals involving the BBC, The New York Times and USA Today, it is sometimes hard to believe that journalistic ethics are being given more than lip service these days. Yet, there are reasons to be optimistic.

Rays of Hope?

First, we must acknowledge that the blogs have truly arrived. It is hard for journalists who have led a sheltered life without public accountability to acknowledge that those days are over.

Second, it will be tough for ombudsmen and women to admit that their unique role as overseers on behalf of the public is also changing. We need to make room on the bench and give the bloggers a place at the dinner table. The question remains: who's for dinner?

NPR listeners have always been quick to point out our errors and lapses, and in a non-partisan way. The blogs are different because many are explicitly political. It will be interesting to see if the "blogosphere" still has as much impact on mainstream journalism once the election is over.

Third, while the bloggers will make life uncomfortable for the media, ultimately, it is a sign of a healthy democratic give-and take. A question for the bloggers is, "what are your standards? How can the rest of us know that your sources are reliable?"

Making the rich and powerful squirm is a short-lived measure of journalistic success -- both for the mainstream media and presumably, for the blogs.

Bloggers must be as accountable to the public as they demand the rest of us must be. That means there should be some consequence for spreading false or partial information. Any thoughts on what those consequences might be would be a useful discussion.

More, Not Less Investigative Journalism

CBS' failure will create a climate of timidity inside some organizations when it comes to investigative journalism. It may be understandable, but it would also be a mistake. There are still a number of unanswered questions about this story.

Ethics for Investigative Journalists

Finally, CBS' problems should remind us of the ethical obligations of investigative journalism. Aly Colón from the Poynter Institute has reissued the guidelines for those organizations (like NPR) that want to enter into this area. (See link at bottom of page.)

They are worth posting in every cubicle. I especially like Aly's idea that every investigative unit should appoint a "contrarian" whose role is to question everything.

In my experience, the failure of investigative units occurs exactly because expressing doubts is seen as not being "on board." Skepticism inside the news organization is also a valuable journalistic tool.

In that spirit, NPR needs to do some clearing up of one of its own sources."

The following words of David Limbaugh's from out of the Heritage Foundation are truly hilarious to me. When one considers what I sent them last year that have thus far been ignored they will laugh too. As a double check I sent the same stuff to him as well to no avail but at least his brother's lawyer Roy Black responded to me. It aided in me forever proving some lawyers are too snotty for their own damned good.

"Men in Black" is a primer on the United States Constitution as well as a clarion call to liberty lovers to wake up to the alarming damage the Court continues to inflict on our republic. Levin documents how the Court has morphed into a super-legislature, legislating from the bench rather than honoring its constitutional role of interpreting the laws.

To be fair to the right here is proof that left wing lawyers are as crooked as the right wing dudes.

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: ecassel1@cox.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 8:24 PM
Subject: Fw: A True Tale of Two Corrupt Governments



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Graham.B@parl.gc.ca
Cc: epeterso@justice.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 12:44 AM
Subject: Fw: A True Tale of Two Corrupt Governments


Hey Bill
Please explain this lawsuit to me real slow. It is by your buddy Billy Matthews against Byron Prior in Newfoundland after you drew my friend's plight to Irwin Cotler's attention? He did finally respond to Byron with a not my job attitude on the very same day Paul Martin's coal boat was caught with the load of cocaine in Sidney.
Furthermore I know what I sent you in my emails last year before I can home to run for Parliament against your party. In return you bastards allow me to be summoned back to the USA to be sent straight to jail without due process of law. Now don't that just piss me off. Methinks I will send you the same Hard Copy I gave John Crosbie last year not too long before I sue some of you nasty lawyers for your malice. What say you sir? Do you feel a sudden fit of ethical behavior coming over you.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: caseyb@parl.gc.ca
Cc: scotta@parl.gc.ca ; andrew.holland@nb.aibn.com
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 4:01 PM
Subject: Fw: A True Tale of Two Corrupt Governments



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca ; Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca
Cc: Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ; Efford.J@parl.gc.ca ; Graham.B@parl.gc.ca ; 'Stephen Harper' ; Jack Layton ; MacAulay.L@parl.gc.ca ; McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; Parrish.C@parl.gc.ca ; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca ; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca ; Zed.P@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 9:57 AM
Subject: Fw: A True Tale of Two Corrupt Governments



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Ind80@aol.com ; kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; Herbert Snider ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; 2mollins@sympatico.ca
Cc: scotta@parl.gc.ca ; andrew.holland@nb.aibn.com
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 9:18 AM
Subject: A True Tale of Two Corrupt Governments


Hey Fellas

Yesterday in the Supreme Court of Newfoundland my friend, Bryon Prior gave his word to a court he knows to be very corrupt not to publish or cause to have published some of the following documents in order for Judge J. Dereck Green not to throw him in jail. I have no doubt he will keep his word. Byron should not be punished for my actions in the necessary defence of my freedom in another country. Byron also also informed the court that there is no way for him to put a muzzle on me.

I am sending this email out to men that I trust that have my Durable Power of Attorney. Whether the bastards like it or not you are me in word and deed as long as I keep breathing. All of you and the court know I must make these matters widely known in order not to be put back in jail. As you all know I gave my fair warning to all of publishing the words within this email before Byron was compelled to make his promise. The Rules of Newfoundland Supreme Court do not hold nor do they mean a Tinker's damn to me until I am named and properly invited to the circus. I would gladly stand as a defendant beside Byron after the Court publishes that fact so it becomes widely known the reasons for my coming home. However it is painfully obvious that the Newfoundland Supreme Court and Byron Prior must wait until my present pending criminal trial in the USA is over before I can become joined in a civil matter up home. Never forget my native land denied me any assistance in trying to stop my being persecuted down here and sent straight to jail without due process of law. At least in compensation Canada is sending down Franky MaKenna to speak for me as I sue his law firm. Won't that be interesting?

The sexual abuse of Byron 's family long ago and wrongful actions within the Offshore Oil Industry in Newfoundland are far more important to everyone in Newfoundland and the rest of the Maritimes than my arguments about Securities Fraud, Tax Fraud and dead ex Fbi agents etc. with Yankees. That said, my must protect my freedom and my own family's interests first before I can help anyone else. I am certain my friends agree and I thank you for your help. Whereas no lawyer would come to Byron's assistance, I did as best I could do from afar to study the rules and write what I could for Byron to use in his defence and counterclaim to expose the truth and to use in my own defence in the USA. The serious mischief that is afoot is within the ex parte doings of the desperate law firm Patterson and Palmer and a very corrupt justice system to have Byron's document stricken after they had demanded them of him. John Crosbie's partner Stephen J. May speaking on behalf of his own law firm and Billy Matthews a Member of Parliament was forced to agree with Byron's inablitity to put a muzzle on me. As anyone can see Stevey Boy May in his Affidavit has admitted to the knowledge of the reasons why I am very angry with his law firm's malice towards Byron and I.

The fact that May refused to file his Affidavit and the court refused to accept Byron's document requesting a postponement today should prove to all what Byron and I say is true. If anyone wishes to view exactly the same documents as were served upon Patterson Palmer and their cohorts up home or upon the Suffolk County District Attorney down here, all they have to do is ask. I will fill their email inbox with scans in a Tiff format. All the documents have been filed in the Public Record during the course of my criminal trial and there are many more to follow. Many Canadian Politicians have received exactly the same material from me and many have answered me. the most recent Respond came from Senator Joe Day yesterday after a five month delay. Any ethical lawyer could easily employ them in Byron's defence and to support his counterclaim. Judge Green has ordered him to find a lawyer to defend him "pro bono" by February 9th. Byron and I hold no illusions about the impossible task. He has already emailed every lawyer within the Newfoundland Law Society asking for assistance and not one has responded before he stood in court yesterday. What is truly necessary is an ethical Royal Commission to investigate T. Alex Hickman and his friends in order for the truth to be revealed.

Since we all know that the Liberal Caucus is now in Fredeicton. I ask that my friends take many of their friends and go see the MP Andy Scott today and ask him why he did not respond to the material I delivered in hand to his office with Dave Mollins before I returned to the USA. The fact that I was falsely imprisoned makes me very angry with people such as Andy Scott and his cohorts who are employed to uphold the Public Trust. As a Member of Parliament he could have stopped this nonsense out of the gate. As the Minister of Indian Affairs he certianly should have contacted my friend the lawyer Barry Bachrach by now. I called his office today and told them to expect some sincere men to turn up with some simple but serious questions for him. I also forwarded him this email to share with the Liberal Caucus now in Fredericton.

Please find within this email three Motions and an Affidavit of mine in a Yankee Court and A court order in Newfoundland with the related Defence, Counterclaim and Request of byron Prior all of which I wrote. Most importantly is an Affidavit by the crooked lawyer Stevey Boy May.

Spotlight on N.B. culture for national Liberal caucus retreat

Maritime Kitchen Party welcomes Prime Minister, cabinet to Province

Fredericton (N.B.) – New Brunswickers are putting on a really big show for Prime Minister Paul Martin and his Liberal caucus when they come to Fredericton later this month.

The National Liberal Caucus Winter Retreat will bring the 135 Liberal Members of Parliament, including Mr. Martin’s entire cabinet, as well as the 61 Liberal Senators to the Capital City for three days of meetings. The retreat is co-hosted by Tobique-Mactaquac MP and Chairman of the National Liberal Caucus Andy Savoy and Hon. Andy Scott, Fredericton MP and Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs.

A Maritime Kitchen Party, Wednesday, January 26, will feature a full evening of New Brunswick-flavoured food, song and dance, from toe-tapping Acadian reels to high-stepping Scottish jigs.

The party headlines Fredericton’s own Downtown Blues Band, Bairdsville singer and songwriter Matt Andersen, the multi-talented La Famille Arsenault and fiddling sensation Dominque Dupuis of Dieppe with Moncton comedian Marshall Button, better known as Lucien, as emcee.

“This is a one-of-a-kind occasion to share our rich cultural heritage with the leaders of our nation,” Mr. Savoy said. “We are proud to be an example of cultural diversity and harmony to the rest of Canada.”

“We want to give our friends in Ottawa the kind of warm welcome that New Brunswickers are noted for,” Mr. Scott said. “This will be a showcase of our heritage and hospitality.”

The Maritime Kitchen Party is open to the public and will begin at 8 p.m. at the Delta Fredericton ballroom. Tickets are now on sale at all MP constituency offices in New Brunswick, as well as the New Brunswick Liberal Association office in Fredericton. For further information, contact the NBLA 1-800-442-4902;

Office of Andy Savoy at 1-866-542-4400 or the Office of Andy Scott, (506) 452-4110.

Office of the Hon. Andy Scott
Towne Centre Building
412 Queen Street
Suite 100
Fredericton, N.B.
E3B 1B6
Phone: (506) 452-4110
Fax: (506) 452-4076
This is the fella I just called.

Andrew Holland
Excutive Assistant
Phone: (506) 452-3516


Read this fellas and then go cause the Liberals that are having to much fun at our expense to weep and worry about their own malevolent interests. Ask them if they still wish to support the Diddlers T. Alex Hickman and their buddy Billy Matthews. At the very least tell everybody to call Andy Savoy and Andy Scott and ask them the same question Lois Skanes asked of Stevey Boy May. Who the Hell is David Amos and what the Hell is he talking about?

THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

THE TRIAL COURT

DORCHESTER, SS. DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT

THE COMMONWEALTH OF )

MASSACHUSETTS ) CRIMINAL ACTION

) DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623

v. ) )

DAVID R. AMOS )

)


MOTION TO DISQUALIFY THE OFFICE OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY

DISTRICT ATTORNEY ON THE BASIS THAT A CONFLICT OF INTEREST

EXISTS THAT WOULD RENDER IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE DEFENDANT,

DAVID R. AMOS TO RECEIVE A FAIR TRIALNow comes the defendant, David R. Amos a Citizen of Canada and a Legal Permanent Resident of the USA within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and demands that the Office of the Suffolk County District Attorney be disqualified from prosecuting this matter. This motion is based on the affidavit previously filed with the clerk of this court and recorded in the public record, the court herein and such matters as may be presented at the hearing on this motion and points to his civil rights under the following authority: the Declaration of the Rights of the Inhabitants of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts PART THE FIRST Article XII which states as follows: "No subject shall be held to answer for any crimes or offence, until the same is fully and plainly, substantially and formally, described to him; or be compelled to accuse, or furnish evidence against himself. And every subject shall have a right to produce all proofs, that may be favorable to him; to meet the witnesses against him face to face, and to be fully heard in his defense by himself, or his counsel, at his election. And no subject shall be arrested, imprisoned, despoiled, or deprived of his property, immunities, or privileges, put out of the protection of the law, exiled, or deprived of his life, liberty, or estate, but by the judgment of his peers, or the law of the land." The defendant legally acting ithin his rights was imprisoned.

In support of this motion, the defendant states that on October 1st, 2004 he returned from safe haven in Canada to stand once more before Judge Coffey of this court as ordered. The judge witnessed the signing the aforesaid affidavit. This was done prior to any hearing of this matter in a court not recognized by the defendant as having the proper jurisdiction and venue for a trial of a Canadian citizen involving serious criminal charges with an unsigned complaint. The defendant was well aware that if he were to be convicted of the false charges he would be subject to a prison term and the revocation of his status as a permanent resident of the USA and that his family would suffer greatly. The plaintiff went to great lengths to inform the correct Canadian authorities of his persecution in the USA. Judge Coffey witnessed the defendant serve the District Attorney and also provide the clerk of this court an exact copy of the aforesaid affidavit before he properly disqualified himself from hearing this matter as soon as he was informed that he lives the defendant’s neighborhood. This was done before the defendant was ever served a complaint that he would be compelled to answer. Attached to the aforesaid affidavit are two large exhibits containing one or more affidavits and many other legal documents etc. that prove the malicious actions of the District Attorney supporting a criminal conspiracy against the freedom, civil rights, interests and property of the defendant.

In further support of this motion the defendant states that beginning in July of 2004, the defendant had fully disclosed to the District Attorney the circumstances of this matter before the Clerk Magistrate Owens went forward and filed his malicious complaint.

The defendant had every right to expect the District Attorney to uphold the law and properly warn the Clerk Magistrate not to attempt to make an illegal compliant. Instead the District Attorney attempted to explain the illegal action while claiming not to be involved. In response the defendant received a letter from the District Attorney dated July 29th, 2004. In it the DA claimed that he as not yet involved but attempted to explain the impending illegal action of the Clerk Magistrate on August 13th, 2004. A true copy of the aforesaid letters to and from the District Attorney in July of 2004 are hereto attached for the court to review.

On September 3rd the District Attorney proved his malice and even demanded imprisonment or bail to make certain that the defendant answer an unsigned complaint that had yet to be served. Judge Coffey properly denied the DA’s request, ordered the DA to serve the defendant copies of all that was in the docket of the matter and ordered a hearing of the matter on October 1st in order establish the legality of the complaint and the proper jurisdiction and venue. The judge suggested that the defendant file the documents he had shown to the court byway of a proper means on October 1st and then he would hear if the District Attorney wanted to continue to prosecute the matter.

To date the defendant has not heard from or received on slip of paper from the District Attorney other than the documents comprising of this complaint ordered by Judge Coffey on Sept 1st. If there was in fact a signed complaint against the defendant dated August 13th, 2004, it should have been served upon him at that time not by Judge Hanlon after he was compelled to waive his right to counsel in order to receive swift justice. The defendant does have three separate copies of an unsigned complaint. One is of the court’s record, one is of the prosecutor’s copy and the last is the defendant’s copy. The defendant strongly believes that the signed copy of the complaint was created October 1st, 2004 after the District Attorney had asked for a recess and studied the defendant’s affidavit. That fact should have been blatantly obvious to the court and Judge Coffey because the District Attorney’s Office had asked to confer with the defendant before he filed the affidavit but afterwards they did not wish to continue with their own request.

It became blatantly obvious to the defendant and his witnesses that the court and the DA were cohorts in the conspiracy against him as they watched the clerk of this court give the District Attorney their copy of the affidavit that that had been filed in the Public Record before Judge Hanlon had the matter called before her on October 1st. On that day Judge Hanlon did inquire about the last statement in the defendant’s affidavit and of his concerns with the well being of his friend Byron Prior in Newfoundland and of the defendant’s own concerns with Canada. The defendant told the judge as much as she was willing to hear before she sent the defendant to jail based on the false allegations of an ADA claiming that Judge Coffey was threatened. The allegations were absurd. If Judge Coffey had in fact felt threatened then he would have dealt with the defendant immediately. After the defendant was put in jail many Canadian authorities act quickly to cover up their own conspiracy against the defendant and Bryon Prior. At the time of the writing of this document a law firm of a well-known Canadian politician, John Crosbie has made a statement of claim against Byron Prior on behalf of the Member of Parliament Bill Matthews while ignoring the very same material that was served upon the Suffolk County District Attorney and this court on October 1st. That matter will be addressed in Canada. However on October 19th as the defendant stood before Judge Hanlon, she clearly affirmed the fact that Judge Coffey had not been threatened but did nothing to chastise the ADA for her false allegations and denied that the original wiretap tapes served upon the District Attorney on Sept 3rd were any sort of evidence in this matter even though the Clerk Magistrate had made note of their existence on August 13th. Thus there is a need to sue the District Attorney and the court.


Dated January 11th, 2005 David R. Amos, Pro Se

153 Alvin Ave.

Milton, MA. 02186

617 698-6549

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, David R. Amos of Milton, MA hereby certify that on January 12th, 2005, I with two friends accompanying me as witnesses served upon the Suffolk County District Attorney, Daniel F. Conley a true original copy of the attached Motion to his office within Dorchester District Court at the following address 510 Washington St. Dorchester, MA

David R. Amos

153 Alvin Ave.

Milton, MA. 02186

THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

THE TRIAL COURT

DORCHESTER, SS. DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT

THE COMMONWEALTH OF )

MASSACHUSETTS ) CRIMINAL ACTION

) DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623

v. )

)

DAVID R. AMOS )

)

MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE SIDNEY HANLON ON THE BASIS THAT A CONFLICT OF INTEREST EXISTS THAT WOULD RENDER IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE DEFENDANT, DAVID R. AMOS TO RECEIVE A FAIR TRIAL


Now comes the David R. Amos, a Citizen of Canada and a Legal Permanent Resident of the USA within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts herein named as the defendant and demands that Judge Sidney Hanlon be disqualified from hearing all further proceedings in the above stated criminal prosecution because of her personal interest in the outcome. In support of this motion, the defendant has attached a true copy of a letter received by Cynthia A. Robinson, the legal counsel of Boston Municipal Court on January 4th,.2005 and a true copy of the docket sheet of this matter. Also attached to the aforesaid letter is a copy of an email that was served upon the Suffolk County District Attorney and a Judge of Dorchester District Count on November 19th, 2004. Within the email are the irrefutable facts that support the defendant’s statements within an Affidavit and its attached exhibits filed in the Public Record of this court on October 1st, 2004 and ordered removed by Judge Hanlon on Oct 19th after she admitted that the defendant did not threaten Judge Coffey. The defendant freely admits that this is a very important trial about Criminal Harassment. However he has always maintained the Criminal Harassment has been practiced by the court against him. The defendant maintains his declaration of innocence and only demands his right to a swift trial in front of a jury of his peers in the proper jurisdiction and venue.

. As of this date the defendant has not received a response from Ms. Robinson either in the spoken or written word to refute his allegations of criminal activity supported by many people employed to up hold the law and the public trust in their elected or politically appointed positions within the justice systems of Canada and the USA. Whereas this motion was the last day to file this motion according to law and ordered by this court in order for it to be heard on January 21st, 2005, the defendant must make it well known to the court that he is about to sue the court to regain lost assets and seek relief for personal injury. Whereas it was Judge Hanlon who willing supported with documents signed in her own hand the malicious actions of the Clerk Magistrate Mr. Owens and the false allegations of the District Attorney, the defendant demands that she be disqualified. The fact that Judge Hanlon went even further and maliciously declared that she believed the defendant had a prior history of mental illness and did not believe his actions within the Canadian justice system and the Parliamentary process was very offensive to the defendant. Please view attachments bearing her signature.

Dated January 11th, 2005 David R. Amos, Pro Se

153 Alvin Ave.

Milton, MA. 02186

617 698-6549

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, David R. Amos of Milton, MA hereby certify that on January 12th, 2005, I with two friends accompanying me as witnesses served upon the Suffolk County District Attorney, Daniel F. Conley a true original copy of the attached Motion to his office within Dorchester District Court at the following address 510 Washington St. Dorchester, MA

David R. Amos

153 Alvin Ave.

Milton, MA. 02186

THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

THE TRIAL COURT

DORCHESTER, SS. DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT

THE COMMONWEALTH OF )

MASSACHUSETTS ) CRIMINAL ACTION

) DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623

v. )

)

DAVID R. AMOS )

)

MOTION OF THE DEFENDANT, DAVID R. AMOS TO DEMAND THAT THE MATTER BE SENT TO US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN ORDER THAT HE MAY RECEIVE A FAIR TRIAL BY A JURY OF HIS PEERS IN THE PROPER JURISDICTION AND VENUE.

Now comes the defendant, David R. Amos a Citizen of Canada and a Legal Permanent Resident of the USA within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and demands his right to a swift trial before a jury of his peers in order to defend his freedom in the proper jurisdiction and venue of the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The defendant has already spent time in a malicious Sheriff’s jail in a clear and irrefutable violation to his Eighth Amendment rights. He asserts his rights as follows and prays that the Dorchester District Court to make note that there are two other directly related motions filed along with this motion and that they should be heard first. The aforesaid motions demand that the entire office of the Suffolk County District Attorney and Judge Hanlon be disqualified because of their interest in the outcome of this matter. This motion is based the affidavit previously filed with the clerk of this court and recorded in the public record, the court herein and such matters as may be presented at the hearing on this motion.

In support of this motion the defendant states that he is being prosecuted for criminal harassment byway of emails on behalf of the lawyer, Angela Troccoli whom he has been litigating against in the USA for years. One of the emails that she claims as harassment contain pictures of police surveillance tapes that contain recordings of the private conversations of several people that reside outside of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Boston Municipal Court does not have jurisdiction to even begin prosecution particularly in light of the fact that the Minister of Justice who is also the Attorney General of Canada received the email that the court finds so offensive before the lawyer Troccoli received her forwarded copy and made her false allegations. If the emails were in fact criminally offensive then David Lutz QC, a lawyer who litigates on behalf of the Attorney General of Canada in the Province of New Brunswick should have filed a complaint against the defendant while he was on Canadian soil. The defendant was running against the candidate Mr. Lutz was supporting for the same seat in Canada’s Parliament. On July 29th, 2004, the very same day that the Suffolk County District Attorney was composing his malicious letter, the defendant was confronting David Lutz in front of many witnesses including the RCMP in Sussex Provincial Court in the Province of New Brunswick. David R, Amos who was yet to be charged with anything was demanding an answer for the many documents served upon David Lutz in his capacity as a prosecutor for the Queen in June of 2004. Mr. Lutz’s only answer was that he had given the material to law enforcement. It appeared to the defendant that a solicitor appointed to speak on behalf of the Queen was content in allowing a Clerk Magistrate of a Boston Municipal Court to attempt to prosecute the defendant in order to assist in the cover up his own wrongs. The defendant’s suspicions have since been affirmed many times over in many ways.

In further support of this motion the defendant states that he must call many witnesses to testify in his defense in federal court. Many of these people act under the federal code of law enforcement. If they had acted within the scope of their employment years ago then it would not have been necessary for the defendant to run for Parliament in Canada let alone stand trail as an innocent man being criminally prosecuted in order to protect the political interests of so many others. Indeed the defendant will joyfully argue a criminal matter in defense of his freedom in order to expose the rampant public corruption the people of the two countries that he is a person of know to exist.

In further support of this motion, the defendant states that on October 1st, 2004, Judge Coffey of this court witnessed the signing the aforesaid affidavit which has since been removed from the public record under Judge Hanlon’s orders. This was done prior to any hearing of this matter in a court not recognized by the defendant as having the proper jurisdiction and venue for a trail of a Canadian citizen involving serious criminal charges in an unsigned complaint. The defendant was well aware that if he were to be convicted of the false charges he would be subject to a prison term of up two and one half years and the revocation of his status as a permanent resident of the USA and that his family would suffer greatly. Attached to the aforesaid affidavit are two large exhibits containing one or more affidavits and many other legal documents etc. that prove the malicious actions of the District Attorney and this court supporting a criminal conspiracy against the freedom, civil rights, interests and property of the defendant. The defendant will have the aforesaid affidavit and many other documents and wiretap tapes to support this motion with him in court on January 21st, 2005. The defendant would refuse to give this material to the Federal Bureau of Investigation or any other law enforcement authority because he now needs it as evidence to be used against them in a civil lawsuit. The material proves that he has been pleading for years fo law enforcement authorities to act within the scope of their employment. Perhaps the District Attorney Daniel Conley upon reading this motion should reconsider and ignore Judge Hanlon’s opinions of the wiretap tapes that he has in his possession then give tapes to the FBI as soon as possible. He has ten days to review all that the defendant has provided him appear as an ethical officer of the court. A true copy of the aforementioned affidavit is hereto attached for the court to review.

Dated January 11th, 2005 David R. Amos, Pro Se

153 Alvin Ave.

Milton, MA. 02186

617 698-6549

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, David R. Amos of Milton, MA hereby certify that on January 12th, 2005, I with two friends accompanying me as witnesses served upon the Suffolk County District Attorney, Daniel F. Conley a true original copy of the attached Motion to his office within Dorchester District Court at the following address 510 Washington St. Dorchester, MA

David R. Amos

153 Alvin Ave.

Milton, MA. 02186



THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

THE TRIAL COURT

DORCHESTER, SS. DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT

THE COMMONWEALTH OF )

MASSACHUSETTS ) CRIMINAL ACTION

) DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623

v. )

DAVID R. AMOS )

)

AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID R. AMOS

Now comes, David R. Amos, a Citizen of Canada and a Legal Permanent Resident of the USA and asserts his Constitutional Rights pursuant to Title 42 Sections 1981, 1982, 1985 and 1986 of the Federal Code and freely swears under the penalties of perjury that the following statements are true and to the best of his knowledge.

On September 3rd, 2004 I returned to the USA and stood before the Dorchester District Court in response to a summons served upon my home in Milton MA dated August 13th, 2004.
On September 3rd, 2004 I reported to the probation officer as ordered after he joked and made fun of me he directed me to serve upon the District Attorney the many original wiretap tapes that I had promised I would bring to court and ask if they wished to continue. The District Attorney Office wished to prosecute me so I returned to the probation office and the required documentation was filled out. I did not discuss the matter with anyone working for the Commonwealth on September 3rd or since that time other than register my indignation about the lack of diligence, professional behavior and malicious acts practiced against me in an effort to impeach my character.
On September 3rd, 2004, before any hearing of the matter began I protested the fact that the Clerk Buckley had claimed that I was pleading not guilty. I had made no plea whatsoever. I refused to waive any of my Rights and I demanded that the court prove its jurisdiction to hear the matter.
For over a period of almost three months I had tried to resolve the issues of this matter with the Clerk’s Office of this court, the Boston Police Dept., the Police Commissioner, the City’s Legal Dept. the Mayor’s office, the Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office, The Governor’s Office, the US Ambassador to Canada, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. CSIS and the Canadian Consulate in Boston. I was refused the right to know what the allegations against me were and no one would discuss my concerns about the possibility of foul play. I knew I had done nothing wrong and I had fully disclosed the circumstances to the Suffolk County District Attorney as Chief Justice Robert A. Mulligan had suggested. I had received an answer from the DA weeks before he was willing to prosecute me on false charges. I had no understanding of the matter. I had not been given information to work with and no one would speak to me. If the District Attorney Daniel F. Conley had acted ethically and diligently the lawyer, Angel Troccoli and her cohorts within the law firm of Dane M. Shulman should have been the ones charged with criminal actions against me.
On September 3rd after the hearing and another hearing was marked for today October 1st, Judge Coffey ordered ADA attempting to prosecute me to give me a copy of the documents that I was entitled to view. In return I gave her my Canadian contact number so that we may confer about this matter. I then returned to Canada to defend my rights and freedom. The ADA never called. I was not surprised because upon viewing the material provided I discovered that there is in fact no complaint against me.
The complaint in this matter is not signed or witnessed by anyone. Apparently the DA did not expect me to make it to court on September 3rd and certainly did not wish to discuss it with Canadian authorities. I now consider the DA Conley to be just another corrupt politician just like Tom Finneran and further proof of why it was so necessary for me to go to Canada and run for Parliament in order to speak in a public forum of my knowledge of public corruption. I gave all the crooks to the last possible minute for one to act ethically and uphold the Public Trust. All I got in return was continued harassment with the little perk of Colonel Foley quitting his job before I left and Tom Finneran quitting his as soon as I got back. It appears that I must complain of the Queen and President Bush if no one in public service is willing to uphold the law and act within the scope of their employment.
For the record I must state the reason I was alarmed by this malicious action against me. The fact is it was the Trail Court of Massachusetts on April 1st, 2003 that had made false allegations against me to agents of the DHS claiming that I had threatened the life of George W. Bush. Now the same court was demanding that I return to the USA to stand in court and answer charges it knew to be false the morning after the President’s big Political Speech in New York. I had no doubt whatsoever that the DHS would pounce on me at the border and use a policy of rather than safe than sorry upon me and take me away for the benefit of many a low man in high places. The RCMP would do nothing to protect me and in fact attempted to run me out of Canada on Sept 2nd That was the very day of the Republican National Convention was much in the news about protests and presidential propaganda. In order to be of no possible threat to the President I was compelled to come to the USA after the President left New York and drive all night in order to appear in court on the morning of the 3rd.
The most alarming fact of all is that everybody knows that I am bounty hunting for Whitey Bulger. The order to come to his old stomping grounds and amongst his friends by the same corrupt justice system that allowed him to practice his criminal behavior for so long and then allow him to escape justice is indeed a very malicious summons.
April 1st, 2003 was also the only day that I ever met with the lawyer, Angela Troccoli before Sept 3rd. I argued her before Judge Livingstone in Plymouth Probate Court. I have argued her again in Norfolk Probate Court on Sept. 21st, 2004. That court found it necessary for no stated reason to place six court guards around me. I am far more than a mere acquaintance to her but obviously a rather formidable litigant against her criminal actions. I did send her emails asking her to ask her clients to stop harassing me with attached photos of the proof. The emails were necessary because she would not return my phone calls and sent my correspondence to her partner Dane M. Shulman to Barry Bachrach claiming that I was his client. I am not and never was. Mr. Bachrach had informed Troccoli many times that he only represented my wife, Jean F. O’Meara because the court had Stricken my right to do so pursuant to M.G.L 201B.
Barry Bachrach has now withdrawn from all of my wife’s matters with my assent because of a conflict of interests over one of his partners and myself about a fraudulent Title V inspection. However he is an important witness to be called because he has complete knowledge of all my contact with Troccoli during the time frame that I have been accused.
Barry Bachrach also has several original wiretap tapes in his possession in case the ones given to the District Attorney have disappeared like so much of my other material has.
On April 1st, 2003 I became aware that Troccoli and the Massachusetts Trial Court had practiced fraud against me and had created a Notice of Appearance in my name with a false document in order to strike me and cover up their own wrongs.
On April 1st, 2003 I had also spoken to a Judge in Quincy District Court in my best effort to have the court place a restraining order against my brother in laws William, Robert and Brian O’Meara in my name because after I had tried to do so a few days before in my wife’s name under her Durable Power of Attorney the court laughed at me and denied it. Within a day of my first appearance in Quincy District Court William O’Meara called my wife at her work and implied that the homes would burn down and he was willing to pay the insurance premiums. Those same insurance premiums were continued to be paid by us and one policy was canceled over one month after the property in Plymouth was destroyed by Troccoli clients. The Plymouth Probate Court called a Trial quickly with no notification to the litigants after Sept 3rd and on September 9th it authorized a very fraudulent real estate sale about a property that had been illegally destroyed for five months.
The lawyer Troccoli and the Massachusetts Trial Court have been assisting the criminal actions of my brother in laws and many others in order to protect the interests of many lawyers and politicians from my actions in other courts.
My wife’s family have forged her signature on a Purchase and Sale Agreement, created fraudulent Title V inspection, broke into our home, assisted in the theft of her rightful inheritance, stolen personal property and food, made false allegations against me in other states, threatened to burn down the homes and harassed us on sometimes a daily basis with the knowledge and assistance of several Police Departments. It is time we sought relief.
Whereas two of my most recent documents have disappeared from the Public Record in two countries I have attached them to this affidavit for the court and the public to view. Exhibit A is a Motion to Dismiss Troccoli’s latest malicious action. It was filed on September 13th, 2004 and stricken from the Public Record by Judge Langlois on September 21st. Exhibit B is a copy of two letters with the same enclosures that were sent to the RCMP in Newfoundland byway of the Canada Post and one was sent to the Canadian Consulate by US Mail. Both mailings were tracked and not received. They are obviously now in the possession of some sort of secret authority. As the court views these documents it can easily see what I say is true and my material is of no concern for the public safety. They are filed in the public record for the benefit of all in my best effort to see that the Public Trust is upheld. I have also brought to court a case of documents requested by Utica Mutual Insurance Company of New York to investigate the actions of their client Jan Whiting. However once they knew the truth they refused to accept or pay for what they had requested. If the court deems it necessary I shall file it into evidence to refute the false allegations made against me.
Since I have last appeared in this court a great deal has transpired that cannot be told of within this affidavit but it concerns the pursuit of justice for many people in two counties. Much has been done by many to stop my friends and I in revealing the truth of our concerns. Thus far we have been able to thwart our adverasies actions. The court should pray that it does not get our blood on its hands. The proof of some of what I state can be found in Exhibit B.
Signed before the court and

under the Pains and

Penalties of Perjury by

Dated October 1st , 2004 David R.Amos, Pro Se

153 Alvin Ave.

Milton, MA. 02186

617 698-6549

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEI,

David R. Amos hereby certify that on October 1st, 2004, I served upon the Suffolk County District Attorney Daniel F. Conley a true copy of this document with all its attachments.

David R. Amos

153 Alvin Ave.

Milton, MA. 02186





2005 01 T 0010

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR

TRAIL DIVISION

BETWEEN: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF

AND: BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT

AND BETWEEN: BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFF BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN SECOND DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: THOMAS MARSHALL THIRD DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: DANNY WILLIAMS FOURTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS FIFTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: JOHN CROSBIE SIXTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: PATTERSON PALMER SEVENTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM

ORDER

Before the Honourable Chief Justice Green.

Filed January 21, 2005

UPON HEARING Stephen J. May, of Counsel for the Plaintiff, AND UPON READING the Application and Affidavit filed herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, until further order of the court, Byron Prior is prohibited from publishing, causing to have published, distributing or causing to have distributed the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim pending the determination of the Applicant’s Application to strike the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim in its entirety, and that the Court’s file in this proceeding is not to be made available for review by anyone other than the parties or their legal counsel pending the determination of the Applicant’s Application to strike the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim in its entirety, and that the requirements relating to the obligations of the Defendants to the Counterclaim to file Defences are be waived pending the determination of the Applicant’s Application to strike the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim in its entirety. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the content of the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim shall not be published or broadcast in any manner whatsoever until further order of the court.

AND IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the Application to strike the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim is scheduled to be heard on January 26, 2005.

AND IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that costs of this Application be in the cause.

DATED at St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador this 21st day of January, 2005.


Signed by J. Derek Green, Chief Justice

2005 01 T 0010

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRAIL DIVISION

BETWEEN


WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF


and:

BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT


DEFENCE

The Defendant, Byron Prior, admits to the statements of the plaintiff, William Matthews in the paragraphs numbered one (1), two (2) and seven (7) of his claim.
Defendant, Byron David Prior (Prior) and his friend David Raymond Amos (Amos) With respect to this claim for damages by a Member of Parliament, have no understanding how the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador can legally proceed with this civil matter until the Attorney General Thomas Marshall (Marshall) and the Premier Danny Williams (Williams) answer the Defendant’s and Amos’ criminal allegations proven to them in September of 2004. The Defendant has the right to know the results of any of the Attorney General’s investigations of his concerns about Public Corruption before any proceedings in this matter. Furthermore Amos’ as a candidate for a seat in Parliament in the last election certainly deserves an answer from the Arar Commission. That Commission has ignored him and allowed him to be illegally imprisoned in the United States of America (USA) long after it was made irrefutably aware of his supporting evidence to Mr. Arar’s matters. Every Member of the 37th and the 38th Parliament has been made well aware of the facts of this matter by the Defendant and Amos for over one year byway of email if not hard copy in the mail or personal service. The Defendant and Amos are just members of the Public but they demand that those in Public Service uphold the Public Trust and expose Public Corruption.
The Defendant further states that hard copy of much evidence of many crimes practiced against the Defendant and Amos were given to Williams by the Defendant on September 9th, 2004 and to Marshall by the Lieutenant Governor Edward Moxon Roberts (Roberts) on September 10th. On September 11th, the Governor General of Canada Adrienne Clarkson (Clarkson) affirmed to Amos that he had taken the appropriate steps and properly contacted all authorities having jurisdiction over his and the Defendant’s concerns about criminal actions. In support thereof Defendant states the Deputy Prime Minister Anne McLellan (McLellan) of the 37th Parliament had directed Amos to do so in December of 2003 and the Defendant was directed to do so by the Minister of Justice Irwin Cotler of the 38th Parliament in July of 2004. Both aforesaid persons are members of the same Liberal caucus as the Plaintiff now seated on a backbench in Parliament.
The Defendant further states that former law firm of Williams had successfully defended him in a criminal trial against other false allegations and charges of criminal acts in 1998. At that time law firm Williams was completely informed by the Defendant of the sexual abuse of his family. The Defendant has no doubt Williams used that knowledge to become the powerful person of his political party he is today rather than assisting his client, the Defendant in attempting to up hold the law and see that criminals with other politically powerful positions be properly prosecuted.
The Defendant further states that whereas this claim of much embarrassment of the Plaintiff as a Member of Parliament, he feels no pity towards a man that had practiced sexual abuse against his family and was never punished.
The Defendant clearly states in his web site (Site) and now in this document signed in his own hand that every word he has published is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help him his God.
The Defendant further states that whereas this claim by the Plaintiff against him comes about byway the words he legally published in his web site ("Site") published in the USA under the First Amendment its Constitutional pursuant to the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press, the onus is upon the Plaintiff to prove without any reasonable doubt that the Defendant’s allegations are false. The defendant is well prepared to argue that every word he has ever said or written about the Plaintiff is true and he is willing to call many witnesses to support the true facts of this matter.
The Defendant further states as he does within his Site that the quickest way for the Plaintiff to prove one of the allegations false without burdening the court would be a few blood tests to prove he is not the father of the person named Aaron whom he chooses to mention within paragraph three (3) his own statement of claim. That is a very small task for a Member of Parliament to do in order to help protect his reputation and save himself from a lot of further embarrassment.
The Defendant further states that he does in fact welcome this claim against him. Plaintiff has finally given the Defendant an opportunity to see justice served upon the plaintiff and his cohorts after over forty years of seeking it for over fifty years of much abuse. Hopefully this will be done byway of this answer and a very justifiable counterclaim that should not be easily dismissed. It is quite honestly the only way a man on welfare can make a legitimate complaint against some of wealthiest and most corrupt persons in Canada.
The Defendant further states whereas the Plaintiff complains that the published words of the Defendant can be found on the Internet, other web sites and within many emails etc, the Plaintiff should complain all the other persons that support the Defendant allegations as well. Otherwise this malicious claim is fruitless to stop the justifiable embarrassment of the Plaintiff and his lawyers.
The Defendant further states if the claim against a layman on welfare were to be won by the legal trickery of a malevolent wealthy law firm it would merely support all what the Defendant has published is true. If the Plaintiff truly wishes to protect his reputation in a legal fashion he must prove with witnesses and evidence in front of a jury that all the allegations of the Defendant are false. The Plaintiff merely claiming falsehoods does not prove the allegations untrue.
The Defendant further states that the Plaintiff makes mention of many emails in his statement of claim paragraphs numbered five (5) and six (6) containing the Defendant’s published work. The Defendant states that one of the persons to send thousands of emails in support of the Defendant and his allegations is his friend Amos. The defendant points out the fact that Amos had sent emails containing the entire text of the Defendant’s Site to every Member of the 37th Parliament before he came to Canada to run for a Seat in the June Election of the 38th Parliament. One of the persons to respond to Amos’ emails was an assistant of McLellan as the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness on March 16th 2004. That person sent back the entire text of the Site the Plaintiff finds so offensive. The Plaintiff should name McLellan as a defendant.
The Defendant further states that Amos would welcome the opportunity to be joined into this matter as a defendant and argue the lawyers he has already crossed paths with his own matters and the Defendant’s during the time he was in Canada running for a seat in Parliament. If any Member of Parliament including the Plaintiff had acted ethically one year ago. Amos would not have been imprisoned to sleep on a cement slab in the Physc Ward of a Downtown Boston Jail while being illegally held against his will under the false charges of "other" until the Yankees could think of something to charge him with. Furthermore the statement of claim of the Plaintiff would not exist and the Defendant would not be still suffering today from more abuse by the Judicial System.
The Defendant further states that this answer and many other documents etc. involving the governments of Canada and several Provinces including Newfoundland will be used in defence of Amos’ freedom during the course of his pending Criminal Trial before a jury of his peers in the USA. However this answer in this civil matter is no less important for the Defendant because the justice system of his own province has failed to uphold the law with regards to the crimes practiced against him for over forty years.
The Defendant states in defence of Plaintiff’s claim in paragraph numbered three (3) that the lawyer Stephen J. May ("May") of the law firm of Patterson Palmer acting for the Plaintiff, the benefit of his own law firm and many others maliciously edited many words from the very first statement in the Defendant’s Site This is a very fraudulent attempt by a lawyer to exclude the names of many other parties who should be plaintiffs as well if in fact the Plaintiff’s claims were valid. For the sake of brevity demanded by the rules of this court the defendant offers only the first statement in the Site because that is where his edited words were gleaned from in the plaintiff’s third statement of his claim. The first words of the Site in their entirety are as follows:
Canadian Corruption Sexual Abuse & Political & Legal Conspiracy.

RCMP Incompetence & Cover up. Priors Of Grand Bank NFLD Canada

How do I get a corrupt legal system to investigate, charge and convict itself? If T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, 1966 to 1979 also Health Minister 1968 to 1969 and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland 1979 to 2000, 34 YEARS OF COMPLETE LEGAL SYSTEMS CONTROL, at 41 years of age, rapes and impregnates your younger sister Susan, at 12 years old, what would you do? Liberal MP Bill Matthews & his friends, raped the same child repeatedly, for more than 3 Yrs. At 14 ,she had a second baby, Aaron, she said she was 80% sure he is Matthews son. A third baby, Harriett, at 18 & 3 miscarriages also, by this time, what abuse of a child. Matthews & his lawyer, Ed Roberts, pressured me to sign papers, saying Matthews had nothing to do with my family & I imagined it all. NOT SO. I have copies of their letters. 2 weeks after I signed these papers, MR ED, THE HORSE'S ASS, ROBERTS was made LT. Governor of NFLD. & LAB. by MR JEAN, THE JACK ASS, CHRETIEN, soon to be known as Canada's most CORRUPT Prime Minister After the Justice Minister, Rapes & Impregnates a 12 Yr. old child, in a small town & everyone knows, who will stop or charge anyone else, for Raping & abusing that same child?? PAUL MARTIN, IS THIS FEDERAL ENOUGH FOR YOU OR MUST I NAME MORE LAWYERS & JUDGES?? DO SOMETHING NOW or I will be forced to name many more, RESPECTABLE NEWFOUNDLANDERS, many names you won't like to read yourself. I am willing to take any tests and answer all questions regarding my entire life. All they have to do is take one blood test. It's time for them to stop manipulating our legal system and face the truth, which I have be telling anyone else who would listen, all of my life.I didn't just awake one morning and decide to accuse the most powerful and most corrupt legal animal in this province. I have had, no childhood, no education, no family, no hometown, no self- esteem or self-respect and no past, present or future as a contributing person. By the time I was 14 years old I was responsible for 9 younger children, all of us abused and molested while our hometown either joined in, bothered us about our situation, or looked the other way and said we were all trouble………

The Defendant altered the above statement published within the Site in October of 2004 upon taking the advice of Amos after he had been released for jail on bail. Amos advised the Defendant take back his promise to the Plaintiff’s lawyer Roberts years ago and tell all that he knew to be true about all things as soon as possible for their own protection and the benefit of all Canadians.
The Defendant further states that one of the aforesaid named parties in his published Site Roberts is a former partner of the law firm Patterson Palmer. In 2002 acting on behalf of the Plaintiff with the assistance of the law firm of Patterson Palmer. Roberts, the well-known and powerful political lawyer had maliciously threatened to sue the unemployed Defendant and his family if his client’s name was ever mentioned in the Defendant’s Site as it existed at that time.
The Defendant further states that it was not the Defendant’s fault that the Plaintiff’s guilty conscience about his own sexual abuse of children had compelled him to hire lawyers to cover up his crimes. However the defendant buckled under Roberts’ pressure and signed a document promising never to mention the Plaintiff within the Site;
The Defendant further states that at that time in of his encounter with Roberts in 2002 and until October of 2004 the Defendant was seeking justice for the sexual abuse of his family by T. Alex Hickman (Hickman), the former Minister of Justice and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. That fact was plainly stated for the world to view from the very beginning of the Defendant’s first published web site. Not once over the years did Hickman openly refute the Plaintiff allegations but he did indeed send many of his cohorts employed within law enforcement and others to harass the Defendant.
The Defendant further states that within mere months of the Defendant’s signature on the documents demanded by Roberts he was appointed the 11th Lieutenant Governor of Newfoundland and Labrador. The defendant has no doubt whatsoever it was a political reward to Roberts for protecting the false integrity of a Member of Parliament with a very guilty conscience within Jean Chrétien’s scandalous government. The fact that May employs the phrase "inter alia" which means "among other things" does not indeed negate the fact that he is a deliberate conspirator in a scheme to cover up Public Corruption assisted and practiced by members of his own law firm of Patterson and Palmer.. The Defendant demands to argue all of his published words not just the words a malicious lawyer has chosen to take out of context to suit his own ends. Justice would not be served again.
The Defendant further states that the following words found within his published Site were also edited by May within the Plaintiff’s fourth (4) paragraph of his claim for the same aforesaid reasons stated in paragraph number two (2) of this defence. The complete context of the Defendant’s words are as follows:
To Whom It May Concern:
July 24, 2001
My name is Byron Prior. I'm the oldest living of these 12 children. I not only had to livethrough my abuse but, watch as the rest of my sisters and brother were abused and raped. Three of my sisters raped, 1 by a grandfather at the age of 4, a second raped by T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, at age 12 & Bill Matthews & friends from 13 on. A third sister raped by a young man in our home town. The legal system are onlyconcerned with keeping all this under cover and protect themselves. Please people, if you have a heart, walk one day in my shoes and tell me you would just forget because these bureaucrats say so. I have copies of my full statement on all the details of what happened, which I gave the R.C.M.P. on March 9, 1998, 52.5 hours at their office. I will send it to anyone who will send me an E-mail address. I will never forget the abuse, shame, and persecution to this day, from the animals who did this to my family.
Sincerely,
Byron Prior

The Plaintiff should have joined as plaintiffs T. Alex Hickman, Edward M. Roberts, Jean Chretien and Paul Martin the persons first mentioned in the Site and numerous others including many members of the RCMP and the justice system named throughout the remainder of the Site pursuant to Rule 7.02 (2) which states as follows: Subject to the provisions of any statute and unless the Court otherwise orders, a plaintiff, who claims any relief that any other person is entitled to jointly with the plaintiff, shall join all persons so entitled as parties to the proceeding, and any of them who do not consent to be joined as a plaintiff shall be made a defendant. The fact that the lawyer May carefully edited the defendant’s published work in the plaintiff’s statement of claim does not negate the fact that many parties are named within the Defendant’s Site.
The Defendant further states in answer to the Plaintiff’s statement of claim paragraph six (6) that denies his allegations of the criminal actions made on his published Site against the Plaintiff and many others are false. The defendant clearly states that all of his allegations made against all parties mentioned within the Site are absolutely true and he has sworn to the truth of some of the stated allegations the Courts of Newfoundland in the past. The text of one of his statements to the RCMP can be found on the published Site. The Plaintiff desires the Freedom of Speech and the Freedom of the Press in another country to be ignored in order to save himself from embarrassment from his own wrongful acts for which he has never been prosecuted and punished because of his association with T. Alex Hickman, the former Minister of Justice an Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador.
The Defendant clearly states that the Plaintiff, Bill Matthews and his cohorts living in Grand Bank many years ago used against the Minister of Justice at the time, their knowledge of the sexual abuse of the minor children of the Prior family by T. Alex Hickman’s in order not to be prosecuted for their own many crimes including their own sexual abuse of the same family. The Plaintiff has continued to prosper ever since that time because of crime not integrity. The Defendant will not take back one word of his truthful publications in the USA. The defendant prays to the court for his right to a jury trial in his own native land in accordance with all the rules of the Supreme Court in order to call many witnesses in support of his defence to insure that the truth about many criminal acts become widely known in order that all the perpetrators including the Plaintiff, William Matthews and the Former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador, T.Alex Hickman may be finally prosecuted for the sexual abuse of his family and himself. The Defendant prays that the crimes against his family will never be forgotten, never repeated upon anyone and never covered up by any Judicial System ever again.
In closing the Defendant, Byron Prior sincerely believes that the conspiracy by so many highly placed public officials over the past forty years to cover-up the crimes of others warrants an investigation by a Royal Commission immediately. .
DATED at Conception Bay South Newfoundland and Labrador this 21st day of January, 2005.

Byron Prior

Reader’s Crescent,

Conception Bay, NL A1W 5B4

The Defendant







TO: Stephen J. May

PATTERSON PALMER

Suite 1000, Scotia Centre

235 Water Street

P.O. Box 610

St. John’s, NL. A1C 5L3

Solicitors for the plaintiff



2005 01 T 0010

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRAIL DIVISION


BETWEEN WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF


and


BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT


AND BETWEEN BYRON PRIOR PLAINTIFF


and


WILLIAM MATTHEWS


T. ALEX HICKMAN


THOMAS MARSHALL


DANNY WILLIAMS


EDWARD M. ROBERTS


JOHN CROSBIE


PATTERSON PALMER DEFENDANTS


COUNTERCLAIM


The Plaintiff, Byron Prior was born and raised Grand Bank Newfoundland. He is an out of work former employee of the offshore oil exploration industry who is now on social assistance. He has been unable to find employment in the area of his expertise because his outspokenness in the 1980’s about oil industry matters that caused Crosbie Offshore Services to be investigated for its wrongful acts. The aforesaid company was then controlled by Andrew Crosbie, brother to John Crosbie a former Minister of Justice of Canada
The Defendant, John Crosbie, is now a partner in the law firm of Patterson Palmer. He was served much evidence of many crimes including the crimes practiced against the Plaintiff byway of his partner, Gregory Byrne a former Minister of Justice of New Brunswick in Fredericton N.B. on August 24th, 2004. This was done by personal service by David Raymond Amos (Amos) a friend of the Plaintiff.
The Defendant, Edward M. Roberts was once a member the law firm of Patterson Palmer who acted against the Plaintiff years ago on behalf of the Defendant William Matthews. He knew the truth of the plaintiffs allegations and did nothing to up hold the law in the pursuit of his own gain. On September 8th, 2004, the Plaintiff made personal service upon Edward Roberts as the Leutenant Governor of Newfoundland Hard irrefutable evidence proving the crimes that concern his friend David Amos on the same day that Amos was having a lawyer file the same documents attached to his affidavit in defence of a friend unjustly charged with criminal behavior in a New Brunswick Provincial Court in Sussex NB. Roberts continued to stay the course of his deceit and merely passed the evidence on the Defendant, Thomas Marshall the Attorney General of Newfoundland and Labrador who has done nothing whatsoever to uphold the law. Marshall has refused to answer or return one phone call or email in order answer or ask one question about the allegations of crime by the plaintiff and his friend Amos.
The Plaintiff further states the Defendant, William Matthews was born and raised Grand Bank Newfoundland. on July 22, 1947. He attended Memorial University and in 1969 he earned a B.P.E., B.Ed. He was first elected to the Newfoundland and Labrador Legislature in 1982 as the MHA for the Grand Bank District. He was re-elected in 1985 and was appointed Minister of Culture, Recreation and Youth. In 1988, Mr. Matthews was appointed Minister of Career Development & Advanced Studies. In 1989, Mr. Matthews was re-elected to the Newfoundland and Labrador Legislature and was appointed Finance Critic. From 1990 to 1995, he served as Fisheries Critic, and in 1991 was appointed as Opposition House Leader. In 1993, Mr. Matthews was again elected to the Legislature and was re-appointed House Leader and Fisheries Critic. On June 2, 1997, he was elected as the Member of Parliament for Burin-St.George’s. the Defendant did serve as Vice-Chair of the Standing Committees on Fisheries & Oceans. On Sept 1st, 2000, he was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs. The defendant was re-elected November 27, 2000 as the Member of Parliament for Burin-St. George’s and re-appointed September 1, 2001 as the Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs. The Defendant was reelected on June 28th, 2005 but is now a backbencher in the Liberal caucus of 38th Parliament of Canada still representing the constituency of Random-Burin-St. George’s having apparently fallen out of favor with Paul Martin’s minority government.
The Plaintiff further states he has no doubt that his actions are part of the reason for the Defendant’s loss of Stature within the Liberal Caucus and the cause of his stated embarrassment in paragraph number six (6) of his statement of claim.
The Plaintiff further states the Defendant, T. Alex Hickman was born and raised Grand Bank Newfoundland. The Plaintiff whose mother was a whore with Hickman as a client has known him since childhood. The Plaintiff witnessed the fact that Hickman sexual abused his younger sibling at 12 years old on the night of his first political win in 1966. Hickman and his associate John Crosbie rose to positions of great power and wealth beginning under the corrupt leadership of Joey Smallwood before turning coat on the Liberal party and climbing even higher on the political totem pole of Public Corruption. Hickman finally retired as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and was later awarded the Order of Canada with the courthouse in Grand Bank now bearing his wicked name.
The Plaintiff has never made any secret of the fact that he hated and despised the Defendants Matthews and Hickman ever since he was a child chucking rocks in the street at Matthews’ big green fifties Chrysler as he sped away to sexually abuse another one of the Plaintiff’s underage siblings. Both the Plaintiff and Matthews knew that that he would never be punished because of what everybody in Grand Bank never of the sexual misdeeds of Hickman. The Plaintiff is grateful for the invention of the World Wide Web in his lifetime in order that he may tell all who wish to read of it what he knows to be true in Newfoundland. Now the Plaintiff can hurl simple truths far and wide at the defendants done the Internet highway. He will not stop telling the world the truth because the defendant, William Matthews feels embarrassed and justifiably hated and despised by many others. The Plaintiff is proud of his work legally published in another country so that the crooks in his home Province of Newfoundland can no longer keep their dirty secrets to themselves.
Plaintiff was denied legal aid in this matter by the government lawyer, John Duggan for no stated reason that the Plaintiff can find within the Legal Aid Act. However the Plaintiff is well aware that he will never receive any assistance from law enforcement or the judicial system because of the cover up the sexual abuse of his family when he was a child by T. Alex Hickman, the former Minister of Justice and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador.
The Plaintiff further states that when his friend Amos heard that the Province was unwilling to offer legal to him or even look at the supporting evidence from Amos they knew for certain all government employees in Newfoundland were acting against the Plaintiff under orders from the Premier Danny Williams. Amos did the best he could to help compose the Plaintiff’s answer and countercomplaint within the time allowed by the rules of this court.
The Plaintiff further states that Amos also went one step further to make certain their suspicion of the malice of Danny Williams was true. On January 20th, 2005, Amos called Danny Williams’ office personally and asked why he had not responded to the identical letter and materials Roberts, Crosbie and the Newfoundland Law Society had received. The Plaintiff had served it upon his office on September 9th and the receipt is signed by one of his assistants. The aforesaid material also included a copy of a police surveillance tape numbered 139 recorded in the USA of the mob. It letter certainly warranted a valid answer for someone in law enforcement. However later in the day another one of Danny Williams’ assistants called Amos back and denied any knowledge of anything. That man’s words affirmed what the plaintiff and his friend already knew and that is almost everyone employed within the justice system is willing to be a liar and support Public Corruption for their own personal gain. People employed in the Public Service of law enforcement only act ethically and do their job if it politically correct to do so in order to keep their job. It truly is just that simple and everybody knows it. The plaintiff and his friend merely went to great lengths to prove it after the Justice Systems of two countries had practiced many crimes against each of them.
The true facts of this matter are stated as best the Plaintiff could in his answer to William Matthews now a defendant in this Counterclaim. For the sake of brevity for the court, the benefit of the Plaintiff and the Public Trust, the Plaintiff, Byron prays the court to review his answer filed at the same time as this counterclaim in a timely fashion as per the rules of this court.
The Plaintiff is now prepared to reveal all that he knows to be true about wrongful actions within the offshore oil exploration industry and to be a supporting witness to the allegations of much Public Corruption within Canada and the United States of America (USA) recently exposed by Amos. The Plaintiff truly believes that is the reason he was served the malicious claim against him by William Matthews at this time and compelled to answer it on by January 21st, 2005 is because of the actions of actions of Amos in the USA and his court ordered appearance in Dorchester District Court in Boston Massachusetts on the very same day. All of the above named defendants are involved in a cross border conspiracy to cover-up many crimes.
The Plaintiff further states that he and his friend are well aware that their knowledge and evidence of many crimes are a very serious and legitimate threat to the false integrity of many persons employed to protect the Public Interests of the people around the world. They have no doubt whatsoever that their lives are in great danger. History has proven many decent men acting as they have died for much less. However history has also proven that if good men do nothing evil will prevail. The Plaintiff and his friend have no choice but to proceed in their efforts to expose Public Corruption because it is not in their nature to quit. They also recognize the fact that as fathers they owe to their children what their forefathers fought so hard in so many wars to secure for them, Freedom within a Just Democracy.
The Plaintiff further states that the sincere actions of he and his friend to make what they know of many crimes become common knowledge has the entire corrupt Justice Systems of Canada and the USA greatly concerned. If the two friends do prevail in revealing the truth to all it will be to the detriment of many malevolent Global Corporations, Bankers, Politicians, lawyers and the most importantly the Catholic Church. There has been much ado in recent times about the affiliations within such societies as Skull and Bones and the involvement Presidents and Senators who attempt to appear to be on the opposite side of the political fence. Politicians come and every four years or so. However it is the puppet master that pulls the strings who always remains behind the scene that is the one who is truly obscene. The Plaintiff, Byron David Prior and his friend David Raymond Amos want the world to know they truly believe their most evil foe is none other than Count Peter-Hans Kolvenbach the Superior General of the Jesuits.
15. The Plaintiff therefore claims:
a. general damages to be assessed;

b. aggravated, exemplary and/or punitive damages;

c. pre-judgment and post-judgment interest pursuant to the provisions of

the Judgment Interest Act, R.S.N. 1990, c. J-2;

d. cost on a solicitor if one is found and own client basis;

e. such further relief deems to be equitable and just in the circumstances.

DATED at Conception Bay South Newfoundland and Labrador this 21st day of January, 2005.

Byron Prior

Reader’s Crescent,

Conception Bay, NL A1W 5B4

The Plaintiff

2005 01 T 0010

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR

TRIAL DIVISION

BETWEEN:WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF

AND: BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT

AND BETWEEN: BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFFBY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN SECOND DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: THOMAS MARSHALL THIRD DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: DANNY WILLIAMS FOURTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS FIFTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: JOHN CROSBIE SIXTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: PATTERSON PALMER SEVENTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM

REQUEST FOR POSTPONEMENT

RE: An Amended Interlocutory Application of the Plaintiff to maintain an Order of the Court restricting publication; to strike portions of the Statement of Defence pursuant to Rule 14.24; and strike the Counterclaim in it’s entirety pursuant to Rules 11.02 and 14.24 and ss. 93 and 94 of the Judicature Act, RSN 1990, c. J-4 as amended.

(Inter Partes)

The Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim in this proceeding requests a postponement before attempting to argue the above stated Application served upon him on January 25, 2005. In support thereof he states as follows:

The Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim is a resident of Conception Bay South who is a layman on welfare with a Grade Eleven GED who has yet to secure legal assistance in his defence and counterclaim in this matter and is ordered by the court to argue a very long and very complicated memorandum of law within one day of being served.
The Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim and Applicant is a resident of Mount Pearl, Newfoundland and Labrador, and a Member of the 38th Parliament of Canada who is represented in this action by the wealthy and influential law firm of Patterson Palmer, which is also the Seventh Defendant by Counterclaim.
The Defendant by Counterclaim, Patterson and Palmer had acted hastily and maliciously in an "ex parte" fashion in order to protect its own interests in this matter and later was compelled to amend the first Interlocutory Application it had composed in order to correct errors and cover up the justifiable existence of the other Defendant by Counterclaim.
The past managing partner of the Seventh Defendant by counterclaim, Stephen J. May (May) had caused the above stated documents to be served upon the Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim in an admitted untimely fashion. May promised not to oppose this request for postponement within a cover letter signed in his own hand one day before the scheduled hearing, The text of May’s letter states as follows:
Please find enclosed our further materials that now seek to strike only portions of your Statement of Defence but still seeks to strike the entire Counterclaim. Our Application also now seeks to refer this proceeding to case management in order to address the service and scheduling of any future Applications that may be brought in advance of a Trial. As I advised previously, the Application is scheduled to be heard by the Supreme Court at the Court House off Duckworth Street on Wednesday, 26 January 2005 at 10:00 a.m. The enclosed Affidavit has not been filed with the Court but I will seek leave to do so on Wednesday. As weather prevented these documents from being served yesterday, we will not oppose a request for a postponement to allow you further time to prepare your position.

Signed by S, J. May

May declares to have served upon the Defendant/Plaintiff by counterclaim his own sworn Affidavit in which he has admitted to the prior contact between himself, his law firm and other named Defendants by the counterclaim with the Defendant/Plaintiff by counterclaim and David R. Amos a willing Joiner in this matter pursuant to Rule 7 02.
Whereas it appears that May does not wish to file his Affidavit in this matter until the counterclaim has been stricken from the Public Record, the Defendant/Plaintiff by counterclaim prays that the court allows May to file his documents immediately and that his Affidavit and related Exhibits be studied closely by the court before considering the Defendant’s latest untimely Application.
DATED at Conception Bay South Newfoundland and Labrador this 25st day of January, 2005.

Byron Prior

Reader’s Hill Crescent,

Conception Bay South, NL A1W 5B4

The Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim







TO: Stephen J. May

PATTERSON PALMER

Suite 1000, Scotia Centre

235 Water Street

P.O. Box 610

St. John’s, NL. A1C 5L3

Seventh Defendant by Counterclaim and

Solicitors for the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim



2005 01 T 0010

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR

TRIAL DIVISION

BETWEEN:WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF

AND: BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT

AND BETWEEN: BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFFBY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN SECOND DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: THOMAS MARSHALL THIRD DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: DANNY WILLIAMS FOURTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS FIFTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: JOHN CROSBIE SIXTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: PATTERSON PALMER SEVENTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM

SUMMARY OF CURRENT DOCUMENT Court File Number(s):2005 01 T 0010Date of Filing of Document:25 January 2005Name of Filing Party or Person:Stephen J. MayApplication to which Document being filed relates:Amended Application of the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim to maintain an Order restricting publication, to strike portions of the Statement of Defence, strike the Counterclaim in it’s entirety, and to refer this proceeding to case management.Statement of purpose in filing:To maintain an Order restricting publication, to strike portions of the Statement of Defence, strike the Counterclaim in its entirety and refer this proceeding to case management.

A F F I D A V I T


I, Stephen J. May, of the City of St. John’s, in the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador, Barrister and Solicitor, make oath and say as follows:


THAT I am a Partner in the St. John’s office of PATTERSON PALMER solicitors for William Matthews, the Member of Parliament for Random-Burin-St. George’s in the Parliament of Canada.


THAT Mr. Matthews originally retained Mr. Edward Roberts, Q.C. on or about 30 April 2002 after Mr. Byron Prior, the Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim, had made allegations against Mr. Matthews in a publication called "My Inheritance - The truth - Not Fiction: A Town with a Secret". In that publication, the allegation was made that Mr. Matthews had had sex with a girl who had been prostituted by her mother. That girl was alleged to have been Mr. Prior’s sister.


THAT upon being retained, Mr. Edward Roberts wrote a letter to Mr. Prior. That letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit "1" to my Affidavit.


THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts’ letter to Mr. Prior, Mr. Roberts received a 1 May 2002 e-mail from Mr. Prior. That e-mail is attached as Exhibit "2".


THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts receipt of the e-mail, Mr. Prior swore an Affidavit acknowledging that what had been said in that publication was false. That Affidavit is attached as Exhibit "3" to my Affidavit. Following Mr. Roberts’ receipt of that Affidavit, Mr. Matthews advised that he was satisfied not to pursue the matter any further and our firm closed our file.


THAT on or about 25 October 2004, I was retained by Mr. Matthews following his gaining knowledge that a web site, made a series of allegations against him relating to my having sex with a girl of approximately 12 years old through to an approximate age of 15 years old. It also accused him of being a father of one of her children and accused him of having raped that girl. Upon checking the web site I saw that Byron Prior, the Defendant, had been identified as the author of the material on the site.


THAT Mr. Matthews instructed me to write Mr. Prior, to remind him of the fact that the allegations had been admitted to being false through a 16 May 2002 Affidavit to advise him of Mr. Matthews’ intentions to commence legal proceedings if the comments were not removed from the web site. A copy of my letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit "4" to this Affidavit.


THAT I attach as Exhibit "5" a transcript from a 5 November 2004 voicemail left by David Amos, identified in the voicemail as a friend of Mr. Prior.


THAT I attach as Exhibit "6" a portion of a 6 November 2004 e-mail from Mr. Amos.


THAT until I received his voicemail and e-mail, I had never heard of Mr. Amos.


THAT Mr. Amos has continued to send me e-mail since his 5 November e-mail. Including his 6 November 2004 e-mail, I have received a total of 15 e-mails as of 23 January 2005. All do not address Mr. Matthews’ claim or my involvement as Mr. Matthews’ solicitor. I attach as Exhibit "7" a portion of a 12 January 2005 e-mail that Mr. Amos sent to me but originally came to my attention through Ms. Lois Skanes whose firm had received a copy. This e-mail followed the service of the Statement of Claim on 11 January 2005 on Mr. Prior. I also attach as Exhibit "8" a copy of a 19 January 2005 e-mail from Mr. Amos.


THAT I attach as Exhibit "9" a copy of a 22 November 2004 letter addressed to me from Edward Roberts, the Lieutenant Governor of Newfoundland and Labrador covering a 2 September 2004 letter from Mr. Amos addressed to John Crosbie, Edward Roberts, in his capacity as Lieutenant Governor, Danny Williams, in his capacity as Premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, and Brian F. Furey, President of the Law Society of Newfoundland and Labrador. I requested a copy of this letter from Government House after asking Mr. Roberts if he had received any correspondence from Mr. Amos during his previous representation of Mr. Matthews. He advised me that he received a letter since becoming Lieutenant Governor, portions of which involved his representation of Mr. Matthews. Mr. Roberts’ letter also covered his reply to Mr. Amos.


THAT I attach as Exhibit "10" an e-mail from Mr. Amos received on Sunday, 23 January 2005.


THAT I swear this Affidavit in support of the Application to strike Mr. Prior’s counterclaim.




SWORN to before me at

St. John’s, Province of Newfoundland

and Labrador this 24th day of

January, 2005.


Signed by Della Hart STEPHEN J. MAY Signature

STAMP

DELLA HART

A Commissioner for Oaths in and for

the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador.

My commission expires on December 31, 2009.






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Byron Prior wrote:
From: "Byron Prior"
To: "David Amos"
CC: "Sam Perrier"
Subject: failure notice What the hell is this about, & guest book entry.
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 01:17:45 -0330


David, this is the same response I've been getting from the mailer, I don't send any mail now, I don't even use the computer, I occasionally check the mail. They will all get my final response very soon. David, I know you think I kicked you aside, if you only knew how many times I've been warned to stay away from you and the people ordering me to. I'm sorry it looked that way, I can't say anymore about that now. I always talk to much for my own good, not anymore.
Sorry
Always The Dumb Newfie
Byron
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: neyops@dreamhost.com ; giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; field_c@jud.state.ma.us ; Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; oda.b@parl.gc.ca ; Press@devalpatrick.com ; bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com ; stronach.b@parl.gc.ca ; jchretien@heenan.ca ; duffy@ctv.ca ; cumby.meghan@dailygleaner.com ; tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com ; paul.dube@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; dwatch@web.net
Cc: bob.fogarty@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; macormie@vac-acc.gc.ca ; josee.touchette@justice.gc.ca ; Maggie.trudel-maggiore@international.gc.ca ; pierrette.lacroix@elections.ca ; rricher@scics.gc.ca ; gsmith@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca ; stella.deacon@chrc-ccdp.ca ; Charlene.Sullivan@acoa-apeca.gc.ca ; cnichols@norwellpolice.com ; jacques_poitras@cbc.ca ; oldmaison@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 8:22 AM
Subject: [Bulk] Re: Fwd: failure notice What the hell is this about?


Rest assured that I will call you later. Bec Oda and her crooked underlings will never try to get to the bottom of this obvious malice. As you can see I did not send this email you rejected to anyone in the USA however some of them may be using you as some sort of host N'est Pas? Rest assured that I will be asking the RCMP anout this nonsense as well but they just keep playing dumb with me. Their boss keeps proving everyday to everybody that he is a liar.
Methinks it is high time to sue old Zack and all his corrupt cops too. EH? Canada's top cop should have went to great lengths to stop the madness in two courts in two countries today. Instead he just makes speeches in defence of his severe lack of integrity. As mean old Zach tries hard to save his his own nasty arse, the dumb Newfy's are attempting to falsely imprison a man and the corrupt Yankees in Hingham Massachusetts are trying to do the same to me. Rest assured with great pleasure I will sue the very corrupt Yankee Judge Hurley in Canada. If your internet company wants to pretend to not understand the reason why perhaps you should have your lawyers read the other emails your Yankee company and the RCMP have been blocking. It would be wise to do before your company attempts to call me a liar or have an underling play dumb to me on the phone when I call you later today.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

Have a look at the recent Bullshit of Canada's top cop

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20061204/arar_Zaccardelli_061204/20061204?hub=QPeriod


208.97.132.30
Record Type: IP Address


OrgName: New Dream Network, LLC OrgID: NDN Address: 10 Pointe Drive Address: Suite 235 City: Brea StateProv: CA PostalCode: 92821 Country: US NetRange: 208.97.128.0 - 208.97.191.255 CIDR: 208.97.128.0/18 NetName: DREAMHOST-BLK5 NetHandle:
NET-208-97-128-0-1 Parent: NET-208-0-0-0-0 NetType: Direct Allocation NameServer: NS1.DREAMHOST.COM NameServer: NS2.DREAMHOST.COM NameServer: NS3.DREAMHOST.COM Comment: RegDate: 2006-01-11 Updated: 2006-04-12 OrgAbuseHandle: DAT5-ARIN OrgAbuseName: DreamHost Abuse Team OrgAbusePhone: +1-714-706-4182 OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@dreamhost.com OrgTechHandle: ZD69-ARIN OrgTechName: Network Operations OrgTechPhone: +1-714-706-4182 OrgTechEmail: netops@dreamhost.com


MAILER-DAEMON@yahoo.com wrote:
Date: 5 Dec 2006 03:02:10 -0000
From: MAILER-DAEMON@yahoo.com
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: failure notice

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

:
208.97.132.30 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 : Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table
Giving up on 208.97.132.30.

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path:
Received: (qmail 27588 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Dec 2006 02:55:28 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID;
b=zhpu3YuM1TxuoOFTBaebwGEkRThFgbBQYzNNysKHsdW1jTUoYY3lJrkaSN57DhNyc2jc+Mm6OB5iexe7be//r3w2CoRiSErcGYHf+nvuAylL7pxKUtmJlQjYFKQeK5DtxTCqEz66LEMTLAPKWqxbfNpBYgaIVxKRoavRbqGZodI=;
X-YMail-OSG: ouslIX4VM1lycwf8uStjPEfSLmsAcssL_.b_lBPdHmAYLQCOwrUPVsI0MdljIdTFmqIl5SryRedqdIRTSTgwnn_GEjequtrJCKbOxIlKHmijYH2Jq4jCAMWDDzwf2cK1QmuAAWD1z2PiqDI-
Received: from [208.114.162.220] by web33602.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 18:55:27 PST
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 18:55:27 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Re: New "posted" comment on blog
To: Robert Ede , telluseverthing@efrank.ca,
Akoschany@ctv.ca, jtravers@thestar.ca, az@thestar.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
kevin@allnovascotia.com, tim.currie@ukings.ns.ca, david@allnovascotia.com,
Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca, cumby.meghan@dailygleaner.com
Cc: dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, flowerswade@nblib.nb.ca, paul@nblib.nb.ca,
dykstrafarms@hotmail.com, premier@gnb.ca, abel.leblanc@gnb.ca,
rick.brewer@gnb.ca, Trevor.HOLDER@gnb.ca, rosemay.poirier@gnb.ca,
Johnw.BETTS@gnb.ca, Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca, bev.harrison@gnb.ca,
Hermenegilde.Chiasson@gnb.ca, belord@gnb.ca
In-Reply-To: <9f7023d50612020741w50dbb73au47ac0b4e3fba6921@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-23588749-1165287327=:27064"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <978102.27064.qm@web33602.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

--0-23588749-1165287327=:27064
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

I believe the law you seek can be found at the bottom of this email that was sent to the very snotty Little Jimmy Travers at the Toronto Star a while back. I think it is best that the Parliamentarians be prosecuted in a Pro Se fashion by many layman rather than a class action run by crooked lawyers.I will explain later in greater detail. But I am kinda busy right now trying to stop crooked Yankees from trying to put me in jail again. It would not behoove me to go to jail right now. I smell another election coming real soon. Don't you?
Ask Ken Dryden to look up the law I quoted. Ask his opinion for shits and giggles.See if he dares to call me a liar like Dion's help did this summer. It seems that Dryden, Rae and Findley Hall really need to go back to law school ASAP before I get the chance to drag their fat nasty Upper Canadian arses into court. At least finally lawyers were losers in the liberal leadership race but a crooked ex Cabinet minister ain't going effect much change in the standard operating procedure of a very corrupt political party. EH?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 10:30:08 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Re: My cell # is 506 434 1379 Stress test my integrity why don't ya?
To: "Travers, Jim"


What you say is true, that is why I must sue.. We all know why your fellow haughty snotty Upper Canadian reporters have ignored the Code of Ethics for journalists for years. The freedom of the press is a myth. They do what they are told. N'est Pas? However your publicly held company is in a world of trouble with me.
If you doubt me ask Marie Beyette your company's Vice-President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary to ask the following dudes about my issues about Tax Fraud Securities Fraud, Bank Fraud and Murder. Rest assured the RCMP ain't gonna tell you shit. Theses dudes are your directors and I have already proven many time that their companies are as crooked as Hell. The Torys oufit was the most fun of all just ask Lord Conrad Black and his sneaky lawyer Eddy Greenspan about the doings between me and the corrupt Yankee US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald just acrost the 49th from you.
SARABJIT S. MARWAH (He should talk to Deborah Alexander)
Vice Chairman and Chief Administrative Officer, Bank of Nova Scotia

RONALD W. OSBORNE (he should talk to Robert C. Pozen and Jeffery Carp)
Chairman, Sun Life Financial Inc.
THE HON. FRANK IACOBUCCI (He should talk to his partner John Laskin)
Chairman of the Board, Torstar Corporation
Counsel, Torys LLP
Former Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos



"Travers, Jim" wrote:

Your integrity is beyond my purview.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


-----Original Message-----

From: David Amos
To: Travers, Jim
Sent: Sat Nov 04 09:08:59 2006
Subject: My cell # is 506 434 1379 Stress test my integrity why don't ya?

David Amos wrote:

Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 22:51:33 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Cya'll in Court Johnny Boy
To: premier@gnb.ca, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca,
Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca,
mary.schryer@gnb.ca, rick.miles@gnb.ca, jack.keir@gnb.ca,
Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca, Cheryl.Lavoie@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
john.foran@gnb.ca, giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
CC: jonesr@cbc.ca, mleger@stu.ca, jwalker@stu.ca, plee@stu.ca,
oldmaison@yahoo.com, belord@gnb.ca, DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca,
davies.carl@nbpub.com, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca,
claude.landry@gnb.ca, mike.olscamp@gnb.ca, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca


David Amos wrote:

Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 10:57:25 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Cya'l in Court Johnny Boy
To: john.logan@gnb.ca, christina.winsor@gnb.ca

Your assistant Katherine Wilson really pissed me off after a long wait on hold to talk to you on the phone today. I read the news today and just shook my head at the nonsense of it all. Wilson claimed that she was well aware of my matters and that all of your associates employed as Crown Attorneys have advised me to the best of your abilities. How can that be? I have not been able to speak to any of you since I spoke to the crook, Jeff Mockler over two years ago and that was immediately after I came screaming out of jail in the USA. I saw red as I read his words to me then. They were obviously sent when he thought I would never get out of that Yankee jail. To date I have not received one response in writng let alone speak to anyone employed by the Crown as legal counsel, Despite the unbelievable volume of material I have faxed emailed and delivered in hand and byway of the Canada Post, you all failed to act within the scope of your employment and certainly do not
deserve a raise. In fact you should all go to jail, not pass go and not allowed to accept even 200, dollars more from the taxpayers of New Brunswick.
The text of the fowarded email I sent last night to you political bosses and many others says enough about my pending lawsuits. the Governor General of Canada is the highest authority in Canada who speaks in the name of the Crown N'est Pas? Well I received that letter mere days before I was falsely imprisoned in the USA.
Well you can easily see that she affirms over two years ago that I had done the right thing with regards to provincial law enforcement authorities just as Deputy Prime Minister Landslide Annie McLellan had suggested I do before I came back home to New Brunswick to run for a federal seat in the malevolent 38th Parlaiment.
Wheras you refused to talk to me today Johnny Boy Logan, may I suggest that you talk to the RCMP or some of your associates starting with Jeff Mockler. I have had enough of your obvious malice. I will leave you to wonder as to who else will read my opinion of you and your legal cohorts in short order. Cya'll in Court.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

"Jan 3rd, 2004

Mr. David R. Amos
153 Alvin Avenue
Milton, MA 02186
U.S.A.
Dear Mr. Amos
Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I apologize for the delay in responding.
If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In addition, any evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their attention since the police are in the best position to evaluate the information and take action as deemed appropriate.
I trust that this information is satisfactory.
Yours sincerely
A. Anne McLellan"

David Amos wrote:

Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:43:33 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: BOOO ya Bastards
To: premier@gnb.ca, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca,
Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca,
mary.schryer@gnb.ca, rick.miles@gnb.ca, jack.keir@gnb.ca,
Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca, Cheryl.Lavoie@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
john.foran@gnb.ca, giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
CC: jonesr@cbc.ca, mleger@stu.ca, jwalker@stu.ca, plee@stu.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, belord@gnb.ca, DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca,
davies.carl@nbpub.com, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca,
claude.landry@gnb.ca, mike.olscamp@gnb.ca, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca


David Amos wrote:

Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:41:38 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: BOOO ya Bastards
To: jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, Deb_Nobes@cbc.ca,
spinks08@hotmail.com, Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca, ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca,
mackay01@canada.com, PoliticsNB@hotmail.com, oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com,
handsofnothing@yahoo.ca, gcox@citizenspress.org, stevengerickson@yahoo.com
CC: MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca, Day.S@parl.gc.ca, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Guimond.M@parl.gc.ca, Cy.LEBLANC@gnb.ca, Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca, Johnw.BETTS@gnb.ca, saintjohnfundy@hotmail.com,len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com, william.gould@gnb.ca, cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca, news@kingscorecord.com


September 11th, 2004
Dear Mr. Amos,

On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson, I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD regarding corruption, one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to us by the Office of the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.
I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot intervene in matters that are the responsibility of elected officials and courts of Justice of Canada. You already contacted the various provincial authorities regarding your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.
Yours sincerely.
Renee Blanchet
Office of the Secretary to the
Governor General


Criminal Code
PART IV OFFENCES AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION OF LAW AND JUSTICE
Corruption and Disobedience 126.
(1) Every one who, without lawful excuse, contravenes an Act of Parliament by wilfully doing anything that it forbids or by wilfully omitting to do anything that it requires to be done is, unless a punishment is expressly provided by law, guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.
(2) Any proceedings in respect of a contravention of or conspiracy to contravene an Act mentioned in subsection (1), other than this Act, may be instituted at the instance of the Government of Canada and conducted by or on behalf of that Government.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 126; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 185(F).
________________________________

Crown lawyers receive help in fight for pay raise
Last Updated: Wednesday, November 1, 2006 | 9:26 AM AT
CBC News

Lawyers who work for the New Brunswick government say a previously secret report may help their case for a bigger pay raise.
The lawyers had to go to court to see the report, which proves they're underpaid, they say.
Government lawyers aren't unionized and can't strike, so have no leverage in asking the government to raise their pay.
Last year, the government commissioned a study of what Crown lawyers make across the country as part of a review of salaries.
The government wouldn't give the Crown Counsel Association a copy of the report when it was done, so the association used the Right to Information Act to take the government to court, and a judge ordered the report released.
Association president John Logan says the report appears to show government lawyers here are paid less than their counterparts in other provinces.
"The association of Crown counsel are reviewing the report and intend to use it as background information."
The association is hoping to meet with the new attorney general to talk about the report, but government spokesperson Christina Winsor says a good pay plan is already in place.
"The current pay plan for the lawyers is an average of three per cent a year over four years, and that is consistent and slightly above inflation rates, which is averaging about two per cent right now."
Winsor says a new study will be commissioned in 2009 when the current schedule of pay increases expires

Robert Ede wrote:
David,

I indeed recall our hour+ conversation (and it's abrupt end)

My recollection of the question from me that prompted your goodbye, was more like "Can you appreciate that the name David Raymond Amos, might not resonate with the voters on London?"

The thrust of your call to me (I believe) was to inform me of far greater injustices than the puny complaints I was attempting to alert the voters to in the course of being a candidate (events that had occurred within your family - and cover-ups of same within the USA & Canada- plus an inter-connected web of lawyers, judges, elected and unelected officials who are taking advantage of their offices, the public trust and being dis-loyal to the very oaths and vows they all took upon joining the bar assoc.)

The part of the conversation that lasted longest with me is your assertion that ~" a lawyer (an officer of the court) once made aware of an injustice MUST proceed to have it investigated"~

The reason I am intrigued is this " If every constitutional lawyer and supreme court judge since 1940 allowed (by doing nothing) the federal government's legislative 'branch' ie the Prime Minister, to
1) subsume the Privy Council's powers and responsibilities
and
2) undermine the mandate of the person holding the office of Governor General to exercise the veto powers (withhold assent, reservation of a Bill for Queen-in-Council assent & disallowance of provincial bills)
and
3) undermine the mandate of the Queen (& before 1982, Queen-in Council) to disallow any Canadian Bill or not assent to a reserved Bill),

then, I believe they are guilty of conspiring to break the constitutional law, breaking their vows as officers of the Court and should be removed from office, disbarred (even posthumously) and every decision they made reviewed in the light of "new circumstances/ evidence".

Can a class action suit of this magnitude be considered?

Rce

Robert Ede
perhaps not just another bag of hot air in Upper Canada







On 12/2/06, David R. Amos wrote: David R. Amos has left a new comment on your post " Confronting the Truth (that we don't know, we don't know)":

You and I talked before the election in a part of Canada that does not reflect my neck of the woods. You talk the talk sir but the instant you spoke the same words every other greedy Upper Canadian has said to me I promptly dismissed you(your words were basicaly what is in it for me?) You were running for public office in order to uphold the public trust and protect the public interest.
What you say in your Blogs about the Crown is largely true. However without the balls or integrity to back up what you say, you are just another bag of hot air in Upper Canada farting in the general direction of the Maritimes. Is it so that you do not raise too much of a stink in Stevey Boy Harper's stomping grounds? You and Dizzie Lizzie May and the others desreve to lose to the liberal. It proves my point about us getting the governments we deserve. N'est Pas?
If any of you had had the balls to even mention my name without even bothering to stand with me. I would have gladly supported you and handled your argument against the Crown in my own way.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

I see that you scree you comments so I doubt anyone else will read this here sp I will merely post and then email it the same words to some of your friends.




Posted by David R. Amos to Walk a Kb or two in my Mocassins at 12/02/2006 06:18:25 AM




--


---------------------------------
Check out the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.
--0-23588749-1165287327=:27064
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


I believe the law you seek can be found at the bottom of this email that was sent to the very snotty Little Jimmy Travers at the Toronto Star a while back. I think it is best that the Parliamentarians be prosecuted in a Pro Se fashion by many layman rather than a class action run by crooked lawyers.I will explain later in greater detail. But I am kinda busy right now trying to stop crooked Yankees from trying to put me in jail again. It would not behoove me to go to jail right now. I smell another election coming real soon. Don't you?
Ask Ken Dryden to look up the law I quoted. Ask his opinion for shits and giggles.See if he dares to call me a liar like Dion's help did this summer. It seems that Dryden, Rae and Findley Hall really need to go back to law school ASAP before I get the chance to drag their fat nasty Upper Canadian arses into court.
At least finally lawyers were losers in the liberal leadership race but a crooked ex Cabinet minister ain't going effect much change in the standard operating procedure of a very corrupt political party. EH?
Veritas Vincit


David Raymond Amos

Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 10:30:08 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Re: My cell # is 506 434 1379 Stress test my integrity why don't ya?
To: "Travers, Jim"


What you say is true, that is why I must sue.. We all
know why your fellow haughty snotty Upper Canadian reporters have ignored the Code of Ethics for journalists for years. The freedom of the press is a myth. They do what they are told. N'est Pas? However your publicly held company is in a world of trouble with me.
If you doubt me ask Marie Beyette your company's Vice-President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary to ask the following dudes about my issues about Tax Fraud Securities Fraud, Bank Fraud and Murder. Rest assured the RCMP ain't gonna tell you shit. Theses dudes are your directors and I have already proven many time that their companies are as crooked as Hell. The Torys oufit was the most fun of all just ask Lord Conrad Black and his sneaky lawyer Eddy Greenspan about the doings between me and the corrupt Yankee US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald just acrost the 49th from you.
SARABJIT S. MARWAH (He should talk
to Deborah Alexander)
Vice Chairman and Chief Administrative Officer, Bank of Nova Scotia

RONALD W. OSBORNE (he should talk to Robert C. Pozen and Jeffery Carp)
Chairman, Sun Life Financial Inc.
THE HON. FRANK IACOBUCCI (He should talk to his partner John Laskin)
Chairman of the Board, Torstar Corporation
Counsel, Torys LLP
Former Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada


Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos



"Travers, Jim" <id=lw_1165283857_45 style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">jtravers@thestar.ca> wrote:

Your integrity is beyond my purview.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


-----Original Message-----

From: David Amos
To: Travers, Jim
Sent: Sat Nov 04 09:08:59 2006
Subject: My cell # is 506 434 1379 Stress test my integrity why don't ya?

David Amos wrote:

Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 22:51:33 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Cya'll in Court Johnny Boy
To: premier@gnb.ca, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca,
Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca,
mary.schryer@gnb.ca, rick.miles@gnb.ca, jack.keir@gnb.ca,
Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca, Cheryl.Lavoie@gnb.ca, href="mailto:greg.byrne@gnb.ca">greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
john.foran@gnb.ca, giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
CC: jonesr@cbc.ca, mleger@stu.ca, jwalker@stu.ca, plee@stu.ca,
oldmaison@yahoo.com, belord@gnb.ca, DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca,
davies.carl@nbpub.com, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca,
claude.landry@gnb.ca, mike.olscamp@gnb.ca, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca


David Amos wrote:

Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 10:57:25 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Cya'l in
Court Johnny Boy
To: john.logan@gnb.ca, christina.winsor@gnb.ca

Your assistant Katherine Wilson really pissed me off after a long wait on hold to talk to you on the phone today. I read the news today and just shook my head at the nonsense of it all. Wilson claimed that she was well aware of my matters and that all of your associates employed as Crown Attorneys have advised me to the best of your abilities. How can that be? I have not been able to speak to any of you since I spoke to the crook, Jeff Mockler over two years ago and that was immediately after I came screaming out of jail in the id=lw_1165283857_74 style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">USA. I saw red as I read his words to me then. They were obviously sent when he thought I would never get out of that Yankee jail. To date I have not received one response in writng let alone speak to anyone employed by the Crown as legal counsel, Despite the unbelievable volume of material I have faxed emailed and delivered in hand and byway of the Canada Post, you all failed to act within the scope of your employment and certainly do not deserve a raise. In fact you should all go to jail, not pass go and not allowed to accept even 200, dollars more from the taxpayers of New Brunswick.
The text of the fowarded email I sent last night to you political bosses and many others says enough about my pending
lawsuits. the Governor General of Canada is the highest authority in Canada who speaks in the name of the Crown N'est Pas? Well I received that letter mere days before I was falsely imprisoned in the USA.
Well you can easily see that she affirms over two years ago that I had done the right thing with regards to provincial law enforcement authorities just as Deputy Prime Minister Landslide Annie McLellan had suggested I do before I came back home to New Brunswick to run for a federal seat in the malevolent 38th Parlaiment.
Wheras you refused to talk to me today Johnny Boy Logan, may I suggest that you talk to
the RCMP or some of your associates starting with Jeff Mockler. I have had enough of your obvious malice. I will leave you to wonder as to who else will read my opinion of you and your legal cohorts in short order. Cya'll in Court.
Veritas Vincit

David Raymond Amos

"Jan 3rd, 2004

Mr. David R. Amos
153 Alvin Avenue
Milton, MA 02186
U.S.A.
Dear Mr. Amos
Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I apologize for the delay in responding.
If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In addition, any evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their attention since the police are in the best position to evaluate the information and take action as deemed appropriate.
I trust that this information is satisfactory.

Yours sincerely
A. Anne McLellan"

David Amos wrote:

Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:43:33 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: BOOO ya Bastards
To: premier@gnb.ca, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca,
Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca,
style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">mary.schryer@gnb.ca, rick.miles@gnb.ca, jack.keir@gnb.ca,
Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca, Cheryl.Lavoie@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
john.foran@gnb.ca, giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
CC: jonesr@cbc.ca, mleger@stu.ca, jwalker@stu.ca, plee@stu.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, belord@gnb.ca, DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca,
davies.carl@nbpub.com, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca,
claude.landry@gnb.ca, mike.olscamp@gnb.ca,
info@pco-bcp.gc.ca


David Amos wrote:

Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:41:38 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: BOOO ya Bastards
To: jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, Deb_Nobes@cbc.ca,
spinks08@hotmail.com, Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca, ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca,
mackay01@canada.com, PoliticsNB@hotmail.com, oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com,
handsofnothing@yahoo.ca, gcox@citizenspress.org,
stevengerickson@yahoo.com
CC: MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca, Day.S@parl.gc.ca, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Guimond.M@parl.gc.ca, Cy.LEBLANC@gnb.ca, Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca, Johnw.BETTS@gnb.ca, saintjohnfundy@hotmail.com,len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com, william.gould@gnb.ca,
href="mailto:cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca">cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca, news@kingscorecord.com


September 11th, 2004
Dear Mr.
Amos,

On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson, I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD regarding corruption, one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to us by the Office of the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.
I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot intervene in matters that are the responsibility of elected officials and courts of Justice of Canada. You already contacted the various provincial authorities regarding your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.

Yours sincerely.
Renee
Blanchet
Office of the Secretary to
the
Governor General


Criminal Code
PART IV
OFFENCES AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION OF LAW AND JUSTICE
Corruption and Disobedience 126.
(1) Every one who, without lawful excuse, contravenes an Act of Parliament by wilfully doing anything that it forbids or by wilfully omitting to do anything that it requires to be done is, unless a punishment is expressly provided by law, guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.
(2) Any proceedings in respect of a contravention of or conspiracy to contravene an Act mentioned in subsection (1), other than this Act, may be instituted at the instance of the Government of Canada and conducted by or on behalf of that Government.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 126; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 185(F).

________________________________

Crown lawyers receive help in fight for pay raise
Last Updated: Wednesday, November 1, 2006 | 9:26 AM AT
CBC News

Lawyers who work for the New Brunswick government say a previously secret report may help their case for a bigger pay raise.
The lawyers had to go to court to see the report, which proves they're underpaid, they say.
Government lawyers aren't unionized and can't strike, so have no leverage in asking the government to raise their pay.
Last year,
the government commissioned a study of what Crown lawyers make across the country as part of a review of salaries.
The government wouldn't give the Crown Counsel Association a copy of the report when it was done, so the association used the Right to Information Act to take the government to court, and a judge ordered the report released.
Association president John Logan says the report appears to show government lawyers here are paid less than their counterparts in other provinces.
"The association of Crown counsel are reviewing the report and intend to use it as background information."
The association is hoping to meet with the new attorney general to talk about the report, but government spokesperson Christina Winsor says a good pay plan is already in place.
"The current pay plan for the lawyers is an average of three per cent a
year over four years, and that is consistent and slightly above inflation rates, which is averaging about two per cent right now."
Winsor says a new study will be commissioned in 2009 when the current schedule of pay increases expires

Robert Ede wrote:
David,

I indeed recall our hour+ conversation (and it's abrupt end)

My recollection of the question from me that prompted your goodbye, was more like "Can you appreciate that the name David Raymond Amos, might not resonate with the voters on London?"

The thrust of your call to me (I believe) was to inform me of far greater injustices than the puny complaints I was attempting to alert the voters to in the course of being a candidate (events
that had occurred within your family - and cover-ups of same within the USA & Canada- plus an inter-connected web of lawyers, judges, elected and unelected officials who are taking advantage of their offices, the public trust and being dis-loyal to the very oaths and vows they all took upon joining the bar assoc.)

The part of the conversation that lasted longest with me is your assertion that ~" a lawyer (an officer of the court) once made aware of an injustice MUST proceed to have it investigated"~

The reason I am intrigued is this " If every constitutional lawyer and supreme court judge since 1940 allowed (by doing nothing) the federal government's legislative 'branch' ie the Prime Minister, to
1) subsume the Privy Council's powers and responsibilities
and
2) undermine the mandate of the person holding the office of Governor General to exercise the
veto powers (withhold assent, reservation of a Bill for Queen-in-Council assent & disallowance of provincial bills)
and
3) undermine the mandate of the Queen (& before 1982, Queen-in Council) to disallow any Canadian Bill or not assent to a reserved Bill),

then, I believe they are guilty of conspiring to break the constitutional law, breaking their vows as officers of the Court and should be removed from office, disbarred (even posthumously) and every decision they made reviewed in the light of "new circumstances/ evidence".

Can a class action suit of this magnitude be considered?

Rce

Robert Ede
perhaps not just another bag of hot air in Upper Canada







On 12/2/06, David R. Amos
wrote:
David R. Amos has left a new comment on your post " Confronting the Truth (that we don't know, we don't know)":

You and I talked before the election in a part of Canada that does not reflect my neck of the woods. You talk the talk sir but the instant you spoke the same words every other greedy Upper Canadian has said to me I promptly dismissed you(your words were basicaly what is in it for me?) You were running for public office in order to uphold the public trust and
protect the public interest.
What you say in your Blogs about the Crown is largely true. However without the balls or integrity to back up what you say, you are just another bag of hot air in Upper Canada farting in the general direction of the Maritimes. Is it so that you do not raise too much of a stink in Stevey Boy Harper's stomping grounds? You and Dizzie Lizzie May and the others desreve to lose to the liberal. It proves my point about us getting the governments we deserve. N'est Pas?
If any of you had had the balls to even mention my name without even bothering to stand with me. I would have gladly supported you and handled your argument against the Crown in my own way.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

I see that you scree you comments so I doubt anyone else will read this here sp I will merely post and then email it the same words to some of your friends.




Posted by David R. Amos to
onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://robertede.blogspot.com/" target=_blank>Walk a Kb or two in my Mocassins at 12/02/2006 06:18:25 AM



--





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful email and get

--- End of message stripped.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cheap Talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.9/573 - Release Date: 12/5/06

From: David Raymond Amos (davidramos@xplornet.com)
You may not know this sender.Mark as safe|Mark as junk
Sent: January 4, 2007 10:10:11 PM
To: Iolmisha@cs.com; jhughes164@yahoo.com; jstc4emsurvivors@yahoo.com; Justice4Tyrell@yahoogroups.com; laceupboots@hotmail.com; mc_victim@hotmail.com; midnightladync@yahoo.com; orwelltoday@orwelltoday.com; september_eleven_vreeland@yahoogroups.com; madd_professor@cox.net; catfishwithlips@yahoo.com; Harper.S@parl.gc.ca; dean Ray (deanr0032@hotmail.com); LPPCIOCE@SMTP.LPS.STATE.NJ.US; mark.delaney@pol.state.ma.us; edward.lynch@po.state.ct.us; stottr@mshp.state.mo.us; fbooth@safety.state.nh.us; cward@cameronward.com
Cc: 4humanitysake@comcast.net; 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com; a_jones10467@yahoo.com; atvnews@ctv.ca; cap871@hotmail.com; c.sperr@comcast.net; dblaron67@yahoo.com; derrickcrobinson@gmail.com; erniemusic2@yahoo.com; irock96@hotmail.com; gerryduffett47@yahoo.com; kevin_annett@hotmail.com; laceupboots@hotmail.com; marsboy683@yahoo.com; mc_victim@hotmail.com; mcclelland_t@hotmail.com; mcclellandt@netzero.com; One_World_Religion@yahoogroups.com; orwelltoday@orwelltoday.com; rghouseholder@msn.com; your_neighbor_2000@yahoo.com; warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
2 attachments
Shawn_Gra...tif (20.3 KB), Shawny Ba...JPG (238.2 KB)


If nothing else maybe I can be of some assistance to a famous hockey player and his with who played in your neck of the woods. The case of the Jersey cops calling them crooks last year as merely a case of the big bad pot calliing a little kettle black.
Your buddies that you introduced me to byway of your emails should never forget that you picked this fight not me. Whereas I have heard nothing from any of them discounting anything you have wrtten of me, I must presume that everyone of them stand with you and against me as you accuse me of being a Hells Angel etc. Many of them should know that the emails about to decend upon you dudes are the reason that the Yahoo Group you lament the loss of crashed and burned over New Years Eve. I do take credit for that. I had no idea who the bitch was who invited me to play your wicked game with you people but I smelled something rotten afoot on the very day they hanged the fella you mentioned. So I just joined and read the un Christian like nonsense until I understood what was up and who was who. Infowarz was not long showing his nasty arse so I gave it a boot but only after he had invited me to do so. His association with the Jones dude in Texas was kinda obvious. N'est Pas?
I was not even around the internet much yesterday while you were busy slandering me and accusing me of assaulting you etc. What planet are you from I must ask? I was very busy trying to get the Dept of Foreign Affairs to finally act within the scope of their employment and stop another Yankee court from swearing out another warrant for my arrest. That affair was much more on my mind than your fainted hearted nonsense in cyber space Kid. Try growing up and get married then divorced and married again, have some kids of your own and a grandchild too before you try to lecture me on what truly matters in this wonderful old world. Rest assured if you grew balls half the size of mine you would turn as mean as me when somebody attacks your family. Failing that try immigrating to a foreign land that your forefathers battled against in two World Wars. borrow a bunch of money buy a farm and work like a dog day and night in order to try to make a living and honour your debts. Then watch way too many cattle die in front of you that your had taken great pains to take care of and see the RCMP not investigate. When you protest too much find yourself locked up in the lonney bin for six months while the powers that be sell your cattle. Find yourself suddenly set free with no reason explained for your imprisonment. Then pick up the pieces and start again while watching the cattle die around you as other farms get endless grants from the govenment to stay in business while you get nothing at all because everybody wants you out of business just so someone can get a good deal on your land. After all that if you mange to keep your faith in your god and your fellow man. Maybe just maybe you would be half the man my friend Werner is.
Whatever happened within your own website was your doings not mine. What was your big loss anyway? Most of your webpage was cut and paste stuff gleened from the internet. There was not much original work. Try reading Just Dave sometime after you unshuffle it. I am not selling anthing I just created to keep a record of some things.. http://davidamos.blogspot.com/2005/03/me-and-bush.html
I will answer one question for you though. FBIndian is David Woodman he is my Fucking Big Indian friend who guarded my family for me from crooked cops etc for for years. I sent him back to the USA last summer with my kids following along shortly thereafter. Now he is just a witness to all the shit that went down. Unless of course somebody bothers my clan and then i will give him a call. He is one of the decent men who has my Durable Power of Attorney and he has been beside me in court and many other places many time. He kinda sorta looks like me and people are often confused as to which one of us is me. The Yankee Secret Service met him in my home in April 2003. Need I say we surprised the Hell out of them. They thought they were watching me as I was watching them.
I defintely did not like you including me and my friend Werner in your nonsense within the Google blogs. Your rants as you rode on my coatails caused a negative effect on our personal pursuit of justice. That is why I contacted you and asked you to stop but you kept accusing me of being things I definitely was not so I hung up. Then you got worse. N'est pas? It had only been a week or so after you first had a long talk with Werner and hustled him to sell some cows to aid you in your pursuit of lucre. I must protect my friends. My friend Werner is a very decent and deeply religious man even though I am not. If there is a heaven i am certain he will get there and warn his god to watch out for me because I have some hellish questions to ask that he could not answer. Werner is also why I selected this particular email to send first when I decided to pounce on that nasty biblepounding Yahoo group. I was proving to a friend that not all people are the Christians they profess to be and that one must be very wary of strangers who tell you what you want to hear. Werner and I both agreed that the behavior over a dictator's hanging reflected very poorly on your Yahoo Group's Christian sense of dignity, honour and integrity. You people deserved to be stress tested about your sense of justice and fair play to the max. So I did so without reservation once Infowarz dared me to go to war with him with more Info than he claimed he could handle. Need I say Bullshit?
However to give the devil his due so to speak when I intruduced you to Werner I truly thought you were an ok fellow. Boy did you ever prove me wrong. EH kid? As for your pals within Google I will handle the little pricks that slandered me in there with a certain self righteous joy I might add. You must admit that not once have I ever called you. It was you who first called me months after Byron Prior had bailed out on me. You must confess that you were somewhat astonished that I already knew who you were. Whats the matter? Are you amazed that an old Maritimer knows his way around the internet? I defended you to Byron when he contacted me well over a year later and sent you my exact words to him because I felt you were entitled to know. Us Maritimers like Sam Perrier and Byron Prior are not all defeatists as your buddy Stevey Boy Harper claims. (I must say I found it interesting that you included him in the email but left out the RCMP so I included the local cop MacBeath but I suspect his acting boss will block the emails as usual) If you have a bone to pick with Sam as he defends his son may I suggest that you take it up with him. I have no doubt Sam will deal with you in his own way. After all you know I sent him the email in which you slammed him.
For the record Werner just lost another cow tonight her name was Bozo. She was a good mother who had given him about seven fine calfs to sell. The RCMP will likely not come to investigate just like they did when the last five calfs I saw die since the end of May. Tomorrow we will do our own investigation into her demise. The cop MacBeath never even talked to me until the Ambassador Daivid wilkins made false allegations against me just before Xmassa. He falsely claimed in his email to me that he suggested I take my dead calves to Prince Edward Island. What he seems to wish to forget is that Werner did that years ago and got a fraudulent report and a bill. Why spend hard earned money for more bullshit we get enough of that for free from the cops?
In regards to all you questions and allegations it was Werner who wanted to talk to you weeks ago not me. It was because he agreed with much of what you wrote in your misbegotten website. I advised him against it. In my humble opinion he is too trusting of strangers who pound on the bible he believes in. I merely warned you that the powers that be would pounce on you bigtime if you were not careful with your mouth. I did not doubt your sincerity but somethings are best left unsaid until the proper place and time. What you go on and on about is not new to anyone who knows their way around the internet. There is big differnece between repeating other peoples words and using your own and standing by them in court with the hard evidence to back up what you say is true. Does that make me a bad guy just because I was correct in what I advised you?
Never forget it was me that the smiling bastards try to take to Cuba after I had sued them not you. The bastards have deleted my work on the web many times. They have killed my cell phones, cut out landlines, killed my ISP and my files and email accounts on the internet. Did I ever point my finger at anyone in particalar about that particular malice? What gives the right to blame me for any of your troubles then say I am a Hell Angels financed by night clubs and T. Alex Hickman and try to run you over with a truck as well just so you can seem like some sort of oppressed hero? Just because you cannot find law suits in the USA in a Canadian website does not mean that they do not exist. Check the email I sent you almost a year ago after you first called me Kid. Those tiff files contain docket numbers etc. Remember your hero Cardinal Law and your long gone MP Landslide Annie? If you truly had balls and were sincere in what you said you would have printed the tiff file i suggested and gave them to the bitch of an MP in your neighborhood and quite likely it would have helped stop the illegal auction of our home and the falsw warrant for my arrest in early 2005.
At least this email proves that you can never deny that I did not give Infowarz and his buddies fair warning not to mess with me. On New Years Eve I merely took the advice from the oft quoted Eze 33:6 in that Yahoo Group and just watched and then sounded one hell of a trumpet. Nest pas?
That said what you say of my support of Byron Prior and Paul Perrier is unforgiveable. Perhaps you should find yourself a lawyer kid. Methinks your friends should call the cops and their lawyers in short order once they listen to some recordings of police surveilance wiretap tapes coming their way EH? Whatever recording you have of me I will welcome any argument about. I am a man of my word and I stand by every word I say everyday. You on the otherhand change your words with the wind. Some Christian you are EH? Don't count me in your crowd of bible pounders. In our purported democracy we have the freedom to have no god at all. In the last email I send I will leave you out of the loop and forward to your friends a collection of some of your many words to me. They can judge me and you for themselves to see who is confused and who is not. More importantly they should see who is honest and who is not. A biblepounder who feels free to swear and slander as he plays his wicked little game or a pigheaded pissed off Maritimer who is trying hard to protect his Clan's rights and interests.
Good luck with your conscience tonight Dean. I will ignore you from now on that is until you or your lawyer answer a summons to court. If not and if I am wrong again and there truly is a Hell I will look forward to meeting you there. Then there will be lots of time to play your silly games. EH?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

While I was writing this email, you send me another email one on one calling us a bunch of communists?As if it was worthy of comment. What gives you the right to even presume that I agree with you or that you are in the same situation as I am? You and I are as different as night and day kid. Your worst enemy is within your own mind and my enemies are very real. The bastards broke up my family, took my family's home and threw me in jail because I can impeach your heroes the Yankee George W. Bush and his little buddy a lot of Canadians call Shrub. The way you talk you sound like a disenchanted skinhead to me kid. If you think I abused Byron Prior May I suggest you explain your words to to him and his friend Sam. No doubt they may have some questions for you. Say hey to the RCMP for me will ya. Tell them i look forward to arguing their lawyers in court.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dean Ray"
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 9:50 PM
Subject: This Communist country sucks Anyway (Canada)

What is the point of sending all these emails to RCMP if you are in the same
situation I am...unless you are actually protected by them. You would have
to be a freemason or dumb as a post to be protected by RCMP.....


----- Original Message -----

From: David Raymond Amos
To: TruthAGAINSTtradition@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 4:05 AM
Subject: Fw: Your wish is my command look out for information overload.and please allow me to introduce you to the RCMP

----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; py.bourduas@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; InfoWarz@rovin.net
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 2:22 AM
Subject: Your wish is my command look out for information overload.and please allow me to introduce you to the RCMP


Ok, can't back down on a double dog dare, so you are ....Liar.

t 11:41 PM 12/30/2006, you wrote:


Research me Mikey Baby. My name is David Raymond Amos. I am neither a prudent nor a simple man. However I am the dude who caused Cardinal Law in Beantown to quit his job on Dec 13th, 2002 Call me a liar I double dog dare to and I will prove it in a heartbeat.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Eze 33:6 But if the watchman see the sword come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned; if the sword come, and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman's hand.

----- Original Message -----
From: iNFoWaRZ
To: TruthAGAINSTtradition@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 12:17 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthAGAINSTtradition] Re: The execution of Saddam Hussein


My name is Mike, as most already know.
Having a handle on the net is as common as having a handle on a CB radio in case you haven't noticed.
The founders of the American government, when debating via written word, used pseudonyms, not because they were ashamed of Christ, but because they didn't want hanged in the public square.
Pro 27:12 A prudent man foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself; but the simple pass on, and are punished.
I did write "To the saints who left Babylon".
The answer to your question comes right out of Armstrong's own book that is sitting on my shelf, "Mystery of the Ages".
Also out of Armstrong's other book called, "America and Britain in Prophecy", also sitting on my shelf.
I just don't blab Babylonian BS like some "flamers" on this list, I do my research.
British Israelism was one of Armstrong's and the WWCG core doctrines, albeit a totally false doctrine.
Now why do you get all excited, when you haven't lifted a finger to do your own research?
Pro 18:13 He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him.



At 10:39 PM 12/30/2006, you wrote:


Infowarz............Who ARE you?? Did you write the piece "To the saints who left Babylon"? If not Who did? Where do you get your information that Armstrong and the WWCOG were British Israelites? Why do you hide behind the pseudomym infowars? Are you ashamed of your affiliation with Jesus Christ? I AM NOT!!!! With Love in Christ, Always, Brother Mark G. Swetz........................
--- In TruthAGAINSTtradition@yahoogroups.com, iNFoWaRZ wrote:
>
> Cooper is dead.
> And he was not a member of the World wide church of God.
> He was adamantly against any form of British Israelism, and in his
> research uncovered the ties of the British Israelites to the secret
> societies and their mystery religion.
> Since Armstrong and his WWCG were British Israelites he would have
> considered them his enemy.
>
>
> At 03:59 PM 12/30/2006, you wrote:
> > Milton William Cooper is a member of the World Wide Church of
> >GOD. You can have big laughs how different they are but it will be
> >interesting where you end up in the next few years.
>
----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: TruthAGAINSTtradition@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 1:40 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthAGAINSTtradition] Jokes Du jour 12/30/06


I must also add that a bit after reading your Madd post about the joke because of a lively little debate I had with buddy after I posted that comment of mine. First I must take my hat to you sir in order to nod my head in your general direction. Your comment about the dead men piling up around us today impressed me to say the least. No matter what is said about them good or bad, history written by the victors later who will put their twist on the truth of the matters. 1984 was a long time afo in Young Tesla's lifetime. Unless the opinions of many common folks are properly recorded like James Brown's tunes were, the truth will never be revealed. My buddy keeps telling me in the counsel of the mutitude wisdom can be found. What you wrote was better than my silence. Now it is my turn to speak up after reading all the nonsense today. I must ask the obvious question has anybody been anywhere to witness what they they claim to know about? What I talk about I have lived through. You folks talk the talk of politics and nasty cops etc. Try walking the walk sometime.
Its past the midnite hour. Tis time for me to prowl and howl a bit before a long winters nap. "Whoa-oa-oa! I feel good" to qoute the words of the one dead man I have reason to respect because he was a memorable song and dance man. James Brown's words will likely be longer remembered and often repeated than that of Black Bull or the nasty old Yankee politician who lived high on the hog that fed on the fat of the land. In my humble opinion for what it is worth your words were well thought out and well put. Good for you sir. One other madman thinks your words were written for the benefit of all without any self serving motive in mind.
As far as the joke goes, you may be mad but I am crazy like a fox, hungry as a horse, as mean as a snake and and smarter than the average bear. Even though my truck has decent brakes and a good horn, I would use neither. I do enjoy fresh road kill and chicken is my favorite meat. My friend, Werner and I had a rather enjoyable debate between ourselves as to whether or not a chicken was chicken. If he was brave enough to cross the road then he could not be chicken even if he was not wise to cross the road as I was coming on down it with a hungry look in my eye. What do I know I am just another beast or whatever maybe something like a fox or snake chased him across but if his timing is spot on I would miss him and flatten his adversary. I would remain hungry and he would become a free running chicken who made it over to the far side that true freedom brings.
I maintain that we are what we eat and as I said chicken, is my favorite meat. Thus I must be largely chicken as well. Call me a chicken or a "flamer" if you wish Mikey Baby but please know that people do not scare me. I am more like a lone wolf that Mother Nature planned for some of us to be. ature. Folks who come too close and attack me merely cause me to wonder how they would taste dipped in butter, properly spiced and cooked until well done :)
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

----- Original Message -----
From: tHe mAdd pRoFeSsOr
To: talking 2 you
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthAGAINSTtradition] Jokes Du jour 12/30/06


Indeed this is cool.

The mAdd version would merely also add.....

Let all the chickens take their chances on whichever side of the road they choose, just let them stay outa my part of the road while they play musical chairs, cuz my truck has no brakes, and chickens do not react well to horns.

----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: TruthAGAINSTtradition@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthAGAINSTtradition] Jokes Du jour 12/30/06


Now thats funny. Many a true word is said in jest. You spread good cheer sir. At least into the mind of one savage soul. I hope those words may travel far and be often repeated. They will no doubt give some good folks food for thought as they chuckle. If we did not laugh at the nonsense of it all we would truly go crazy and be of no help to anyone at all. Eh?
As for my two bits worth. Methinks the chicken was born to cross the road. He could not help himself. If he did not he would defy Mother Nature and sooner or later she would make certain that all chickens would become extinct because he quite simply went against her plan. Man is doing the same thing to himself. N'est Pas? My question is who is wiser a chicken or a man?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond amos

Warren McBeath wrote:

Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
From: "Warren McBeath"
To: ,,
, , ,

CC: ,,
, ,
"Bev BUSSON" ,
"Paul Dube"
Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n

Dear Mr. Amos,

Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off over
the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I was not
ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.

As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.

As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear that
Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and the
US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment policing in
Petitcodiac, NB.

It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.

Sincerely,

Warren McBeath, Cpl.
GRC Caledonia RCMP
Traffic Services NCO
Ph: (506) 387-2222
Fax: (506) 387-4622
E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: nada.sarkis@gnb.ca ; MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca ; kilgoursite@ca.inter.net ; dwatch@web.net ; riding@chuckstrahl.com ; ottawa@chuckstrahl.com ; wally.stiles@gnb.ca
Cc: warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; John.Foran@gnb.ca ; bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; riding@chuckstrahl.com ; ottawa@chuckstrahl.com ; Oda.B@parl.gc.ca ; paul.dube@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 1:01 PM
Subject: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not..


Cpl McBeath
Please allow me to introduce to you two biggests bosses and one dead little calf. One boss Foran cares about politicians at a Provincial level (Liberal ones that is) and the other Busson cares about the RCMP at the Federal level (The Conservative supporters at least) Stevey Boy Harper did appoint her correct? My calf don't care about nothing anymore even the fact you refused to pick up his guts because our bosses told you not to N'est Pas? However I still do. After all as you know is is against the law to kill cattle and I have the right to know who done it and if not what? I tried to talk to you today after waiting for a week because you appeared to be an honest man. I have waited long enough for a response from you after particularly after I had proven to you the allegations made against me by the US State Dept in Ottawa were false. I also sent to you proof of their malice against me and we discussed it etc and you promised to get bacK to me sir. How come you have not? If the Yankee lawyer David Wilkins and his cohorts in Ottawa were truly in jeopardy as they had claimed you would have jailed me in minutes on behalf of that crooked Yankee lawyer. I have no doubt whatsoever that you got back to them and told them not to worry.
How come the Canadain public does not get such prompt service I must ask. Who do you work Yankees or us? Do I not have rights as well I told you one week ago about a very suspicious action about to go down in a Yankee Court in Hingham on Jan 3rd without any notification to me whatsoever. Since the time you called me on behalf of Yankee concerns I have managed to cross paths with several RCMP officers within your own District. your associates have proven to me that they are willing to be flat out liars about wiretap tapes and as well as dead calfs. It appears that the Crown Corpt RCMP wish to assist in my false imprisonment once again before I can sue you for your first two rounds of malice in order to support two former liberal mandates of federal government. Well lets see how Stevey Boy Harper does in defending the RCMP's obvious wrongs.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

P.S.
Nada check the last paragraph in the email and ask your boss Mr Murphy where he was on the night of Nov 16th, 2006. that was the day the calf died and Werner was a fellow liberal who was voting in the election of the New President Mr Keating in Salibury. The newest Minister of heath displayed many time since then how little he care about the health and well being of Werner and I. We have called many times and not once has he called me back after I talked to him almost a year and a half ago. Howevver Brian Murphy's wicked nasty help quickly called back when I call Mikey Brian's brother. When I make a mistake the bastard's are not long correcting me but when what I say is true they quite simply ignore for reasons of personal gain and the detritment of the public interest.

David Amos wrote:

Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 10:31:28 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Remember me? I just called you bastards again
To: brad.horncastle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

David Amos wrote:

Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 10:18:53 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Remember me? I just called you bastards again
To: Laurie.COLLETTE@gnb.ca, daniel.guitard@gnb.ca, orphans@oromoctospca.ca,
roland.hache@gnb.ca, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca


----- Original Message -----

From: David Raymond Amos
To: John.Foran@gnb.ca ; belord@gnb.ca ; stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: premier@gnb.ca ; kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca ; greg.byrne@gnb.ca ; john.foran@gnb.ca ; jonesr@cbc.ca ; mleger@stu.ca ; jwalker@stu.ca ; plee@stu.ca ; DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca ; davies.carl@nbpub.com ; bruce.northrup@gnb.ca ; carl.urquhart@gnb.ca
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:23 AM
Subject: Hey Shawn how many calfs must I watch die before I sue you?



----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: riding@chuckstrahl.com ; ottawa@chuckstrahl.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:14 AM
Subject: Attn DICK ISABELLE,


----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: John.Foran@gnb.ca
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:14 AM
Subject: Attn DICK ISABELLE,



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: davidramos@xplornet.com
Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2006 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Canadian RCMP Incompetence....Re: Hey Shawn remember me? Well the cops you employ to patrol Peticodiac really pissed me off today.


I did and some arsehole named Ricky Baby Kelly called me on Friday from a Driver Ed School in Fredericton. He merely wanted to slander my friend Werner Bock rather than do his god damned job. Rest assured I saved his nasty voicemail to me as well. Tell him for me that I ain't no Hillbilly whining about his wife and her pet. Tell your boss Brad Horncastle and the director who is an RCMP officer as well that they and the sneaky little company called SPCA INC.need a god damned lawyer or two ASAP
Tell me honestly if you can find it in your sould to do so lady. I know beef cattle don't make for great house pets but theu are animals and they are a source of livelyhood and supper for a great deal of people as well. Just how many animals must i witness die down on this farm and see the cop and the S{CA look the other way before realizing that there is something fishy going on in New Brunswick? I just watched the second calf this week die right in front of me while I was typing this shit..That is fifth one I saw die since May 31st this year. You do understand that killing cattle falls under the fedeal Criminal Code and anyone covering up a crime stands quilty of it as well?

Criminal Code
PART XI: WILFUL AND FORBIDDEN ACTS IN RESPECT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY
Cattle and Other Animals
Injuring or endangering cattle 444. Every one who wilfully
(a) kills, maims, wounds, poisons or injures cattle, or
(b) places poison in such a position that it may easily be consumed by cattle,
is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 400.


Say hey to your buddy John Carty for me while you are at it. I ran against him in the last federal election and I suspect that you and Ricky Baby Kelly voted for him instead of me EH?

"Oromocto and Area SPCA Inc." wrote:

Dear Mr Amos,

If you have a complaint regarding animal cruelty or neglect, please contact the New Brunswick SPCA at 458-8863. We run a cat and dog animal shelter and cannot investigate reports of animal abuse.

Tracy Marcotullio
Oromocto and Area SPCA


David Amos wrote:

Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:52:50 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Canadian RCMP Incompetence....Re: Hey Shawn remember me? Well the cops you employ to patrol Peticodiac really pissed me off today.
To: orphans@oromoctospca.ca

kmdickson@comcast.net wrote:

From: kmdickson@comcast.net
To: David Amos , premier@gnb.ca, abel.leblanc@gnb.ca, Margaret-Ann.BLANEY@gnb.ca, kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca, David.ALWARD@gnb.ca, claude.landry@gnb.ca, rick.brewer@gnb.ca, Trevor.HOLDER@gnb.ca, rosemay.poirier@gnb.ca, Percy.Mockler@gnb.ca, Jody.CARR@gnb.ca, Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca, Johnw.BETTS@gnb.ca
CC: eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca, Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca, claude.williams@gnb.ca, bev.harrison@gnb.ca, Madeleine.DUBE@gnb.ca, Cy.LEBLANC@gnb.ca, tony.huntjens@gnb.ca, dale.graham@gnb.ca, brian.kenny@gnb.ca, susan.butterfield@gnb.ca, belord@gnb.ca, Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca, Bernard.Richard@gnb.ca
Subject: Canadian RCMP Incompetence....Re: Hey Shawn remember me? Well the cops you employ to patrol Peticodiac really pissed me off today.
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:32:58 +0000

My experience with the RCMP is that they are even dumber than the FBI.
This is unfortunate.

I made a complaint to the RCMP, in Quebec, just outside the airport, about the
scientific fraud and racketeering in Lyme disease which the CT Attorney General's
AntiTrust Division is now investigating,
http://www.courant.com/news/local/hc-ctlyme1117.artnov17,0,1670696.story

I was being stalked and harassed by the same perps responsible (Yale) for
the RICO crime of "Lyme Disease," and I was declared a "dangerously intelligent
chemist, like Ted Kascynski" and they even tried to peg the Yale bombing on me.

Then they gave me a gag order not to "criticize the government" after 8 months
of incarceration for being charged with being a Unibomber chemist.

I am not exaggerating.

Giving the RICO infornation about the Lyme Racketeering crime committed by Yale
University to the RCMP, in addition to asking the RCMP to believe me credible since
I am an analytical chemist from Pfizer, resulted in the RCMP doing little more than
making Viagra jokes.

Here in the States, the local (New Haven, Corrupticut) incompetent FBI had been
given the same data upon the referral of the US Department of Justice in Washington,
in 2002, but their only topic is pediatric porn.

One assumes that's because they enjoy watching it too.

I would hope Canada would one day soon find reason not to follow the
footsteps of the States which hires and train morons to be employed in
every single dot guv agency.

If you follow US "politics," you will note that the incompetence and conflicts
of interest at the NIH and the FDA are now a point of deep concern (since the
Nove 06 elections), so if Canada is buying USA medications, Canada needs a
rethink: All US agencies and federal departments are as corrupt as a three dollar
bill. One wonders how the RCMP could possibly aspire to outdo US Trade/
Commerce, Bogus Regulatory Affairs, and these obvious low-lives they
hire as "law enforcement."

I, too, was not happy with the RCMP.

I figured ANYONE could do it better than Corrupticut. Our US Attorney is
friends and actually *neighbors* with the corrupt Governor Rowland who
went to jail for accepting bribes which included improvements to his
cottage in Bantam Lake, right next to the US Attorney, whose wife worked
in Rowland's legal office during all the DCF-Rowlandgate PARTY AND
SCREW FOR THE PEDIATRIC JAIL CONTRACTS crimes.

The wife of the US Attorney worked in former Governor John G. Rowland's
legal office during all the crime, and she is responsible for getting this
US Attorney his job:
http://www.corporatecrimereporter.com/curryinterview.htm

I hope that is clear.

We have no law enforcement protection here, because they instead
protect the white collar criminals.

With all the resources Canada has, you are in great danger of
being corrupted by US culture and losing it all. The worst of our problems
is the corrupt US Department of Justice- they go after whistleblowers and
they approved torture, which had the result of ruining our national security,
since the whole (thinking) world hates us.

Canada is in great danger. Don't do what we do. Integrity has to
start at the level of the cops. I recommend not allowing them the privilege
of only working 20 years before getting retirement benefits. These mobs
(unions) are worse than anything we ever had imported from Sicily or
even the Whitie Bulger Gang- which are the tapes that Dave Amos has, by
the way, and is currently being investigated again here in Corrupticut:
http://www.courant.com/news/local/hc-framed1119.artnov19,0,2868721.story

The tapes that Dave Amos has are no joke. This is the real thing. This
is really going on. As far out as it sounds, this is real. If I hadn't gotten
Lyme Disease I would be in La-La Land, too.

It took me about 10 years to finally see that Plum Island could have
been the Lyme source. I never wanted to believe it, but surely this
cover-up about the seriousness of Lyme by the CDC and the fact that
after I filed a RICO complaint against Yale, I was falsely criminally charged
with being a terrorist... you get the idea.

Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3680s2_11.pdf
--
http://www.actionlyme.org

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: premier@gnb.ca, abel.leblanc@gnb.ca, Margaret-Ann.BLANEY@gnb.ca, kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca, David.ALWARD@gnb.ca, claude.landry@gnb.ca, rick.brewer@gnb.ca, Trevor.HOLDER@gnb.ca, rosemay.poirier@gnb.ca, Percy.Mockler@gnb.ca, Jody.CARR@gnb.ca, Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca, Johnw.BETTS@gnb.ca
CC: eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca, Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca, claude.williams@gnb.ca, bev.harrison@gnb.ca, Madeleine.DUBE@gnb.ca, Cy.LEBLANC@gnb.ca, tony.huntjens@gnb.ca, dale.graham@gnb.ca, brian.kenny@gnb.ca, susan.butterfield@gnb.ca, belord@gnb.ca, Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca, Bernard.Richard@gnb.ca
Subject: Hey Shawn remember me? Well the cops you employ to patrol Peticodiac really pissed me off today.
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 23:59:45 +0000


Whilst Sgt Cormier and his no mind help are on vacation another calf died on Werner's farm. Your problem is nobody can ever deny that that little calf was mine. Well when the other corrupt RCMP Sgt named Comeau laughed at my troubles as a whistleblower and said he thought the copy of the police surveilance tape # 139 was funny that was bad enough. But when he went further and refused to investigate the loss of my property I saw red and decided to register my indignation with a wicked bunch of Rea Coats. I promised to sue Sgt Comeau's nasty French arse and so I shall. My question is wouldn't behoove the Province and you red Coated Party to fire him before I do? French RCMP/GRC officers are a dime a dozen these days in this province. He can be easily replaced EH? John Foran's reputation as his overseer will not be so easily repaired if I don't hear from him soon. N'est Pas?
My little calf only survived one day in this wicked province but I am gonna make certain that it is long remembered. I named him after you Shawny Baby. You were his red coated godfather but I must say his reddish coloured coat is far better looking than yours. EH?
You did promise to send your mean nasty old liberal guard dogs Leroy Armstrong and Abey Baby LeBlanc to help protect all the animals down on Werner's farm remember? Both of them ignored Werner. Why? Was it because I was his friend and the third party you suggested he employ? Well one old liberal bastard lost the election and the other one just swears at me on the phone. Both of them have invited me to sue them because they stood with Bernie Lord and his banishment of me from the legislature where you claim Democracy is purportedly served. I guess the mean old guard dog of my Clan is destined to meet you red coats and your crooked cop pals in court EH Shawny Baby?
Before that day comes I gonna try to make one dead calf raise quite a stink around the old Maison as your pal Chucky Leblanc describes it. Werner could have done nothing wrong in the care of that calf. I trucked him around and watched the care he took in its delivery. It was born nice and healthy on a warm day and barely had time to find his moma's titty when something very wierd happened to cause him to get very sick the next day and die immediately thereafter.
Tommorrow we will do the autopsy ourselves and post the result on the web for the whole wide wolrd to see. If something in the environment is killing all this cattle then could the same thing not effect us humans too? Should that not fall under the purview of the latest Ministers of Heath or the Envirnoment even if John Foran's cops do not wish to act within the scope of their employment? Or does one shitty little farmer and a mean spirted ghost of elections past not count for squat now that the Red Coats rule the House?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: nada.sarkis@gnb.ca ; MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca ; kilgoursite@ca.inter.net ; dwatch@web.net ; riding@chuckstrahl.com ; ottawa@chuckstrahl.com ; wally.stiles@gnb.ca
Cc: warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; John.Foran@gnb.ca ; bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; riding@chuckstrahl.com ; ottawa@chuckstrahl.com ; Oda.B@parl.gc.ca ; paul.dube@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 1:03 PM
Subject: Fwd: So the RCMP does not have the resources to even investigate dead farm animalsEH?

David Amos wrote:

Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:41:38 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: So the RCMP does not have the resources to even investigate dead farm animalsEH?
To: john.foran@gnb.ca, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca,
Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca,
mary.schryer@gnb.ca, rick.miles@gnb.ca, jack.keir@gnb.ca,
Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca, Cheryl.Lavoie@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
CC: jonesr@cbc.ca, mleger@stu.ca, jwalker@stu.ca, plee@stu.ca,
oldmaison@yahoo.com, belord@gnb.ca, DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca,
davies.carl@nbpub.com, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca,
claude.landry@gnb.ca, mike.olscamp@gnb.ca, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca


Hey Johnny Boy Foran and his pals,
I know you don't love me but your really should call me back sometime before I send you a summons to court. N'est Pas? I know what I would do if I had hired a plumber who falsely claimed that he could do a job with no tools. Whereas you hire the RCMP to police this province it is your job to check their work and protect the public interest. The incompetance of the RCMP rests in your hands sir. Perhaps you should act within the scope of your employment not only for the benefit of farm animals but people too.
I am certain that the people on Grand Manan agree with me today about the failures of the justice system. I made certain that the RCMP in Saint Andrews knew of my issues with the severe lack of integrity of McAvity and Lutz BEFORE the jury was compelled to make any decision about the reactions of their fellow citizens to the incompentence of the RCMP. Everybody knows that I can easily prove that the trial recently conducted by our justice system about the events on the Grand Manan last summer was just a smoke and mirror show to cover up the true crime of the RCMP deliberately failing to act within the scope of their employment for the benefit of politicians.
On Friday Werner I were busy too. As Bernie Lord prepared to discuss his future with his pals we were looking into the guts of an animal that had no future at all. (Yea I heard the rumour that Bernie may be our next Ambassador to France so it appears I must sue him soon before he escapes the Province and gets diplomatic immunity in a foreign land.) That said after we cut Shawny Baby open ourselves and checked his cause of death and recorded it etc. I was done with him. (Except that I may want to make a vest out his nice reddish coat.) Werner then called Sgt. Comeau again and offered the animal to the RCMP so that they could double check our findings as theyr requested. The day before Comeau wanted the animal to be given to a vet so tha RCMP could maintain the promise of Staff Sgt. Paul Cormier to us three weeks before. However onFFriday Comeau changed his tune and claimed that the RCMP does not have the resources to investigate our allegations of crime and refused to even come to the farm to view the animal for himself. That bullshit statement really pissed us off so we obviously took the animal to town and parked the tractor in front of the local RCMP office. Still no cop had the balls to show up and Wally Stiles assistant would not even give me her name as Werner discussed the animals' plight with her. It appears by the news the RCMP/GRCs were too busy on Friday giving tickets for seats belt vio;ations rather than bother with true crime EH? Need I say I was not surprised?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos


David Amos wrote:

Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:00:00 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Your help laughs at my plight Mr. Minister of Agriculture?
To: ronald.ouellette@gnb.ca, premier@gnb.ca, abel.leblanc@gnb.ca,
Margaret-Ann.BLANEY@gnb.ca, kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca, David.ALWARD@gnb.ca,
rick.brewer@gnb.ca, Trevor.HOLDER@gnb.ca, rosemay.poirier@gnb.ca,
Percy.Mockler@gnb.ca, Jody.CARR@gnb.ca, Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca,
Johnw.BETTS@gnb.ca, Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
bev.harrison@gnb.ca
CC: jtravers@thestar.ca, comments@michaelignatieff.ca, info@bobrae.ca,
Akoschany@ctv.ca, cumby.meghan@dailygleaner.com, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca,
flowerswade@nblib.nb.ca, paul@nblib.nb.ca, dykstrafarms@hotmail.com,
Steve.Gilliland@gnb.ca, dale.graham@gnb.ca, brian.kenny@gnb.ca,
Hermenegilde.Chiasson@gnb.ca, belord@gnb.ca

Have your lawyers call me will ya? 506 434 1379 I try try to make them cry. perhaps you should have a long talk with you old buddy Wally Stiles after you look a just one picture EH? Lots of people in Peti saw my dead calf on Friday soon that calf (Shawny Baby will be well known around the world by way of the Blogs or my name ain't Dave.
Fw: Never foget who who picked this fight Mikey Baby you called me a liar and other folks Flamers‏
From: David Raymond Amos (davidramos@xplornet.com)
You may not know this sender.Mark as safe|Mark as junk
Sent: January 4, 2007 10:35:32 PM
To: Iolmisha@cs.com; jhughes164@yahoo.com; jstc4emsurvivors@yahoo.com; Justice4Tyrell@yahoogroups.com; laceupboots@hotmail.com; mc_victim@hotmail.com; midnightladync@yahoo.com; orwelltoday@orwelltoday.com; september_eleven_vreeland@yahoogroups.com; madd_professor@cox.net; catfishwithlips@yahoo.com; Harper.S@parl.gc.ca; dean Ray (deanr0032@hotmail.com); LPPCIOCE@SMTP.LPS.STATE.NJ.US; mark.delaney@pol.state.ma.us; edward.lynch@po.state.ct.us; stottr@mshp.state.mo.us; fbooth@safety.state.nh.us; cward@cameronward.com
Cc: 4humanitysake@comcast.net; 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com; a_jones10467@yahoo.com; atvnews@ctv.ca; cap871@hotmail.com; c.sperr@comcast.net; dblaron67@yahoo.com; derrickcrobinson@gmail.com; erniemusic2@yahoo.com; irock96@hotmail.com; gerryduffett47@yahoo.com; kevin_annett@hotmail.com; laceupboots@hotmail.com; marsboy683@yahoo.com; mc_victim@hotmail.com; mcclelland_t@hotmail.com; mcclellandt@netzero.com; One_World_Religion@yahoogroups.com; orwelltoday@orwelltoday.com; rghouseholder@msn.com; your_neighbor_2000@yahoo.com; warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
2 attachments
stime=1167549 (0.0 KB), US Treasu...jpg (179.7 KB)



----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: TruthAGAINSTtradition@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 4:31 AM
Subject: Never foget who who picked this fight Mikey Baby you called me a liar and other folks Flamers


If the Inspector General of the US Treasury Dept Internal revenue Division is careful not to call me a liar or a jerk what makes ye with no name think you have the right to do so?
To the othe folks I must ast you to please take note that the Yankees sent me this letter exactly one year ago to my home that they had already stolen without warrants or due process of law in an effort to bankrupt my Clan and break our hearts and backs as well. They did so whilst I was running once again for a seat in Parliament and suggested that I should keep the matter under my hat. Do you really think I am going to do so as I sue the Crown and run for a seat the third time? The fierce political animal in me smells a another wicked federal election coming. Don't you?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

You are a spamming jerk.
A simple paragraph to this list explaining what cardinal law and beantown is would have would have sufficed.
Attempting to flood my personal mailbox with megabytes of crap was uncalled for.
May your modem fry, and your keyboard melt from your bad breath, may your fingers become arthritic, and may the fleas of a thousand Mastadons infest your eyebrows, jerk.

----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; py.bourduas@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; InfoWarz@rovin.net
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 2:27 AM
Subject: Fw: Just in case Bev Busson's underlings forgot who picked this fight.



----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: dutydesk@torontopolice.on.ca ; vpd@vpd.ca ; eps@police.edmonton.ab.ca
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 6:37 PM
Subject: Fw: Just in case Bev Busson's underlings forgot who picked this fight.



----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: Chief Campbell ; info@woodstockpolice.ca ; stevemci@nbnet.nb.ca
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 5:51 PM
Subject: Fw: Just in case Bev Busson's underlings forgot who picked this fight.



----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: bnpp@nb.aibn.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 4:51 PM
Subject: Fw: Just in case Bev Busson's underlings forgot who picked this fight.



----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 3:00 PM
Subject: Fw: Just in case Bev Busson's underlings forgot who picked this fight.



----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: ottawairc@state.gov
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 10:29 AM
Subject: Fw: Just in case Bev Busson's underlings forgot who picked this fight.



----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: doralee.smith@pwgsc.gc.ca ; MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 9:50 AM
Subject: Fw: Just in case Bev Busson's underlings forgot who picked this fight.



----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: eamacleod@cbrmps.cape-breton.ns.ca
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 5:27 PM
Subject: Fw: Just in case Bev Busson's underlings forgot who picked this fight.



----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; Oda.B@parl.gc.ca ; paul.dube@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; Henry McCandless ; dwatch@web.net ; president@utoronto.ca ; chris.cunningham@utoronto.ca ; ottawa@chuckstrahl.com ; riding@chuckstrahl.com
Cc: Dykstra.R@parl.gc.ca ; solberg.m@parl.gc.ca ; thompson.g@parl.gc.ca ; toews.v@parl.gc.ca ; Daniel.Conley@state.ma.us ; ruby@ruby-edwardh.com ; fbinhct@leo.gov ; patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov ; Russell_Feingold@feingold.senate.gov ; stephen.cutler@wilmerhale.com ; Press@devalpatrick.com ; olived@sen.parl.gc.ca ; bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com ; broy@ogilvyrenault.com ; cumby.meghan@dailygleaner.com ; stronach.b@parl.gc.ca ; day.s@parl.gc.ca ; iwhitehall@heenan.ca ; jchretien@heenan.ca ; rheenan@heenan.ca ; duffy@ctv.ca ; tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com ; mikemurphymla@hotmail.com ; dykstrafarms@hotmail.com
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 11:57 AM
Subject: Just in case Bev Busson's underlings forgot who picked this fight.


Do ya remember when the RCMP assisted the US Treasury Dept and the Dept. of Homeland Security in a attempt to take me to Cuba in April of 2003? Was it just because I had embarassed the US Attorney Mikey Sullivan and his cohorts in US District Court in Boston? The RCMP should know everything an affidavit of mine that was witnessed by an RCMP officer in J Division in April of 2002 was argued by the US Attorney in a very illegal and incompetent ex parte fashion over six months BEFORE the War in Iraq began and at about the same time that Americans were bombing our warriors in Afganistan. Shame on all of you for laughing a me and assisting in the torture of my little Clan.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: scarpinelli@publicintegrity.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 10:07 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is a news tip



----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: jballiro@wolfblock.com
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 1:09 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is a news tip



----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: leo@primetimecrime.com ; gary.bignell@peelpolice.on.ca ; crilf@ucalgary.ca
Cc: giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; cnichols@norwellpolice.com ; info@pco-bcp.gc.ca ; Daniel.Conley@state.ma.us ; BBACHRACH@bowditch.com ; kmearn@mpdmilton.org ; swanson@storm.ca ; alltrue@nl.rogers.com ; norm.mcfarlane@saintjohn.ca ; Ivan.court@saintjohn.ca ; spinks08@hotmail.com ; Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca ; oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com ; btaylor@nbnet.nb.ca ; pat.bonner@saintjohn.ca ; thomas.gatzunis@state.ma.us
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 12:14 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is a news tip



----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: tips@upi.com ; fair@fair.org ; info@ap.org ; letters@washpost.com
Cc: letters@usnews.com ; nytnews@nytimes.com ; letters@time.com ; letters@newsweek.com
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 10:40 AM
Subject: Here is a news tip


----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: TruthAGAINSTtradition@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 4:01 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthAGAINSTtradition] Ban the Jerk


It seems that you don't know that slander is a hanging offence in Canada EH Mikey Baby? Read the text of just two of the documents I sent you. You called for the info when you called me a liar. Remember? You should have read the info I sent you that you just admitted recieving before you chose to delete it. I will post the first and the last email sent to you within this group so that they may judge me for themselves. If they wish to receive the ones in the middle all they have to do is ask and they can have a peek at some awful truths for themseleves.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

One I received caused me to return to Canada and run for a seat in Parlaiment about a year or so after the Yankees attempted to take me to Cuba for the benefit of Cardinal Law and the new born bible pounder, Georgey Boy Bush. it went as follows:
Jan 3rd, 2004

Mr. David R. Amos
153 Alvin Avenue
Milton, MA 02186
U.S.A.

Dear Mr. Amos
Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I apologize for the delay in responding.
If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In addition, any evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their attention since the police are in the best position to evaluate the information and take action as deemed appropriate.
I trust that this information is satisfactory.

Yours sincerely
A. Anne McLellan

This letter I recived after running for a Seat in Parlaiment in 2004 and just before I was falsely imprisoned in the USA under the charges of "other" without bail and held in solitary confinement while my wife's phone line was cut. Need a say that not afterwards Georgey Bush won another very questionable election? What you may not know is that because I crossed and international border after the Governor General admitted on behalf of the Queen that she new of my battles with the rampant public corruption of the two countries everybody lost sovereign immunity. Never forget that even though Queen dizzie Lizzie is just the figurative head of our state she is always the protector of the faith of the Church of England. N'est Pas. Now the Holy War will begin in court between the Crown, the Holy See and the very mean spirited little old me:) (Interesting Date EH?)


September 11th, 2004

Dear Mr. Amos,

On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson, I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD regarding corruption, one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to us by the Office of the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.
I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot intervene in matters that are the responsibility of elected officials and courts of Justice of Canada. You already contacted the various provincial authorities regarding your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.

Yours sincerely.
Renee Blanchet
Office of the Secretary
to the Governor General

----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: TruthAGAINSTtradition@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 3:30 AM
Subject: Re: {Spam?} Re: [TruthAGAINSTtradition] Re: The execution of Saddam Hussein


So Mikey Baby I see you are somewhat of an outraged liar. How are ya doing with all the info you craved for your Warz with me? Seven emails should have done the trick to get an apology from you or failing that at least the name of your lawyer. N'est Pas? Instead you make an even worse liar out of yourself. Tell me honestly if you dare. What did you think of the portions of the police surveilance tapes I sent you? Do ya think they would be worth anything to anyone wishing to impeach George W. Bush and his cohorts? Trust that what i sent you is just the tip of the iceberg. Other people who inserted a lot of info into this Group of well meaning folks know that I am as serious as a attack and never reckless with the awlful truth. What say you sir do I hear an apology and an amen or will you at least show enough sand as a man and give me your lawyer's contact info.


----- Original Message -----
From: iNFoWaRZ
To: TruthAGAINSTtradition@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 3:26 AM
Subject: [TruthAGAINSTtradition] Ban the Jerk


Warning, This stupid SOB Troll, David Raymond Amos, just flooded my mailbox with Multi-Megabytes of garbage.
I'm on dial up, and I had to go into my server on the net and delete the remainder of his spam to prevent it from being downloaded by my Eudora E-mail program, or it would have taken hours to download.
This is totally uncalled for.
Ban the SOB.

__._,_.___



Eze 33:6 But if the watchman see the sword come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned; if the sword come, and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman's hand.




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe